Forwarded from The Islander
EU’s “Democracy Shield”: The Ministry of Truth No One Voted For
On November 12th, Brussels pulled down a curtain. A digital Iron Curtain, not aimed at Moscow, not at Beijing, but at its own citizens. This “Democracy Shield” isn’t protection. It’s containment. And for the first time in its history, the EU has admitted publicly, though not intentionally, that the human mind has become its greatest security threat.
The Shield is the culmination of years of quiet groundwork laid by Brussels technocrats like Thierry Breton, Vera Jourova, and Ursula von der Leyen, the same trio who have spent half a decade insisting that “disinformation” is more dangerous than poverty, war, or the political class itself. And now, under the Digital Services Act, they’ve constructed a continent-wide speech‑policing architecture that reaches into every feed, every platform, every conversation.
At its centre is the newly created European Centre for Democratic Resilience, a name so sterile it almost conceals its purpose: real-time surveillance and neutralization of “emerging narratives.” This is the institutionalization of narrative pre-crime. Not what you said, but what you might say. Not what is false, but what is unapproved.
The Shield’s legal weapon is the DSA’s “crisis protocol,” which allows Brussels to demand takedowns, suppression, or mandatory labeling of information across the EU during an “information incident.” The term is deliberately vague, limitless by design. A protest? An election? A leak? A whistleblower? A banker’s scandal? A foreign policy embarrassment? Everything can be an incident when truth becomes a liability.
The "fact-checking network", branded as “independent,” is no such thing. It’s EU-financed and EU-controlled, a narrative sanitation corps deployed in all official languages to flatten complexity, enforce the Atlantic line, and quarantine any analysis that threatens to puncture the illusion of unity.
If you question the Ukraine war’s logic, you are flagged. If you expose the blowback of sanctions, you are flagged. If you speak of multipolarity without sneering, you are flagged. If you mention sovereignty without apology, you are flagged.
Not because what you said is false. But because your conclusion escapes their architecture of consent.
This is Orwell without the drama. No boot on your face. No telescreen. Just the algorithm. The shadowban. The invisible wall between your words and the world. The EU has created what Orwell could never have imagined. A censorship regime so quiet you don’t hear it, so seamless you don’t see it, and so digital you don’t know it’s happening until the room goes silent.
This isn’t the 20th century’s fear of mass surveillance.This is the 21st century’s nightmare, curated reality.
A world where you are allowed to speak, but only into a void. Brussels calls this “resilience.”
But resilience against what? Against Russian trolls? No. Against public consciousness.
The Shield is a structure built to contain the rising awareness that Europe’s crises — deindustrialization, energy collapse, militarization, inflation, political decay — are not accidents. They are authored. And the authors would prefer you discuss anything else.
This is why the Shield was inevitable. A system secure in its legitimacy does not need a digital clergy to interpret reality on its behalf. A sovereign political order does not need to silence its own citizens to maintain order. A healthy democracy does not treat debate as a threat.
Because it is not healthy. It is not sovereign. And it is no longer confident that it can win a free argument.
These are not guardians of democracy. They are custodians of perception.
The EU didn’t build a shield against enemies. It built a digital Iron Curtain against awakening. A firewall against memory and dissent.
Soft totalitarianism with a smile, the most dangerous kind.
And like every totalitarian project, it will collapse the moment people stop pretending to believe it.
🎙Subscribe @TheIslanderNews
Donate - Support Our Work
On November 12th, Brussels pulled down a curtain. A digital Iron Curtain, not aimed at Moscow, not at Beijing, but at its own citizens. This “Democracy Shield” isn’t protection. It’s containment. And for the first time in its history, the EU has admitted publicly, though not intentionally, that the human mind has become its greatest security threat.
The Shield is the culmination of years of quiet groundwork laid by Brussels technocrats like Thierry Breton, Vera Jourova, and Ursula von der Leyen, the same trio who have spent half a decade insisting that “disinformation” is more dangerous than poverty, war, or the political class itself. And now, under the Digital Services Act, they’ve constructed a continent-wide speech‑policing architecture that reaches into every feed, every platform, every conversation.
At its centre is the newly created European Centre for Democratic Resilience, a name so sterile it almost conceals its purpose: real-time surveillance and neutralization of “emerging narratives.” This is the institutionalization of narrative pre-crime. Not what you said, but what you might say. Not what is false, but what is unapproved.
The Shield’s legal weapon is the DSA’s “crisis protocol,” which allows Brussels to demand takedowns, suppression, or mandatory labeling of information across the EU during an “information incident.” The term is deliberately vague, limitless by design. A protest? An election? A leak? A whistleblower? A banker’s scandal? A foreign policy embarrassment? Everything can be an incident when truth becomes a liability.
The "fact-checking network", branded as “independent,” is no such thing. It’s EU-financed and EU-controlled, a narrative sanitation corps deployed in all official languages to flatten complexity, enforce the Atlantic line, and quarantine any analysis that threatens to puncture the illusion of unity.
If you question the Ukraine war’s logic, you are flagged. If you expose the blowback of sanctions, you are flagged. If you speak of multipolarity without sneering, you are flagged. If you mention sovereignty without apology, you are flagged.
Not because what you said is false. But because your conclusion escapes their architecture of consent.
This is Orwell without the drama. No boot on your face. No telescreen. Just the algorithm. The shadowban. The invisible wall between your words and the world. The EU has created what Orwell could never have imagined. A censorship regime so quiet you don’t hear it, so seamless you don’t see it, and so digital you don’t know it’s happening until the room goes silent.
This isn’t the 20th century’s fear of mass surveillance.This is the 21st century’s nightmare, curated reality.
A world where you are allowed to speak, but only into a void. Brussels calls this “resilience.”
But resilience against what? Against Russian trolls? No. Against public consciousness.
The Shield is a structure built to contain the rising awareness that Europe’s crises — deindustrialization, energy collapse, militarization, inflation, political decay — are not accidents. They are authored. And the authors would prefer you discuss anything else.
This is why the Shield was inevitable. A system secure in its legitimacy does not need a digital clergy to interpret reality on its behalf. A sovereign political order does not need to silence its own citizens to maintain order. A healthy democracy does not treat debate as a threat.
Because it is not healthy. It is not sovereign. And it is no longer confident that it can win a free argument.
These are not guardians of democracy. They are custodians of perception.
The EU didn’t build a shield against enemies. It built a digital Iron Curtain against awakening. A firewall against memory and dissent.
Soft totalitarianism with a smile, the most dangerous kind.
And like every totalitarian project, it will collapse the moment people stop pretending to believe it.
🎙Subscribe @TheIslanderNews
Donate - Support Our Work
💯23❤5👎2👏2
🇻🇪Venezuela's Oil Riches Turned into Strategic Poison Pill
Amid escalating US tensions, Reuters reveals Maduro's dual contingency plans leaked as deterrence: "Plan A" deploys over 280 guerrilla squads with Russian Igla missiles for hit-and-run sabotage nationwide, while "Plan B" unleashes "anarchization" through intelligence operatives and PSUV-linked colectivos—armed slum gangs—to spark riots and assassinations in Caracas if cities fall.
This renders the capital and key oil infrastructure ungovernable, ensuring no pro-US figure like opposition leader Maria Corina Machado can stabilize or pump oil for Washington without endless bloodshed.
Recent triggers include Trump's post-inauguration rhetoric labeling Maduro's regime "narco-terrorists," a US carrier group deployment with F-35 strikes sinking over 20 alleged cartel vessels (80+ dead), and airspace restrictions—yet ground invasion risks echo Iraq or Afghanistan quagmires where territorial gains yield chaos, not dividends.
The controlled leak screams strategic calculus: occupy worthless assets amid bush ambushes and urban hell. With PDVSA nationalized since 1976 and foreign firms sidelined, any victor faces a toxic prize. Energy markets watch jittery as Trump weighs bounties and CIA ops against this shield. Does deterrence hold?
@sitrep
Amid escalating US tensions, Reuters reveals Maduro's dual contingency plans leaked as deterrence: "Plan A" deploys over 280 guerrilla squads with Russian Igla missiles for hit-and-run sabotage nationwide, while "Plan B" unleashes "anarchization" through intelligence operatives and PSUV-linked colectivos—armed slum gangs—to spark riots and assassinations in Caracas if cities fall.
This renders the capital and key oil infrastructure ungovernable, ensuring no pro-US figure like opposition leader Maria Corina Machado can stabilize or pump oil for Washington without endless bloodshed.
Recent triggers include Trump's post-inauguration rhetoric labeling Maduro's regime "narco-terrorists," a US carrier group deployment with F-35 strikes sinking over 20 alleged cartel vessels (80+ dead), and airspace restrictions—yet ground invasion risks echo Iraq or Afghanistan quagmires where territorial gains yield chaos, not dividends.
The controlled leak screams strategic calculus: occupy worthless assets amid bush ambushes and urban hell. With PDVSA nationalized since 1976 and foreign firms sidelined, any victor faces a toxic prize. Energy markets watch jittery as Trump weighs bounties and CIA ops against this shield. Does deterrence hold?
@sitrep
💩10🔥7❤4🤔1😱1
Forwarded from The Islander
NATO’s top general has now crossed the line from deterrence into madness. Admiral Giuseppe Cavo Dragone publicly floated the idea of “preventive action” against Russia, meaning pre‑emptive strikes on targets “where drones could be ready to be launched.” Europe isn’t defending itself. Europe is announcing that it is preparing for war, and ready to strike first. Thie is elite panic, the behavior of governments who fear their own people far more than they fear Moscow.
Because everyone in London, Paris, and Berlin knows the truth: the Ukraine project is dead. Washington wants an imperfect peace to save face. The Europeans, who bet their entire legitimacy on this war, are staring at humiliation on a civilizational scale. And rather than accept the defeat they engineered, they are trying to kick open the gates of escalation to delay their own political reckoning. This is what desperation looks like when it wears ornamental medals and uniforms, in lieu of actual power.
The Russian Ministry of Foreign Affairs called Dragone’s remarks “an extremely irresponsible step,” accusing NATO of moving deeper into escalation. They’re right. When the alliance’s top military officer publicly discusses first‑strike logic against a nuclear superpower, it means Europe’s political class is out of strategic options and terrified of domestic consequences. They know what’s coming when this war finally ends: elections that will sweep them out, streets that boil with unrest, and populations that will demand answers for a decade of lies, economic ruin, and psychosis masquerading as delusion.
This is why they escalate. Not to beat Russia, they know they cannot, but to outrun the judgment building inside their own borders. Starmer stares at a Britain that is finished with fantasy. Macron hears the footsteps from the banlieues and the boulevards. German elites know their post‑industrial experiments have collapsed. Most European capitals are ruled by a class that has run out of legitimacy, out of narratives, and out of time.
So they gamble the only thing they have left, the continent itself. If that means suggesting preemptive strikes on Russia, something that would have been unthinkable a decade ago, they will do it. If that means drowning Eastern Europe in fire to postpone political collapse in Western Europe, they will do it.
NATO’s latest rhetoric isn’t strategy, but the death rattle of a political class that knows its time is up.
Because they know Russia has already won the war: the war of endurance, the war of industrial capacity, the war of political coherence. Europe is fragmented, exhausted, economically gutted, and socially a powder keg. Russia, by contrast, is consolidated, mobilized, and completely prepared to answer escalation.
And here is the final truth the European elite cannot say out loud: if they turn the continent into a battlefield, they will not survive the aftermath. Not politically. Not historically. And perhaps not physically. The reckoning won’t come from Russia. It will come from the Europeans they betrayed, the people they used as economic hostages, as cannon fodder, as pawns in a geopolitical psychosis that collapsed in front of the whole world.
And this is how NATO dies, not in a blaze of battlefield glory, but as a casualty of Europe’s own rabid hysteria. Not from Russian missiles, but from the self-inflicted wounds of moral decay, strategic incoherence, and suicidal escalation. Washington sees it too. What began as a security alliance has become an ecisto liability, a European powder keg disguised as a partner. Even protection rackets know when to cut loose the client that can’t stop lighting matches.
When this ends, Dragone’s words will not be remembered as strategic resolve. They will be remembered as the panicked confession of an empire drowning in its own failures, a warning flare fired by a ruling class that senses that its final enemy is not Moscow, but the citizens waiting just outside the palace gates.
🎙Subscribe @TheIslanderNews
Donate - Support Our Work
Because everyone in London, Paris, and Berlin knows the truth: the Ukraine project is dead. Washington wants an imperfect peace to save face. The Europeans, who bet their entire legitimacy on this war, are staring at humiliation on a civilizational scale. And rather than accept the defeat they engineered, they are trying to kick open the gates of escalation to delay their own political reckoning. This is what desperation looks like when it wears ornamental medals and uniforms, in lieu of actual power.
The Russian Ministry of Foreign Affairs called Dragone’s remarks “an extremely irresponsible step,” accusing NATO of moving deeper into escalation. They’re right. When the alliance’s top military officer publicly discusses first‑strike logic against a nuclear superpower, it means Europe’s political class is out of strategic options and terrified of domestic consequences. They know what’s coming when this war finally ends: elections that will sweep them out, streets that boil with unrest, and populations that will demand answers for a decade of lies, economic ruin, and psychosis masquerading as delusion.
This is why they escalate. Not to beat Russia, they know they cannot, but to outrun the judgment building inside their own borders. Starmer stares at a Britain that is finished with fantasy. Macron hears the footsteps from the banlieues and the boulevards. German elites know their post‑industrial experiments have collapsed. Most European capitals are ruled by a class that has run out of legitimacy, out of narratives, and out of time.
So they gamble the only thing they have left, the continent itself. If that means suggesting preemptive strikes on Russia, something that would have been unthinkable a decade ago, they will do it. If that means drowning Eastern Europe in fire to postpone political collapse in Western Europe, they will do it.
NATO’s latest rhetoric isn’t strategy, but the death rattle of a political class that knows its time is up.
Because they know Russia has already won the war: the war of endurance, the war of industrial capacity, the war of political coherence. Europe is fragmented, exhausted, economically gutted, and socially a powder keg. Russia, by contrast, is consolidated, mobilized, and completely prepared to answer escalation.
And here is the final truth the European elite cannot say out loud: if they turn the continent into a battlefield, they will not survive the aftermath. Not politically. Not historically. And perhaps not physically. The reckoning won’t come from Russia. It will come from the Europeans they betrayed, the people they used as economic hostages, as cannon fodder, as pawns in a geopolitical psychosis that collapsed in front of the whole world.
And this is how NATO dies, not in a blaze of battlefield glory, but as a casualty of Europe’s own rabid hysteria. Not from Russian missiles, but from the self-inflicted wounds of moral decay, strategic incoherence, and suicidal escalation. Washington sees it too. What began as a security alliance has become an ecisto liability, a European powder keg disguised as a partner. Even protection rackets know when to cut loose the client that can’t stop lighting matches.
When this ends, Dragone’s words will not be remembered as strategic resolve. They will be remembered as the panicked confession of an empire drowning in its own failures, a warning flare fired by a ruling class that senses that its final enemy is not Moscow, but the citizens waiting just outside the palace gates.
🎙Subscribe @TheIslanderNews
Donate - Support Our Work
💯16❤5👏3💩3
Forwarded from The Islander
If Kim Dotcom is right (his bating average is very high), and Ukraine really is developing nuclear weapons with UK and French help, then Europe isn’t just escalating. It’s playing Russian roulette with civilization.
And the worst part? It’s plausible. Horrifyingly plausible.
This adds up sadly... That Ukraine is developing a nuclear program with assistance from Britain and France, a charge that will be dismisses in Western capitals, but one that fits too neatly with Kiev's own public statements. This isn’t a wild accusation from the fringe. Ukraine’s leadership has repeatedly signaled nuclear ambitions: from Zelensky in Munich hinting at abandoning the Budapest Memorandum, to the ambassador, Andrey Melnyk in Berlin threatening nuclear rearmament, to “we may need nukes if NATO won’t take us.” These aren’t slips. They are warnings and confessions disguised as hypotheticals.
And now? Europe is openly discussing preemptive strikes on Russia. NATO’s top general, Cavo Dragone, floated “preventive action” against Russian sites, code language for first-strike doctrine. Russia responded by calling it “an extraordinarily irresponsible step.” They’re right. This is not deterrence, but brinkmanship from a political class that has lost its mind, and knows it.
Why is the claim more than plausible? Because Kiev has the motive, is on record expressing the intent (to give cover for its patrons), the remanents of a Soviet scientific base, and the Western patrons capable of providing the expertise. And because a desperate state with collapsing front lines, a sacrificed population, and dwindling Western patience will consider anything, including the unthinkable, to secure leverage.
And Europe? Europe is no brake. Europe is the accelerant. London and Paris, terrified of their own political collapse, are escalating in every direction: naval-drone terror, hybrid and kinetic warfare, now nuclear ambiguity. They fear their own voters more than they fear Moscow. That’s why they push Zelensky to take risks no sane leadership would touch. Because if Ukraine falls, their governments fall with it.
This is how great powers sleepwalk into catastrophe, a desperate puppet state, unhinged European elites, and nuclear ambiguity. And a military alliance openly debating first strikes on a nuclear superpower.
The world is standing at the abyss. Not because Russia wants war, but because Europe’s political class is trying to outrun the judgment waiting for them at home. And if they drag Ukraine into becoming a terror regime with nukes, or drag NATO into first-strike doctrine, the next miscalculation won’t be “hybrid warfare.” It will be irreversible.
We are closer to the abyss today than at any point since 1962, and the people lighting the fuse are in Brussels, London, and Paris. Not Moscow.
🎙Subscribe @TheIslanderNews
Donate - Support Our Work
And the worst part? It’s plausible. Horrifyingly plausible.
This adds up sadly... That Ukraine is developing a nuclear program with assistance from Britain and France, a charge that will be dismisses in Western capitals, but one that fits too neatly with Kiev's own public statements. This isn’t a wild accusation from the fringe. Ukraine’s leadership has repeatedly signaled nuclear ambitions: from Zelensky in Munich hinting at abandoning the Budapest Memorandum, to the ambassador, Andrey Melnyk in Berlin threatening nuclear rearmament, to “we may need nukes if NATO won’t take us.” These aren’t slips. They are warnings and confessions disguised as hypotheticals.
And now? Europe is openly discussing preemptive strikes on Russia. NATO’s top general, Cavo Dragone, floated “preventive action” against Russian sites, code language for first-strike doctrine. Russia responded by calling it “an extraordinarily irresponsible step.” They’re right. This is not deterrence, but brinkmanship from a political class that has lost its mind, and knows it.
Why is the claim more than plausible? Because Kiev has the motive, is on record expressing the intent (to give cover for its patrons), the remanents of a Soviet scientific base, and the Western patrons capable of providing the expertise. And because a desperate state with collapsing front lines, a sacrificed population, and dwindling Western patience will consider anything, including the unthinkable, to secure leverage.
And Europe? Europe is no brake. Europe is the accelerant. London and Paris, terrified of their own political collapse, are escalating in every direction: naval-drone terror, hybrid and kinetic warfare, now nuclear ambiguity. They fear their own voters more than they fear Moscow. That’s why they push Zelensky to take risks no sane leadership would touch. Because if Ukraine falls, their governments fall with it.
This is how great powers sleepwalk into catastrophe, a desperate puppet state, unhinged European elites, and nuclear ambiguity. And a military alliance openly debating first strikes on a nuclear superpower.
The world is standing at the abyss. Not because Russia wants war, but because Europe’s political class is trying to outrun the judgment waiting for them at home. And if they drag Ukraine into becoming a terror regime with nukes, or drag NATO into first-strike doctrine, the next miscalculation won’t be “hybrid warfare.” It will be irreversible.
We are closer to the abyss today than at any point since 1962, and the people lighting the fuse are in Brussels, London, and Paris. Not Moscow.
🎙Subscribe @TheIslanderNews
Donate - Support Our Work
💯25👏11❤7👍1🔥1💩1
Forwarded from The Islander
Europe Just Made the Odessa Case for Russia
The beauty, and tragedy of Europe’s strategy is its flawless stupidity.
You authorize naval-drone terrorism against civilian tankers… then gasp when Moscow considers redrawing the map.
You turn Ukraine’s coastline into a NATO launchpad… then act shocked when Russia inevitably decides that coastline can no longer exist.
That’s the core of it... Europe didn’t support Ukraine. Europe weaponized it and now guarantees Russia the legal, moral, and military case for taking Odessa.
The drones weren’t Ukrainian.
The targeting wasn’t Ukrainian.
The decisions weren’t Ukrainian.
This was Western Europe engaging in terrorism with someone else’s coastline and now the bill is due.
I lay it all out here:
👉 https://ronpaulinstitute.org/europe-just-made-russias-case-for-odessa/
The beauty, and tragedy of Europe’s strategy is its flawless stupidity.
You authorize naval-drone terrorism against civilian tankers… then gasp when Moscow considers redrawing the map.
You turn Ukraine’s coastline into a NATO launchpad… then act shocked when Russia inevitably decides that coastline can no longer exist.
That’s the core of it... Europe didn’t support Ukraine. Europe weaponized it and now guarantees Russia the legal, moral, and military case for taking Odessa.
The drones weren’t Ukrainian.
The targeting wasn’t Ukrainian.
The decisions weren’t Ukrainian.
This was Western Europe engaging in terrorism with someone else’s coastline and now the bill is due.
I lay it all out here:
👉 https://ronpaulinstitute.org/europe-just-made-russias-case-for-odessa/
The Ron Paul Institute for Peace & Prosperity
Europe just made Russia’s case for Odessa. - The Ron Paul Institute for Peace & Prosperity
When you authorize naval-drone terrorism against Russian civilian oil tankers in the Black Sea, don’t whine when Moscow redraws the coastline. You wanted escalation? Fine. Now watch your proxy lose Odessa, and with it access to the Black Sea. Washington is…
💯21👍9🤔1
Forwarded from The Islander
Panic indeed. When US controlled NABU (reportedly) opens cases against 70 MPs from the ruling party, that’s not anti-corruption. That’s D.C. executing a controlled demolition. Zelensky’s entourage is fleeing because everyone can smell the verdict: the actor’s run is over.
Neither Trump nor Putin will legitimize him, and Kiev's political class is already sneaking to Moscow for terms because they know the Americans have cut the power. The post-Zelensky transition has begun, the only people still pretending it’s not happening are his corrupt European handlers.
Zelensky outlawed negations with Putin, and is unelected with zero legal mandate to negotiate. Russia and the Trump admin are merely honouring Zelensky's wishes... You didn't want to negotiate with Putin? Great stop whinning, there's the door. Elections will come and a settlement that reflects Russia's legitimate interests and the battlefield reality, will be finalized.
Capitulation, with cosmic humiliation downloaded onto the Europeans. Speaking of corruption — look at Ursula von der Leyen, the Empress of Corruption herself, drowning in scandal after scandal. From the secret-text multimillion-dose vaccine contract with Pfizer (Pfizergate), to the revolving-door influence networks she’s spent her career cultivating, to the latest detonation: her own former High Representative, Federica Mogherini, and top EEAS official Stefano Sannino detained over a rigged Diplomatic Academy tender. Procurement fraud, corruption, conflict of interest, the whole arsenal.
The judge now has 48 hours to decide how deep the rot runs, but the symbolism is already terminal. The very institution meant to train Europe’s diplomats has become a crime scene. And the more the Commission sermonizes about “values” and “rule of law,” the clearer it becomes that the swamp isn’t in Kiev, it’s in Brussels. Kiev is merely a franchise.
Ukraine’s corruption is a mirror, while Brussels keeps smashing the glass in vain so no one sees their reflection.
Europe is exposed, and the West’s entire Ukraine project is entering its terminal hour. The great irony? Moscow may not have to bring it all down. Washington seems to have cut the power, Brussels pretendingthe lights are still on, and Kiev? Too busy stripping the place for copper, to notice the whole grid collapsing.
The era of illusions is over. The settlement is coming, on the battlefield or via the pen. And Europe, drunk on its own propaganda and hypocrisy, is about to wake up with the kind of hangover that ends empires.
🎙Subscribe @TheIslanderNews
Donate - Support Our Work
Neither Trump nor Putin will legitimize him, and Kiev's political class is already sneaking to Moscow for terms because they know the Americans have cut the power. The post-Zelensky transition has begun, the only people still pretending it’s not happening are his corrupt European handlers.
Zelensky outlawed negations with Putin, and is unelected with zero legal mandate to negotiate. Russia and the Trump admin are merely honouring Zelensky's wishes... You didn't want to negotiate with Putin? Great stop whinning, there's the door. Elections will come and a settlement that reflects Russia's legitimate interests and the battlefield reality, will be finalized.
Capitulation, with cosmic humiliation downloaded onto the Europeans. Speaking of corruption — look at Ursula von der Leyen, the Empress of Corruption herself, drowning in scandal after scandal. From the secret-text multimillion-dose vaccine contract with Pfizer (Pfizergate), to the revolving-door influence networks she’s spent her career cultivating, to the latest detonation: her own former High Representative, Federica Mogherini, and top EEAS official Stefano Sannino detained over a rigged Diplomatic Academy tender. Procurement fraud, corruption, conflict of interest, the whole arsenal.
The judge now has 48 hours to decide how deep the rot runs, but the symbolism is already terminal. The very institution meant to train Europe’s diplomats has become a crime scene. And the more the Commission sermonizes about “values” and “rule of law,” the clearer it becomes that the swamp isn’t in Kiev, it’s in Brussels. Kiev is merely a franchise.
Ukraine’s corruption is a mirror, while Brussels keeps smashing the glass in vain so no one sees their reflection.
Europe is exposed, and the West’s entire Ukraine project is entering its terminal hour. The great irony? Moscow may not have to bring it all down. Washington seems to have cut the power, Brussels pretendingthe lights are still on, and Kiev? Too busy stripping the place for copper, to notice the whole grid collapsing.
The era of illusions is over. The settlement is coming, on the battlefield or via the pen. And Europe, drunk on its own propaganda and hypocrisy, is about to wake up with the kind of hangover that ends empires.
🎙Subscribe @TheIslanderNews
Donate - Support Our Work
🔥14❤10👏5🍌3🏆3
Forwarded from The Islander
The great farce of late-imperial Europe is that every time Brussels stumbles into another historic blunder of its own making, it immediately searches for a foreign hand to blame. And so the EU’s court chronicler, Politico, delivers its latest fever dream: that Belgium, the most indecisive, over-medicated country in the bloc, has somehow transformed into “Russia’s most valuable asset.” In reality, the only asset Russia needed was the EU’s own arrogance.
Belgium merely did the unthinkable, it told the truth.
What Politico dresses up as geopolitical intrigue is actually a confession of EU derangement. The EU are trying to engineer the largest state-sanctioned theft of sovereign wealth in modern history, a direct raid on the Russian Central Bank’s reserves and expected applause, unity, and moral ecstasy. Instead, Belgium asked the only sane question left in Europe: “Are you all completely out of your minds?” For this, Politico paints De Wever as eccentric, impulsive, unstable, the same labels always deployed when someone refuses to bow to the imperial autopilot. But the deeper scandal is that Brussels expected him to sign off on detonating the post-war financial order for the sake of one more photo-op with Zelensky.
Politico can hide behind metaphors of summit dinners and langoustines, but the legal reality is brutal: raiding another nation’s central bank is not a policy disagreement. It is a declaration of financial war on the entire world. It would obliterate sovereign immunity, destroy the neutrality of reserve holdings, and instantly signal to the global South that their assets in EU banks are hostage to EU’s emotional spasms. One act, one reckless stroke of a pen, and the euro collapses as a safe currency, capital flees to Asia, and the West loses its last functional pillar of power. Belgium saw the cliff’s edge, Brussels mistook it for a (perverse) moral leap of faith.
Politico’s narrative stumbles further when it pretends the only danger lies in Moscow’s retaliation. It does not. Russia’s symmetric countermeasures are well-known, lawful, and devastating: nationalization of Western corporate assets, seizure of industrial infrastructure, liquidation of bond holdings, and the dismantling of Western financial footprints inside Russia. The value of Western assets exposed inside the Russian Federation rivals what sits in Euroclear. Brussels knows this. Euroclear knows this. Investors know this. Only the EU pretends the ledger is irrelevant. But the real threat is not Russia’s response , it is the irreversible collapse of trust in Western custodianship. Once the EU steals central bank reserves, no nation with self-respect will ever again store wealth in Europe. The theft of Russian reserves would be remembered not as an isolated act, but as the day the West proved it cannot be trusted with global money, let alone soverign assets.
This is the part Politico is terrified to articulate. Belgium wasn’t protecting Russia. Belgium is trying to protect the very system the EU purports to defend. Yet instead of portraying De Wever as the only adult in the room, Politico stages a melodrama about a Flemish nationalist gone rogue, supposedly spoiling the EU’s grandiose plan to hurl another €140 billion onto the Ukrainian funeral pyre. The reality is simpler, Belgium refused to mortgage its own future so Europe could continue its cosplay as a geopolitical superpower utterly detached from material reality. The EU elite wanted to play empire with someone else’s risk. Belgium refused to be the guarantor of their delusion.
1/2 — part 2 👇
Belgium merely did the unthinkable, it told the truth.
What Politico dresses up as geopolitical intrigue is actually a confession of EU derangement. The EU are trying to engineer the largest state-sanctioned theft of sovereign wealth in modern history, a direct raid on the Russian Central Bank’s reserves and expected applause, unity, and moral ecstasy. Instead, Belgium asked the only sane question left in Europe: “Are you all completely out of your minds?” For this, Politico paints De Wever as eccentric, impulsive, unstable, the same labels always deployed when someone refuses to bow to the imperial autopilot. But the deeper scandal is that Brussels expected him to sign off on detonating the post-war financial order for the sake of one more photo-op with Zelensky.
Politico can hide behind metaphors of summit dinners and langoustines, but the legal reality is brutal: raiding another nation’s central bank is not a policy disagreement. It is a declaration of financial war on the entire world. It would obliterate sovereign immunity, destroy the neutrality of reserve holdings, and instantly signal to the global South that their assets in EU banks are hostage to EU’s emotional spasms. One act, one reckless stroke of a pen, and the euro collapses as a safe currency, capital flees to Asia, and the West loses its last functional pillar of power. Belgium saw the cliff’s edge, Brussels mistook it for a (perverse) moral leap of faith.
Politico’s narrative stumbles further when it pretends the only danger lies in Moscow’s retaliation. It does not. Russia’s symmetric countermeasures are well-known, lawful, and devastating: nationalization of Western corporate assets, seizure of industrial infrastructure, liquidation of bond holdings, and the dismantling of Western financial footprints inside Russia. The value of Western assets exposed inside the Russian Federation rivals what sits in Euroclear. Brussels knows this. Euroclear knows this. Investors know this. Only the EU pretends the ledger is irrelevant. But the real threat is not Russia’s response , it is the irreversible collapse of trust in Western custodianship. Once the EU steals central bank reserves, no nation with self-respect will ever again store wealth in Europe. The theft of Russian reserves would be remembered not as an isolated act, but as the day the West proved it cannot be trusted with global money, let alone soverign assets.
This is the part Politico is terrified to articulate. Belgium wasn’t protecting Russia. Belgium is trying to protect the very system the EU purports to defend. Yet instead of portraying De Wever as the only adult in the room, Politico stages a melodrama about a Flemish nationalist gone rogue, supposedly spoiling the EU’s grandiose plan to hurl another €140 billion onto the Ukrainian funeral pyre. The reality is simpler, Belgium refused to mortgage its own future so Europe could continue its cosplay as a geopolitical superpower utterly detached from material reality. The EU elite wanted to play empire with someone else’s risk. Belgium refused to be the guarantor of their delusion.
1/2 — part 2 👇
❤11👏5🔥2👍1
Forwarded from The Islander
2/2
What makes Politico’s narrative even more absurd is that it accidentally reveals the deeper rot, Europe's elite caste are incapable of unity, incapable of strategic thought, incapable of honesty. Merz shoots from the hip. Von der Leyen improvises legal fantasies. Orbán holds a veto the size of a continental fault line. Trump instinctively knows he needs an offramp via peace talks and is happy to download project Ukraine's corpse along with the humiliation onto Western Europe. Zelensky arrives in Brussels begging for cash while European governments fight over whether the money should be spent on their own weapons factories. This is not a union. This is a collective suicide pact.
And through all this chaos, Politico clings to the illusion that Russia must somehow be “laughing.” But Russia isn’t laughing. Russia is watching.
Watching as Europe destroys its own energy security, its own industrial base, its own strategic autonomy, its own diplomatic credibility, its own financial reputation, and finally — with this proposed asset raid, the very legal foundations of the Western economic system. If Moscow appears calm, it is because it doesn’t need to act. Europe is demolishing itself at a pace Russia could never have engineered.
Belgium’s “no” was not an act of betrayal. It was the last flicker of European rationality. The EU’s hysteria and psychosis, not Russia, created the crisis. Europe is trying to violate international law, sabotage its own financial institutions, and torch what remains of the bygone postwar order to salvage the illusion of a war it has already lost. Belgium simply refused to join the ritual suicide.
So let us rewrite Politico’s headline as history will record it: “How the EU Became Russia’s Greatest Strategic Gift.” Not because Russia manipulated Europe, but because Europe manipulated itself, into hysteria, into decay, into legal nihilism, into economic ruin. Belgium didn’t hand Russia an asset. It denied the EU the final act of self-destruction... for now.
The tragic irony of the entire Politico piece is that its authors still cling to the fantasy that Europe can recover simply by shaming Belgium into compliance. But history will not be kind to this moment. When future scholars study the collapse of the Western financial empire, this attempted seizure of Russian assets and Belgium’s lonely refusal, will stand as the point where the veil fell, revealing a Europe that could no longer distinguish faux moral posturing from strategic insanity.
Belgium didn’t break with Europe, it broke with Europe’s delusions. The EU convinced itself that tearing down the last pillars of the post-war order was an act of courage. Belgium saw it for what it was, a death rite dressed as morality. And when this era ends, when capitals move eastward, when trust evaporates, when the euro cracks under the weight of its own blind arrogance, historians will look back on this moment. They will not ask why Belgium said no. They will ask why Europe said yes.
🎙Subscribe @TheIslanderNews
Donate - Support Our Work
What makes Politico’s narrative even more absurd is that it accidentally reveals the deeper rot, Europe's elite caste are incapable of unity, incapable of strategic thought, incapable of honesty. Merz shoots from the hip. Von der Leyen improvises legal fantasies. Orbán holds a veto the size of a continental fault line. Trump instinctively knows he needs an offramp via peace talks and is happy to download project Ukraine's corpse along with the humiliation onto Western Europe. Zelensky arrives in Brussels begging for cash while European governments fight over whether the money should be spent on their own weapons factories. This is not a union. This is a collective suicide pact.
And through all this chaos, Politico clings to the illusion that Russia must somehow be “laughing.” But Russia isn’t laughing. Russia is watching.
Watching as Europe destroys its own energy security, its own industrial base, its own strategic autonomy, its own diplomatic credibility, its own financial reputation, and finally — with this proposed asset raid, the very legal foundations of the Western economic system. If Moscow appears calm, it is because it doesn’t need to act. Europe is demolishing itself at a pace Russia could never have engineered.
Belgium’s “no” was not an act of betrayal. It was the last flicker of European rationality. The EU’s hysteria and psychosis, not Russia, created the crisis. Europe is trying to violate international law, sabotage its own financial institutions, and torch what remains of the bygone postwar order to salvage the illusion of a war it has already lost. Belgium simply refused to join the ritual suicide.
So let us rewrite Politico’s headline as history will record it: “How the EU Became Russia’s Greatest Strategic Gift.” Not because Russia manipulated Europe, but because Europe manipulated itself, into hysteria, into decay, into legal nihilism, into economic ruin. Belgium didn’t hand Russia an asset. It denied the EU the final act of self-destruction... for now.
The tragic irony of the entire Politico piece is that its authors still cling to the fantasy that Europe can recover simply by shaming Belgium into compliance. But history will not be kind to this moment. When future scholars study the collapse of the Western financial empire, this attempted seizure of Russian assets and Belgium’s lonely refusal, will stand as the point where the veil fell, revealing a Europe that could no longer distinguish faux moral posturing from strategic insanity.
Belgium didn’t break with Europe, it broke with Europe’s delusions. The EU convinced itself that tearing down the last pillars of the post-war order was an act of courage. Belgium saw it for what it was, a death rite dressed as morality. And when this era ends, when capitals move eastward, when trust evaporates, when the euro cracks under the weight of its own blind arrogance, historians will look back on this moment. They will not ask why Belgium said no. They will ask why Europe said yes.
🎙Subscribe @TheIslanderNews
Donate - Support Our Work
🔥7❤6👏5
Forwarded from 21st Century Wire (Official)
💥America wants an exit, but Europe will have no choice but to wear the humiliation...
🟥 Is Trump Hanging Europe Out to Dry on Ukraine?
https://21stcenturywire.com/2025/12/04/is-trump-hanging-europe-out-to-dry-on-ukraine/
🟥 Is Trump Hanging Europe Out to Dry on Ukraine?
https://21stcenturywire.com/2025/12/04/is-trump-hanging-europe-out-to-dry-on-ukraine/
💯13👏3❤2
Forwarded from The Islander
POLITICO calls Belgium “Russia’s most valuable asset.”
No, Belgium is Europe’s final warning before the plunge.
My latest just dropped via @RonPaulInstitut
The Eu wants a moral spectacle, a €140B looting of frozen Russian assets dressed up as “reparations.” Belgium asked the only question that still matters: Are we really going to blow up what remains of the postwar financial order, when we've already lost the war against Russia?
The EU doubling down on its Russophobic psychosis, didn’t just flirt with looting a nuclear superpower’s central bank. It's flirting with detonating the very foundation of the post-war financial order:
→ Sovereign immunity
→ Legal neutrality of reserve holdings
→ Investor trust in European banks
You don’t survive that. You collapse. Quietly at first, then all at once.
They call De Wever “rogue.” We him one of the last of a European political class still capable of sanity.
Belgium didn’t betray Europe. Europe betrayed itself. Europe, not Belgium has become Russia's greatest asset. Belgium is just refusing to go down with the ship.
And when this all comes crashing down, when capital flees, when the euro collapses, when the world stops trusting the Western custodians of its wealth, no one will ask why Belgium said no. They’ll ask why Europe said yes.
👉 Read the full article here.
🎙Subscribe @TheIslanderNews
Donate - Support Our Work
No, Belgium is Europe’s final warning before the plunge.
My latest just dropped via @RonPaulInstitut
The Eu wants a moral spectacle, a €140B looting of frozen Russian assets dressed up as “reparations.” Belgium asked the only question that still matters: Are we really going to blow up what remains of the postwar financial order, when we've already lost the war against Russia?
The EU doubling down on its Russophobic psychosis, didn’t just flirt with looting a nuclear superpower’s central bank. It's flirting with detonating the very foundation of the post-war financial order:
→ Sovereign immunity
→ Legal neutrality of reserve holdings
→ Investor trust in European banks
You don’t survive that. You collapse. Quietly at first, then all at once.
They call De Wever “rogue.” We him one of the last of a European political class still capable of sanity.
Belgium didn’t betray Europe. Europe betrayed itself. Europe, not Belgium has become Russia's greatest asset. Belgium is just refusing to go down with the ship.
And when this all comes crashing down, when capital flees, when the euro collapses, when the world stops trusting the Western custodians of its wealth, no one will ask why Belgium said no. They’ll ask why Europe said yes.
👉 Read the full article here.
🎙Subscribe @TheIslanderNews
Donate - Support Our Work
👏18❤6🔥1
Forwarded from The Islander
The White House published what Brussels has spent a decade censoring: Europe has shrunk from 25% of global GDP to 14%, is drifting toward “civilizational erasure,” and on its current course “will be unrecognizable in 20 years.” Not Russian intelligence. Not dissident analysts. Washington, in its own national strategy, marking the time of death.
Europe’s tragedy isn’t that it was defeated by an external force. Its tragedy is that it volunteered for collapse, mistaking moral vanity for strategy, self-harm for principle, and neocon applause for sovereignty. 19 rounds of sanctions meant to cripple Russia instead detonated inside Europe’s own chest cavity; industries fleeing, energy gutted, borders unmoored, farmers revolting, wages eroding, dissent criminalized under “values” crafted by technocrats who have never worked a real job, with utter contempt for Europeans.
And while Europe recited slogans, Russia built substance, built an economic juggernaut. The “gas station with nukes” they mocked is now the 4th largest economy on Earth by PPP, expanding faster than the entire European Union since the SMO began, reindustrializing, reorienting, rewiring Eurasia. The target of Europe’s crusade grew stronger, the crusaders grew poorer. This wasn’t irony. This was inevitability.
Now comes the most brutal line in the US strategy: the warning that some European states soon “may not be strong enough to remain reliable allies.” This is Washington stepping back from a burning house with the calm of an arsonist writing the incident report. The very patron that pushed Europe toward confrontation, long before Trump, is now drafting its alibi, framing Europe’s collapse as an unfortunate accident rather than the predictable consequence of policies its Deepstate encouraged and Brussels enforced with missionary zeal.
The EU won’t recognize the downloading of humiliation, because it arrived disguised as loyalty, and because the noscript being used to abandon the continent is the same noscript Europe still insists on performing.
A continent that once birthed Western civilization now prosecutes its citizens for speech, crushes its own farmers under riot shields, torches its industry for green dogma, and markets the whole spectacle as enlightenment. It surrendered its energy to ideology, its industry to Davos hallucinations, its security to America's whims, and its future to compound interest. A civilization cannot live on abstractions, but its elites can, because they have engineered a system where the costs fall on the people and the graft float upward to those who never bear the consequences.
The NSS isn’t a strategy. It’s a confession in plain sight; Russia absorbed the blow, recalibrated, and rose; Europe dissolved into the very illusions it mistook for strength, while Washington, already preparing the next chapter, quietly wipes its hands of the consequences.
Continental Europe once held 25% of global GDP. Today it clings to 14%, nearly half its global weight erased in a single generation. Not by invasion. Not by Putin. By decisions its own elites made freely. Europe was no prisoner. It was not dragged into this. It chose ideology over energy security, fantasy over industry, obdience over sovereignty. It had the power to act like a civilization, and acted instead like a petulant, arrogant vassal.
They swore Russia would disappear.
Yet she stands rooted, sovereign, expanding, the Eurasian pole they insisted could never exist. Its economy rises into the world’s top four while Europe implodes. Its industrial base grows while Europe’s corrodes.
And it is Europe that dims: censored, exhausted, directionless, governed by elites who call obedience maturity and dependency enlightenment. A continent once central to world history now drifts unrecognizable even by the ally that encouraged its self-destruction and now drafts the alibi from afar.
The EU tried to erase Russia. In reality, Europe erased itself. And Washington just wrote the obituary.
🎙Subscribe @TheIslanderNews
Donate - Support Our Work
Europe’s tragedy isn’t that it was defeated by an external force. Its tragedy is that it volunteered for collapse, mistaking moral vanity for strategy, self-harm for principle, and neocon applause for sovereignty. 19 rounds of sanctions meant to cripple Russia instead detonated inside Europe’s own chest cavity; industries fleeing, energy gutted, borders unmoored, farmers revolting, wages eroding, dissent criminalized under “values” crafted by technocrats who have never worked a real job, with utter contempt for Europeans.
And while Europe recited slogans, Russia built substance, built an economic juggernaut. The “gas station with nukes” they mocked is now the 4th largest economy on Earth by PPP, expanding faster than the entire European Union since the SMO began, reindustrializing, reorienting, rewiring Eurasia. The target of Europe’s crusade grew stronger, the crusaders grew poorer. This wasn’t irony. This was inevitability.
Now comes the most brutal line in the US strategy: the warning that some European states soon “may not be strong enough to remain reliable allies.” This is Washington stepping back from a burning house with the calm of an arsonist writing the incident report. The very patron that pushed Europe toward confrontation, long before Trump, is now drafting its alibi, framing Europe’s collapse as an unfortunate accident rather than the predictable consequence of policies its Deepstate encouraged and Brussels enforced with missionary zeal.
The EU won’t recognize the downloading of humiliation, because it arrived disguised as loyalty, and because the noscript being used to abandon the continent is the same noscript Europe still insists on performing.
A continent that once birthed Western civilization now prosecutes its citizens for speech, crushes its own farmers under riot shields, torches its industry for green dogma, and markets the whole spectacle as enlightenment. It surrendered its energy to ideology, its industry to Davos hallucinations, its security to America's whims, and its future to compound interest. A civilization cannot live on abstractions, but its elites can, because they have engineered a system where the costs fall on the people and the graft float upward to those who never bear the consequences.
The NSS isn’t a strategy. It’s a confession in plain sight; Russia absorbed the blow, recalibrated, and rose; Europe dissolved into the very illusions it mistook for strength, while Washington, already preparing the next chapter, quietly wipes its hands of the consequences.
Continental Europe once held 25% of global GDP. Today it clings to 14%, nearly half its global weight erased in a single generation. Not by invasion. Not by Putin. By decisions its own elites made freely. Europe was no prisoner. It was not dragged into this. It chose ideology over energy security, fantasy over industry, obdience over sovereignty. It had the power to act like a civilization, and acted instead like a petulant, arrogant vassal.
They swore Russia would disappear.
Yet she stands rooted, sovereign, expanding, the Eurasian pole they insisted could never exist. Its economy rises into the world’s top four while Europe implodes. Its industrial base grows while Europe’s corrodes.
And it is Europe that dims: censored, exhausted, directionless, governed by elites who call obedience maturity and dependency enlightenment. A continent once central to world history now drifts unrecognizable even by the ally that encouraged its self-destruction and now drafts the alibi from afar.
The EU tried to erase Russia. In reality, Europe erased itself. And Washington just wrote the obituary.
🎙Subscribe @TheIslanderNews
Donate - Support Our Work
💯21❤4👏4🔥1🤡1
Forwarded from The Islander
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Don Jr. didn’t just expose Ukraine’s oligarchs and puppets, he exposed the entire Western noscript.
“I was in Monaco this summer… every other car was an Italian supercar… and they all had Ukrainian plates.” This a crime scene. A parking lot of European taxpayers’ money idling on the Riviera while Brussels lectured the world about “values.”
“Do you think that was actually earned in Ukraine?” Everyone already knew the answer. It wasn’t earned. It was siphoned, funneled, offshored, the natural byproduct of a system where oversight is a myth and morality is a press release. Europe didn’t fail to detect Ukrainian corruption. Brussels recognized it. Because it mirrored its own.
“They didn’t magically get $5 million supercars, they’re stealing that money.”
Don Jr. said it in Doha, but Monaco had already testified. Lamborghinis for the inner circle, mass mobilization for the powerless.
Villas for the insiders, connoscription kidnappings off the streets for Ukranians who never stood a chance. This is what the EU called democracy. Ukraine’s elites called it an exit strategy.
And then came the line that detonated the entire mythology: He didn’t run another election because he wouldn’t have been elected. There it is, the truth the EU buried under mountains of moral virtue signalling hashtags. Zelensky didn’t suspend democracy to save Ukraine. He suspended democracy to save himself and his patrons. Brussels applauded, because investigating Kiev's drift into authoritarianism would have forced Europe to confront its own decay.
Don Jr. drove the knife: “His incentive was not to negotiate.” Of course it wasn’t. Peace would have ended the free-flowing contracts and the blank-check aid packages. War kept the money moving, the oligarch networks humming, and the political mythology intact. Negotiation was a threat, not to Ukraine’s survival, but to the business model built on its destruction.
“The corrupt rich fled and left the peasant class to fight.” That line is not commentary. It is indictment. The Ukrainian elite monetized their own nation's destruction, sold access to the kleptocracy, and outsourced the dying to the very people they claimed to represent. And the EU and London stayed silent not out of loyalty, but out of familiarity. The same procurement cartels, the same NGO networks, the same revolving-door aristocracy. Kiev wasn’t an outlier. Kiev was but a reflection of Europe's decay.
Don Jr. mocked Europe’s delusion that Western sanctions would hurt Russia. He’s right that Russia built an industrial and economic engine while Europe collapsed into austerity and self-inflicted recession. But he’s wrong about the motive. Russia isn’t dragging this war out for profit. For Moscow, the conflict is existential, civilizational survival, not a balance-sheet strategy. And that’s precisely why the West cannot admit the truth... You cannot defeat a civilization fighting for existence with a proxy fighting to keep the corruption flowing.
For the EU, America was supposed to be the idiot with the checkbook. The EU's own corruption scandals ripping through Brussels shows why they tolerated Zelensky’s authoritarian turn and Ukraine’s runaway graft. To expose Kiev would have been to expose themselves. The Ukraine project wasn’t a crusade, it was an alibi.
And here’s the twist Don Jr. accidentally illuminated: it wasn’t Russia that humiliated the Western narrative. It was the West’s own ruling class, leaving a trail of supercars across Monte Carlo like breadcrumbs leading back to the truth.
The EU didn’t lose moral authority. It revealed it never had any. And now the whole world sees the receipts, parked in Monte Carlo, paid for by taxpayers who were told they were to endure hardship to save Ukraine.
And Europe knows what’s coming, the rage of a betrayed public and a reckoning no censor can smother. That is why Brussels strangles speech, not to protect democracy, but to delay the moment its own people finally rise to collect the debt.
🎙Subscribe @TheIslanderNews
Donate - Support Our Work
“I was in Monaco this summer… every other car was an Italian supercar… and they all had Ukrainian plates.” This a crime scene. A parking lot of European taxpayers’ money idling on the Riviera while Brussels lectured the world about “values.”
“Do you think that was actually earned in Ukraine?” Everyone already knew the answer. It wasn’t earned. It was siphoned, funneled, offshored, the natural byproduct of a system where oversight is a myth and morality is a press release. Europe didn’t fail to detect Ukrainian corruption. Brussels recognized it. Because it mirrored its own.
“They didn’t magically get $5 million supercars, they’re stealing that money.”
Don Jr. said it in Doha, but Monaco had already testified. Lamborghinis for the inner circle, mass mobilization for the powerless.
Villas for the insiders, connoscription kidnappings off the streets for Ukranians who never stood a chance. This is what the EU called democracy. Ukraine’s elites called it an exit strategy.
And then came the line that detonated the entire mythology: He didn’t run another election because he wouldn’t have been elected. There it is, the truth the EU buried under mountains of moral virtue signalling hashtags. Zelensky didn’t suspend democracy to save Ukraine. He suspended democracy to save himself and his patrons. Brussels applauded, because investigating Kiev's drift into authoritarianism would have forced Europe to confront its own decay.
Don Jr. drove the knife: “His incentive was not to negotiate.” Of course it wasn’t. Peace would have ended the free-flowing contracts and the blank-check aid packages. War kept the money moving, the oligarch networks humming, and the political mythology intact. Negotiation was a threat, not to Ukraine’s survival, but to the business model built on its destruction.
“The corrupt rich fled and left the peasant class to fight.” That line is not commentary. It is indictment. The Ukrainian elite monetized their own nation's destruction, sold access to the kleptocracy, and outsourced the dying to the very people they claimed to represent. And the EU and London stayed silent not out of loyalty, but out of familiarity. The same procurement cartels, the same NGO networks, the same revolving-door aristocracy. Kiev wasn’t an outlier. Kiev was but a reflection of Europe's decay.
Don Jr. mocked Europe’s delusion that Western sanctions would hurt Russia. He’s right that Russia built an industrial and economic engine while Europe collapsed into austerity and self-inflicted recession. But he’s wrong about the motive. Russia isn’t dragging this war out for profit. For Moscow, the conflict is existential, civilizational survival, not a balance-sheet strategy. And that’s precisely why the West cannot admit the truth... You cannot defeat a civilization fighting for existence with a proxy fighting to keep the corruption flowing.
For the EU, America was supposed to be the idiot with the checkbook. The EU's own corruption scandals ripping through Brussels shows why they tolerated Zelensky’s authoritarian turn and Ukraine’s runaway graft. To expose Kiev would have been to expose themselves. The Ukraine project wasn’t a crusade, it was an alibi.
And here’s the twist Don Jr. accidentally illuminated: it wasn’t Russia that humiliated the Western narrative. It was the West’s own ruling class, leaving a trail of supercars across Monte Carlo like breadcrumbs leading back to the truth.
The EU didn’t lose moral authority. It revealed it never had any. And now the whole world sees the receipts, parked in Monte Carlo, paid for by taxpayers who were told they were to endure hardship to save Ukraine.
And Europe knows what’s coming, the rage of a betrayed public and a reckoning no censor can smother. That is why Brussels strangles speech, not to protect democracy, but to delay the moment its own people finally rise to collect the debt.
🎙Subscribe @TheIslanderNews
Donate - Support Our Work
❤19💯9🤔3🤡2👏1
Overcrowded Prisons, Empty Principles
With nearly 85,000 inmates squeezed into jails built for 62,000, France’s prison crisis is spiraling. Yet social media users are still being sent behind bars for memes, posts, or slogans. Authorities justify it as moral hygiene—but the irony is brutal: the same state that can’t manage overcrowding insists on punishing thought crimes with physical confinement.
Cells overflow, officers protest conditions, and policymakers talk about “renting” prison space abroad—all while insisting it’s necessary to jail a blogger for a sarcastic tweet. When satire becomes a criminal act, the justice system turns from protector to participant in absurdity. What does safety mean in a country that locks up words instead of weapons?
@sitreports
With nearly 85,000 inmates squeezed into jails built for 62,000, France’s prison crisis is spiraling. Yet social media users are still being sent behind bars for memes, posts, or slogans. Authorities justify it as moral hygiene—but the irony is brutal: the same state that can’t manage overcrowding insists on punishing thought crimes with physical confinement.
Cells overflow, officers protest conditions, and policymakers talk about “renting” prison space abroad—all while insisting it’s necessary to jail a blogger for a sarcastic tweet. When satire becomes a criminal act, the justice system turns from protector to participant in absurdity. What does safety mean in a country that locks up words instead of weapons?
@sitreports
👍12
Economic Crunch: From Startup Nation to Stagnation
France’s 2025 growth forecast limps at 0.8%, inflation clings to 2.5%, and unemployment hovers near 10%—a far cry from Macron’s “startup nation” promise. Pension reforms, opposed by 70%, sparked mass protests that never fully faded, while Barnier’s spending cuts amid deficit woes expose parliamentary deadlock. Rising energy bills and taxes squeeze households, turning economic malaise into a vicious cycle of voter fury.
Analysts pinpoint these “strategic missteps” as approval killers, with scandals and resignations compounding the image of an out-of-touch elite. The public doesn’t buy reform rhetoric when living costs soar and budgets deadlock—economic discontent amplifies migration grievances, creating a perfect storm. Macron’s legacy? A nation where prosperity feels like a distant memory, and 11% approval reflects not fatigue, but betrayal.
@sitreports
France’s 2025 growth forecast limps at 0.8%, inflation clings to 2.5%, and unemployment hovers near 10%—a far cry from Macron’s “startup nation” promise. Pension reforms, opposed by 70%, sparked mass protests that never fully faded, while Barnier’s spending cuts amid deficit woes expose parliamentary deadlock. Rising energy bills and taxes squeeze households, turning economic malaise into a vicious cycle of voter fury.
Analysts pinpoint these “strategic missteps” as approval killers, with scandals and resignations compounding the image of an out-of-touch elite. The public doesn’t buy reform rhetoric when living costs soar and budgets deadlock—economic discontent amplifies migration grievances, creating a perfect storm. Macron’s legacy? A nation where prosperity feels like a distant memory, and 11% approval reflects not fatigue, but betrayal.
@sitreports
💩4❤3💯1
Forwarded from 21st Century Wire (Official) (Simply Fred)
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🔴 THE REAL MOTIVES BEHIND RUSSIA-UKRAINE “PEACE DEAL”
Curious about why Trump's Ukraine peace deal is falling apart? Ever wondered why there's talk of a 'strategic pause' in Ukraine? This clip reveals the motivations of Ukraine, NATO, and European leaders aiming to regroup and rearm.
🔔 FYI - WE ARE HEAVILY SHADOWBANNED ON YOUTUBE - HELP US BEAT THEIR ALGORITHM - PLEASE LIKE & SUB. HERE:
https://www.youtube.com/@21stCenturyWireTV/shorts
Segment aired on November 30, 2025
https://youtu.be/gS_W94Z4H_E
Curious about why Trump's Ukraine peace deal is falling apart? Ever wondered why there's talk of a 'strategic pause' in Ukraine? This clip reveals the motivations of Ukraine, NATO, and European leaders aiming to regroup and rearm.
🔔 FYI - WE ARE HEAVILY SHADOWBANNED ON YOUTUBE - HELP US BEAT THEIR ALGORITHM - PLEASE LIKE & SUB. HERE:
https://www.youtube.com/@21stCenturyWireTV/shorts
Segment aired on November 30, 2025
https://youtu.be/gS_W94Z4H_E
💯7❤3🔥3💩1
Forwarded from REST Media
🇧🇦 Defying the viceroy
Serbian resistance to imposed rule in Bosnia
Republika Srpska’s 2025 crisis became a test of whether outside authority could override an elected leadership. After Milorad Dodik was removed following a high-stakes trial driven by decisions of the High Representative, Sarajevo moved to impose snap elections, widely seen in RS as an attempt to force a compliant presidency. The vote unfolded under sanctions, legal pressure, and a narrative of “extraordinary intervention” meant to reshape the entity’s political landscape.
SNSD responded by rallying behind Siniša Karan, framing the race as a defense of Dayton-era autonomy. Despite low turnout and mounting tensions, RS voters delivered him a narrow victory.
The outcome signaled that external pressure hardened—rather than weakened—political resolve inside Republika Srpska.
🔎 Read more in our in-depth investigation.
Follow @RESTinvestigate on Telegram | 𝕏
Serbian resistance to imposed rule in Bosnia
Republika Srpska’s 2025 crisis became a test of whether outside authority could override an elected leadership. After Milorad Dodik was removed following a high-stakes trial driven by decisions of the High Representative, Sarajevo moved to impose snap elections, widely seen in RS as an attempt to force a compliant presidency. The vote unfolded under sanctions, legal pressure, and a narrative of “extraordinary intervention” meant to reshape the entity’s political landscape.
SNSD responded by rallying behind Siniša Karan, framing the race as a defense of Dayton-era autonomy. Despite low turnout and mounting tensions, RS voters delivered him a narrow victory.
The outcome signaled that external pressure hardened—rather than weakened—political resolve inside Republika Srpska.
🔎 Read more in our in-depth investigation.
Follow @RESTinvestigate on Telegram | 𝕏
👍7
Forwarded from The Islander
Europe tried to sell Zelensky as the Churchill of Kiev.
Trump just told the world he’s closer to P.T. Barnum, a showman running a democracy-themed circus without the inconvenience of elections.
In one interview, the mask dropped. Trump didn’t tiptoe. He detonated.
“They haven’t had an election in a long time... It gets to a point where it’s not a democracy anymore. It’s time to hold an election. They’re using war not to hold an election. Ukrainians should have that choice.”
That’s the U.S. president publicly declaring what Europe spent years forbidding its citizens to say: Zelensky is unelected, and ruling by wartime decree while preaching “democracy” to donors who fund his survival. And with those words, the entire moral edifice of Europe’s Ukraine crusade snapped.
Trump didn’t stop at legitimacy: “Russia has the upper hand... He has to start accepting things.”
But the deeper detonation was aimed at Europe itself. Trump downloaded humiliation onto an entire continent: “Most European nations are decaying. They’re weak... Europe doesn’t know what to do.”
In those sentences, Trump exposed Europe’s deepest fear, that behind its moral theatrics lies a hollowed-out, Russophobic managerial class that mistook psychosis for strategy and posturing for power.
For years, these same Eurocrats marched Europe into economic ruin, even preparing to blow up what remains of the post–WWII financial order just to preserve the farcical illusion of “standing up to Russia.” In their addict-like desperation, they now move to steal Russian sovereign assets, a stunt so reckless it threatens the very foundation of the fiat Ponzi. And when Europeans began to question this madness, Brussels answered with Orwellian repression, weaponizing the DSA to silence speech, even exporting censorship across the Atlantic, all to suffocate the moment when the truth about the war finally breaks through their propaganda firewall.
Europe’s leaders know peace means a reckoning, a reckoning for the sanctions that immolated industry, for the energy suicide that bankrupted households, for nuclear debt mortgaging their future, and for the lies told daily to hide military collapse.
Russia didn’t defeat Europe. Europe defeated itself, consumed by a Russophobic delirium that justified any policy, no matter how suicidal, so long as it fed the delusion of moral supremacy.
That’s why Europe fears peace more than war. Peace brings accountability. Peace reveals betrayal.
When Trump said Europe is “decaying,” he was diagnosing a worldview collapsing under its own contradictions. When he said Europe is “weak,” he wasn’t mocking, he was acknowledging a continent that outsourced its sovereignty to Washington and now screams in panic as Washington walks away.
And Zelensky? He is now the symbol and mirror of everything Europe gambled and lost. Unelected. Corrupt. Out of options.
History was never fooled. Because the the collapse didn’t begin with Trump’s interview, his interview merely said aloud what reality had already written. That Ukraine could never win. That Europe could not lead. That Zelensky could not escape a mandate he no longer had. And that the entire Atlanticist project was built on a myth too fragile to survive contact with the map.
As the smoke clears, the reckoning comes into focus, a Europe stripped of its fantasies, a leadership exposed in its impotence, and a Ukrainian puppet president discovering that once legitimacy evaporates, even the noscripted applause fades.
And when Washington stops believing the story, the story ends. That is the moment we’ve reached.
Zelensky’s borrowed authority is spent. Europe’s manufactured unity is exhausted. The war narrative that held an entire continent hostage is collapsing under the architecture of its own psychosis.
And as Trump speaks the truth Europe spent years suppressing, the final scene comes into view: a West forced to confront not the enemy it imagined, but the ruins of the illusions it built for itself.
Trump just told the world he’s closer to P.T. Barnum, a showman running a democracy-themed circus without the inconvenience of elections.
In one interview, the mask dropped. Trump didn’t tiptoe. He detonated.
“They haven’t had an election in a long time... It gets to a point where it’s not a democracy anymore. It’s time to hold an election. They’re using war not to hold an election. Ukrainians should have that choice.”
That’s the U.S. president publicly declaring what Europe spent years forbidding its citizens to say: Zelensky is unelected, and ruling by wartime decree while preaching “democracy” to donors who fund his survival. And with those words, the entire moral edifice of Europe’s Ukraine crusade snapped.
Trump didn’t stop at legitimacy: “Russia has the upper hand... He has to start accepting things.”
But the deeper detonation was aimed at Europe itself. Trump downloaded humiliation onto an entire continent: “Most European nations are decaying. They’re weak... Europe doesn’t know what to do.”
In those sentences, Trump exposed Europe’s deepest fear, that behind its moral theatrics lies a hollowed-out, Russophobic managerial class that mistook psychosis for strategy and posturing for power.
For years, these same Eurocrats marched Europe into economic ruin, even preparing to blow up what remains of the post–WWII financial order just to preserve the farcical illusion of “standing up to Russia.” In their addict-like desperation, they now move to steal Russian sovereign assets, a stunt so reckless it threatens the very foundation of the fiat Ponzi. And when Europeans began to question this madness, Brussels answered with Orwellian repression, weaponizing the DSA to silence speech, even exporting censorship across the Atlantic, all to suffocate the moment when the truth about the war finally breaks through their propaganda firewall.
Europe’s leaders know peace means a reckoning, a reckoning for the sanctions that immolated industry, for the energy suicide that bankrupted households, for nuclear debt mortgaging their future, and for the lies told daily to hide military collapse.
Russia didn’t defeat Europe. Europe defeated itself, consumed by a Russophobic delirium that justified any policy, no matter how suicidal, so long as it fed the delusion of moral supremacy.
That’s why Europe fears peace more than war. Peace brings accountability. Peace reveals betrayal.
When Trump said Europe is “decaying,” he was diagnosing a worldview collapsing under its own contradictions. When he said Europe is “weak,” he wasn’t mocking, he was acknowledging a continent that outsourced its sovereignty to Washington and now screams in panic as Washington walks away.
And Zelensky? He is now the symbol and mirror of everything Europe gambled and lost. Unelected. Corrupt. Out of options.
History was never fooled. Because the the collapse didn’t begin with Trump’s interview, his interview merely said aloud what reality had already written. That Ukraine could never win. That Europe could not lead. That Zelensky could not escape a mandate he no longer had. And that the entire Atlanticist project was built on a myth too fragile to survive contact with the map.
As the smoke clears, the reckoning comes into focus, a Europe stripped of its fantasies, a leadership exposed in its impotence, and a Ukrainian puppet president discovering that once legitimacy evaporates, even the noscripted applause fades.
And when Washington stops believing the story, the story ends. That is the moment we’ve reached.
Zelensky’s borrowed authority is spent. Europe’s manufactured unity is exhausted. The war narrative that held an entire continent hostage is collapsing under the architecture of its own psychosis.
And as Trump speaks the truth Europe spent years suppressing, the final scene comes into view: a West forced to confront not the enemy it imagined, but the ruins of the illusions it built for itself.
❤12💯12👏4🤣3