Origin of "Woke Capitalism"
So-called "Woke Capitalism" is a product of Leftist cultural hegemony (specifically in academia), elite conspiracy, and "Civil Rights" law.
1. Leftist hegemony in academia (and education in general) indoctrinates each new generation of elites, bureaucrats, and middle managers with "woke" nonsense — see for example, the Tumblr generation getting HR jobs at Amazon. Leftist views are also socially enforced via media, social media, etc.
2. Elite conspiracy is self-explanatory: All major CEOs and corporate leaders are members of globalist organizations like the Council on Foreign Relations and Bilderberg Group. Open the website of any major corporation and you'll find that its board of directors is full of CFR and Davos goons. These types have been pushing Leftist ideology for centuries; "Globalism" and "Leftism" are synonymous.
3. All corporations are beholden to so-called "Civil Rights" laws that literally force them to "go woke." Even if corporations aren't involved with shady Globalist organizations, they still get spanked by the government if they do a heckin' racism.
There is currently a convoluted Marxoid-type theory in vogue on the Right, which states that "wokeness" is a "natural result of Capitalism" because Capitalism is about "removing barriers to consumption." So, it's completely rational that mega-corporations would fund BLM (a Marxist terrorist organization), promote pedophilic "Drag Queen" story hours, and indoctrinate literal toddlers with transgender ideology.
This theory makes no sense at all.
If "wokeness" is an inevitable result of Capitalism, then why were corporations "bigoted" from the dawn of capitalism in the 16th Century, until after the Second World War? What caused these corporations to abruptly switch from being unironic "White supremacists" to supporters of Black Trans Toddler Lives Matter?
"Woke Capitalism" only arose after Leftists had secured cultural hegemony and multiple generations had been brainwashed. Woke Capitalism is simply Cultural Marxism. James Lindsay was 100% correct when he identified the progression of "wokeness" as Leninism → Maosim → Western Marxism → "Neo-Marxism" ("wokeness").
"Capitalism" is not an autonomous force. Corporations shouldn't be viewed as special unique entities controlled by abstract wizardry, but as nodes of power that can be captured and controlled by ideologically-motivated parties, just like the media, academia, or judiciary.
Certain people use their capital to push Globalist/Leftist politics, as they have always done: Engels was a rich factory owner, Jacob Schiff (a director of Wells Fargo and an architect of the Federal Reserve) funded the Bolsheviks, and so on.
Currently, the world's largest 'asset management' firm (which is basically a company that manages funds for other companies and invests money on their behalf) is BlackRock, with 9.5 trillion dollars in assets. The company is so big that Bloomberg called them the "fourth branch of the government."
BlackRock's CEO, Larry Fink (who is an 'Agenda Contributor' for the World Economic Forum), follows a United Nations policy called Environmental, Social, and Corporate Governance (ESG). BlackRock prioritizes investments in companies that are in line with the UN's ESG principles, which include: Climate change, sustainability, diversity, human rights, and animal welfare. (AKA: Technocracy, White genocide, and veganism). ESG functions as a "woke" social credit score that cuts companies out of the financial system.
Did "Capitalism" make Larry Fink enforce these radical, Far-Left values? Is it profitable to cut the dicks off little children or to normalize pedophilia? Or are these people perhaps motivated by something other than the mere acquisition of wealth?
So-called "Woke Capitalism" is a product of Leftist cultural hegemony (specifically in academia), elite conspiracy, and "Civil Rights" law.
1. Leftist hegemony in academia (and education in general) indoctrinates each new generation of elites, bureaucrats, and middle managers with "woke" nonsense — see for example, the Tumblr generation getting HR jobs at Amazon. Leftist views are also socially enforced via media, social media, etc.
2. Elite conspiracy is self-explanatory: All major CEOs and corporate leaders are members of globalist organizations like the Council on Foreign Relations and Bilderberg Group. Open the website of any major corporation and you'll find that its board of directors is full of CFR and Davos goons. These types have been pushing Leftist ideology for centuries; "Globalism" and "Leftism" are synonymous.
3. All corporations are beholden to so-called "Civil Rights" laws that literally force them to "go woke." Even if corporations aren't involved with shady Globalist organizations, they still get spanked by the government if they do a heckin' racism.
There is currently a convoluted Marxoid-type theory in vogue on the Right, which states that "wokeness" is a "natural result of Capitalism" because Capitalism is about "removing barriers to consumption." So, it's completely rational that mega-corporations would fund BLM (a Marxist terrorist organization), promote pedophilic "Drag Queen" story hours, and indoctrinate literal toddlers with transgender ideology.
This theory makes no sense at all.
If "wokeness" is an inevitable result of Capitalism, then why were corporations "bigoted" from the dawn of capitalism in the 16th Century, until after the Second World War? What caused these corporations to abruptly switch from being unironic "White supremacists" to supporters of Black Trans Toddler Lives Matter?
"Woke Capitalism" only arose after Leftists had secured cultural hegemony and multiple generations had been brainwashed. Woke Capitalism is simply Cultural Marxism. James Lindsay was 100% correct when he identified the progression of "wokeness" as Leninism → Maosim → Western Marxism → "Neo-Marxism" ("wokeness").
"Capitalism" is not an autonomous force. Corporations shouldn't be viewed as special unique entities controlled by abstract wizardry, but as nodes of power that can be captured and controlled by ideologically-motivated parties, just like the media, academia, or judiciary.
Certain people use their capital to push Globalist/Leftist politics, as they have always done: Engels was a rich factory owner, Jacob Schiff (a director of Wells Fargo and an architect of the Federal Reserve) funded the Bolsheviks, and so on.
Currently, the world's largest 'asset management' firm (which is basically a company that manages funds for other companies and invests money on their behalf) is BlackRock, with 9.5 trillion dollars in assets. The company is so big that Bloomberg called them the "fourth branch of the government."
BlackRock's CEO, Larry Fink (who is an 'Agenda Contributor' for the World Economic Forum), follows a United Nations policy called Environmental, Social, and Corporate Governance (ESG). BlackRock prioritizes investments in companies that are in line with the UN's ESG principles, which include: Climate change, sustainability, diversity, human rights, and animal welfare. (AKA: Technocracy, White genocide, and veganism). ESG functions as a "woke" social credit score that cuts companies out of the financial system.
Did "Capitalism" make Larry Fink enforce these radical, Far-Left values? Is it profitable to cut the dicks off little children or to normalize pedophilia? Or are these people perhaps motivated by something other than the mere acquisition of wealth?
Bloomberg.com
In Fink We Trust: BlackRock Is Now ‘Fourth Branch of Government’
When the Fed looked for bond-buying help in a crisis, it turned to the giant money manager.
This is a real article by a real journalist.
https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/politics/anti-vaxxers-kill-your-babies-25025422
https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/politics/anti-vaxxers-kill-your-babies-25025422
UK: In a shocking turn of events, "Lord Ahmed of Rotherham" has been convicted of pedophilia, with crimes spanning almost 50 years.
Nazir Ahmed, a Pakistani immigrant and ex-Labor Party politician, was recommended for lordship by Tony Blair. He was the UK's first Muslim Lord.
https://archive.vn/wjcXQ
Nazir Ahmed, a Pakistani immigrant and ex-Labor Party politician, was recommended for lordship by Tony Blair. He was the UK's first Muslim Lord.
https://archive.vn/wjcXQ
The 'Build Back Better' agenda was invented by the United Nations in the early 2000s. As far as I know, the phrase was first used in 2004 by UNICEF and the Global Facility for Disaster Reduction and Recovery (which was founded by the UN's World Bank).
"Build Back Better" basically means "never let a good crisis go to waste." It is a strategy, designed by the United Nations, for Globalists to use disasters (natural or otherwise) as justification for expanding their domination over societies by building new or replacement infrastructure.
Naturally, they pass it off as harmless, no-strings-attached philanthropy but it is nothing of the sort. BBB agendas focus on meeting "Sustainable Development Goals" (implementing Agenda 21) and always include stereotypical Globalist nonsense about promoting "fairness" and "equality," which means teaching prepubescent children about sodomy and destroying the family by turning women into wageslaves.
"Build Back Better" basically means "never let a good crisis go to waste." It is a strategy, designed by the United Nations, for Globalists to use disasters (natural or otherwise) as justification for expanding their domination over societies by building new or replacement infrastructure.
Naturally, they pass it off as harmless, no-strings-attached philanthropy but it is nothing of the sort. BBB agendas focus on meeting "Sustainable Development Goals" (implementing Agenda 21) and always include stereotypical Globalist nonsense about promoting "fairness" and "equality," which means teaching prepubescent children about sodomy and destroying the family by turning women into wageslaves.
No idea why people on the Right keep trying to redeem Socialism by desperately scouring history for mythical "based Leftists," and so on.
The Left has always been "woke." Proudhon was an anti-racist/anti-nationalist. Fourier invented feminism. People like the Saint Simonianists (the "patriarchs of Socialism" according to Marx) preached sexual revolution a century before Magnus Hirschfeld founded the World League for Sexual Reform.
Since its inception, Leftism has been an international conspiracy to destroy White civilization via a two-pronged attack on our demographics: Firstly undermining the family via feminism, LGBT, etc., and secondly the race and nation via mass migration, anti-imperialism, post-colonialism, Cultural Marxism, etc.
The rare Leftists in history who were not anti-family were almost always anti-White (e.g. Third World dictators) and those who were not anti-White were almost always anti-family (e.g. early Socialists who lived in homogeneous White countries).
Today, all Leftists are vehemently anti-White and vehemently anti-family. So, who is the target audience for "muh based Leftists"? Is it the gays? The transgenders? The Black nationalists? Just who is this malarkey supposed to appeal to?
The Left has always been "woke." Proudhon was an anti-racist/anti-nationalist. Fourier invented feminism. People like the Saint Simonianists (the "patriarchs of Socialism" according to Marx) preached sexual revolution a century before Magnus Hirschfeld founded the World League for Sexual Reform.
Since its inception, Leftism has been an international conspiracy to destroy White civilization via a two-pronged attack on our demographics: Firstly undermining the family via feminism, LGBT, etc., and secondly the race and nation via mass migration, anti-imperialism, post-colonialism, Cultural Marxism, etc.
The rare Leftists in history who were not anti-family were almost always anti-White (e.g. Third World dictators) and those who were not anti-White were almost always anti-family (e.g. early Socialists who lived in homogeneous White countries).
Today, all Leftists are vehemently anti-White and vehemently anti-family. So, who is the target audience for "muh based Leftists"? Is it the gays? The transgenders? The Black nationalists? Just who is this malarkey supposed to appeal to?
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
"6G-powered mixed-reality goggles" made by China and exhibited at CES 2022.
Two handy functions: Hides the disgusting Third World dystopia that Globalism Inc turned your country into and beams YouTube adverts directly into your eyeballs.
https://twitter.com/FrRonconi/status/1479494612003794956
Two handy functions: Hides the disgusting Third World dystopia that Globalism Inc turned your country into and beams YouTube adverts directly into your eyeballs.
https://twitter.com/FrRonconi/status/1479494612003794956
Forwarded from Morgoth's Review
With people such as Robert Malone and Mike Yeadon finally being given mainstream platforms I'm starting to see a trend emerge where many people online become bored with them and are now calling Malone in particular a shill.
I'm delighted and somewhat relieved that subjects such as the efficacy of the vaccines, side effects, digital ID's and the technocratic power-grab are entering mainstream discourse but for online subcultures this often means they've lost the monopoly on their own ''truth''.
And so we enter a situation where the largest podcast in the world platforms a man who alleges a crime against humanity is taking place, that there's mass corruption and deaths, but by doing so the issues raised become normie-tier, passe, old. Like when people go off an Indie band after they hit the big-time.
Yet the implications of this going forward are that public trust in western institutions and authorities could collapse entirely with consequences we can only guess at, in the internet age though, it's all just entertainment and there's always another novelty take out there to titillate, the next new thing.
I'm delighted and somewhat relieved that subjects such as the efficacy of the vaccines, side effects, digital ID's and the technocratic power-grab are entering mainstream discourse but for online subcultures this often means they've lost the monopoly on their own ''truth''.
And so we enter a situation where the largest podcast in the world platforms a man who alleges a crime against humanity is taking place, that there's mass corruption and deaths, but by doing so the issues raised become normie-tier, passe, old. Like when people go off an Indie band after they hit the big-time.
Yet the implications of this going forward are that public trust in western institutions and authorities could collapse entirely with consequences we can only guess at, in the internet age though, it's all just entertainment and there's always another novelty take out there to titillate, the next new thing.
100% agree with Morgoth's post above — The entire point of dissident politics is to make your "fringe" views mainstream. Every step in that direction is a positive. As I've said in the past, all normal people hate this globalist shit ("wokeness," technocracy, digital identity, etc.) and it's now easier than ever to explain that it's all part of the same agenda.
Edit: You see someone shit talking the WHO or WEF or The Great Reset and you can easily say "Hey you know the United Nations and European Union follow an official policy called 'Replacement Migration' that aims to fill the West with hundreds of millions of Third World migrants? They have big NGOs shipping these so-called 'refugees' by the boatload 24/7. They're sponsored by people like Bill Gates and George Soros."
Edit: You see someone shit talking the WHO or WEF or The Great Reset and you can easily say "Hey you know the United Nations and European Union follow an official policy called 'Replacement Migration' that aims to fill the West with hundreds of millions of Third World migrants? They have big NGOs shipping these so-called 'refugees' by the boatload 24/7. They're sponsored by people like Bill Gates and George Soros."
One of the main problems with "democracy" is that it doesn't really exist. "Democratic" states are always owned by an oligarchy (either covert or overt) that controls a corrupt bureaucracy, which in turn tricks the masses into thinking that they have power over society by allowing them to vote in a new faceman every four years. Worse still, the masses take any criticism of "democracy" as a personal attack, as if you yourself are trying to steal away their individual political power, which didn't really exist to begin with.
If Western countries were truly democratic, they would never have devolved into the cancerous state they're in today. The agendas of Globalism have never had any organic mass support. Even now, with the might of the entire establishment behind them, utilizing the most advanced and intrusive propaganda machine in human history, Globalist agendas are still utterly repulsive to a significant proportion of the population.
If Western countries were truly democratic, they would never have devolved into the cancerous state they're in today. The agendas of Globalism have never had any organic mass support. Even now, with the might of the entire establishment behind them, utilizing the most advanced and intrusive propaganda machine in human history, Globalist agendas are still utterly repulsive to a significant proportion of the population.
US spooks collaborating with CCP and other Globalists to organize worldwide virus hoax?
Project Veritas just released this statement that the COVID virus was a DARPA project developed in a Wuhan lab.
Timestamp around 4 mins: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_zgoENmeddA
The document is noscriptd if "HR00118S0017" if you want to search for it.
Reminder that Moderna was funded by DARPA and BioNTech (Pfizer) was funded by the European Union.
Project Veritas just released this statement that the COVID virus was a DARPA project developed in a Wuhan lab.
Timestamp around 4 mins: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_zgoENmeddA
The document is noscriptd if "HR00118S0017" if you want to search for it.
Reminder that Moderna was funded by DARPA and BioNTech (Pfizer) was funded by the European Union.
Forwarded from American Krogan
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
I'll just leave this here. It's from a 2018 conference about the Anti-Semitism Cyber Monitoring System.
The then, Diaspora Affairs Ministry Naftali Bennett, (Now the Israeli PM) said:
“The time has come to put a mirror in front of our haters and expose the ugly face of modern anti-Semitism. From now on we’ll know who every anti-Semitic inciter is.”
The then, Diaspora Affairs Ministry Naftali Bennett, (Now the Israeli PM) said:
“The time has come to put a mirror in front of our haters and expose the ugly face of modern anti-Semitism. From now on we’ll know who every anti-Semitic inciter is.”