Since I shared my bad mental health with you some hours ago, I have received outstanding support from a lot of you!
Thank you so much, I appreciated so much and I hope you find yourself a bit at home here in my little channel 💕
Thank you so much, I appreciated so much and I hope you find yourself a bit at home here in my little channel 💕
❤34🥰5
Two days of flamming with the same ennoscriptd dude on Facebook, dreaming we were fighting on my channel so I could ban him
❤10👍1
Hey wassup personally spending my time simping over Spike (the vampire)
🔥2
How come there's a cult about Snape but not one about sexy vampires from the 90s? Good decade for vampires, would join the cult immediately
🤔2❤1
Tw: graphic, mention of ra*e
Just to be clear: banning safe abortions doesn't save lives, it just ruins the life of people who cannot have a child and, sometimes, it kills them.
My grandgrandma used to tell me about her teenage years, when young people were r**ed by soldiers and having a child before wedlock - from a foreigner, even! - would have ruined both the mother and the child's life forever, staining them forever. So, they had to go to a older woman, and she took care of things with crochet needles. Sometimes she took care of the body, later, because things weren't safe and the risk of not making it was high.
Seems so old, lost in time, and yet there are, today, countries when women whose husbands are in jail are literally forced to sell their bodies to tourists, unable even to keep enough money to feed their already living children. So, when these women, these people, happen to get pregnant with an unwanted child from a ra**y tourist, they too have to go to an older woman, risk their lives just to go through a painful process because they cannot do anything else.
But it's not only about tragic, extreme cases. Teenagers deserve to have the rights to end their pregnancies if they don't feel ready yet. Childfree people as well should have this right. Everyone should have this right.
And to see what's happening in the self proclaimed "country of freedom" is disgusting. No uterus, no opinion.
Just to be clear: banning safe abortions doesn't save lives, it just ruins the life of people who cannot have a child and, sometimes, it kills them.
My grandgrandma used to tell me about her teenage years, when young people were r**ed by soldiers and having a child before wedlock - from a foreigner, even! - would have ruined both the mother and the child's life forever, staining them forever. So, they had to go to a older woman, and she took care of things with crochet needles. Sometimes she took care of the body, later, because things weren't safe and the risk of not making it was high.
Seems so old, lost in time, and yet there are, today, countries when women whose husbands are in jail are literally forced to sell their bodies to tourists, unable even to keep enough money to feed their already living children. So, when these women, these people, happen to get pregnant with an unwanted child from a ra**y tourist, they too have to go to an older woman, risk their lives just to go through a painful process because they cannot do anything else.
But it's not only about tragic, extreme cases. Teenagers deserve to have the rights to end their pregnancies if they don't feel ready yet. Childfree people as well should have this right. Everyone should have this right.
And to see what's happening in the self proclaimed "country of freedom" is disgusting. No uterus, no opinion.
👍18👏5
P(r)ettyposting 💖🎀🍉
Tw: graphic, mention of ra*e Just to be clear: banning safe abortions doesn't save lives, it just ruins the life of people who cannot have a child and, sometimes, it kills them. My grandgrandma used to tell me about her teenage years, when young people were…
Quoting the statement directly:
"For that reason, in future cases, we should reconsider all of this Court's substantive due process precidents, including Griswold, Lawerence, and Obergefell."
A more informed person that me reports:
"Griswold v Connecticut defined federal protections for married couples rights to buy contraceptives. Griswold was extended in Eisenstadt v Baird to include unmarried couples. Furthermore, it was the backbone of the ruling in Carey v Population Services International, which provided federal protections for the right of contraceptives for individuals 16 years and older. Loving v Virginia, shortly after Griswold, used Griswold to create federal protections for interracial marriage.
Lawrence v Texas defined federal protections striking down sodomy laws, which were used in the past to discriminate against, and blatantly attack, trans people.
Obergefell v Hodges defines federal protections for same sex marriage.
The source I am reading from speculates that it will most likely be used against any 14th-amendment derived case in the united states.
Notably, one of the people on the US Supreme Court, who signed the ruling overturning Roe v Wade, is a black man married to a white woman."
"For that reason, in future cases, we should reconsider all of this Court's substantive due process precidents, including Griswold, Lawerence, and Obergefell."
A more informed person that me reports:
"Griswold v Connecticut defined federal protections for married couples rights to buy contraceptives. Griswold was extended in Eisenstadt v Baird to include unmarried couples. Furthermore, it was the backbone of the ruling in Carey v Population Services International, which provided federal protections for the right of contraceptives for individuals 16 years and older. Loving v Virginia, shortly after Griswold, used Griswold to create federal protections for interracial marriage.
Lawrence v Texas defined federal protections striking down sodomy laws, which were used in the past to discriminate against, and blatantly attack, trans people.
Obergefell v Hodges defines federal protections for same sex marriage.
The source I am reading from speculates that it will most likely be used against any 14th-amendment derived case in the united states.
Notably, one of the people on the US Supreme Court, who signed the ruling overturning Roe v Wade, is a black man married to a white woman."
❤7