Did anyone manage to catch my first Telegram livestream about the London pro-human rights demonstration today? Robin.

How long will it take him to understand that mass rather than targeted 'vaccination' and "leaky vaccines" are what drive new immune eacape variants as opposed to natural immunity which neutralizes them?

"The head of the WHO in Europe has expressed doubts about vaccines' ability to put an end to the Covid pandemic, as new variants dash hopes of reaching herd immunity."

https://www.rte.ie/news/coronavirus/2021/0910/1245839-who-vaccine-pandemic/

The Lightpaper September 13th

This hopelessly inadequate response to a FOI enquiry should be read in concert with the letter of follow up to MHRAs reply here.
Mike
Ps: apologies if a duplicate. I am running behind thousands of messages.

From: Stephen Feldman <s.feldman85@yahoo.co.uk>
Date: 25 September 2021 at 08:01:45 GMT-6
To: Pharmacovigilanceservice <pharmacovigilanceservice@mhra.gov.uk>
Cc: "enquiry@logistics.org.uk" <enquiry@logistics.org.uk>, "info@aslef.org.uk" <info@aslef.org.uk>, "balpa@balpa.org" <balpa@balpa.org>, "mail@itf.org.uk" <mail@itf.org.uk>, "etf@etf-europe.org" <etf@etf-europe.org>, "inlandtransport@itf.org.uk" <inlandtransport@itf.org.uk>, "info@rmt.org.uk" <info@rmt.org.uk>, "enquiries@nautilusint.org" <enquiries@nautilusint.org>, "greaterlondonregion@unison.co.uk" <greaterlondonregion@unison.co.uk>, "yhgeneralenquiries@unison.co.uk" <yhgeneralenquiries@unison.co.uk>, "info@bigbrotherwatch.org.uk" <info@bigbrotherwatch.org.uk>, "oxfordhumanrightshub@law.ox.ac.uk" <oxfordhumanrightshub@law.ox.ac.uk>, "info@stagecoachgroup.com" <info@stagecoachgroup.com>, "katie.loudon@stagecoachgroup.com" <katie.loudon@stagecoachgroup.com>, "sales@thekingsferry.co.uk" <sales@thekingsferry.co.uk>, "info@clarkescoaches.co.uk" <info@clarkescoaches.co.uk>, "hello@mhpp.me" <hello@mhpp.me>, "enquiries@arriva.co.uk" <enquiries@arriva.co.uk>, "matthew.gregory@firstgroup.com" <matthew.gregory@firstgroup.com>, "info@bihr.org.uk" <info@bihr.org.uk>
Subject: FOI 21/752 COMPLAINT - URGENT HEALTH AND SAFETY


Communications Directorate, 
4-T, 
Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency


Re FOI 21/752

cc: Freight Transport Association
cc: International Transport Workers' Federation
cc: Associated Society of Locomotive Engineers and Firemen
cc: British Airline Pilots Association
cc: The National Union of Rail, Maritime and Transport Workers
cc: Nautilus International
cc: Unison
cc: Oxford Human Rights Hub
cc: Big Brother Watch
cc: The British Institute of Human Rights

cc: Various others


Dear MHRA

I am replying independently and in response to your answer to my own freedom of information request and the views expressed here are my own. I would like an internal review of my freedom of information request which asks for data you hold to back your statement:

"The total number and the nature of Yellow Cards reported so far is not unusual for a new vaccine for which members of the public and healthcare professionals are encouraged to report any suspected adverse reaction"

I note that I am replying to your offered email address within your requested 2 month period; today being 25th September and your response date being on 27th July. Ideally I would have thanked you for your reply but I was very disappointed and quite frankly aggrieved that you had not provided the information which I asked for. 

Your response was so lacking that I had to seek some help in finding a way to receive an adequate reply. Indeed, I now understand you have received a report from EbMC Squared CIC which was copied to Dr. June Raine of MHRA, Dr. Sarah Branch of MHRA, Professor Anthony Harnden of JCVI, Mrs Madeleine Wang, Ms Sara Payne and more, bearing details of your reply to my freedom of information request along with their complaint that you have not answered my question. The report can be found here: https://ebmcsquared.org/urgent-preliminary-report-of-yellow-card-data

Nothing has been forthcoming. I am therefore asking you again to reply under freedom of information laws of which any citizen would expect to receive the relevant information and in the hope that your response will be adequate.

I now understand from your reply that you are not comparing COVID-19 vaccines to previous UK vaccination campaigns, at least for the purpose of the Yellow Card Summary of Reporting but I actually asked you, the MHRA, for the data to justify your original statement in this report irrespective of which report it was being used for.

I can only conclude from your actions that you have obfuscated me which is not something I would expect from a public health agency and especially one bearing a profound responsibility at this time.

My requests were clear and straightforward and based on the obvious notion which any citizen would conceive from your statement, that indeed you were or still are comparing death and injury figures from other vaccine rollouts and yet you have not provided this data. 

I am now forced to find ways to justify my original request which should never happen under these circumstances and this is exactly the kind of problem of which freedom of information laws were designed to tackle but I understand that sadly, other people and entities have also encountered the same sorts of problems with you as I have.

Furthermore, not only have you not issued a retraction to your original statement "The total number and the nature of Yellow Cards reported so far is not unusual for a new vaccine" etc, to my surprise it is in fact still present in your Yellow Card Summary of Reporting which is being published week after week to members of the public and professionals alike. It has to be a grave concern that you are not being forthcoming with the data and so I'm here now writing this request which should have been completely unnecessary.

These are the following points which you've forced me to generate in attending to your obfuscation:


1) You have not stated that you, the MHRA, have not got the data I requested. Rather, you have stated that previous UK vaccine rollouts are not being used as a comparative measure for the purposes of the Yellow Card Summary of Reporting. I'm very concerned that you are tying my question directly to a specific use to avoid answering which has caused myself bewilderment into how I am supposed to obtain a straight answer from a health agency who does this.

2) A regulatory health agency such as yourselves would have a safety first imperative. With such an imperative, with other vaccine rollout death and incident figures available, a very lack of investigation would automatically present the rollout of the COVID-19 vaccines as either expected or unusual through Yellow Card reporting numbers even if in a crude or rough sense, until any concerns, differences or disparities which may arise, could be resolved through investigation as to whether or not they would remain true. Therefore it is not conceivable that you wouldn't hold such information.

3) If you understand reporting figures are higher for COVID-19 vaccines, then you must know the difference between what is expected (usual) and what is unusual. A specific threshold would not be needed to differentiate between these two terms as per your implication that it would as further investigation would resolve this situation as per your safety first imperative. Therefore with your statement contained in the Yellow Card Summary of Reporting in view, I believe you have this data.

4) You would not have been able to generate the statement under my query in the Yellow Card Summary of Reporting without possessing the numbers of deaths and injuries from other vaccines, would not have failed to issue a retraction and would not have left it still in your report week after week.

I understand that the larger scale of the programme, increased public awareness, substantial efforts to engage healthcare professionals and members of the public and also a press release, are most of your reasons provided to me for a higher Yellow Card reporting number which you have admitted.  These conceivably would increase the number, I agree. In regards to your advancement of these reasons as an explanation however, I have to say, I don't believe you.  A rate of death reporting nearly 30 times higher per dose than for influenza vaccines and you would like a member of the public to believe these reasons accommodate this? EbMC Squared CIC found this vastly important rate yet with no figures to compare with, you won't be able to.

There is something very very wrong here. Your voice in the letter comes across as subdued in a way as to not draw too much attention. I should be hearing conviction behind what you are saying in showing confidence for your course of action but it's not there.

In fact, I'm not getting any impression that you have a direction. Anyone worth their salt would have known to take a product off the market after a handful of Yellow Card death reports but you don't seem to be able to do that do you? 1645 death reports later and the best you can do is to advance hypothesis instead of taking regulatory action? That's not a possible scenario with a safety first approach. That's not a possible course of action for any public health regulator. You should know CLEARLY what's what. That is what the public expects of you. If somebody was told in the street that a product was generating death reports, the first thing they would ask is if it had been withdrawn, it's human instinct. But 1645 times over, I'm not getting any feel for yours. Who knows how many out there have really been killed? Yellow Card reports are known to provide only 10% of the true number and professional analysis already sent to you indicates that figure is still a gross understatement. Booster jabs are coming. And yet instead of taking action, you are prodding around for reasons whilst rooted to the back of the class. You are completely immobile. 

I can give you a reason for you why death reports are this much higher and do you know what that is? It's because you've sat there and done nothing! You may answer that you switched to Pfizer and identified Myocarditis, Capillary Leak Syndrome, Menstrual disorders and all these other problems which these COVID-19 vaccines seem to cause but no matter how many problems you identify, those death reports just keep piling up don't they? A product cannot be rectified without the ability to act upon it and that is precisely what you are not doing. There is no way a public health agency would ever court such disrepute. It just isn't possible. 

As a health agency that works for the public, there's nobody at home is there? You've got nothing behind you and it's clear that there cannot be any effective regulation. I don't believe in you. You are not a public health regulator, you are just some people operating their machinery to put on a front to the public. I can see you.

And now I've got two questions for you which you should already have answered responsibly:


"The total number and the nature of Yellow Cards reported so far is not unusual for a new vaccine for which members of the public and healthcare professionals are encouraged to report any suspected adverse reaction"

1.  Fitting the above statement, please provide both death and incident figures along with vaccine types and nations of the vaccine rollouts you are referring too as the basis of comparison for coronavirus vaccine Yellow Card reporting not to be unusual.

2. Please provide a list of those vaccine rollouts, including death numbers, incident numbers and nation, fitting your above statement which demonstrated unusual numbers of reporting.


You are not capable of an adequate reply of course. The Information Commissioner has already been contacted in advance and as a result of your conduct, many more contacts are continuing to be made by concerned citizens. My understanding is that you place no limit on the level of death and injury from these vaccines which you will accept. It is up to us therefore to make our own choices now.

Stephen Feldman

I think we would all do well to retain a copy of this summary of 30 important facts related to the entire crisis.
While it’s unlikely to shift anyone clinging, barnacle-like to the official narrative, anyone now openly questioning WTH is going on will find it a real eye-opener!
Best wishes
Dr Mike Yeadon

https://off-guardian.org/2021/09/22/30-facts-you-need-to-know-your-covid-cribsheet/

This article is as good as its noscript indicates.
MHRA’s response under a FOI request does correctly list the total number of deaths associated with covid19 vaccination (by product) & it’s clear there have been 4X as many deaths after covid19 vaccination than after ALL OTHER VACCINES COMBINED SINCE 2001.
This is NOT NORMAL.
Why have these experimental treatments not been withdrawn?
What is wrong with staff at MHRA?
Why have there not been a rush of resignations especially of senior people at the end of their careers?
I genuinely don’t understand how anyone can remain employed there when they’ve an option to resign & retire.
Best wishes
Dr Mike Yeadon

https://theexpose.uk/2021/09/25/uk-medicine-regulator-confirms-there-have-been-four-times-as-many-deaths-due-to-the-covid-19-vaccines-in-8-months-than-deaths-due-to-all-other-vaccines-combined-in-20-years/

AFFIDAVIT OF LTC. THERESA LONG M.D. IN SUPPORT OF A MOTION FOR A PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION ORDER

Extracts:

“I personally observed the most physically fit female Soldier I have seen in over 20 years in the Army, go from Colligate level athlete training for Ranger School, to being physically debilitated with cardiac problems, newly diagnosed pituitary brain tumor, thyroid dysfunction within weeks of getting vaccinated. Several military physicians have shared with me their firsthand experience with a significant increase in the number of young Soldiers with migraines, menstrual irregularities, cancer, suspected myocarditis and reporting cardiac symptoms after vaccination”

“Numerous Soldiers and DOD civilians have told me of how they were sick, bed-ridden, debilitated, and unable to work for days to weeks after vaccination. I have also recently reviewed three flight crew members’ medical records, all of which presented with both significant and aggressive systemic health issues. Today I received word of one fatality and two ICU cases on Fort Hood; the deceased was an Army pilot who could have been flying at the time. All three pulmonary embolism events happened within 48 hours of their vaccination... The subject matter of this Motion for a Preliminary Injunction and its devastating effects on members of the military compel me to conclude and conduct accordingly as follows…”.

“That, in accordance with the foregoing, I hereby recommend to the Secretary of Defense that all pilots, crew and flight personnel in the military service who required hospitalization from injection or received any Covid 19 vaccination be grounded similarly for further dispositive assessment.”

“That this Court should grant an immediate injunction to stop the further harm to all military personnel to protect the health and safety of our active duty, reservists and National Guard troops”

Link: https://www.deepcapture.com/2021/09/affidavit-of-ltc-theresa-long-m-d-in-support-of-a-motion-for-a-preliminary-injunction-order/

NHS email below sent to the Headteacher of a SEN school from a COMMUNITY HEALTHCARE NHS FUNDATION TRUST about the upcoming "vaccination" of children:

The second requirement on the list is the availability of “1-2 Crash Mats” for the day of the "vaccinations" .

How is it that this is still not raising alarm bells in ALL teaching staff seeing these emails?


"XXXXX COMMUNITY HEALTHCARE NHS FUNDATION TRUST


Dear Head Teacher,

We would like to offer you a Covid 19 vaccination session in xxxx School on xxxx.

The consent forms will be with you as soon as possible and we will collect them 2-3 days before the session.

Please can the consent forms could be distributed to pupils in years 7 to 11 as soon as possible before the session if possible.

We would be grateful if you could share with us electronic up to date class lists preferably with the pupils’ names, dates of birth, addresses and contact numbers of parents – this will support the immunisation team to answer any queries that may arise from information provided on the consent forms.

We are allowed by law to have consent for vaccinations confirmed in writing or verbally by someone with parental responsibility.

We would ask that the hall is prepared ready for the immunisation team to arrive at 8am. The session requires:

2 members of school staff to support

1-2 Crash Mats

Supply of water and plastic cups

1 table and 3 chairs per nurse (1 nurse ) – set up 2 metres apart

1 table and 2 chairs for clerks

4 large tables for Vaccine Diluters and 4 chairs

An adjacent room/screened area for privacy –if possible

Chairs or PE benches for waiting prior to vaccination - to sit 20 – 30 children

Chairs or PE benches for waiting after vaccination – to sit 20 – 30 children

Please note: Pupils will be advised to wait for 15 minutes after vaccinations.

Are you happy for us to leave double bagged PPE and general waste on site?

An up-to-date class list for the Year Group will be requested by the immunisation team- this is to help us to keep track of pupils who leave or are new to the school

Regards

XXXXX
Schools Immunisation Team"


Perhaps get in touch with your local COMMUNITY HEALTHCARE NHS FUNDATION TRUST and find out if this is a standard email that all Trusts are sending and ask why they are requesting crash mats be present at the vaccination of children.

Parents should also write to their children's schools to clarify whether they do or do not consent to the school handing over any further personal details of their children or themselves to the NHS.

MILAN 🇮🇹 Pro-human rights demonstrators break through police lines. The "GreenPass" is being resisted by the section of the population which is corageous enough to fight for its freedom from endless and needless coerced tests or injections.

ROME 🇮🇹 Pro-human rights demonstration of resistance to the "GreenPass".

LOVEnotfear @LOVEnotfearmankind

Watch "ABYSSINIANS - Declaration Of Rights [1971]" on YouTube
https://youtu.be/Jba2HtUPpQI

REALLY IMPORTANT INFORMATION FOR THE PEOPLE OF UNITED KINGDOM:

Almost everyone in the younger age range already have antibodies to SARS-CoV-2. Close to 90%.

This cohort could NEVER have benefitted from covid19 vaccines because their risks of serious illnesses or death was so low, it made no sense to even offer them.

Now we know that it’s even worse: they’re MORE likely to be injured if vaccinated because they already memorised all parts of the virus (& similar variants & related pathogens).

Please DIScourage any young people you know not to get vaccinated especially for non medical reasons.

It’s pure tyranny, what’s being forced upon us, and it’ll only stop when enough of say “No. Now, get lost”.

Mike

Ian Brown's music choice

LOVEnotfear @LOVEnotfearmankind

Watch "LUKAS LION - 1984" on YouTube
https://youtu.be/4X1A5gxJn_I

Please ignore the earlier message. It’s got a typo where it couldn’t be worse (more ambiguous if not the opposite of my intention, so sorry).

Replace with THIS LATER VERSION. Thank you for pointing out the error. I am unable to edit it, hence a replacement message & this plea.

Cheers
Mike Y

REALLY IMPORTANT INFORMATION FOR THE PEOPLE OF UNITED KINGDOM:

Almost everyone in the younger age range already have antibodies to SARS-CoV-2. Close to 90%.

This cohort could NEVER have benefitted from covid19 vaccines because their risks of serious illnesses or death was so low, it made no sense to even offer them.

Now we know that it’s even worse: they’re MORE likely to be injured if vaccinated because they already memorised all parts of the virus (& similar variants & related pathogens).

Please encourage any young people you know NOT to get vaccinated (especially for non medical reasons).

Repeat: don’t get vaccinated. Don’t let anyone pressure you into it. Don’t let them seduce you with bits of your own freedoms back. Just NO.

It’s pure tyranny, what’s being forced upon us, and it’ll only stop when enough of say “No. Now, get lost”.

Mike