WATER FLUORIDATION: POISON ON TAP.
“Fluoride is a by-product of aluminium manufacturing and phosphate mining. The toxic waste product is difficult and costly to dispose of and has no commercial value.
Phosphate plants used to release the hazardous vapours into the air via smokestacks but this resulted in the death of cattle and plants on nearby ranches and farms.
Instead, mining companies now use ‘wetscrubbers’ to capture the emissions, which are labelled as fluoride (though technically hexafluorosilic acid and sodium silicofluoride), sold for profit and offloaded in the world’s water supplies”
Link: https://thelightpaper.co.uk/assets/pdf/The-Light-Issue-7-Final.pdf
The fluoridation of public drinking water began in the USA when The Aluminium Company of America had a serious fluorosilicic acid waste disposal problem.
They commissioned a biochemist (Cox) – to find a way to dispose of the substance without cost; he actually did better than that and he managed to sell it.
Cox discovered the town of Hereford in Texas where the locals had good teeth: he also found that the local water supply had natural fluoride in the form of calcium fluoride. Cox announced to the world that the answer to bad teeth was fluoride and the idea took off. The dental health of the town later declined, as it did elsewhere, after radical changes to people’s diets.
Read more about the history of fluoride here: http://nofluoride.com/food_and_water.cfm
“Fluoride is a by-product of aluminium manufacturing and phosphate mining. The toxic waste product is difficult and costly to dispose of and has no commercial value.
Phosphate plants used to release the hazardous vapours into the air via smokestacks but this resulted in the death of cattle and plants on nearby ranches and farms.
Instead, mining companies now use ‘wetscrubbers’ to capture the emissions, which are labelled as fluoride (though technically hexafluorosilic acid and sodium silicofluoride), sold for profit and offloaded in the world’s water supplies”
Link: https://thelightpaper.co.uk/assets/pdf/The-Light-Issue-7-Final.pdf
The fluoridation of public drinking water began in the USA when The Aluminium Company of America had a serious fluorosilicic acid waste disposal problem.
They commissioned a biochemist (Cox) – to find a way to dispose of the substance without cost; he actually did better than that and he managed to sell it.
Cox discovered the town of Hereford in Texas where the locals had good teeth: he also found that the local water supply had natural fluoride in the form of calcium fluoride. Cox announced to the world that the answer to bad teeth was fluoride and the idea took off. The dental health of the town later declined, as it did elsewhere, after radical changes to people’s diets.
Read more about the history of fluoride here: http://nofluoride.com/food_and_water.cfm
The Dangers of Fluoride
“Fluoride is one of the most toxic substances known to man, yet based on its inclusion in virtually every brand of toothpaste, the American Dental Association believes it’s okay to use fluoride for preventative dental care.
Other products, such as bottled water, infant formulas, and even vitamin supplements, now contain fluoride..Material Safety Data Sheets (MSDS) typically label sodium fluoride as “…toxic by ingestion, inhalation and skin contact” and that PPE (personal protection equipment) for handling should include safety glasses and gloves.
Fluorides are more toxic than lead and only slightly less poisonous than arsenic… and these toxins can enter your body from brushing your teeth or rinsing with many popular dental care products…
Every year Poison Control centers receive thousands of calls from people reporting excessive consumption of fluoride-containing products, such as vitamins, toothpaste, mouthwash, etc.
Fluoride poisoning severely damages the body and can be fatal. This lethal chemical creates a toxic state that can cause a variety of harmful effects.”
Link: https://dreddymd.com/2017/03/25/the-dangers-of-fluoride/comment-page-1/
“Fluoride is one of the most toxic substances known to man, yet based on its inclusion in virtually every brand of toothpaste, the American Dental Association believes it’s okay to use fluoride for preventative dental care.
Other products, such as bottled water, infant formulas, and even vitamin supplements, now contain fluoride..Material Safety Data Sheets (MSDS) typically label sodium fluoride as “…toxic by ingestion, inhalation and skin contact” and that PPE (personal protection equipment) for handling should include safety glasses and gloves.
Fluorides are more toxic than lead and only slightly less poisonous than arsenic… and these toxins can enter your body from brushing your teeth or rinsing with many popular dental care products…
Every year Poison Control centers receive thousands of calls from people reporting excessive consumption of fluoride-containing products, such as vitamins, toothpaste, mouthwash, etc.
Fluoride poisoning severely damages the body and can be fatal. This lethal chemical creates a toxic state that can cause a variety of harmful effects.”
Link: https://dreddymd.com/2017/03/25/the-dangers-of-fluoride/comment-page-1/
Dr. Eddy Bettermann MD
The Dangers of Fluoride
Source: The Dangers of Fluoride by Dr. Edward Group Fluoride is one of the most toxic substances known to man, yet based on its inclusion in virtually every brand of toothpaste, the American D…
❤2👍1
Both the Germans and the Russians added fluoride to the drinking water of prisoners of war “to make them stupid and docile”
“At the end of the Second World War, the United States Government sent Charles Elliot Perkins, a research worker in chemistry, biochemistry, physiology and pathology, to take charge of the vast Farben chemical plants in Germany.
While there, he was told by German chemists of a scheme which had been worked out by them during the war and adopted by the German General Staff.
“This scheme was to control the population in any given area through mass medication of drinking water.
In this scheme, sodium fluoride occupied a prominent place.
“Repeated doses of infinitesimal amounts of fluoride will in time reduce an individual’s power to resist domination by slowly poisoning and narcotizing a certain area of the brain, and will thus make him submissive to the will of those who wish to govern him"
“Both the Germans and the Russians added fluoride to the drinking water of prisoners of war to make them stupid and docile"
It is interesting that Dr George Estabrooks, an adviser to the United States Government on hypnotism and psychological behaviour control, later became chairman of the Department of Psychology at Colgate University. Internationally, Colgate was and remains today the most ardent producer and advocate for fluoridated toothpaste.
The use of chemicals by the government to modify the behaviour of select population groups is not new. During the first two World Wars, bromides were administered to service men to dim the libido in an attempt to inhibit forays into local bordellos.
Today, in Australia, the military fluoridates the drinking water of the soldiers, ostensibly to protect the teeth. However, since the mythical ability of fluorides “to prevent tooth decay” only exists for those under the age of 12, it is certain that the real purpose is less altruistic”
Link: https://www.vitelwater.com.au/fluoridation/
“At the end of the Second World War, the United States Government sent Charles Elliot Perkins, a research worker in chemistry, biochemistry, physiology and pathology, to take charge of the vast Farben chemical plants in Germany.
While there, he was told by German chemists of a scheme which had been worked out by them during the war and adopted by the German General Staff.
“This scheme was to control the population in any given area through mass medication of drinking water.
In this scheme, sodium fluoride occupied a prominent place.
“Repeated doses of infinitesimal amounts of fluoride will in time reduce an individual’s power to resist domination by slowly poisoning and narcotizing a certain area of the brain, and will thus make him submissive to the will of those who wish to govern him"
“Both the Germans and the Russians added fluoride to the drinking water of prisoners of war to make them stupid and docile"
It is interesting that Dr George Estabrooks, an adviser to the United States Government on hypnotism and psychological behaviour control, later became chairman of the Department of Psychology at Colgate University. Internationally, Colgate was and remains today the most ardent producer and advocate for fluoridated toothpaste.
The use of chemicals by the government to modify the behaviour of select population groups is not new. During the first two World Wars, bromides were administered to service men to dim the libido in an attempt to inhibit forays into local bordellos.
Today, in Australia, the military fluoridates the drinking water of the soldiers, ostensibly to protect the teeth. However, since the mythical ability of fluorides “to prevent tooth decay” only exists for those under the age of 12, it is certain that the real purpose is less altruistic”
Link: https://www.vitelwater.com.au/fluoridation/
Vitel Water
Flouridation | Removing Flouride from Water | Vitel Water
It is a matter of record that sodium fluoride has been used for behaviour control of populations. Click here to read more...
❤1
The Use Of Fluoridation For Mass Mind Control
Letter received by the Lee Foundation for Nutritional Research, Milwaukee Wisconsin, on 2 October 1954, from Mr. Charles Perkins, a chemist:
"I have your letter of September 29 asking for further documentation regarding a statement made in my book, The Truth About Water Fluoridation, to the effect that the idea of water fluoridation was brought to England from Russia by the Russian Communist Kreminoff.
"In the 1930`s, Hitler and the German Nazi`s envisioned a world to be dominated and controlled by a Nazi philosophy of pan-Germanism. The German chemists worked out a very ingenious and far-reaching plan of mass-control which was submitted to and adopted by the German General Staff. This plan was to control the population in any given area through mass medication of drinking water supplies.
By this method they could control the population in whole areas, reduce population by water medication that would produce sterility in women, and so on. In this scheme of mass-control, sodium fluoride occupied a prominent place. ...
"Repeated doses of infinitesimal amounts of fluoride will in time reduce an individual`s power to resist domination, by slowly poisoning and narcotizing a certain area of the brain, thus making him submissive to the will of those who wish to govern him. [A convenient light lobotomy]….
"The real reason behind water fluoridation is not to benefit children`s teeth. If this were the real reason there are many ways in which it could be done that are much easier, cheaper, and far more effective. The real purpose behind water fluoridation is to reduce the resistance of the masses to domination and control and loss of liberty.
"When the Nazis under Hitler decided to go into Poland, both the German General Staff and the Russian General Staff exchanged scientific and military ideas, plans, and personnel, and the scheme of mass control through water medication was seized upon by the Russian Communists because it fitted ideally into their plan to communize the world. ...
"I was told of this entire scheme by a German chemist who was an official of the great IG Farben chemical industries and was also prominent in the Nazi movement at the time. I say this with all the earnestness and sincerity of a scientist who has spent nearly 20 years` research into the chemistry, biochemistry, physiology and pathology of fluorine--any person who drinks artificially fluorinated water for a period of one year or more will never again be the same person mentally or physically." CHARLES E. PERKINS, Chemist, 2 October 1954”
Link: https://rense.com/general79/hd3.htm
Harley Rivers Dickinson, Liberal Party Member of the Victorian Parliament also referred to the above and raised this issue in 1987 in the Victorian Legislative council on the historical use of fluorides by govts for behavior control:
See page 155: https://www.parliament.vic.gov.au/images/stories/historical_hansard/VicHansard_19870811_19870812.pdf
Letter received by the Lee Foundation for Nutritional Research, Milwaukee Wisconsin, on 2 October 1954, from Mr. Charles Perkins, a chemist:
"I have your letter of September 29 asking for further documentation regarding a statement made in my book, The Truth About Water Fluoridation, to the effect that the idea of water fluoridation was brought to England from Russia by the Russian Communist Kreminoff.
"In the 1930`s, Hitler and the German Nazi`s envisioned a world to be dominated and controlled by a Nazi philosophy of pan-Germanism. The German chemists worked out a very ingenious and far-reaching plan of mass-control which was submitted to and adopted by the German General Staff. This plan was to control the population in any given area through mass medication of drinking water supplies.
By this method they could control the population in whole areas, reduce population by water medication that would produce sterility in women, and so on. In this scheme of mass-control, sodium fluoride occupied a prominent place. ...
"Repeated doses of infinitesimal amounts of fluoride will in time reduce an individual`s power to resist domination, by slowly poisoning and narcotizing a certain area of the brain, thus making him submissive to the will of those who wish to govern him. [A convenient light lobotomy]….
"The real reason behind water fluoridation is not to benefit children`s teeth. If this were the real reason there are many ways in which it could be done that are much easier, cheaper, and far more effective. The real purpose behind water fluoridation is to reduce the resistance of the masses to domination and control and loss of liberty.
"When the Nazis under Hitler decided to go into Poland, both the German General Staff and the Russian General Staff exchanged scientific and military ideas, plans, and personnel, and the scheme of mass control through water medication was seized upon by the Russian Communists because it fitted ideally into their plan to communize the world. ...
"I was told of this entire scheme by a German chemist who was an official of the great IG Farben chemical industries and was also prominent in the Nazi movement at the time. I say this with all the earnestness and sincerity of a scientist who has spent nearly 20 years` research into the chemistry, biochemistry, physiology and pathology of fluorine--any person who drinks artificially fluorinated water for a period of one year or more will never again be the same person mentally or physically." CHARLES E. PERKINS, Chemist, 2 October 1954”
Link: https://rense.com/general79/hd3.htm
Harley Rivers Dickinson, Liberal Party Member of the Victorian Parliament also referred to the above and raised this issue in 1987 in the Victorian Legislative council on the historical use of fluorides by govts for behavior control:
See page 155: https://www.parliament.vic.gov.au/images/stories/historical_hansard/VicHansard_19870811_19870812.pdf
It isn’t just about fluoride in the water either: 20-30% of all prenoscription drugs contain fluoride, milk, toothpaste, mouth washes, dental treatments, supplements and infant formula.
Some of the most common fluorinated prenoscription medications:
The FDA has not approved the use of fluoride in prenoscription or over-the-counter drugs, yet these drugs all contain fluoride:
Statin cholesterol drugs such as atorvastatin (Lipitor), fluvastatin (Lescol)
Fluoroquinolone antibiotics such as ciprofloxacin (Cipro) and levofloxacin (Levaquin)
The antidepressants fluoxetine (Prozac), paroxetine (Paxil), citalopram (Celexa) and escitalopram (Lexapro).
Antifungals such as fluconazole (Diflucan)
Steroids like dexamethasone (Decadron), fluticasone (Flonase) and flunisolide (Nasarel and Nasalide)
The medication used for major depression and obsessive compulsive disorder called fluvoxamine (Luvox)
Link:https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0022113910000722
More info: https://truthaboutfluoride.com/drugs-that-contain-fluoride/
NHS: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/delivering-better-oral-health-an-evidence-based-toolkit-for-prevention/chapter-9-fluoride
Link: https://suzycohen.com/articles/is-your-medication-making-you-sick/
Link :https://fluoridealert.org/news/prenoscription-drugs-that-contain-fluoride/
Some of the most common fluorinated prenoscription medications:
The FDA has not approved the use of fluoride in prenoscription or over-the-counter drugs, yet these drugs all contain fluoride:
Statin cholesterol drugs such as atorvastatin (Lipitor), fluvastatin (Lescol)
Fluoroquinolone antibiotics such as ciprofloxacin (Cipro) and levofloxacin (Levaquin)
The antidepressants fluoxetine (Prozac), paroxetine (Paxil), citalopram (Celexa) and escitalopram (Lexapro).
Antifungals such as fluconazole (Diflucan)
Steroids like dexamethasone (Decadron), fluticasone (Flonase) and flunisolide (Nasarel and Nasalide)
The medication used for major depression and obsessive compulsive disorder called fluvoxamine (Luvox)
Link:https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0022113910000722
More info: https://truthaboutfluoride.com/drugs-that-contain-fluoride/
NHS: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/delivering-better-oral-health-an-evidence-based-toolkit-for-prevention/chapter-9-fluoride
Link: https://suzycohen.com/articles/is-your-medication-making-you-sick/
Link :https://fluoridealert.org/news/prenoscription-drugs-that-contain-fluoride/
👍1
“More than 6million people in England use antidepressants as record number turn to pills during Covid lockdown”
Is it a coincidence that prenoscription medication, containing fluoride and other toxic ingredients has soared in use across the world in recent decades not just in adults but also in children?
Lock down policies of fear and control have helped fuel an even greater uptake as people try to find ways to deal with anxiety, depression and the consequences of stress and an almost solely prenoscription based healthcare system.
Link: https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-9106219/More-6million-people-England-use-antidepressants-record-number-turn-pills-lockdown.html
Is it a coincidence that prenoscription medication, containing fluoride and other toxic ingredients has soared in use across the world in recent decades not just in adults but also in children?
Lock down policies of fear and control have helped fuel an even greater uptake as people try to find ways to deal with anxiety, depression and the consequences of stress and an almost solely prenoscription based healthcare system.
Link: https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-9106219/More-6million-people-England-use-antidepressants-record-number-turn-pills-lockdown.html
Mail Online
More than 6million people in England use antidepressants as record number turn to pills during Covid lockdown, new figures show
A record number of people have been prescribed antidepressants in England as Covid 19 continues to impact our mental health. More than six million people were prescribed the pills.
Countries that fluoridate their water- is this helping to drive compliance?
Does fluoride in the water explain some of the issues of compliance with govt rules and diktats, perhaps not the whole answer but when combined with other sources of fluoride such as the excessive use of prenoscription medication it may help to explain some of it.
“Only 11 countries in the world have more than 50% of their population drinking fluoridated water: Australia (80%).... the Irish Republic (73%), Israel (70% –note that they stopped fluoridation in 2014 and haven’t resumed as of April 2021)....New Zealand (62%)....and the United States (64%)"
Link: https://fluoridealert.org/content/bfs-2012/
Does fluoride in the water explain some of the issues of compliance with govt rules and diktats, perhaps not the whole answer but when combined with other sources of fluoride such as the excessive use of prenoscription medication it may help to explain some of it.
“Only 11 countries in the world have more than 50% of their population drinking fluoridated water: Australia (80%).... the Irish Republic (73%), Israel (70% –note that they stopped fluoridation in 2014 and haven’t resumed as of April 2021)....New Zealand (62%)....and the United States (64%)"
Link: https://fluoridealert.org/content/bfs-2012/
Fluoride Action Network
Countries that Fluoridate Their Water
Quick Facts: Most developed nations do not fluoridate their water. In western Europe, for example, only 3% of the population consumes fluoridated water. While 25 countries have water fluoridation programs, 11 of these countries have less than 20% of their…
The headline is very encouraging. You have to read to the end though to appreciate it’s nothing like normality.
Mike
https://m.theepochtimes.com/mkt_morningbrief/norway-official-covid-19-can-now-be-compared-to-the-flu-as-country-removes-pandemic-restrictions_4014597.html
Mike
https://m.theepochtimes.com/mkt_morningbrief/norway-official-covid-19-can-now-be-compared-to-the-flu-as-country-removes-pandemic-restrictions_4014597.html
The Epoch Times
Norway Official: COVID-19 Can Now Be Compared to the Flu as Country Removes Pandemic Restrictions
Did anyone manage to catch my first Telegram livestream about the London pro-human rights demonstration today? Robin.
How long will it take him to understand that mass rather than targeted 'vaccination' and "leaky vaccines" are what drive new immune eacape variants as opposed to natural immunity which neutralizes them?
"The head of the WHO in Europe has expressed doubts about vaccines' ability to put an end to the Covid pandemic, as new variants dash hopes of reaching herd immunity."
https://www.rte.ie/news/coronavirus/2021/0910/1245839-who-vaccine-pandemic/
"The head of the WHO in Europe has expressed doubts about vaccines' ability to put an end to the Covid pandemic, as new variants dash hopes of reaching herd immunity."
https://www.rte.ie/news/coronavirus/2021/0910/1245839-who-vaccine-pandemic/
RTE.ie
WHO expresses doubts about vaccines ending pandemic
The head of the WHO Europe has expressed doubts about vaccines' ability to put an end to the Covid pandemic, as new variants dash hopes of reaching herd immunity.
❤1
Forwarded from Mike Yeadon
This hopelessly inadequate response to a FOI enquiry should be read in concert with the letter of follow up to MHRAs reply here.
Mike
Ps: apologies if a duplicate. I am running behind thousands of messages.
Mike
Ps: apologies if a duplicate. I am running behind thousands of messages.
Forwarded from Mike Yeadon
From: Stephen Feldman <s.feldman85@yahoo.co.uk>
Date: 25 September 2021 at 08:01:45 GMT-6
To: Pharmacovigilanceservice <pharmacovigilanceservice@mhra.gov.uk>
Cc: "enquiry@logistics.org.uk" <enquiry@logistics.org.uk>, "info@aslef.org.uk" <info@aslef.org.uk>, "balpa@balpa.org" <balpa@balpa.org>, "mail@itf.org.uk" <mail@itf.org.uk>, "etf@etf-europe.org" <etf@etf-europe.org>, "inlandtransport@itf.org.uk" <inlandtransport@itf.org.uk>, "info@rmt.org.uk" <info@rmt.org.uk>, "enquiries@nautilusint.org" <enquiries@nautilusint.org>, "greaterlondonregion@unison.co.uk" <greaterlondonregion@unison.co.uk>, "yhgeneralenquiries@unison.co.uk" <yhgeneralenquiries@unison.co.uk>, "info@bigbrotherwatch.org.uk" <info@bigbrotherwatch.org.uk>, "oxfordhumanrightshub@law.ox.ac.uk" <oxfordhumanrightshub@law.ox.ac.uk>, "info@stagecoachgroup.com" <info@stagecoachgroup.com>, "katie.loudon@stagecoachgroup.com" <katie.loudon@stagecoachgroup.com>, "sales@thekingsferry.co.uk" <sales@thekingsferry.co.uk>, "info@clarkescoaches.co.uk" <info@clarkescoaches.co.uk>, "hello@mhpp.me" <hello@mhpp.me>, "enquiries@arriva.co.uk" <enquiries@arriva.co.uk>, "matthew.gregory@firstgroup.com" <matthew.gregory@firstgroup.com>, "info@bihr.org.uk" <info@bihr.org.uk>
Subject: FOI 21/752 COMPLAINT - URGENT HEALTH AND SAFETY
Communications Directorate,
4-T,
Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency
Re FOI 21/752
cc: Freight Transport Association
cc: International Transport Workers' Federation
cc: Associated Society of Locomotive Engineers and Firemen
cc: British Airline Pilots Association
cc: The National Union of Rail, Maritime and Transport Workers
cc: Nautilus International
cc: Unison
cc: Oxford Human Rights Hub
cc: Big Brother Watch
cc: The British Institute of Human Rights
cc: Various others
Dear MHRA
I am replying independently and in response to your answer to my own freedom of information request and the views expressed here are my own. I would like an internal review of my freedom of information request which asks for data you hold to back your statement:
"The total number and the nature of Yellow Cards reported so far is not unusual for a new vaccine for which members of the public and healthcare professionals are encouraged to report any suspected adverse reaction"
I note that I am replying to your offered email address within your requested 2 month period; today being 25th September and your response date being on 27th July. Ideally I would have thanked you for your reply but I was very disappointed and quite frankly aggrieved that you had not provided the information which I asked for.
Your response was so lacking that I had to seek some help in finding a way to receive an adequate reply. Indeed, I now understand you have received a report from EbMC Squared CIC which was copied to Dr. June Raine of MHRA, Dr. Sarah Branch of MHRA, Professor Anthony Harnden of JCVI, Mrs Madeleine Wang, Ms Sara Payne and more, bearing details of your reply to my freedom of information request along with their complaint that you have not answered my question. The report can be found here: https://ebmcsquared.org/urgent-preliminary-report-of-yellow-card-data
Nothing has been forthcoming. I am therefore asking you again to reply under freedom of information laws of which any citizen would expect to receive the relevant information and in the hope that your response will be adequate.
I now understand from your reply that you are not comparing COVID-19 vaccines to previous UK vaccination campaigns, at least for the purpose of the Yellow Card Summary of Reporting but I actually asked you, the MHRA, for the data to justify your original statement in this report irrespective of which report it was being used for.
I can only conclude from your actions that you have obfuscated me which is not something I would expect from a public health agency and especially one bearing a profound responsibility at this time.
Date: 25 September 2021 at 08:01:45 GMT-6
To: Pharmacovigilanceservice <pharmacovigilanceservice@mhra.gov.uk>
Cc: "enquiry@logistics.org.uk" <enquiry@logistics.org.uk>, "info@aslef.org.uk" <info@aslef.org.uk>, "balpa@balpa.org" <balpa@balpa.org>, "mail@itf.org.uk" <mail@itf.org.uk>, "etf@etf-europe.org" <etf@etf-europe.org>, "inlandtransport@itf.org.uk" <inlandtransport@itf.org.uk>, "info@rmt.org.uk" <info@rmt.org.uk>, "enquiries@nautilusint.org" <enquiries@nautilusint.org>, "greaterlondonregion@unison.co.uk" <greaterlondonregion@unison.co.uk>, "yhgeneralenquiries@unison.co.uk" <yhgeneralenquiries@unison.co.uk>, "info@bigbrotherwatch.org.uk" <info@bigbrotherwatch.org.uk>, "oxfordhumanrightshub@law.ox.ac.uk" <oxfordhumanrightshub@law.ox.ac.uk>, "info@stagecoachgroup.com" <info@stagecoachgroup.com>, "katie.loudon@stagecoachgroup.com" <katie.loudon@stagecoachgroup.com>, "sales@thekingsferry.co.uk" <sales@thekingsferry.co.uk>, "info@clarkescoaches.co.uk" <info@clarkescoaches.co.uk>, "hello@mhpp.me" <hello@mhpp.me>, "enquiries@arriva.co.uk" <enquiries@arriva.co.uk>, "matthew.gregory@firstgroup.com" <matthew.gregory@firstgroup.com>, "info@bihr.org.uk" <info@bihr.org.uk>
Subject: FOI 21/752 COMPLAINT - URGENT HEALTH AND SAFETY
Communications Directorate,
4-T,
Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency
Re FOI 21/752
cc: Freight Transport Association
cc: International Transport Workers' Federation
cc: Associated Society of Locomotive Engineers and Firemen
cc: British Airline Pilots Association
cc: The National Union of Rail, Maritime and Transport Workers
cc: Nautilus International
cc: Unison
cc: Oxford Human Rights Hub
cc: Big Brother Watch
cc: The British Institute of Human Rights
cc: Various others
Dear MHRA
I am replying independently and in response to your answer to my own freedom of information request and the views expressed here are my own. I would like an internal review of my freedom of information request which asks for data you hold to back your statement:
"The total number and the nature of Yellow Cards reported so far is not unusual for a new vaccine for which members of the public and healthcare professionals are encouraged to report any suspected adverse reaction"
I note that I am replying to your offered email address within your requested 2 month period; today being 25th September and your response date being on 27th July. Ideally I would have thanked you for your reply but I was very disappointed and quite frankly aggrieved that you had not provided the information which I asked for.
Your response was so lacking that I had to seek some help in finding a way to receive an adequate reply. Indeed, I now understand you have received a report from EbMC Squared CIC which was copied to Dr. June Raine of MHRA, Dr. Sarah Branch of MHRA, Professor Anthony Harnden of JCVI, Mrs Madeleine Wang, Ms Sara Payne and more, bearing details of your reply to my freedom of information request along with their complaint that you have not answered my question. The report can be found here: https://ebmcsquared.org/urgent-preliminary-report-of-yellow-card-data
Nothing has been forthcoming. I am therefore asking you again to reply under freedom of information laws of which any citizen would expect to receive the relevant information and in the hope that your response will be adequate.
I now understand from your reply that you are not comparing COVID-19 vaccines to previous UK vaccination campaigns, at least for the purpose of the Yellow Card Summary of Reporting but I actually asked you, the MHRA, for the data to justify your original statement in this report irrespective of which report it was being used for.
I can only conclude from your actions that you have obfuscated me which is not something I would expect from a public health agency and especially one bearing a profound responsibility at this time.
EbMCsquared CIC
Urgent Preliminary Report of Yellow Card Data - EbMCsquared CIC
The Yellow Card System is an early warning system where doctors and individuals can report side effects that they suspect correspond with a medicine they have received. It is a vital way of monitoring the safety of medicines and can also identify any issues…
Forwarded from Mike Yeadon
My requests were clear and straightforward and based on the obvious notion which any citizen would conceive from your statement, that indeed you were or still are comparing death and injury figures from other vaccine rollouts and yet you have not provided this data.
I am now forced to find ways to justify my original request which should never happen under these circumstances and this is exactly the kind of problem of which freedom of information laws were designed to tackle but I understand that sadly, other people and entities have also encountered the same sorts of problems with you as I have.
Furthermore, not only have you not issued a retraction to your original statement "The total number and the nature of Yellow Cards reported so far is not unusual for a new vaccine" etc, to my surprise it is in fact still present in your Yellow Card Summary of Reporting which is being published week after week to members of the public and professionals alike. It has to be a grave concern that you are not being forthcoming with the data and so I'm here now writing this request which should have been completely unnecessary.
These are the following points which you've forced me to generate in attending to your obfuscation:
1) You have not stated that you, the MHRA, have not got the data I requested. Rather, you have stated that previous UK vaccine rollouts are not being used as a comparative measure for the purposes of the Yellow Card Summary of Reporting. I'm very concerned that you are tying my question directly to a specific use to avoid answering which has caused myself bewilderment into how I am supposed to obtain a straight answer from a health agency who does this.
2) A regulatory health agency such as yourselves would have a safety first imperative. With such an imperative, with other vaccine rollout death and incident figures available, a very lack of investigation would automatically present the rollout of the COVID-19 vaccines as either expected or unusual through Yellow Card reporting numbers even if in a crude or rough sense, until any concerns, differences or disparities which may arise, could be resolved through investigation as to whether or not they would remain true. Therefore it is not conceivable that you wouldn't hold such information.
3) If you understand reporting figures are higher for COVID-19 vaccines, then you must know the difference between what is expected (usual) and what is unusual. A specific threshold would not be needed to differentiate between these two terms as per your implication that it would as further investigation would resolve this situation as per your safety first imperative. Therefore with your statement contained in the Yellow Card Summary of Reporting in view, I believe you have this data.
4) You would not have been able to generate the statement under my query in the Yellow Card Summary of Reporting without possessing the numbers of deaths and injuries from other vaccines, would not have failed to issue a retraction and would not have left it still in your report week after week.
I understand that the larger scale of the programme, increased public awareness, substantial efforts to engage healthcare professionals and members of the public and also a press release, are most of your reasons provided to me for a higher Yellow Card reporting number which you have admitted. These conceivably would increase the number, I agree. In regards to your advancement of these reasons as an explanation however, I have to say, I don't believe you. A rate of death reporting nearly 30 times higher per dose than for influenza vaccines and you would like a member of the public to believe these reasons accommodate this? EbMC Squared CIC found this vastly important rate yet with no figures to compare with, you won't be able to.
There is something very very wrong here. Your voice in the letter comes across as subdued in a way as to not draw too much attention. I should be hearing conviction behind what you are saying in showing confidence for your course of action but it's not there.
I am now forced to find ways to justify my original request which should never happen under these circumstances and this is exactly the kind of problem of which freedom of information laws were designed to tackle but I understand that sadly, other people and entities have also encountered the same sorts of problems with you as I have.
Furthermore, not only have you not issued a retraction to your original statement "The total number and the nature of Yellow Cards reported so far is not unusual for a new vaccine" etc, to my surprise it is in fact still present in your Yellow Card Summary of Reporting which is being published week after week to members of the public and professionals alike. It has to be a grave concern that you are not being forthcoming with the data and so I'm here now writing this request which should have been completely unnecessary.
These are the following points which you've forced me to generate in attending to your obfuscation:
1) You have not stated that you, the MHRA, have not got the data I requested. Rather, you have stated that previous UK vaccine rollouts are not being used as a comparative measure for the purposes of the Yellow Card Summary of Reporting. I'm very concerned that you are tying my question directly to a specific use to avoid answering which has caused myself bewilderment into how I am supposed to obtain a straight answer from a health agency who does this.
2) A regulatory health agency such as yourselves would have a safety first imperative. With such an imperative, with other vaccine rollout death and incident figures available, a very lack of investigation would automatically present the rollout of the COVID-19 vaccines as either expected or unusual through Yellow Card reporting numbers even if in a crude or rough sense, until any concerns, differences or disparities which may arise, could be resolved through investigation as to whether or not they would remain true. Therefore it is not conceivable that you wouldn't hold such information.
3) If you understand reporting figures are higher for COVID-19 vaccines, then you must know the difference between what is expected (usual) and what is unusual. A specific threshold would not be needed to differentiate between these two terms as per your implication that it would as further investigation would resolve this situation as per your safety first imperative. Therefore with your statement contained in the Yellow Card Summary of Reporting in view, I believe you have this data.
4) You would not have been able to generate the statement under my query in the Yellow Card Summary of Reporting without possessing the numbers of deaths and injuries from other vaccines, would not have failed to issue a retraction and would not have left it still in your report week after week.
I understand that the larger scale of the programme, increased public awareness, substantial efforts to engage healthcare professionals and members of the public and also a press release, are most of your reasons provided to me for a higher Yellow Card reporting number which you have admitted. These conceivably would increase the number, I agree. In regards to your advancement of these reasons as an explanation however, I have to say, I don't believe you. A rate of death reporting nearly 30 times higher per dose than for influenza vaccines and you would like a member of the public to believe these reasons accommodate this? EbMC Squared CIC found this vastly important rate yet with no figures to compare with, you won't be able to.
There is something very very wrong here. Your voice in the letter comes across as subdued in a way as to not draw too much attention. I should be hearing conviction behind what you are saying in showing confidence for your course of action but it's not there.
Forwarded from Mike Yeadon
In fact, I'm not getting any impression that you have a direction. Anyone worth their salt would have known to take a product off the market after a handful of Yellow Card death reports but you don't seem to be able to do that do you? 1645 death reports later and the best you can do is to advance hypothesis instead of taking regulatory action? That's not a possible scenario with a safety first approach. That's not a possible course of action for any public health regulator. You should know CLEARLY what's what. That is what the public expects of you. If somebody was told in the street that a product was generating death reports, the first thing they would ask is if it had been withdrawn, it's human instinct. But 1645 times over, I'm not getting any feel for yours. Who knows how many out there have really been killed? Yellow Card reports are known to provide only 10% of the true number and professional analysis already sent to you indicates that figure is still a gross understatement. Booster jabs are coming. And yet instead of taking action, you are prodding around for reasons whilst rooted to the back of the class. You are completely immobile.
I can give you a reason for you why death reports are this much higher and do you know what that is? It's because you've sat there and done nothing! You may answer that you switched to Pfizer and identified Myocarditis, Capillary Leak Syndrome, Menstrual disorders and all these other problems which these COVID-19 vaccines seem to cause but no matter how many problems you identify, those death reports just keep piling up don't they? A product cannot be rectified without the ability to act upon it and that is precisely what you are not doing. There is no way a public health agency would ever court such disrepute. It just isn't possible.
As a health agency that works for the public, there's nobody at home is there? You've got nothing behind you and it's clear that there cannot be any effective regulation. I don't believe in you. You are not a public health regulator, you are just some people operating their machinery to put on a front to the public. I can see you.
And now I've got two questions for you which you should already have answered responsibly:
"The total number and the nature of Yellow Cards reported so far is not unusual for a new vaccine for which members of the public and healthcare professionals are encouraged to report any suspected adverse reaction"
1. Fitting the above statement, please provide both death and incident figures along with vaccine types and nations of the vaccine rollouts you are referring too as the basis of comparison for coronavirus vaccine Yellow Card reporting not to be unusual.
2. Please provide a list of those vaccine rollouts, including death numbers, incident numbers and nation, fitting your above statement which demonstrated unusual numbers of reporting.
You are not capable of an adequate reply of course. The Information Commissioner has already been contacted in advance and as a result of your conduct, many more contacts are continuing to be made by concerned citizens. My understanding is that you place no limit on the level of death and injury from these vaccines which you will accept. It is up to us therefore to make our own choices now.
Stephen Feldman
I can give you a reason for you why death reports are this much higher and do you know what that is? It's because you've sat there and done nothing! You may answer that you switched to Pfizer and identified Myocarditis, Capillary Leak Syndrome, Menstrual disorders and all these other problems which these COVID-19 vaccines seem to cause but no matter how many problems you identify, those death reports just keep piling up don't they? A product cannot be rectified without the ability to act upon it and that is precisely what you are not doing. There is no way a public health agency would ever court such disrepute. It just isn't possible.
As a health agency that works for the public, there's nobody at home is there? You've got nothing behind you and it's clear that there cannot be any effective regulation. I don't believe in you. You are not a public health regulator, you are just some people operating their machinery to put on a front to the public. I can see you.
And now I've got two questions for you which you should already have answered responsibly:
"The total number and the nature of Yellow Cards reported so far is not unusual for a new vaccine for which members of the public and healthcare professionals are encouraged to report any suspected adverse reaction"
1. Fitting the above statement, please provide both death and incident figures along with vaccine types and nations of the vaccine rollouts you are referring too as the basis of comparison for coronavirus vaccine Yellow Card reporting not to be unusual.
2. Please provide a list of those vaccine rollouts, including death numbers, incident numbers and nation, fitting your above statement which demonstrated unusual numbers of reporting.
You are not capable of an adequate reply of course. The Information Commissioner has already been contacted in advance and as a result of your conduct, many more contacts are continuing to be made by concerned citizens. My understanding is that you place no limit on the level of death and injury from these vaccines which you will accept. It is up to us therefore to make our own choices now.
Stephen Feldman
❤1
I think we would all do well to retain a copy of this summary of 30 important facts related to the entire crisis.
While it’s unlikely to shift anyone clinging, barnacle-like to the official narrative, anyone now openly questioning WTH is going on will find it a real eye-opener!
Best wishes
Dr Mike Yeadon
https://off-guardian.org/2021/09/22/30-facts-you-need-to-know-your-covid-cribsheet/
While it’s unlikely to shift anyone clinging, barnacle-like to the official narrative, anyone now openly questioning WTH is going on will find it a real eye-opener!
Best wishes
Dr Mike Yeadon
https://off-guardian.org/2021/09/22/30-facts-you-need-to-know-your-covid-cribsheet/
OffGuardian
30 facts you NEED to know: Your Covid Cribsheet
We get a lot of e-mails and private messages along these lines “do you have a source for X?” or “can you point me to mask studies?” or “I know I saw a graph for mortal…
This article is as good as its noscript indicates.
MHRA’s response under a FOI request does correctly list the total number of deaths associated with covid19 vaccination (by product) & it’s clear there have been 4X as many deaths after covid19 vaccination than after ALL OTHER VACCINES COMBINED SINCE 2001.
This is NOT NORMAL.
Why have these experimental treatments not been withdrawn?
What is wrong with staff at MHRA?
Why have there not been a rush of resignations especially of senior people at the end of their careers?
I genuinely don’t understand how anyone can remain employed there when they’ve an option to resign & retire.
Best wishes
Dr Mike Yeadon
https://theexpose.uk/2021/09/25/uk-medicine-regulator-confirms-there-have-been-four-times-as-many-deaths-due-to-the-covid-19-vaccines-in-8-months-than-deaths-due-to-all-other-vaccines-combined-in-20-years/
MHRA’s response under a FOI request does correctly list the total number of deaths associated with covid19 vaccination (by product) & it’s clear there have been 4X as many deaths after covid19 vaccination than after ALL OTHER VACCINES COMBINED SINCE 2001.
This is NOT NORMAL.
Why have these experimental treatments not been withdrawn?
What is wrong with staff at MHRA?
Why have there not been a rush of resignations especially of senior people at the end of their careers?
I genuinely don’t understand how anyone can remain employed there when they’ve an option to resign & retire.
Best wishes
Dr Mike Yeadon
https://theexpose.uk/2021/09/25/uk-medicine-regulator-confirms-there-have-been-four-times-as-many-deaths-due-to-the-covid-19-vaccines-in-8-months-than-deaths-due-to-all-other-vaccines-combined-in-20-years/
The Expose - Home
UK Medicine Regulator confirms there have been four times as many deaths due to the Covid-19 Vaccines in 8 months than deaths due…
The UK Medicine Regulator has responded to a Freedom of Information request demanding to know how many deaths have occurred in the past 20 years due to all vaccines, and their response has revealed that there have been four times as many deaths in just eight…
AFFIDAVIT OF LTC. THERESA LONG M.D. IN SUPPORT OF A MOTION FOR A PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION ORDER
Extracts:
“I personally observed the most physically fit female Soldier I have seen in over 20 years in the Army, go from Colligate level athlete training for Ranger School, to being physically debilitated with cardiac problems, newly diagnosed pituitary brain tumor, thyroid dysfunction within weeks of getting vaccinated. Several military physicians have shared with me their firsthand experience with a significant increase in the number of young Soldiers with migraines, menstrual irregularities, cancer, suspected myocarditis and reporting cardiac symptoms after vaccination”
“Numerous Soldiers and DOD civilians have told me of how they were sick, bed-ridden, debilitated, and unable to work for days to weeks after vaccination. I have also recently reviewed three flight crew members’ medical records, all of which presented with both significant and aggressive systemic health issues. Today I received word of one fatality and two ICU cases on Fort Hood; the deceased was an Army pilot who could have been flying at the time. All three pulmonary embolism events happened within 48 hours of their vaccination... The subject matter of this Motion for a Preliminary Injunction and its devastating effects on members of the military compel me to conclude and conduct accordingly as follows…”.
“That, in accordance with the foregoing, I hereby recommend to the Secretary of Defense that all pilots, crew and flight personnel in the military service who required hospitalization from injection or received any Covid 19 vaccination be grounded similarly for further dispositive assessment.”
“That this Court should grant an immediate injunction to stop the further harm to all military personnel to protect the health and safety of our active duty, reservists and National Guard troops”
Link: https://www.deepcapture.com/2021/09/affidavit-of-ltc-theresa-long-m-d-in-support-of-a-motion-for-a-preliminary-injunction-order/
Extracts:
“I personally observed the most physically fit female Soldier I have seen in over 20 years in the Army, go from Colligate level athlete training for Ranger School, to being physically debilitated with cardiac problems, newly diagnosed pituitary brain tumor, thyroid dysfunction within weeks of getting vaccinated. Several military physicians have shared with me their firsthand experience with a significant increase in the number of young Soldiers with migraines, menstrual irregularities, cancer, suspected myocarditis and reporting cardiac symptoms after vaccination”
“Numerous Soldiers and DOD civilians have told me of how they were sick, bed-ridden, debilitated, and unable to work for days to weeks after vaccination. I have also recently reviewed three flight crew members’ medical records, all of which presented with both significant and aggressive systemic health issues. Today I received word of one fatality and two ICU cases on Fort Hood; the deceased was an Army pilot who could have been flying at the time. All three pulmonary embolism events happened within 48 hours of their vaccination... The subject matter of this Motion for a Preliminary Injunction and its devastating effects on members of the military compel me to conclude and conduct accordingly as follows…”.
“That, in accordance with the foregoing, I hereby recommend to the Secretary of Defense that all pilots, crew and flight personnel in the military service who required hospitalization from injection or received any Covid 19 vaccination be grounded similarly for further dispositive assessment.”
“That this Court should grant an immediate injunction to stop the further harm to all military personnel to protect the health and safety of our active duty, reservists and National Guard troops”
Link: https://www.deepcapture.com/2021/09/affidavit-of-ltc-theresa-long-m-d-in-support-of-a-motion-for-a-preliminary-injunction-order/