In this thread, I post many citations proving that Leftists are just "bad people." Leftism is primarily motivated by spite, envy, desire for revenge against society, which they blame for nature making them losers.
X (formerly Twitter)
th_l_t_d_ 🇺🇸 (@thltd_) on X
Why are leftists like this? Pure spite because they are, on average, uglier, shorter, poorer, weaker, more neurotic, more mentally ill, more selfish, narcissistic, etc. They also have low disgust sensitivity, impaired threat detection, and so on.
I will…
I will…
Tiktok on why women break up with men shared by a self-proclaimed "traditionalist match-maker" on Twitter.
The five examples of things that caused the fictional girl to break up with her fictional boyfriend were:
- No good morning texts
- Didn't compliment her haircut
- Forgot her dog's birthday
- Five minutes late to dinner
- Left dishes in the sink.
She also says that the boyfriend forgetting to send good morning texts "made" his girlfriend pick fights with him.
All this proves is that foids are insane, manipulative, irrational, and vindictive.
The five examples of things that caused the fictional girl to break up with her fictional boyfriend were:
- No good morning texts
- Didn't compliment her haircut
- Forgot her dog's birthday
- Five minutes late to dinner
- Left dishes in the sink.
She also says that the boyfriend forgetting to send good morning texts "made" his girlfriend pick fights with him.
All this proves is that foids are insane, manipulative, irrational, and vindictive.
This is the sort of bullshit you get on the Right if you don't gatekeep the crypto-feminists: "Umm, actually, the breakup was the man's fault because he didn't play along with his girlfriend's psychotic mind games and irrational demands."
https://news.1rj.ru/str/thuletide/6305
https://news.1rj.ru/str/thuletide/6305
Telegram
Thuletide
Tiktok on why women break up with men shared by a self-proclaimed "traditionalist match-maker" on Twitter.
The five examples of things that caused the fictional girl to break up with her fictional boyfriend were:
- No good morning texts
- Didn't compliment…
The five examples of things that caused the fictional girl to break up with her fictional boyfriend were:
- No good morning texts
- Didn't compliment…
Reminder: Whites who racemix are on average dumber, poorer, fatter, less honest, more promiscuous, more mentally ill, more neurotic, and more prone to risk-taking behavior.
https://mankindquarterly.org/archive/issue/64-2/8
https://mankindquarterly.org/archive/issue/64-2/8
Forwarded from /CIG/ Telegram | Counter Intelligence Global (ȚepeȘ)
📖 The Fall of Man — Richard Lynn’s Dysgenics
Dysgenics: Genetic Deterioration in Modern Populations
When it comes to population, quality matters more than quantity. While educated Westerners never tire of sprinkling their conversations with the word “overpopulation,” voicing concern about population worth is taboo. Put it this way: you have to spend the rest of your life in a city filled with Nigerians or Japanese. You can either pick the ethnic makeup or the amount of people in the city. Which would you choose? As it’s settled that genes influence character and intelligence, could these traits be declining in some or all populations? Has it to some extent? Anecdotes exist about single educated women and fertile welfare queens, but hard data is needed.
While support for eugenics has been around since the time of Plato, the first person to worry about genetic deterioration was French physician Benedict August Morel. He’s an obscure figure today and much better known is the more important Sir Francis Galton, who coined the term eugenics in 1883. He thought that more genes for lower intelligence and poor character were concentrated in the lower classes, whose higher fertility would lead to a decline in genetic quality. Galton spent his life working to reverse the trend. He eventually convinced Darwin himself of the danger. Biologist Alfred Russell Wallace wrote:
In one of my last conversations with Darwin he expressed himself very gloomily on the future of humanity, on the ground that in our modern civilisation natural selection had no play and the fittest did not survive.
It wasn’t until 1974 that Nobel prize winning physicist William Shockley called the process dysgenics. Darwin went on to despair over the excessive breeding of “the scum.” Data has always been needed on whether his fears had been justified. Richard Lynn brings together studies and data from the last 200 years dealing with the connection between fertility and intelligence/socioeconomic status from all over the world. How afraid should we be?
⬇️ Continued:
🔗 https://counter-currents.com/2011/04/richard-lynns-dysgenics/
Dysgenics: Genetic Deterioration in Modern Populations
When it comes to population, quality matters more than quantity. While educated Westerners never tire of sprinkling their conversations with the word “overpopulation,” voicing concern about population worth is taboo. Put it this way: you have to spend the rest of your life in a city filled with Nigerians or Japanese. You can either pick the ethnic makeup or the amount of people in the city. Which would you choose? As it’s settled that genes influence character and intelligence, could these traits be declining in some or all populations? Has it to some extent? Anecdotes exist about single educated women and fertile welfare queens, but hard data is needed.
While support for eugenics has been around since the time of Plato, the first person to worry about genetic deterioration was French physician Benedict August Morel. He’s an obscure figure today and much better known is the more important Sir Francis Galton, who coined the term eugenics in 1883. He thought that more genes for lower intelligence and poor character were concentrated in the lower classes, whose higher fertility would lead to a decline in genetic quality. Galton spent his life working to reverse the trend. He eventually convinced Darwin himself of the danger. Biologist Alfred Russell Wallace wrote:
In one of my last conversations with Darwin he expressed himself very gloomily on the future of humanity, on the ground that in our modern civilisation natural selection had no play and the fittest did not survive.
It wasn’t until 1974 that Nobel prize winning physicist William Shockley called the process dysgenics. Darwin went on to despair over the excessive breeding of “the scum.” Data has always been needed on whether his fears had been justified. Richard Lynn brings together studies and data from the last 200 years dealing with the connection between fertility and intelligence/socioeconomic status from all over the world. How afraid should we be?
⬇️ Continued:
🔗 https://counter-currents.com/2011/04/richard-lynns-dysgenics/
Counter-Currents
The Fall of Man: Richard Lynn’s Dysgenics
1,944 words Richard Lynn Dysgenics: Genetic Deterioration in Modern Populations Westport, Conn.: Praeger Publishers, 1996 When it comes to population, quality matters more than quantity. While educated Westerners never tire of sprinkling their conversations…
Forwarded from LeakyVax
Although it's been a fad for a while I've recently been looking into red light therapy, and it seems to be another episode in the saga of strangely simple interventions with seemingly many benefits. Red light therapy appears to be able to:
The common mechanism behind these benefits seems to be that red light excites porphyrins, a class of compound ubiquitous in the body, and when this occurs in mitochondria it increases ATP production, generates reactive oxygen species, change trannoscription factors, this in turn has many trickle down effects that impact cell proliferation, tissue oxygenation, inflammation, etc.
A 15 min exposure to 670 nm light reduced the degree of blood glucose elevation following glucose intake by 27.7%
—Light stimulation of mitochondria reduces blood glucose levels, J. Biophotonics. (2024)
[10.1002/jbio.202300521]
Here, we use 670-nm light to improve photoreceptor performance and measure this psychophysically in those aged 28-72 years.
—Optically Improved Mitochondrial Function Redeems Aged Human Visual Decline, J. Gerontol. (2020)
[10.1093/gerona/glaa155]
The results of these biochemical and cellular changes in animals and patients include such benefits as increased healing in chronic wounds, improvements in sports injuries and carpal tunnel syndrome, pain reduction in arthritis and neuropathies, and amelioration of damage after heart attacks, stroke, nerve injury and retinal toxicity.
—Mechanisms of low level light therapy, SPIE BiOS (2006)
[10.1117/12.646294]
Amelioration of acne by light therapy, although comparable to the effects of oral antibiotics, offers faster resolution and fewer side effects and leads to patient satisfaction.
—Light Therapy in the Treatment of Acne Vulgaris, Dermatol. Surg. (2004)
[10.1111/j.1524-4725.2004.30053.x]
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Average IQ worldwide is 86. So, what White people regard as "average" intelligence is actually one standard deviation above the mean.
Highest national average IQ:
Singapore 106
Hong Kong 105
South Korea 104.3
Japan 104.2
Lowest NIQ:
Malawi 64.5
Sierra Leone 64.1
Gambia 63.7
São Tomé & Príncipe 63.2
Countries of interest:
United States 97.7
Canada 100.3
United Kingdom 99.3
Australia 99.3
Germany 99
Brazil 84.7
Russia 97.2
India 78.5
China 101
South Africa 71.6
Iran 85
Mexico 86.4
Haiti 68.9
Syria 79.1
Libya 82.4
Afghanistan 73.2
Israel 94.4
UAE 87.3
Argentina 88.5
https://www.sebjenseb.net/p/most-accurate-national-iqs-possible
Highest national average IQ:
Singapore 106
Hong Kong 105
South Korea 104.3
Japan 104.2
Lowest NIQ:
Malawi 64.5
Sierra Leone 64.1
Gambia 63.7
São Tomé & Príncipe 63.2
Countries of interest:
United States 97.7
Canada 100.3
United Kingdom 99.3
Australia 99.3
Germany 99
Brazil 84.7
Russia 97.2
India 78.5
China 101
South Africa 71.6
Iran 85
Mexico 86.4
Haiti 68.9
Syria 79.1
Libya 82.4
Afghanistan 73.2
Israel 94.4
UAE 87.3
Argentina 88.5
https://www.sebjenseb.net/p/most-accurate-national-iqs-possible
Stalin: "Without American aid via Lend-Lease, the USSR would have lost WW2."
https://history.state.gov/historicaldocuments/frus1943CairoTehran/d353
https://history.state.gov/historicaldocuments/frus1943CairoTehran/d375
https://history.state.gov/historicaldocuments/frus1943CairoTehran/d353
https://history.state.gov/historicaldocuments/frus1943CairoTehran/d375
Forwarded from Thuletide
Left-Wing elites aren't imposing multiracialism and immigration just to be nice to brown people, they genuinely hate White people and want to cause us as much suffering as possible.
White Leftists have negative in-group preference, meaning that they genuinely hate their own race and actively work against their own racial interests at every available opportunity.
They don't believe in equality, they believe that Whites are lazier, less intelligent, and more violent than Blacks, that Whites are oppressing Blacks, and that all Whites should feel guilty.
They are also extremely mentally ill.
And that's just the White Leftists. When you factor in that many elites are non-Whites who have anti-White revenge complexes and ethnic grievance vendettas, the malevolence of their policies becomes even more transparent.
White Leftists have negative in-group preference, meaning that they genuinely hate their own race and actively work against their own racial interests at every available opportunity.
They don't believe in equality, they believe that Whites are lazier, less intelligent, and more violent than Blacks, that Whites are oppressing Blacks, and that all Whites should feel guilty.
They are also extremely mentally ill.
And that's just the White Leftists. When you factor in that many elites are non-Whites who have anti-White revenge complexes and ethnic grievance vendettas, the malevolence of their policies becomes even more transparent.
Useful data from the UK:
On social issues, politicians are more Left-Wing than their voters. "Conservative" politicians are almost as Left-Wing as people who vote for the Labour Party.
Economically, Conservative politicians range from centrist to moderately Capitalist while Conservative voters lean slightly Socialist - I suspect this is because the UK has a long history of state welfare and a terrible economy.
I imagine politicians vs. public data would show similar patterns in other Western countries, but I haven't discovered any polls as of yet.
Source (archive link)
On social issues, politicians are more Left-Wing than their voters. "Conservative" politicians are almost as Left-Wing as people who vote for the Labour Party.
Economically, Conservative politicians range from centrist to moderately Capitalist while Conservative voters lean slightly Socialist - I suspect this is because the UK has a long history of state welfare and a terrible economy.
I imagine politicians vs. public data would show similar patterns in other Western countries, but I haven't discovered any polls as of yet.
Source (archive link)