Orgone Channel Telegram pinned «American Cop (November/December issue) THE EMOTIONAL PLAGUE (ACO Press, 2008) addresses the questions that everyone in law enforcement has always asked at the scene of a crime – How could anyone do this? How could anyone be this evil? What causes such banality?…»
Administration of Cosmic Orgone Energy:
•Regulation of Orgone Energy Accumulator Distribution
•An Administrative Law Needed
Wilhelm Reich, MD
Orgone Energy Bulletin Vol. IV №4
•Regulation of Orgone Energy Accumulator Distribution
•An Administrative Law Needed
Wilhelm Reich, MD
Orgone Energy Bulletin Vol. IV №4
Abe Books is owned by Amazon.
https://ethicalrevolution.co.uk/amazon-alternatives/
Here are genuine alternatives. 👇
•http://Partage.com 👈🏼
•http://OnBuy.com 👈🏼
*http://Partage.com 👈🏼
*http://libro.fm 👈🏼
AND MORE 👇🏼👇🏼👇🏼
•https://ethicalrevolution.co.uk/amazon-alternatives/ 👈🏼
•https://twitter.com/Ethicalution/status/1396713063806652417?t=e6OgMwMAz9trA9EHFbW71w&s=19 👈🏼
https://ethicalrevolution.co.uk/amazon-alternatives/
Here are genuine alternatives. 👇
•http://Partage.com 👈🏼
•http://OnBuy.com 👈🏼
*http://Partage.com 👈🏼
*http://libro.fm 👈🏼
AND MORE 👇🏼👇🏼👇🏼
•https://ethicalrevolution.co.uk/amazon-alternatives/ 👈🏼
•https://twitter.com/Ethicalution/status/1396713063806652417?t=e6OgMwMAz9trA9EHFbW71w&s=19 👈🏼
Truth versus Modju
Dr. Wilhelm Reich, MD
Orgone Energy Bulletin Vol. IV № 3
Dr. Wilhelm Reich, MD
Orgone Energy Bulletin Vol. IV № 3
🥰1
'Part I of ORGONOMIC FUNCTIONALISM, "Ether, God and Devil," appears in the Annals of the Orgone Institute, №. 2.
ORGONOMIC FUNCTIONALISM itself is part of the third volume of THE DISCOVERY OF THE ORGONE: ORGONOMETRY.'
Footnote from
Orgone Energy Bulletin Vol. 2, No. 1, January 1950, page 1,
Orgonomic Functionalism Part II, On the Historical Development of Orgonomic Functionalism,
by Wilhelm Reich
ORGONOMIC FUNCTIONALISM itself is part of the third volume of THE DISCOVERY OF THE ORGONE: ORGONOMETRY.'
Footnote from
Orgone Energy Bulletin Vol. 2, No. 1, January 1950, page 1,
Orgonomic Functionalism Part II, On the Historical Development of Orgonomic Functionalism,
by Wilhelm Reich
🔥1
"This was what Feynman called the Babylonian approach to science. It’s closer to engineering. To a Babylonian scientist, “Does it work?” “Does the bridge stand?” are better questions than, “Is it elegant?” “Does it explain the mind of God?”
"Feynman divided all scientists as Athenians or Babylonians. He was of the second group. But Athenians wanted to know the essence of the problem. They, like Plato, thought of the perfect form. A chair had a form or an essence that was more elegant than the thing in your dining room that had splinters and wobbled. The form was more important to Athenian philosophy, than the thing itself.
"Feynman pointed out that the Babylonians used mathematics with base 60 because it allowed for more factoring. So we still have a circle with 360 degrees, 60 minutes and 60 seconds of arc. It was practical. Feynman’s rival, Murray Gell-Mann was an Athenian in how he approached theoretical physics. These two brilliant physicists couldn’t agree on anything. It is ironic that Gell-Mann and Feynman shared a secretary. She must have had an interesting job.
"In direct answer to your question, a Babylonian or an engineer stands by that which stands."
https://news.1rj.ru/str/orgonecontinuum/86
"Feynman divided all scientists as Athenians or Babylonians. He was of the second group. But Athenians wanted to know the essence of the problem. They, like Plato, thought of the perfect form. A chair had a form or an essence that was more elegant than the thing in your dining room that had splinters and wobbled. The form was more important to Athenian philosophy, than the thing itself.
"Feynman pointed out that the Babylonians used mathematics with base 60 because it allowed for more factoring. So we still have a circle with 360 degrees, 60 minutes and 60 seconds of arc. It was practical. Feynman’s rival, Murray Gell-Mann was an Athenian in how he approached theoretical physics. These two brilliant physicists couldn’t agree on anything. It is ironic that Gell-Mann and Feynman shared a secretary. She must have had an interesting job.
"In direct answer to your question, a Babylonian or an engineer stands by that which stands."
https://news.1rj.ru/str/orgonecontinuum/86
Telegram
Orgone Channel Telegram
https://www.quora.com/What-did-Richard-Feynman-mean-when-he-said-What-I-cannot-create-I-do-not-understand