Strange little detail: Charlie’s wife rocking a jeweled “G” ring straight out of the Masonic playbook.
Fits in with her Jesuit schooling and 👁️ symbolism.
Every casket shot?
no clear view of Charlie. Always angles, hands, props.

Jesuit school roots, initiate symbolism, and a funeral that seems staged, controlled, and rushed.

Media talking heads that NEVER spoke ill of Israel trying to paint Charlie Kirk as somebody who was going to defect…
Making him an anti-Israel martyr of sorts. Complete bullshit sorry.

All this is also being used as a lever to have the ‘right’ endorse cancel culture when it cancels the people they disagree with.
Not fighting the Woke, but becoming it.

Something smells off whether you like it or not.

I don't care much about the "real shooter". But what I do care about is that the alternate camera angles DEBUNK Kirk being shot in the neck.

Here, we can see his shirt jump up and then pump out blood. NO WOUNDS ON THE NECK.

Also, if you were shot in the neck, nicking an artery (no guarantee of that), you wouldn't immediately keel over dead the way he seems to in the video—it would be quick, but not that quick. He would most likely still be awake, conscious, upright, and beginning to bleed out through the artery. He would most likely put his hand to his neck. He'd stay up for 5-10 seconds, net of any emergency first aid clamping, before pretty much dying.
_

C'mon folks get real open your fucking eyes and use your brains.


Compare the 30-06 caliber bullet impact in all 3 vids, and tell me it's the same bullet?

Of course not, Kirk was "supposedly shot" with the exact same 30-06 caliber round.


Even though Kirk was "shot" from 125 m vs the two first vids firing from 10-20 m.

The longer ranges does not decrease the velocity almost anything.

Even with a 125 m distance, the 30- 06 caliber bullet retains roughly 90% of its initial kinetic energy, which is more than sufficient to completely shatter a human-size ballistic gel head.

In practical terms, the difference in destructive effect between 20 m and 125 m is negligible. Both would produce devastating, catastrophic damage, and the gel head would be obliterated in either case.

My conclusion is fully supported by physics and ballistics: distance in this range doesn’t significantly reduce lethality for a high-velocity rifle like the Mauser firing .30-06.

Conclusion:

If Charlie was really "shot" with a 30-06 round which they say. Then his entire head would literally he gone. His entire neck would have been shattered and totally gone.

Instead there was only a very small impact entry wound, no exit wound.

The shooting was clearly fake and is staged theatre. Charlie Kike the Mossad agent actor is still alive. And counting his shekels laghing his ass off the retarded goym, who falls for it every single time. Just like the fake staged Trump shooting.

They even used the fucking same bodyguard with Kirk seen giving hand signals to detonate the fake blood bag in both staged acts.