Linux - Reddit – Telegram
Linux - Reddit
760 subscribers
4.18K photos
207 videos
39.8K links
Stay up-to-date with everything Linux!
Content directly fetched from the subreddit just for you.

Powered by : @r_channels
Download Telegram
Standard standards. Pure Linux?

I'm in my cups so give me some legroom here...

My brother (20) and I (35) were discussing some issues between dnf apt and flatpak when he mentioned that it would be nice if there was a universally official linux distro. I supposed that to mean a linux distro that isn't a distro, but rather a "standard" Linux body coming from one particular source, I suppose from Linus himself or something. And more specifically, he's talking about making Linux an OS with the desktop tools provided so that it worked in perfect parity as an operating system. I tried explaining that this is not how things work, we have distros because we have forks. We have forks because we have different approaches at things, and a distro is simply someone picking one of those things for you so you can keep using Linux as a desktop and pretend youre a programmer. But I tend to be the high and mighty Linux dude who's spent two decades playing with and then working with Linux, and I am listening him out, as he's getting frustrated.

His argument, as such, is this:

It is to be made by some "official" source. I mentioned canonical could be considered that these days but no he means Linux as its own object, instead of the collection of objects it really is. No choice on desktop manager, no choice on compositor etc. Just like "this is default desktop Linux and if you want anything more specific move on to distros". I couldn't quite get him to understand that Linux is a living organism of many parts. When we say Linux, we're referring to the kernel. Everything after that library, package, or bin that do things, the system itself. The defining difference between distros often comes down to the package manager they do or do not use. So I wasn't sure how to tell him, Linux is a kernel, and we run everything up from there. He wants to make Linux like Mac, where it has a default distribution that people wanting Linux as their desktop OS could use. I try to explain that the modular nature of Linux (kernel pun) is what makes it amazing. You can't really tie Linux down like that but this is coming from a guy who has never had to do a .configure, make, make install, in his life. He's really into projects like Flatpak and such and automatize some of the bin and lib storage for every program.

​

I am at no doubt at your wits end with my drunken rambling so I'll get to the fucking point:

​

Is Linux an ever-evolving collection of constantly changing sources, producing the best lump sum, in as so far Desktops are concerned.

​

Or should there be a Linux MASTER, lets call it LinuxOS, and it comes with all the desktop features streamlined into one idea, and all the service features committed to one group of systems. I didn't want him to get frustrated so I met him half way, but really, am I the crazy one here or is he?

​

​

Edit: Ok, thank you for reinforcing what I already knew to be true. I wont mention it to him, he got really defensive the first time I disagreed.

https://redd.it/f1u16z
@r_linux
GrSecurity

Hi,
anyone know if grsecurity team has planing to sell grsecurity patches just for personal use ?

https://redd.it/f1srpc
@r_linux
Alexa, are you listening? The Amazon Echo is vulnerable to a physical attack that allows an attacker to gain a root shell on the underlying Linux operating system and install malware without leaving physical evidence of tampering.
https://labs.f-secure.com/archive/alexa-are-you-listening/

https://redd.it/f23e2r
@r_linux
Desktop publishing on Linux: SCRIBUS and VIVADESIGNER

There is very few good software solutions for desktop publishing in Linux. I have been using Scribus for a few years and have learned the tricks of pre-press production on this software. It is excellent and reliable, although it does have some drawbacks.

Very recently I also discovered the German proprietary software called VivaDesigner, which has a Linux version. It is quite cheap, but almost completely unknown. I do not know why this company does not advertize its products more efficiently. Due to the lack of reviews on the internet about VivaDesigner I was reluctant to buy it but the free demo version convinced me. It is a well thought-out piece of software which is going to make my life as a book designer easier. Their support is responsive, personalized, quick and very helpful.

One of the best features of VivaDesigner is the possibility to import Indesign .indd and .idml files. VivaDesigner also exports the .idml file. Scribus also has the plugin to import the .idml, but not to export it.

With this post I wanted to give an indication to those Linux people who are looking for a programs to use in addition to Scribus. And also I wanted to spread the word about one of the few companies in this field who caters to Linux users.

https://redd.it/f23uy9
@r_linux
Why is it so hard for a company to provide an open firmware?

In the last few years, we've seen a number of improvement in terms of hardware support on Linux. More and more hardware work "out of the box" (especially if you're using a distro such as Fedora or Ubuntu or their derivatives).

However, there is always a pain point for anything requiring a firmware. For instance, touchpads and touchscreens. Often do I see problems with touchpads, spend some time investigating, and after a while discover this has been magically fixed by an obscure firmware update\*. Sometimes the problem is indeed fixed, sometimes the situation has merely improved, but it's never possible to know what's been done in this firmware.

I was discussing with a colleague who told me that even if these firmwares were open source, they would be totally useless without public datasheet. And even if the datasheet were made publicly available, we would still require the whole proprietary toolchain used to produce the binary firmwares.

His conclusion is that it's impossible to get this, because of the way manufacturers and [ODM](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ODM) work.

I'm still unsure what's the big deal here. For instance, touchpads have been around for at least 3 decades to the general user. Surely, there is no huge secret or intellectual property that a touchpad-making company would like to keep from its competitors... is there? Am I missing something?

(Of course, the same goes with computers BIOS.)

Thanks!

\* sometimes I also discover there are no firmware update and the issue cannot be fixed by software either, making the device hardly usable or unusable.

https://redd.it/f24ryp
@r_linux
KDE's Plasma 5.18 is out: easier system settings, interactive notifications, emojis, wallpapers and much more
https://kde.org/announcements/plasma-5.18.0

https://redd.it/f27iit
@r_linux
Is it possible to make money as a linux distro dev? Open discussion and sharing ideas how.

The noscript is too short to deliver my thought :)

Somebody in another place said something super interesting. Something that probably most devs tried to make money from working on a Linux distro but very few succeeded. Those few who did it are being envied and often bad mouthed by the rest.



How a distro dev can make a living from working on distro or open software?


My first thought is patreon and youtube channel.


P.s. I'm not a dev but it hurts me when I hear a story of a leading dev who goes through depression and financial troubles while burning out working on a distro.

https://redd.it/f27y31
@r_linux
PeerTube v2.1 released with: UI improvements, performance improvements, ability to disable WebTorrent (and only enable HLS), new internal video privacy mode, ability to transcode videos in an audio only video container, comments improvements, bug fixes & much more!
https://github.com/Chocobozzz/PeerTube/releases/tag/v2.1.0

https://redd.it/f2a0ez
@r_linux
Dell's Linux support is a major disappointment

I saw a lot of posts in this subreddit hailing Dell for putting Linux on their machines. After doing some research, I decided to dive in and bought a Dell Precision 7540 with Ubuntu 18.04 pre-installed.

The Precision was pricey but I loved it's upgrade-ability and I hoped that this would be a computer I could rely on for a long time. Additionally, I am a relative Linux newbie (Apple refugee) and I hoped that the system would be adequately supported by Dell if I ran into trouble.

Things went downhill quickly. The computer I received had several issues, including that it would frequently not wake up from a suspend state and if it did, it would often start a fresh session after logging in (e.g. no apps or documents open). Additionally, before the login screen would appear, I often could see my desktop for a few seconds as though I were already logged in – obviously a big security risk.

After a call to Dell Pro support, I realized that their approach to any issues on a Linux system is basically to reinstall the system. Their Pro technicians are not trained to support Linux...at all. Their internal support documentation is so poor that during one of my calls when I managed to fix the issue I had called in about, the technician asked me to provide a detailed denoscription of how I solved it so he could use that solution for future calls. I was happy to, but then I realized that he should have already had this kind of documentation on hand.

Eventually, Dell support decided to replace my unit, but when the replacement arrived it had Windows instead of Ubuntu Linux installed. I had to wait another 10 days to get a third replacement and guess what...it also had Windows installed.

This is my work machine and the process has cost me several hours. I am also a freelancer, so those lost hours equate to money lost. I requested a return and refund and I will never buy from Dell again let alone recommend their services.

If you bought a Dell XPS, did you have a better experience? Were my expectations unreasonable?

https://redd.it/f2ccl8
@r_linux
Restic sftp: "Permission denied" (SSH_FX_PERMISSION_DENIED)

I'm trying to use backup my data with restic over ssh from my main machine macos to the raspberry pi 3 with ssd drive. ssh works fine but when I'm trying to use sftp with restic I get this error:

Fatal: create repository at sftp:hostname@ipaddress:/mnt failed: sftp: "Permission denied" (SSH\_FX\_PERMISSION\_DENIED)

command I'm trying to exe: restic -r sftp:hostname@ipaddress:/mnt init

How to fix this?

https://redd.it/f2dww8
@r_linux
iptables not doing it's job?

Hi, so I'll try to be short.

​

I've been using google cloud for a while now. I have Ubuntu and I'm using VNC to access and host some online game rooms for my friends and I.

​

I often get locked out of VNC (can't connect due to too many failed authentications). Later I found out there have been brute force attacks every 2 or so hours mostly from Ukraine.

​

I had the iptables set so the port 5901 which I use will only let my IP connect, so how is it locking me out?

​

Later I tried setting the google cloud firewall for my account and that did work, but I just want to know if iptables are actually not preventing this issue.

​

Also, is there a way to reset failed authentications, so I don't have to close the instance and open it again to access it (I would have to rehost all the rooms again if I did that)?

​

Edit : this is what i've been using so far :

​

sudo iptables -S

sudo iptables -F INPUT

sudo iptables -I INPUT -p tcp -s myip --dport 5901 -j ACCEPT

sudo iptables -A INPUT -p tcp -s myip --dport 5901 -j DROP

sudo iptables -S

https://redd.it/f2fqtb
@r_linux