For decades, when we talked about plastic bottles/containers and food additives we were called crazy, weird, paranoid and conspiracy theorists
But now...
Mr I-Hate-mRNA(oh-actually-I-love-it) is making a big PR operation to show he's removing a few toxins, so now suddenly it's OK to admit that food additivesare toxic can be toxic... and all of a sudden this 'debate has been long-running for decades'.
Hmm, OK.
Now we talk about nanotech, alternative-industry takeover, supplement psyops, synthetic biology and wireless body area networks, we're called crazy, weird, paranoid and conspiracy theorists.
"It's not that deep", they say.
Oh I forgot, nanotech doesn't exist... or if it does exist there's no way it can be weaponised against us.
Ignore these kinds of people, they'll be back in two decades telling us in urgent high-pitched voices the news that "the use of nanotech is concerning"
Learn more: @powerofthepulse
But now...
Mr I-Hate-mRNA(oh-actually-I-love-it) is making a big PR operation to show he's removing a few toxins, so now suddenly it's OK to admit that food additives
Hmm, OK.
Now we talk about nanotech, alternative-industry takeover, supplement psyops, synthetic biology and wireless body area networks, we're called crazy, weird, paranoid and conspiracy theorists.
"It's not that deep", they say.
Oh I forgot, nanotech doesn't exist... or if it does exist there's no way it can be weaponised against us.
Ignore these kinds of people, they'll be back in two decades telling us in urgent high-pitched voices the news that "the use of nanotech is concerning"
Learn more: @powerofthepulse
👏13🔥9👍3❤1🌭1
👺 Vague Double-Speak
When promoting supplement psyops, goofy gurus often need to create an image of the product in your mind...
The supplement being promoted is actually a poison, so therefore this images needs to be separate from the real reality of the material.
But there's a problem. Creating false notions and convincing people a poison is actually a miracle cure can be difficult.
The solution they use is Vague Doublespeak.
So instead of telling you ridiculously obvious lies... those lies are implied. Language is manipulated very precisely, and ...
➡️ This results in the listener (you) constructing ideas that they're implying... in your own head.
For example, this is why they tell you that "Zeolite is an ancient mineral".
'Ancient', implies it has been used by traditional cultures. This is false.
'Mineral', implying it's healthy and utilised by the body. This is false.
So far, we've exposed two vague double-speak fallacies:
"it's natural": https://news.1rj.ru/str/powerofthepulse/626
"it's a mineral": https://news.1rj.ru/str/powerofthepulse/641
Today we discuss another very clever and insidious double-speak phrase.
When raising concerns about aluminum toxicity in Zeolite, goofy gurus say "don't worry, the aluminum in Zeolite is caged"
When further questioned, they try to equate "zeolite has a cage-like structure" with "the aluminum is caged" 🤪
Notice the word 'cage'? Why use this word in particular?
Zeolite can be described as having a cage-like structure however it is rarely used in the world of zeolite research because it can also imply a misleading image. (Scientifically it's a Zeolitic Imidazolate Framework (ZIF) or molecular sieve)
When they tell you "it's caged" you naturally imagine aluminum in a cage. This subconsciously suggests to you that it's trapped and cannot get out.
As you will soon see on this channel, that is the furthest thing from the truth.
And they themselves know that this is a sly misrepresentation! If we insist on referring to zeolite as a cage, the aluminum and silica are the metal bars.
Of course they'll never tell you that directly because then you'll imagine the world (and thus your biology) interacting with those metal bars.
However, if questioned, they have plausible deniability.
"All we meant is that the Zeolite has a cage like structure, and the aluminum is part of that structure"
And that right there is doublespeak. Learn to notice vagueness and demand answers 🙌
Learn more: @powerofthepulse
When promoting supplement psyops, goofy gurus often need to create an image of the product in your mind...
The supplement being promoted is actually a poison, so therefore this images needs to be separate from the real reality of the material.
But there's a problem. Creating false notions and convincing people a poison is actually a miracle cure can be difficult.
The solution they use is Vague Doublespeak.
Doublespeak is language that obscures, disguises and distorts meaning.
It is designed to make the unpleasant appear pleasant and the unattractive appear attractive.
It is language that pretends to communicate, but doesn't.
Paraphrased from William Lutz: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fub8PsNxBqI
So instead of telling you ridiculously obvious lies... those lies are implied. Language is manipulated very precisely, and ...
➡️ This results in the listener (you) constructing ideas that they're implying... in your own head.
For example, this is why they tell you that "Zeolite is an ancient mineral".
'Ancient', implies it has been used by traditional cultures. This is false.
'Mineral', implying it's healthy and utilised by the body. This is false.
So far, we've exposed two vague double-speak fallacies:
"it's natural": https://news.1rj.ru/str/powerofthepulse/626
"it's a mineral": https://news.1rj.ru/str/powerofthepulse/641
Today we discuss another very clever and insidious double-speak phrase.
When raising concerns about aluminum toxicity in Zeolite, goofy gurus say "don't worry, the aluminum in Zeolite is caged"
When further questioned, they try to equate "zeolite has a cage-like structure" with "the aluminum is caged" 🤪
Notice the word 'cage'? Why use this word in particular?
Zeolite can be described as having a cage-like structure however it is rarely used in the world of zeolite research because it can also imply a misleading image. (Scientifically it's a Zeolitic Imidazolate Framework (ZIF) or molecular sieve)
When they tell you "it's caged" you naturally imagine aluminum in a cage. This subconsciously suggests to you that it's trapped and cannot get out.
As you will soon see on this channel, that is the furthest thing from the truth.
And they themselves know that this is a sly misrepresentation! If we insist on referring to zeolite as a cage, the aluminum and silica are the metal bars.
Of course they'll never tell you that directly because then you'll imagine the world (and thus your biology) interacting with those metal bars.
However, if questioned, they have plausible deniability.
"All we meant is that the Zeolite has a cage like structure, and the aluminum is part of that structure"
And that right there is doublespeak. Learn to notice vagueness and demand answers 🙌
Learn more: @powerofthepulse
⚡13❤6👍5💯2👏1
Forwarded from Zac ~ Power of the Pulse
Organic Nanopesticides 🪲☠️
You may have heard of neem extract being used as a natural pest-deterrent.
Well, the quest to corrupt anything good is alive and well... an example is displayed below
They're taking neem, putting it in a nano delivery system, then calling it an 'organic pesticide'
⬇️
Imagine taking those PEGylated Lipid Nanoparticles that are in the vax and putting vitamin C inside them and calling it a 'safe & effective anti-oxidant supplement'.
"Nanopesticides encapsulate the active pesticide ingredients within microscopic carriers."
"Organic pesticides use this formulation, and we also use this molecule in the center. Although the carriers are different, the active ingredient inhibits or inactivates the pest."
Do you see what a farce the word 'organic' is now? 🤔
https://phys.org/news/2024-11-nanopesticide-delivery-neem-seed-pesticide.html
https://news.1rj.ru/str/powerofthepulse
You may have heard of neem extract being used as a natural pest-deterrent.
Well, the quest to corrupt anything good is alive and well... an example is displayed below
They're taking neem, putting it in a nano delivery system, then calling it an 'organic pesticide'
⬇️
Imagine taking those PEGylated Lipid Nanoparticles that are in the vax and putting vitamin C inside them and calling it a 'safe & effective anti-oxidant supplement'.
"Nanopesticides encapsulate the active pesticide ingredients within microscopic carriers."
"Organic pesticides use this formulation, and we also use this molecule in the center. Although the carriers are different, the active ingredient inhibits or inactivates the pest."
Do you see what a farce the word 'organic' is now? 🤔
https://phys.org/news/2024-11-nanopesticide-delivery-neem-seed-pesticide.html
https://news.1rj.ru/str/powerofthepulse
⚡6💯5🤬3😢2🔥1
Compromise the Soil, Compromise the Food
These diagrams show how nanoparticles in the soil target the root system and then enter the plant... compromising everything from the base to the leaves.
A tiny bit of nano won't matter... but years of constant exposure... 🤔
And then they wonder where the constantly-worsening plant diseases and blights are coming from 😐
Reference:
1. Nano-Enabled Products: Challenges and Opportunities for Sustainable Agriculture
2. Interaction of Nanoparticles with Edible Plants and Their Possible Implications in the Food Chain
Learn more: @powerofthepulse
These diagrams show how nanoparticles in the soil target the root system and then enter the plant... compromising everything from the base to the leaves.
A tiny bit of nano won't matter... but years of constant exposure... 🤔
And then they wonder where the constantly-worsening plant diseases and blights are coming from 😐
Reference:
1. Nano-Enabled Products: Challenges and Opportunities for Sustainable Agriculture
2. Interaction of Nanoparticles with Edible Plants and Their Possible Implications in the Food Chain
Learn more: @powerofthepulse
🔥11👍5❤2
🤓 Goofy Guru False Frames
Many times when concerned truthers raise points about supplements psyops, like:
⚠️ zeolite is composed of aluminum
❗️ methylene blue is a petrochemical paint
☠️ diatomaceous earth rips the insides of pests like slugs
Goofy gurus defending these psyops often respond with points like:
😃 "the aluminum is bound up"
🤓 "but goofy-guru-X says it's amazing"
🤪 "yes but it's natural"
However...
If we examine these statements, they're entirely irrelevant to the main point of concern.
⬇️
Whether aluminum is bound-up or not does not change the fact that it's aluminum.
What a goofy guru says about a material doesn't change the facts of it's composition.
A material being natural does not make it safe.
However, it's very easy to miss the fact that these goofy responses aren't relevant. Here's why...
Because of the way our language works:
Saying "the aluminum is bound up" implies that if aluminum is 'bound up', it's safe.
Saying "goofy guru X says it's amazing" implies that the goofy guru cannot be wrong about anything, negating the basic facts of the material
Saying "it's natural" implies that anything natural is good.
These responses apply an altered frame on the conversation that you subconsciously accept. Now instead of the problem being about aluminum, or a material being a petrochemical...
It becomes about arguing whether aluminum is bound-up or whether goofy guru X is to be trusted etc.
And in doing so, these irrelevant talking points distract you from the main important issue.
It all comes back to the Big Pharma Dance: https://news.1rj.ru/str/powerofthepulse/658
Also refer to post on Vague Doublespeak: https://news.1rj.ru/str/powerofthepulse/711
Learn more: @powerofthepulse
Many times when concerned truthers raise points about supplements psyops, like:
⚠️ zeolite is composed of aluminum
❗️ methylene blue is a petrochemical paint
☠️ diatomaceous earth rips the insides of pests like slugs
Goofy gurus defending these psyops often respond with points like:
😃 "the aluminum is bound up"
🤓 "but goofy-guru-X says it's amazing"
🤪 "yes but it's natural"
However...
If we examine these statements, they're entirely irrelevant to the main point of concern.
⬇️
Whether aluminum is bound-up or not does not change the fact that it's aluminum.
What a goofy guru says about a material doesn't change the facts of it's composition.
A material being natural does not make it safe.
However, it's very easy to miss the fact that these goofy responses aren't relevant. Here's why...
Because of the way our language works:
Saying "the aluminum is bound up" implies that if aluminum is 'bound up', it's safe.
Saying "goofy guru X says it's amazing" implies that the goofy guru cannot be wrong about anything, negating the basic facts of the material
Saying "it's natural" implies that anything natural is good.
These responses apply an altered frame on the conversation that you subconsciously accept. Now instead of the problem being about aluminum, or a material being a petrochemical...
It becomes about arguing whether aluminum is bound-up or whether goofy guru X is to be trusted etc.
And in doing so, these irrelevant talking points distract you from the main important issue.
It all comes back to the Big Pharma Dance: https://news.1rj.ru/str/powerofthepulse/658
Also refer to post on Vague Doublespeak: https://news.1rj.ru/str/powerofthepulse/711
Learn more: @powerofthepulse
Telegram
Zac ~ Power of the Pulse
Gaslight, Deflect, Distract, Discredit
It's the same tactic over and over again.
They use it on people injured by the *cough cough* carrot 🥕
They use it on parents of children injured by the childhood carrots 🥕
And they use it on those of us who speak out…
It's the same tactic over and over again.
They use it on people injured by the *cough cough* carrot 🥕
They use it on parents of children injured by the childhood carrots 🥕
And they use it on those of us who speak out…
👍13❤3🔥3👏2
What do you see? 🧐
Spike proteins on a cell?
Nanoparticles?
Damaged biology?
Will discuss this tomorrow ;)
Learn more: @powerofthepulse
Spike proteins on a cell?
Nanoparticles?
Damaged biology?
Will discuss this tomorrow ;)
Learn more: @powerofthepulse
🤔11👍10❤2👾1
We will expand on the above soon, but first we need to talk about this ⬇️
🦠 Nanoparticle Protein Corona
Of all the weird and wacky peculiarities that nanoparticles possess, this perhaps is the scariest.
Not only does this phenomenon directly disrupt the body... it reveals the doorframe of a much deeper and darker synthetic biology reality.
When nanomaterials enter your body...
➡️ they coat themselves in a layer of the body's proteins.
Firstly, this is problematic because the nanoparticle is stealing your proteins.
These proteins are necessary for cellular repair, communication, transportation, digestion and almost every imaginable task in your body.
Even if a protein doesn't end up stuck to the particle, in the process of interaction it is damaged, disrupting its function.
Different particles bind to different proteins and nanomaterials can be programmed to attract particular proteins
It gets worse ...
Now the toxic nanomaterial is coated in proteins it is far more stealthy
It is no longer recognised by your defence-system as a toxic nanomaterial. It just looks like a jumble of protein.
Certain proteins in particular fool the body so effectively, this is exploited to keep nanoparticles in blood circulation or to make cells internalise toxic nanomaterials.
Nano researchers themselves refer to this as the 'stealth effect'.
And then it gets worse ...
The damage to proteins is only the start. Nanoparticles also bind to lipids, hormones, nutrients, toxins and genetic material.
The protein corona phenomenon reveals a much larger issue with nanomaterials; The marriage of convenience between the inherent stealth of nanotech and nanomaterials attracting and integrating with biological components.
If you're familiar with synthetic biology, the protein corona is just the start.
Learn more: @powerofthepulse
Of all the weird and wacky peculiarities that nanoparticles possess, this perhaps is the scariest.
Not only does this phenomenon directly disrupt the body... it reveals the doorframe of a much deeper and darker synthetic biology reality.
When nanomaterials enter your body...
➡️ they coat themselves in a layer of the body's proteins.
Firstly, this is problematic because the nanoparticle is stealing your proteins.
These proteins are necessary for cellular repair, communication, transportation, digestion and almost every imaginable task in your body.
Even if a protein doesn't end up stuck to the particle, in the process of interaction it is damaged, disrupting its function.
Different particles bind to different proteins and nanomaterials can be programmed to attract particular proteins
It gets worse ...
Now the toxic nanomaterial is coated in proteins it is far more stealthy
It is no longer recognised by your defence-system as a toxic nanomaterial. It just looks like a jumble of protein.
Certain proteins in particular fool the body so effectively, this is exploited to keep nanoparticles in blood circulation or to make cells internalise toxic nanomaterials.
Nano researchers themselves refer to this as the 'stealth effect'.
And then it gets worse ...
The damage to proteins is only the start. Nanoparticles also bind to lipids, hormones, nutrients, toxins and genetic material.
The protein corona phenomenon reveals a much larger issue with nanomaterials; The marriage of convenience between the inherent stealth of nanotech and nanomaterials attracting and integrating with biological components.
If you're familiar with synthetic biology, the protein corona is just the start.
Learn more: @powerofthepulse
🔥11❤5🤯2🤣2🤓1
References:
Protein corona: https://www.nature.com/articles/ncomms11770
Silica nanoparticles: https://www.researchgate.net/figure/Morphological-overview-of-silica-nanoparticles-for-protein-corona-formation-displaying_fig1_362663516
'Spike protein' from 2011: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21130884/#&gid=article-figures&pid=fig-1-uid-0
Blood 1: https://www.researchgate.net/figure/Scanning-electron-microscopy-images-of-red-blood-cells-RBCs-A-RBCs-under-0-mmHg-on_fig2_326335613
Blood 2: https://medschool.co/test-findings/echinocytes
Blood 3: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/332533531/
Other 'spike protein' images: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spike_protein
Learn more: @powerofthepulse
Protein corona: https://www.nature.com/articles/ncomms11770
Silica nanoparticles: https://www.researchgate.net/figure/Morphological-overview-of-silica-nanoparticles-for-protein-corona-formation-displaying_fig1_362663516
'Spike protein' from 2011: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21130884/#&gid=article-figures&pid=fig-1-uid-0
Blood 1: https://www.researchgate.net/figure/Scanning-electron-microscopy-images-of-red-blood-cells-RBCs-A-RBCs-under-0-mmHg-on_fig2_326335613
Blood 2: https://medschool.co/test-findings/echinocytes
Blood 3: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/332533531/
Other 'spike protein' images: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spike_protein
Learn more: @powerofthepulse
👍4🙏3✍1
Spikey Monstrosities
When it comes to microscopy of the protein corona phenomenon, there are numerous types of coronas, each having it's own appearance.
Interestingly, certain coronas look strangely similar to the images of alleged 'spike proteins'.
Could a nanoparticle covered in proteins be interpreted as a 'virus' particle? 🤔
I personally don't talk about 'spike proteins' and am suspicious of anyone that does... it is worth noting some of the similarities in appearance.
Keep this in mind when we hear labels like 'spike protein'.
Also note that if scale isn't present, damaged Red Blood Cells can also be mistaken for a 'spike' or corona.
Images in order:
1. Protein corona
2. 'Spike protein'
3. Silica nanoparticles
4,5,6. Red Blood Cells
7. 'Spike proteins'
References: https://news.1rj.ru/str/powerofthepulse/722
Nanoparticle Protein Corona: https://news.1rj.ru/str/powerofthepulse/720
Learn more: @powerofthepulse
When it comes to microscopy of the protein corona phenomenon, there are numerous types of coronas, each having it's own appearance.
Interestingly, certain coronas look strangely similar to the images of alleged 'spike proteins'.
Could a nanoparticle covered in proteins be interpreted as a 'virus' particle? 🤔
I personally don't talk about 'spike proteins' and am suspicious of anyone that does... it is worth noting some of the similarities in appearance.
Keep this in mind when we hear labels like 'spike protein'.
Also note that if scale isn't present, damaged Red Blood Cells can also be mistaken for a 'spike' or corona.
Images in order:
1. Protein corona
2. 'Spike protein'
3. Silica nanoparticles
4,5,6. Red Blood Cells
7. 'Spike proteins'
References: https://news.1rj.ru/str/powerofthepulse/722
Nanoparticle Protein Corona: https://news.1rj.ru/str/powerofthepulse/720
Learn more: @powerofthepulse
🔥7👍4❤2🤯1
🧳 Health Journey Starter Kit
So you're working on your health
But why are you starting with 15 new supplements, spray bottles and patches?
You're still eating gluten... still eating out... still eating/drinking out of plastic... still smearing your skin with endocrine disruptors and sniffing neurotoxic perfumes/soaps.
Cleaning up your food is just the bare minimum.
The Big Pharma model tells you that you don't need to stop openly poisoning yourself because they have a magic pill for everything.
You want to talk about natural-living, let's talk... there is no magic-pill for a forest destroyed by fire. There is no instant-fix for a chopped-up tree. There is no perfect cure-all for industrial waste in rivers.
How exactly do you expect to be healthy if you're choosing to put poison in your mouth daily?
We're not talking about chemtrails, nano-takeover of agriculture, organic-food-takeover. We're talking about the foods you willingly choose to eat.
The gut-brain axis and gut microbiome are super-trendy topics.
➡️ So what's the goofy guru solution? Buy this product and that product.
These products may or may not be amazing... HOWEVER:
No product will save you from a lifestyle of wilful self-poisoning.
Start with the inputs and your environment... not goofy guru 'protocols'.
Learn more: @powerofthepulse
So you're working on your health
But why are you starting with 15 new supplements, spray bottles and patches?
You're still eating gluten... still eating out... still eating/drinking out of plastic... still smearing your skin with endocrine disruptors and sniffing neurotoxic perfumes/soaps.
Cleaning up your food is just the bare minimum.
The Big Pharma model tells you that you don't need to stop openly poisoning yourself because they have a magic pill for everything.
You want to talk about natural-living, let's talk... there is no magic-pill for a forest destroyed by fire. There is no instant-fix for a chopped-up tree. There is no perfect cure-all for industrial waste in rivers.
How exactly do you expect to be healthy if you're choosing to put poison in your mouth daily?
We're not talking about chemtrails, nano-takeover of agriculture, organic-food-takeover. We're talking about the foods you willingly choose to eat.
The gut-brain axis and gut microbiome are super-trendy topics.
➡️ So what's the goofy guru solution? Buy this product and that product.
These products may or may not be amazing... HOWEVER:
No product will save you from a lifestyle of wilful self-poisoning.
Start with the inputs and your environment... not goofy guru 'protocols'.
Learn more: @powerofthepulse
💯15🔥6❤5👏2⚡1
On Fear & Understanding
Why is the dark so scary?
Isn't it the unknown? The possibility of what might be lurking?
Is it not our imagination that creates the most terrifying demons?
Have you ever noticed in Hollywood how the monster/psychopath is always far scarier as a faceless nameless entity... its goals unknown and its purpose left vague and menacing.
When the monster is revealed, it can often lose its power to grips us with cold fear.
This is what goofy gurus use when they speak about topics such as transhumanism, IoB, synthetic biology and self-spreading bioweapons...
It's always vague, expansive ambiguity.
Closely interrelated topics like nanotech, nano in blood, Body Area Networks and the sleeve-roll-up 🥕 get lazily ground together in a chaotic, formless mess leaving people more confused.
Often, this is because the goofy gurus themselves are confused because they haven't taken the time to study the material. Instead they opt to make the latest trendy shock-value headline, without the necessary research to legitimately explain the topic.
I vividly recall in mid-2023 an Aussie alternative-platform was interviewing numerous syn-bio goofy gurus saying
"I know you've explained this multiple times but people are still very confused with what you're saying"
Of course they're confused!
If they just name the enemy and reveal it to the light... fear evaporates and understanding sets in.
Once you know what you're dealing with you know the solution.
You recognise the danger and severity of the problem and you're empowered to protect yourself.
The issue is that oftentimes, vague stories of the mysterious predator shrouded in silent menace is far far more sellable.
It's a story, it's fascinating, attractive, terrifying.
It's also misleading and inaccurate.
Learn to recognise ambiguity and vagueness. Ask yourself "what are they actually saying?".
Perhaps leave fantasy for entertainment, and when it comes to the real-life assault against us, focus on methodical, logical proof presented in a structured and systematic manner.
Learn more: @powerofthepulse
Why is the dark so scary?
Isn't it the unknown? The possibility of what might be lurking?
Is it not our imagination that creates the most terrifying demons?
Have you ever noticed in Hollywood how the monster/psychopath is always far scarier as a faceless nameless entity... its goals unknown and its purpose left vague and menacing.
When the monster is revealed, it can often lose its power to grips us with cold fear.
This is what goofy gurus use when they speak about topics such as transhumanism, IoB, synthetic biology and self-spreading bioweapons...
It's always vague, expansive ambiguity.
Closely interrelated topics like nanotech, nano in blood, Body Area Networks and the sleeve-roll-up 🥕 get lazily ground together in a chaotic, formless mess leaving people more confused.
Often, this is because the goofy gurus themselves are confused because they haven't taken the time to study the material. Instead they opt to make the latest trendy shock-value headline, without the necessary research to legitimately explain the topic.
I vividly recall in mid-2023 an Aussie alternative-platform was interviewing numerous syn-bio goofy gurus saying
"I know you've explained this multiple times but people are still very confused with what you're saying"
Of course they're confused!
You don't shed light on a dark cavernous topic by throwing a towel on the lantern and then saying "look at my light" ... "we have a lantern, you should be able to see clearly"
If they just name the enemy and reveal it to the light... fear evaporates and understanding sets in.
Once you know what you're dealing with you know the solution.
You recognise the danger and severity of the problem and you're empowered to protect yourself.
The issue is that oftentimes, vague stories of the mysterious predator shrouded in silent menace is far far more sellable.
It's a story, it's fascinating, attractive, terrifying.
It's also misleading and inaccurate.
Learn to recognise ambiguity and vagueness. Ask yourself "what are they actually saying?".
Perhaps leave fantasy for entertainment, and when it comes to the real-life assault against us, focus on methodical, logical proof presented in a structured and systematic manner.
Learn more: @powerofthepulse
👏13⚡4❤2👍1🤝1
Finding a solution first requires precisely defining the problem.
💯12