Thursday at 6 PM ET – Morgoth returns to RO for a discussion on power and systems of control. Looking forward to it!

If you haven't seen our first show, be sure to watch it here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qyoebEUVAg0

Is Wokeness a Religion? - New short video from Patrick Casey.

I'm enjoying these sub-10 minute videos. I'd like to see more of them. Most RW content is longform today and while there's nothing wrong with such content, it's good to have some variety. People's attention spans have shrunk a lot over the last decade or so.

"Definition of wokeness" and "why it is bad" as requested by this Twitter libtard:

Wokeness is primarily hating straight White people, and secondarily hating success, beauty, strength, etc. The first is bad because straight White people built the West and everyone else is ruining it, the second is bad because worshiping failure, ugliness, and weakness is suicidal.

Also succinctly summarized by the pictured Mystery Grove quote and by Edward Dutton: "Wokeness is merely Communism for a society of high material wealth."

Small donors overwhelmingly support Trump.

Joseph Bronski said that he defines "Wokeness" in his research as: Support for feminism, homosexuality, and foreigners. He pointed out that these things depress the fertility of the founding/native population of an empire/nation and always seem to pop up during periods of societal decline.

I would add support for economic leftism to that list, since it predicts negative psychological and physical characteristics (spite, malicious envy, selfishness, physical weakness, etc.).

The current conservative definition of 'wokeness' essentially boils down to: "These crazy RADICAL Leftists are destroying our race- and gender-blind utopia! This isn't what MLK's dream was about!" It exists to give Leftists like Chris Rufo and James Lindsay wiggle room to say: "I'm not like THOSE crazy Leftists! They want to acknowledge group differences!"

We need to change this definition to one that captures the essence of "wokeness" (which is just regular Leftism as it has existed for centuries): The inversion of everything that is healthy, evolutionarily adaptive, and in favor of White group interests.

- Anti-White / pro-brown
- Anti-male / pro-female
- Anti-family / pro-LGBT
- Anti-wealth / pro-poverty
- Anti-strength / pro-weakness
- Anti-beauty / pro-ugliness
- Anti-health / pro-sickness

This is the nature of "wokeness," not the Rufo-Lindsay-ite idea that it is some sort of "Neo-Racism" or "Neo-Sexism." It is about making society more brown, more gay, more feminist, poorer, weaker, uglier, sicker.

Thread debunking the claim that Proto-Indo-Europeans originated in the Middle East: https://twitter.com/th_l_t_d_/status/1684662987943034880

This thread is genetics autism but a good example of how geneticists etc. lie by manipulating data. These lies get published in academic journals, sent to journalists who don't understand what they're reading, then become canon after being injected into public consciousness by MSM.

Dutton explained an idea in a video a few months ago that it is not adaptive to be high trust while being low IQ, if you were low IQ and high trust you would be constantly exploited so that trust is punished rapidly and harshly selected out (the broader conspiracy culture strongly reminds me of this).

Therefore, taking this theory as true, as IQ declines trust naturally will too, meaning dysgenics and social decay are probably inextricable.

A new linguistics paper predicts PIE is way older than previously assumed, and tries to reconcile their model with bad data from the southern arc paper about a CHG origin for PIe resulting in bad data out and a PIE=CHG conclusion. They ignore Sredny Stog which is STILL old enough for their novel posterior dating (i added it to their graph above to demonstrate)
Even the author of the Southern Arc hypothesis, Laziridis, himself doubts this new linguistic dating based on the mismatch with genetic evidence and an historical linguist, Guus Kroonen, has pointed out that the dates are too early and are unrealistic.
The new linguistic theory basically pushes southern arc to even more ludicrous extremes and says IVC and BMAC spoke Indo-Iranic languages. This is one of the stupidest takes in IE studies in a long time.

Of course when this libtard says Afrikaners are "rude" and "difficult" he isn't talking about manners/politeness.

He just hates Afrikaners because they don't want to live around Third World brown people — and neither does he, considering he lives somewhere that's 95% White and 5% Chinese.

Studies debunking the myth that Neolithic Early European Farmers were egalitarian, matriarchal, feminist, pacifists:

"Compiling data from various sources, it becomes apparent that violence was endemic in Neolithic [northwestern] Europe, sometimes reaching levels of intergroup hostilities that ended in the utter destruction of entire communities. [...] Increasing competition and inequality are key factors that fostered the emergence of larger-scale human conflict and warfare." (Source)

"The new evidence presented here for unequivocal lethal violence on a large scale is put into perspective for the Early Neolithic of Central Europe and, in conjunction with previous results, indicates that massacres of entire communities were not isolated occurrences but rather were frequent features of the last phases of the LBK. [...] A new violence-related pattern was identified here: the intentional and systematic breaking of lower limbs. The abundance of the identified perimortem fractures clearly indicates torture and/or mutilation of the victims." (Source)

"The scale and sophistication of megalithic architecture along the Atlantic seaboard, culminating in the great passage tomb complexes, is particularly impressive. [...] the human expenditure required to erect the largest monuments has led some researchers to emphasize hierarchy - of which the most extreme case is a small elite marshalling the labour of the masses. Here we present evidence that a social stratum of this type was established during the Neolithic period in Ireland [...] patrilineal royal families that are headed by god-kings" (Source)

"Here we report ancient DNA, strontium isotope and contextual data from more than 100 individuals [...] dated to the western European Neolithic around 4850–4500 bc. We find that this burial community was genetically connected by two main pedigrees, spanning seven generations, that were patrilocal and patrilineal, with evidence for female exogamy. [...] The differences between younger and older-age sex ratios suggest that older daughters, from around the age of 15, left to join new groups, again consistent with a female exogamic residential system." (Source)

Tattooed women are more likely to be LGBT, promiscuous, egalitarian, drug users, exhibit psychopathology, and get divorced. Stereotypes 100% correct once again. No data on increased criminality afaik.

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/341764944_Tattooed_and_Non-Tattooed_Women_Motivation_Social_Practices_and_Risk_Behavior

https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12119-020-09729-1

https://sci-hub.ru/https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1047279711002870