Nanotech Quote of the Day #32 ~ Aluminum Food Additives

This is the European Food Safety Authority evaluating aluminum silicates food additives; coded E 554 and E 555.

Most commonly used as an anti-caking agent. They can be in anything powdered, and anything that contains powdered ingredients.

Commonly: table salts, cheese, spices, confectionary, dried or separated eggs, and even supplements.

"Exposure to aluminium from this use of E 554 was calculated to exceed the TWI for aluminium."

📝 TWI stands for Tolerable Weekly Intake
⚠️ They're admitting that by their own 'standards' for 'safe' aluminum exposure levels, people are being exposed to way too much aluminum through food additives (oftentimes these aren't even disclosed, sometimes in direct defiance of safety laws, and sometimes exploiting loopholes).

Occasionally someone thinks they can have a quick 'gotcha' moment telling me 'oOoO pRoVe iT'... but they all come to find out that everything I say is backed by straight hard evidence. I remain uninterested in drama. What matters to me is OUR HEALTH and the truth about the assault against us.

Now imagine if the corporations using this aluminum told you "oh don't worry, the aluminum in our products is bound up so there's nothing to worry about" 🤔

All references & additional diagrams: https://news.1rj.ru/str/powerofthepulse/695

Learn more: @powerofthepulse

It's worth noting that there are many ways to interpret these facts.

Fact #1: Aluminum Silicates are widely used in the food industry
Fact #2: These Aluminum Silicates are toxic
Fact #3: When framed as being used & promoted by mainstream corporations, ridiculous selling points like aluminum being 'bound up' become laughable... which means that no matter what lies and excuses they try, you know that it's toxic

Unlike basic facts, logic cannot be 'proven' nor can it be easily transferred.
Our logic and 'common sense' is built upon our beliefs, values and experiences. This means that we assimilate the facts that we want and in the way that we want.

When seeing basic truths, our logical reasoning builds around the information that we already have. If someone doesn't yet have information to start building a picture, or just isn't thinking for themselves, they may 'learn' facts... but the facts don't inform them about their world!

For example, the average truther may read the above and just think, "oh, packaged food has some bad stuff in it".
🤔 They may not extend this information to the potential for 'organic foods' to be compromised with the same 'undisclosed additives'.
😟 They may not realise that the same aluminum silicates they recognise as toxic are also sold to them as miracle health supplements.
😬 They may completely miss the irony and cognitive dissonance of Fact #3, which demonstrates how marketing and branding affects how we view the same thing (excuses saying 'aluminum is safe' etc from doctor vs goofy guru).

When the *cough cough* 🥕 companies say that their toxins are safe, they're laughed at.
When the alternative psyop companies say that their toxins are safe, they sell sell sell.

Our logical reasoning can also recognise facts and give them additional and insightful meaning.

For example, someone more familiar with the Big Pharma supplement psyops recognises the similarities between:
⚠️ aluminum in the food,
⚠️ aluminum in 🌧✈️☠️ ,
⚠️ aluminum in the 🥕 ... and
⚠️ aluminum in supplement psyops.

They recognise the confidence trick and exploitation of authority that may naturally cause us to believe a lie we would normally laugh at.

And from these same facts, an anti-nano truther can logically deduce that there seems to be an agenda to get aluminum (and many other toxic metals) into people one way or another.

➡️ This type of logic is not 'provable' in the way a reference to research is, however to many of us this logical deduction has become second nature.
You might as well be asking "why does it rain?"... or perhaps the more modern version; "why do they ⚠️🌧✈️☠️ on us?".

Once you see it... you can't unsee it.

Dots start connecting, and you see how the alternative world is misdirected and manipulated.

Learn more: @powerofthepulse

Refer to the Big Pharma Dance: https://news.1rj.ru/str/powerofthepulse/658

Learn more: @powerofthepulse

Binders binders binders

Who told you that you need a binder? and why do you need a binder to begin with?

😕 "to bind with toxins and get them out"

Do you not have elimination pathways? Do you not have your own 'binders'... the body's garbage collectors and dump trucks?
Were you not created with the natural ability to remove toxins that come into your body?

Consider this -

What happens when that binder ends up stuck to your intestinal walls? Causing a blockage (clay)? Ripping everything to shreds (diatomaceous earth)?

What if the reason you're not getting better is because you're not allowing your body to recover?

What would happen if you support your body, instead of forcing it.

📝 If you have an emergency, activated charcoal can save your life. However, believe it or not... you're not meant to eat a bunch of burnt wood every day.

Binder Problems: https://news.1rj.ru/str/powerofthepulse/515
Detox: https://news.1rj.ru/str/powerofthepulse/481

Learn more: @powerofthepulse

Refer to post below ⬇️

Learn more: @powerofthepulse

What do YOU think?

I'm asked many questions each day.
Sometimes it is in response to information I'm sharing regarding supplement psyops of various kinds.

Occasionally, someone genuine will ask me more questions, often citing goofy-guru talking-points to me.

In response, I usually avoid telling them what to think. I instead ask them what they think.

My questions to them often look like this:
"Oh so they tell you aluminum is safe because it's bound up, what do you think about that? Does that make sense to you?"
When people talk about binders, my most common answer is: "let's talk about this... why do you believe you need a binder to remove toxins? and who told you so?"

Recently, a few people got very frustrated by this.
Some of them don't seem to realise it's a genuine question.

❓ What happened to asking yourself what you think?

I've been contemplating this for a few days now -

From our earliest ages we've been taught to look for- and comply with authority. The school system, media & medical system... we're told what to think, how to think and when to think (or told not to think).

We're taught that when we give authority power over us they take care of us, and we're safe.

"Submit to the medical/alternative professionals, and they will keep you safe"

So people give away their own power to the goofy-gurus. They don't question things, and they allow decisions to be made FOR them.
But when things go left... is the goofy guru going to take responsibility for your health? Will they care?

No.

For example, most zeolite adverse reports are deleted and supressed while the victims are gaslit or banned.

I believe that because of these systems of authority, power and 'safety', many of us don't practice applying our own logic to personal health decisions.

Even if your logic-based choices aren't always 'correct', at least they're YOURS, not a goofy guru choosing for you.

🤔 Would you give them power knowing they won't take responsibility?

Learn more: @powerofthepulse

👺 Vague Double-Speak

When promoting supplement psyops, goofy gurus often need to create an image of the product in your mind...

The supplement being promoted is actually a poison, so therefore this images needs to be separate from the real reality of the material.

But there's a problem. Creating false notions and convincing people a poison is actually a miracle cure can be difficult.

The solution they use is Vague Doublespeak.

Doublespeak is language that obscures, disguises and distorts meaning.
It is designed to make the unpleasant appear pleasant and the unattractive appear attractive.
It is language that pretends to communicate, but doesn't.

Paraphrased from William Lutz: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fub8PsNxBqI

So instead of telling you ridiculously obvious lies... those lies are implied. Language is manipulated very precisely, and ...

➡️ This results in the listener (you) constructing ideas that they're implying... in your own head.

For example, this is why they tell you that "Zeolite is an ancient mineral".

'Ancient', implies it has been used by traditional cultures. This is false.
'Mineral', implying it's healthy and utilised by the body. This is false.

So far, we've exposed two vague double-speak fallacies:
"it's natural": https://news.1rj.ru/str/powerofthepulse/626
"it's a mineral": https://news.1rj.ru/str/powerofthepulse/641

Today we discuss another very clever and insidious double-speak phrase.

When raising concerns about aluminum toxicity in Zeolite, goofy gurus say "don't worry, the aluminum in Zeolite is caged"
When further questioned, they try to equate "zeolite has a cage-like structure" with "the aluminum is caged" 🤪

Notice the word 'cage'? Why use this word in particular?

Zeolite can be described as having a cage-like structure however it is rarely used in the world of zeolite research because it can also imply a misleading image. (Scientifically it's a Zeolitic Imidazolate Framework (ZIF) or molecular sieve)

When they tell you "it's caged" you naturally imagine aluminum in a cage. This subconsciously suggests to you that it's trapped and cannot get out.

As you will soon see on this channel, that is the furthest thing from the truth.

And they themselves know that this is a sly misrepresentation! If we insist on referring to zeolite as a cage, the aluminum and silica are the metal bars.

Of course they'll never tell you that directly because then you'll imagine the world (and thus your biology) interacting with those metal bars.

However, if questioned, they have plausible deniability.
"All we meant is that the Zeolite has a cage like structure, and the aluminum is part of that structure"

And that right there is doublespeak. Learn to notice vagueness and demand answers 🙌

Learn more: @powerofthepulse

Organic Nanopesticides 🪲☠️

You may have heard of neem extract being used as a natural pest-deterrent.

Well, the quest to corrupt anything good is alive and well... an example is displayed below

They're taking neem, putting it in a nano delivery system, then calling it an 'organic pesticide'

⬇️
Imagine taking those PEGylated Lipid Nanoparticles that are in the vax and putting vitamin C inside them and calling it a 'safe & effective anti-oxidant supplement'.

"Nanopesticides encapsulate the active pesticide ingredients within microscopic carriers."

"Organic pesticides use this formulation, and we also use this molecule in the center. Although the carriers are different, the active ingredient inhibits or inactivates the pest."

Do you see what a farce the word 'organic' is now? 🤔

https://phys.org/news/2024-11-nanopesticide-delivery-neem-seed-pesticide.html

https://news.1rj.ru/str/powerofthepulse

🤓 Goofy Guru False Frames

Many times when concerned truthers raise points about supplements psyops, like:

⚠️ zeolite is composed of aluminum
❗️ methylene blue is a petrochemical paint
☠️ diatomaceous earth rips the insides of pests like slugs

Goofy gurus defending these psyops often respond with points like:

😃 "the aluminum is bound up"
🤓 "but goofy-guru-X says it's amazing"
🤪 "yes but it's natural"

However...

If we examine these statements, they're entirely irrelevant to the main point of concern.

⬇️
Whether aluminum is bound-up or not does not change the fact that it's aluminum.
What a goofy guru says about a material doesn't change the facts of it's composition.
A material being natural does not make it safe.

However, it's very easy to miss the fact that these goofy responses aren't relevant. Here's why...

Because of the way our language works:

Saying "the aluminum is bound up" implies that if aluminum is 'bound up', it's safe.
Saying "goofy guru X says it's amazing" implies that the goofy guru cannot be wrong about anything, negating the basic facts of the material
Saying "it's natural" implies that anything natural is good.

These responses apply an altered frame on the conversation that you subconsciously accept. Now instead of the problem being about aluminum, or a material being a petrochemical...

It becomes about arguing whether aluminum is bound-up or whether goofy guru X is to be trusted etc.

And in doing so, these irrelevant talking points distract you from the main important issue.

It all comes back to the Big Pharma Dance: https://news.1rj.ru/str/powerofthepulse/658
Also refer to post on Vague Doublespeak: https://news.1rj.ru/str/powerofthepulse/711

Learn more: @powerofthepulse

What do you see? 🧐

Spike proteins on a cell?

Nanoparticles?

Damaged biology?

Will discuss this tomorrow ;)

Learn more: @powerofthepulse