Understanding GNOME Shell’s focus stealing prevention.
https://blogs.gnome.org/shell-dev/2024/09/20/understanding-gnome-shells-focus-stealing-prevention/
https://redd.it/1mrjh4b
@r_linux
https://blogs.gnome.org/shell-dev/2024/09/20/understanding-gnome-shells-focus-stealing-prevention/
https://redd.it/1mrjh4b
@r_linux
GNOME Shell & Mutter
Understanding GNOME Shell’s focus stealing prevention
Focus stealing prevention exists for two main reasons: One is security, since we need to prevent rogue apps from deceiving users into e.g. typing their password into another window. If apps can...
This Week in Plasma: a lot of polishing!
https://blogs.kde.org/2025/08/16/this-week-in-plasma-a-lot-of-polishing/
https://redd.it/1mrlrkb
@r_linux
https://blogs.kde.org/2025/08/16/this-week-in-plasma-a-lot-of-polishing/
https://redd.it/1mrlrkb
@r_linux
KDE Blogs
This Week in Plasma: a lot of polishing!
Welcome to a new issue of This Week in Plasma!
Every week we cover the highlights of what’s happening in the world of KDE Plasma and its associated apps like Discover, System Monitor, and more.
Every week we cover the highlights of what’s happening in the world of KDE Plasma and its associated apps like Discover, System Monitor, and more.
Is CachyOS in violation of upstream licences?
Not exactly the post I wanted to make, but here we go.
I have been daily driving CachyOS for a while now, as I wanted to experiment a bit more with distributions I never got to use. I am actually having a good time, so there is no hate nor ill intent of mine over this project.
Still, today I was reading some documentation I ended up on this page, their terms of service for the repository... and I cannot help but to find it troubling.
They basically prevent redistribution of packages https://wiki.cachyos.org/policy/repository\_policy/#6-prohibited-redistribution with some narrow exceptions for caching. Their language (emphasis mine):
>5. Redistribution of the Repository
>This policy defines “redistribution” as the behaviors of inclusion of the CachyOS repository (and its mirrors) or packages obtained from the CachyOS repository as a part of the distributed image of the operating system or sysroots. Redistribution also includes the behaviors of Linux distributions to provide the utilities that enable CachyOS repository by users’ choice, or to provide any distributed or official document that guide users to enable CachyOS repository (and its mirrors) by their means. End users and third-party mirrors are not subject to the redistribution policy.
>Redistribution of CachyOS repository is exclusively authorized to the CachyOS team only.
>6. Prohibited Redistribution
>Redistribution of the CachyOS repository (and its mirrors) in any unauthorized Linux distribution, including other Arch-based distributions, is STRICTLY PROHIBITED. This includes, but is not limited to:
>Manjaro
>EndeavourOS
>ArcoLinux
>Parabola
>Any other Linux distribution not explicitly mentioned in the “Redistribution of the Repository” section.
My understanding is that those clauses are in gross violation of several upstream licences like the GPL3.0, as one cannot prevent third-parties to freely distribute derivatives (which packages are).
Am I getting this wrong or the language of that policy is unenforceable and possibly illegal?
https://redd.it/1mrnfeh
@r_linux
Not exactly the post I wanted to make, but here we go.
I have been daily driving CachyOS for a while now, as I wanted to experiment a bit more with distributions I never got to use. I am actually having a good time, so there is no hate nor ill intent of mine over this project.
Still, today I was reading some documentation I ended up on this page, their terms of service for the repository... and I cannot help but to find it troubling.
They basically prevent redistribution of packages https://wiki.cachyos.org/policy/repository\_policy/#6-prohibited-redistribution with some narrow exceptions for caching. Their language (emphasis mine):
>5. Redistribution of the Repository
>This policy defines “redistribution” as the behaviors of inclusion of the CachyOS repository (and its mirrors) or packages obtained from the CachyOS repository as a part of the distributed image of the operating system or sysroots. Redistribution also includes the behaviors of Linux distributions to provide the utilities that enable CachyOS repository by users’ choice, or to provide any distributed or official document that guide users to enable CachyOS repository (and its mirrors) by their means. End users and third-party mirrors are not subject to the redistribution policy.
>Redistribution of CachyOS repository is exclusively authorized to the CachyOS team only.
>6. Prohibited Redistribution
>Redistribution of the CachyOS repository (and its mirrors) in any unauthorized Linux distribution, including other Arch-based distributions, is STRICTLY PROHIBITED. This includes, but is not limited to:
>Manjaro
>EndeavourOS
>ArcoLinux
>Parabola
>Any other Linux distribution not explicitly mentioned in the “Redistribution of the Repository” section.
My understanding is that those clauses are in gross violation of several upstream licences like the GPL3.0, as one cannot prevent third-parties to freely distribute derivatives (which packages are).
Am I getting this wrong or the language of that policy is unenforceable and possibly illegal?
https://redd.it/1mrnfeh
@r_linux
CachyOS
Repository Usage Policy
Can icons in right click context menu be changed?
I am using Linux Mint Cinnamon Edition. I have been able to change the icons of the applications, however it appears that changing icon themes has no effect on right click context menu icons, which makes the system look divergent.
Is it possible to change the icons using themes or otherwise?
https://preview.redd.it/kb881nrmcdjf1.png?width=1618&format=png&auto=webp&s=e21ceff54273b70efdce9b54268f488b039d613b
https://redd.it/1mrsvt5
@r_linux
I am using Linux Mint Cinnamon Edition. I have been able to change the icons of the applications, however it appears that changing icon themes has no effect on right click context menu icons, which makes the system look divergent.
Is it possible to change the icons using themes or otherwise?
https://preview.redd.it/kb881nrmcdjf1.png?width=1618&format=png&auto=webp&s=e21ceff54273b70efdce9b54268f488b039d613b
https://redd.it/1mrsvt5
@r_linux
Vodafone TV blocks Linux users – let’s make our voices heard
I recently discovered that Vodafone TV is completely inaccessible from Linux desktops. On the very same PC, it works fine under Windows, but on Linux the service blocks playback altogether. Even with tricks like user-agent spoofing or running a Windows VM, it still refuses to play anything. The only way I could get it working was by booting into my Windows partition, which makes it clear that Vodafone is deliberately blocking Linux browsers.
This is extremely frustrating, because Vodafone advertises the service as accessible “from any device via browser” without ever disclosing that Linux is excluded. At the same time, the company’s own hardware and infrastructure are heavily based on Linux, from routers to Android TV boxes, making this restriction feel hypocritical and arbitrary.
It is also unfair and discriminatory. In many regions Linux has a larger desktop market share than macOS, yet macOS is supported while Linux users are left out. There is no real technical excuse for this either. Competing streaming platforms such as Netflix, Disney+, Amazon Prime, HBO, and even local services like COSMOTE TV have supported Linux browsers for years using standard DRM technologies like Widevine. Vodafone simply hasn’t bothered to implement the same solution.
Beyond the technical issues, this raises important questions of consumer rights, accessibility, and transparency. Paying customers are denied equal access to a service they have subscribed to, with no prior disclosure. That is unacceptable in 2025, especially from a company of Vodafone’s size and resources.
I have already submitted a formal complaint to Vodafone Greece. But this won’t change unless Linux users everywhere make their voices heard. If you are a Vodafone customer in any country, please take a few minutes to send a complaint to your local Vodafone branch.
Even a short message demanding equal support for Linux is valuable. If we push together, Vodafone will have no choice but to realize that ignoring Linux users is not an option.
https://redd.it/1mrvik9
@r_linux
I recently discovered that Vodafone TV is completely inaccessible from Linux desktops. On the very same PC, it works fine under Windows, but on Linux the service blocks playback altogether. Even with tricks like user-agent spoofing or running a Windows VM, it still refuses to play anything. The only way I could get it working was by booting into my Windows partition, which makes it clear that Vodafone is deliberately blocking Linux browsers.
This is extremely frustrating, because Vodafone advertises the service as accessible “from any device via browser” without ever disclosing that Linux is excluded. At the same time, the company’s own hardware and infrastructure are heavily based on Linux, from routers to Android TV boxes, making this restriction feel hypocritical and arbitrary.
It is also unfair and discriminatory. In many regions Linux has a larger desktop market share than macOS, yet macOS is supported while Linux users are left out. There is no real technical excuse for this either. Competing streaming platforms such as Netflix, Disney+, Amazon Prime, HBO, and even local services like COSMOTE TV have supported Linux browsers for years using standard DRM technologies like Widevine. Vodafone simply hasn’t bothered to implement the same solution.
Beyond the technical issues, this raises important questions of consumer rights, accessibility, and transparency. Paying customers are denied equal access to a service they have subscribed to, with no prior disclosure. That is unacceptable in 2025, especially from a company of Vodafone’s size and resources.
I have already submitted a formal complaint to Vodafone Greece. But this won’t change unless Linux users everywhere make their voices heard. If you are a Vodafone customer in any country, please take a few minutes to send a complaint to your local Vodafone branch.
Even a short message demanding equal support for Linux is valuable. If we push together, Vodafone will have no choice but to realize that ignoring Linux users is not an option.
https://redd.it/1mrvik9
@r_linux
Reddit
From the linux community on Reddit
Explore this post and more from the linux community
I'm using Linux Mint now daily for the last 4 months and I start to love the flexibility & simpleness of Linux. Windows on the other hand feels now clunky and bloated.
https://redd.it/1mrxkfd
@r_linux
https://redd.it/1mrxkfd
@r_linux
What were your biggest struggles when switching to Linux for the first time?
I've been helping a couple of people, mostly friends, switch to Linux recently after the current state of privacy on Windows and I'm surprised at the different parts of the experience different people struggle with, what are the points of the change that you needed help with or would have liked better tutorials for?
https://redd.it/1mrxbf6
@r_linux
I've been helping a couple of people, mostly friends, switch to Linux recently after the current state of privacy on Windows and I'm surprised at the different parts of the experience different people struggle with, what are the points of the change that you needed help with or would have liked better tutorials for?
https://redd.it/1mrxbf6
@r_linux
Reddit
From the linux community on Reddit
Explore this post and more from the linux community
Windows 12 could be Linux's biggest chance, Mint 22.2 beta: Linux Weekly News - The Linux Experiment
https://peertube.wtf/w/swvrwjMRigEKqZgfeLNtMj
https://redd.it/1ms45yw
@r_linux
https://peertube.wtf/w/swvrwjMRigEKqZgfeLNtMj
https://redd.it/1ms45yw
@r_linux
PeerTube.wtf
Windows 12 could be Linux's biggest chance, Mint 22.2 beta: Linux Weekly News
Head to https://squarespace.com/thelinuxexperiment to save 10% off your first purchase of a website or domain using code thelinuxexperiment Grab a brand new laptop or desktop running Linux: https:/...
Linux Format gone...
I've been using Linux for about twenty years and bought a few linux magazines during that time. Linux Format was my favorite and while I didn't subscribe I bought a few each year if they had articles I wanted or contents on the included disc. So it was a bad feeling when my local magazine place didn't have a copy lately. So I looked at the LF website to see that they are folding their tent. I just want to say my thanks to some good people I don't know and I will certainly miss the magazine.
https://redd.it/1ms64yx
@r_linux
I've been using Linux for about twenty years and bought a few linux magazines during that time. Linux Format was my favorite and while I didn't subscribe I bought a few each year if they had articles I wanted or contents on the included disc. So it was a bad feeling when my local magazine place didn't have a copy lately. So I looked at the LF website to see that they are folding their tent. I just want to say my thanks to some good people I don't know and I will certainly miss the magazine.
https://redd.it/1ms64yx
@r_linux
Reddit
From the linux community on Reddit
Explore this post and more from the linux community
JayzTwoCents' Linux benchmarks feel OFF... - Gardiner Bryant
https://peertube.wtf/w/rsg7LREccDhsRFaPdfsXab
https://redd.it/1ms48cg
@r_linux
https://peertube.wtf/w/rsg7LREccDhsRFaPdfsXab
https://redd.it/1ms48cg
@r_linux
PeerTube.wtf
JayzTwoCents' Linux benchmarks feel OFF...
JayzTwoCents has had it rough with Linux lately... join me as we review his latest Linux video for commentary and criticism. My Game ❯ Get the source code: https://github.com/heavyelementinc/dudeli...
Battlefield 6 Requires Windows Secure Boot
I’ve been dual booting Linux and Windows for years now, and this is the first true roadblock that I’ve run into. Battlefield 6 is requiring my Secure Boot option to be set to “Windows” instead of “Other OS” in BIOS or else the game won’t launch due to the Anti-Cheat.
While no, this doesn’t mean Linux won’t boot, it does mean that the graphics drivers do not work. It stretches the image and makes it practically unusable.
I assume I’m not the first to ever experience this, so how do other people combat anti-cheat on Windows restricting their dual booting needs? If there was a way I could just use the Windows secure boot option with correct video drivers for Ubuntu, I would be covered.
https://redd.it/1msehr8
@r_linux
I’ve been dual booting Linux and Windows for years now, and this is the first true roadblock that I’ve run into. Battlefield 6 is requiring my Secure Boot option to be set to “Windows” instead of “Other OS” in BIOS or else the game won’t launch due to the Anti-Cheat.
While no, this doesn’t mean Linux won’t boot, it does mean that the graphics drivers do not work. It stretches the image and makes it practically unusable.
I assume I’m not the first to ever experience this, so how do other people combat anti-cheat on Windows restricting their dual booting needs? If there was a way I could just use the Windows secure boot option with correct video drivers for Ubuntu, I would be covered.
https://redd.it/1msehr8
@r_linux
Reddit
From the linux community on Reddit
Explore this post and more from the linux community
Are there any fortune-mod addons or implementations that give arbitrary tips about git, grep, awk and sed?
Pretty much like games do on loading screens, but with fortune-mod with Unix general development/management tools. It would be a great use-case to learn more about these tools in a daily basis and experiment new things.
https://redd.it/1msf0g8
@r_linux
Pretty much like games do on loading screens, but with fortune-mod with Unix general development/management tools. It would be a great use-case to learn more about these tools in a daily basis and experiment new things.
https://redd.it/1msf0g8
@r_linux
Reddit
From the linux community on Reddit
Explore this post and more from the linux community
Why are some distros better than others at handling nvidia drivers?
I hope being brave enough to post this here, instead of r/linux4noobs was not the wrong decision. Be kind linux gigachads, I have been using linux personally and for work for a few years now, so felt confident to post here.
I am kind of a distro hopper (I see/reminisce about a different distro than the one I am currently on, I will bkp my data and do a fresh install), but trying my best to stop doing this.
So, over the course of the last 10 days, I have tried 3-4 different distros on the same set of hardware (an HP Omen Laptop with AMD CPU and Nvidia GPU (1660Ti) ). And I had quite the different set of experiences when it came to getting my dGPU working across them.
First up was Cachy OS (back home, using it right now and mostly stick to this), pretty smooth sailing. No issues with the installer, it loaded up without any special flags/changes to GRUB. Installed the drivers on its own. I could login to a desktop and use applications on the GPU directly after install.
Next was Linux Mint, though it didn't install nvidia proprietary or the new nvidia-open ones (not noveau)...still worked, installer used my integrated GPU. And installing post install on linux mint has always been nice and easy for me. just go to their driver manager and it tells you which one is reccomended amongst the various proprietary drivers and you just install that. After install, everything works as expected.
Then MX Linux, given their focus on accessibility/ease-of-use with their MxTools, it was pretty easy there too.......to cut the story short...lets fast forward a bit
Then I wanted to give openSUSE another shot after I had heard zypper got parallel downloads. And boy was that a mistake.....when I launch the installer without modifying nomodeset in GRUB, it will not load the installer for me (I checked all ttys with ctrl+alt+f2-f7)...and if do launch installer by setting nomodeset it starts up and installls.......BUT!!!! directly after installing the OS I get 1280x768 something resolution which is wrong! (my display is 1080p). Also btw, everytime after installing openSUSE, zypper repo list was broken for me, it was referencing a repo from my boot USB or something so I had to remove it. Then I followed the automated install steps on https://en.opensuse.org/SDB:NVIDIA\_drivers \--> add the NVIDIA repo, refresh zypper, then the automated install steps (which btw it says, tested on TUMBLEWEED !!!!!) and lo and behold zypper does install something. Since I had secure boot disabled both before install and (set it to disabled in the OS installer) I didn't have to go through the MOK process (it never appeared after reboot)....and it still didn't fucking work!!!
So the main thing I wanted to discuss is why? why is it like this? that some arch-based distro can support a GPU driver out of the box, an LTS debian distro can support the computer out of the box and then post install you can install proprietary drivers pretty straightforward way but these rpm based distros always make it so complicated ! (unless you go for ublue or some other containerized version)
The thing with opensuse is, there wasn't even noveau bundled in and even though it was using my integrated GPU it was the completely wrong res when other distros like mint allow me to run at the right res even with my integrated gpu. And I completely opted out of the SE Linux/App-armor thing during install.....
so tell me, what kind of sane person who has nvidia GPUs would use openSUSE? since it seems to be so unreliable? (ik RHEL is even worse, have to use it at work) why would someone with say a server with one or more nvidia GPUs use something like openSUSE or RHEL or any rpm based distro (Fedora has also been a bit all over the place with regards to the drivers in the past for me) ?
and why can't they just do it like debian based distros seem to do it? or arch-based distros do it? or bundle something either noveau or the new nvidia-open ones in their initial install
I hope being brave enough to post this here, instead of r/linux4noobs was not the wrong decision. Be kind linux gigachads, I have been using linux personally and for work for a few years now, so felt confident to post here.
I am kind of a distro hopper (I see/reminisce about a different distro than the one I am currently on, I will bkp my data and do a fresh install), but trying my best to stop doing this.
So, over the course of the last 10 days, I have tried 3-4 different distros on the same set of hardware (an HP Omen Laptop with AMD CPU and Nvidia GPU (1660Ti) ). And I had quite the different set of experiences when it came to getting my dGPU working across them.
First up was Cachy OS (back home, using it right now and mostly stick to this), pretty smooth sailing. No issues with the installer, it loaded up without any special flags/changes to GRUB. Installed the drivers on its own. I could login to a desktop and use applications on the GPU directly after install.
Next was Linux Mint, though it didn't install nvidia proprietary or the new nvidia-open ones (not noveau)...still worked, installer used my integrated GPU. And installing post install on linux mint has always been nice and easy for me. just go to their driver manager and it tells you which one is reccomended amongst the various proprietary drivers and you just install that. After install, everything works as expected.
Then MX Linux, given their focus on accessibility/ease-of-use with their MxTools, it was pretty easy there too.......to cut the story short...lets fast forward a bit
Then I wanted to give openSUSE another shot after I had heard zypper got parallel downloads. And boy was that a mistake.....when I launch the installer without modifying nomodeset in GRUB, it will not load the installer for me (I checked all ttys with ctrl+alt+f2-f7)...and if do launch installer by setting nomodeset it starts up and installls.......BUT!!!! directly after installing the OS I get 1280x768 something resolution which is wrong! (my display is 1080p). Also btw, everytime after installing openSUSE, zypper repo list was broken for me, it was referencing a repo from my boot USB or something so I had to remove it. Then I followed the automated install steps on https://en.opensuse.org/SDB:NVIDIA\_drivers \--> add the NVIDIA repo, refresh zypper, then the automated install steps (which btw it says, tested on TUMBLEWEED !!!!!) and lo and behold zypper does install something. Since I had secure boot disabled both before install and (set it to disabled in the OS installer) I didn't have to go through the MOK process (it never appeared after reboot)....and it still didn't fucking work!!!
So the main thing I wanted to discuss is why? why is it like this? that some arch-based distro can support a GPU driver out of the box, an LTS debian distro can support the computer out of the box and then post install you can install proprietary drivers pretty straightforward way but these rpm based distros always make it so complicated ! (unless you go for ublue or some other containerized version)
The thing with opensuse is, there wasn't even noveau bundled in and even though it was using my integrated GPU it was the completely wrong res when other distros like mint allow me to run at the right res even with my integrated gpu. And I completely opted out of the SE Linux/App-armor thing during install.....
so tell me, what kind of sane person who has nvidia GPUs would use openSUSE? since it seems to be so unreliable? (ik RHEL is even worse, have to use it at work) why would someone with say a server with one or more nvidia GPUs use something like openSUSE or RHEL or any rpm based distro (Fedora has also been a bit all over the place with regards to the drivers in the past for me) ?
and why can't they just do it like debian based distros seem to do it? or arch-based distros do it? or bundle something either noveau or the new nvidia-open ones in their initial install
One shot book to learn Linux and Operating System
Hey, I just read a book on Computer Networks (Computer Networking: A Top-Down Approach). Now I am thinking about reading a book on Linux that also explains OS terms.
Does something like this exist? If so, can you please guide me? I want to be a backend engineer, and it will really help me in this journey.
https://redd.it/1msd9p1
@r_linux
Hey, I just read a book on Computer Networks (Computer Networking: A Top-Down Approach). Now I am thinking about reading a book on Linux that also explains OS terms.
Does something like this exist? If so, can you please guide me? I want to be a backend engineer, and it will really help me in this journey.
https://redd.it/1msd9p1
@r_linux
Reddit
From the linux community on Reddit
Explore this post and more from the linux community
GDPR meant nothing: chat control ends privacy for the EU
https://www.reddit.com/r/Romania/comments/1msjxqp/gdpr_meant_nothing_chat_control_ends_privacy_for/
https://redd.it/1msltp3
@r_linux
https://www.reddit.com/r/Romania/comments/1msjxqp/gdpr_meant_nothing_chat_control_ends_privacy_for/
https://redd.it/1msltp3
@r_linux
Reddit
From the Romania community on Reddit: GDPR meant nothing: chat control ends privacy for the EU
Explore this post and more from the Romania community
How much % CPU does your mouse use on Linux desktop?
Here's something odd that we found out during a Linux LAN event this weekend. This is not a tech support question, but a peculiar behavior denoscription that got people into quite a heated exchange during the event, and was seen as something unexpected.
1. Close all programs so your Linux system is idle and no windows are open.
2. Open a terminal and run
3. Vigorously move your mouse in circles or back and forth over the desktop for several seconds, while observing output from
Surprising result: on three tested systems (Linux Mint 22 Cinnamon, Debian 13, Fedora 42 KDE), CPU usage spikes up to 20%, 50% and even up to 100% on one system, just from moving the mouse.
All these systems have desktop GPUs used for playing games - not integrated graphics.
Someone said that they would have expected moving the mouse to not even register in
Does Linux design dedicate a CPU core for processing the mouse?
I thought it would be interesting to poll: how much CPU overhead does moving the mouse result in on your Linux desktop system? Is e.g. 20%-100% CPU usage from moving the mouse nominal/expected on Linux? Does some Linux distro/desktop environment get 0% for mouse?
https://redd.it/1msmuyv
@r_linux
Here's something odd that we found out during a Linux LAN event this weekend. This is not a tech support question, but a peculiar behavior denoscription that got people into quite a heated exchange during the event, and was seen as something unexpected.
1. Close all programs so your Linux system is idle and no windows are open.
2. Open a terminal and run
top.3. Vigorously move your mouse in circles or back and forth over the desktop for several seconds, while observing output from
top.Surprising result: on three tested systems (Linux Mint 22 Cinnamon, Debian 13, Fedora 42 KDE), CPU usage spikes up to 20%, 50% and even up to 100% on one system, just from moving the mouse.
All these systems have desktop GPUs used for playing games - not integrated graphics.
Someone said that they would have expected moving the mouse to not even register in
top, i.e. some 0-1% CPU overhead, and that is what would happen on Windows and on macOS. That got me thinking that surely that couldn't be possible, since the CPU must do some work at least to process the mouse.Does Linux design dedicate a CPU core for processing the mouse?
I thought it would be interesting to poll: how much CPU overhead does moving the mouse result in on your Linux desktop system? Is e.g. 20%-100% CPU usage from moving the mouse nominal/expected on Linux? Does some Linux distro/desktop environment get 0% for mouse?
https://redd.it/1msmuyv
@r_linux
Reddit
From the linux community on Reddit
Explore this post and more from the linux community
I was recently given these manuals and decided to give them a try. I hope I'm up to date.
https://redd.it/1msxhj7
@r_linux
https://redd.it/1msxhj7
@r_linux
Humble Bundle; any of them good?
Humble Bundle currently has a bundle of Linux and Unix related books. I was looking at picking it up. Is this bundle worth picking up? Any books in it specifically a great read or a skip book?
https://www.humblebundle.com/books/linux-complete-pearson-books
https://redd.it/1msxmy4
@r_linux
Humble Bundle currently has a bundle of Linux and Unix related books. I was looking at picking it up. Is this bundle worth picking up? Any books in it specifically a great read or a skip book?
https://www.humblebundle.com/books/linux-complete-pearson-books
https://redd.it/1msxmy4
@r_linux
Humble Bundle
Humble Tech Book Bundle: Linux Complete by Pearson
Unleash your machine’s potential with our latest Humble Tech Book Bundle: Linux Complete—customize, design, and help support The BINC Foundation today!