SMO Alternative Analysis provides curated translations and summaries of critical commentary from Russian military bloggers and patriots.We focus on constructive analysis of the SMO's strategy, tactics, and logistics, offering an alternative viewpoint.

This channel is for those seeking nuanced discussion about the Special Military Operation.

We provide:

✅Patriotic Critique: Analysis from Russians who support the SMO's goals but are critical of its execution.

✅Constructive Focus: Posts on strategy, tactics, logistics, and leadership.

✅Source Diversity: Perspectives from various Russian milbloggers and analysts.

We avoid:
❌Anti-Russian rhetoric or
❌Unconstructive complaining.
❌Official press releases or pure propaganda.

Seeking a perspective on the SMO that official channels don't show?

Join for raw, constructive analysis from the front lines of information.

https://news.1rj.ru/str/smoalt

The Belgorod Brit describes the collapse of the South Vietnam after the USA admitted defeat to the North Vietnamese and ran home, with a string of broken promises to their hapless erstwhile "partners" trailing behind them. He draws parallels with the coming collapse of Ukraine as money and weapons dry up and the Ukrainian military is defeated.

In the podcast, BB goes into more details of the collapse of South Vietnam, including the fate of the soldiers and the administration, as well as those who disagreed with the new regime and took to boats in search of a new life. Then BB talks about the similarities and differences between Ukraine and South Vietnam and what that means for people who are left in Ukraine after defeat and those who will flee. BB outlines why he is optimistic for Ukrainians under Russian rule.

#TheBelgorodBrit
#InfoDefenseAuthor
#IndoDefensePodcast

The Belgorod Brit Channel 🇷🇺🇬🇧

🎙Russia's Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov's interview with the Franco-Russian Dialogue Association YouTube channel (recorded on November 21, 2025)

📰 Read in full
📺 Watch the interview

Key points:

• We still believe that a diplomatic resolution [to the Ukrainian crisis] remains the preferred option. The Summit in Alaska was preceded by the visit of US Presidential Special Envoy Steve Witkoff to Moscow, acting on the direct instructions of US President Donald Trump. Mr Witkoff brought to his meeting with President Vladimir Putin specific parameters for a settlement that took into account our principled approaches – namely, the need to address the root causes of this conflict, which are well known to all.

• The story of this tragedy began with the West’s attempt to absorb Ukraine into NATO, to create a military threat to Russia directly on our borders – in defiance of all the assurances once given to the Soviet Union, and in breach of the commitments made later with the Russian Federation within the OSCE framework on the indivisibility of security, and the principle that no organization or state in Europe should strengthen its security at the expense of the security of others. NATO acted in precisely the opposite way.

• The current US administration’s approach may be described in various ways, but its essence is that America must be first everywhere and everyone must obey. This approach is applied not only to Europe but to all others as well. Europe, however, is more dependent on the US in terms of security and in shaping its foreign-policy – in this case, its line on Ukraine. Nobody listens to Europe now because European elites have bet everything on their belief that, through the hands and bodies of the nationalist regime in Kiev, they could inflict a “strategic defeat” on Russia.

• We are now witnessing something close to chaos emerging in international trade and investment. It is by no means certain that the US aims solely to subordinate Europe. Its goal is to extract profit wherever possible, in any scenario – and to secure a sizeable “payoff”.

• France has long acted dishonestly towards Russia. This includes the Minsk Agreements, which France in 2015 – represented by then President François Hollande, alongside then German Chancellor Angela Merkel, President Vladimir Putin and then Ukrainian President Pyotr Poroshenko – formally guaranteed with its signature. Yet by 2020, when everyone began to examine how events had unfolded and why the Minsk Agreements had never been implemented, both French and German leaders openly admitted that none of them had ever intended to do so.

• President Putin is a very honest man. After the beginning of the special military operation, speaking about the Minsk Agreements, Russia’s relations with the West and the Ukrainian issue as a whole, he noted that at the start of the 2000s we had had many illusions about the West. These illusions gradually faded, yet hopes remained – above all, hopes for the ability of our Western European partners to honor their commitments and act in good faith.

• President Macron recently made yet another statement, alleging that Russia had supposedly “invented” this war, that there had been no reasons and no real threats – that everything was a “mystification”. To quote from memory: these are the convulsions of a state lamenting the loss of its statehood and its imperial, colonial past. Such rhetoric suggests his approval ratings are abysmal.

• We are well aware of how the Western propaganda machine operates and how skillfully it manufactures anti-Russian and Russophobic narratives out of thin air. We have a clear and consistent position on each such attempt.

• As President Putin emphasizes, the war waged against us by the West through Ukraine has united our nation and allowed us to “cleanse” ourselves of those who were insincere in their attitude towards their own Motherland.