Leftist Xenophilia:
Updated 2020 stats of White leftist xenophilia (2018 stats on the right)
White leftists hate White people almost three times as much as conservatives like White people.
White conservatives are less ethnocentric than the least ethnocentric Blacks, Asians, and Hispanics.
Updated 2020 stats of White leftist xenophilia (2018 stats on the right)
White leftists hate White people almost three times as much as conservatives like White people.
White conservatives are less ethnocentric than the least ethnocentric Blacks, Asians, and Hispanics.
The global anti-White cultural revolution spreads to Canada:
https://twitter.com/PoliticsForAlI/status/1410902612329836546
I have seen some people asking why they should care about statues of Queen Elizabeth being torn down? This is why :
1. Anti-White hordes do not care who these statues depict, they attack them because statues, in general, symbolize white history/culture/politicalpower/etc.
2. The anti-White cultural revolution is a global threat.
3. American BLM-style riots will quickly evolve into South African "kill all Whites" if they remain unchallenged.
Anti-White people who openly say that they want to genocide us are destroying our civilizations from within. Selectively supporting their cultural revolution because they tore down some statues of people you personally dislike is completely insane. They are only tearing down statues because it is not (yet) legal for them to openly attack regular White people.
White people as a whole are in a global struggle against global enemies in a globalized world. Whites as a whole will be collectively screwed until we understand/accept this fact and organize accordingly.
I'm not advocating pan-Euroism erasure of ethnic identities or anything like that, just pointing out that all past (or current) geopolitical squabbles lose relevancy when almost the entire race is under threat of extinction. Smart Americans have warned about this since early 1900s.
https://twitter.com/PoliticsForAlI/status/1410902612329836546
I have seen some people asking why they should care about statues of Queen Elizabeth being torn down? This is why :
1. Anti-White hordes do not care who these statues depict, they attack them because statues, in general, symbolize white history/culture/politicalpower/etc.
2. The anti-White cultural revolution is a global threat.
3. American BLM-style riots will quickly evolve into South African "kill all Whites" if they remain unchallenged.
Anti-White people who openly say that they want to genocide us are destroying our civilizations from within. Selectively supporting their cultural revolution because they tore down some statues of people you personally dislike is completely insane. They are only tearing down statues because it is not (yet) legal for them to openly attack regular White people.
White people as a whole are in a global struggle against global enemies in a globalized world. Whites as a whole will be collectively screwed until we understand/accept this fact and organize accordingly.
I'm not advocating pan-Euroism erasure of ethnic identities or anything like that, just pointing out that all past (or current) geopolitical squabbles lose relevancy when almost the entire race is under threat of extinction. Smart Americans have warned about this since early 1900s.
Twitter
Politics For All
🚨 | NEW: Statues of Queen Victoria and Queen Elizabeth II have been toppled during protests in Canada
>Canadians aren’t allowed to leave their homes due to Covid unless it’s to burn down churches and destroy statues
https://twitter.com/leftyinvests/status/1410983102868951050
https://twitter.com/leftyinvests/status/1410983102868951050
Forwarded from Survive the Jive: All-feed
“I wish it need not have happened in my time,” said Frodo. “So do I,” said Gandalf, “and so do all who live to see such times. But that is not for them to decide. All we have to decide is what to do with the time that is given us.”
The fact that militaries across the west are purging everyone with vaguely pro-White sentiment should be a huge red flag to everyone and a strong indicator of what elites plan for us in the future.
https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/canadian-forces-army-ranger-myggland-1.6012307
https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/canadian-forces-army-ranger-myggland-1.6012307
CBC
Army probe of Ranger unit finds some members 'vulnerable' to extremism | CBC News
A Canadian army investigation of a troubled reserve unit at the centre of allegations of right-wing extremism identified several members as "vulnerable" and "at risk" of being swept up into "a hateful ideology."
Forwarded from Blair Cottrell 🇦🇺
>Man gets blood clots from AstraZeneca shot, is rushed to ICU
>Still wants his second shot, but with Pfizer instead
>His wife after seeing her husband hospitalised for 2 weeks over a vaccine wants her shot too
No, this isn’t the Babylon Bee, this is a state broadcaster and these are real people.
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2021-06-29/garry-recovering-from-blood-clots-linked-to-astrazeneca/100252574
>Still wants his second shot, but with Pfizer instead
>His wife after seeing her husband hospitalised for 2 weeks over a vaccine wants her shot too
No, this isn’t the Babylon Bee, this is a state broadcaster and these are real people.
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2021-06-29/garry-recovering-from-blood-clots-linked-to-astrazeneca/100252574
A lot of left-wing political theory and analysis just consists of pointing at objectively good things and then pathologizing them as evil and bigoted. So, if you ignore their stupid conclusions and whining, then a lot of their observations can be helpful.
Take critical race theory, for example: Western Civilization was objectively founded to benefit White people at the disadvantage of everyone else, and that's a good thing. White societies are irreparably "racist," and that's a good thing. Defending the West and the values of the West is defacto defending the political power and ideological values of White people, and that's a good thing.
The problems with Leftist theory is not their observational analysis, but their genius solutions to the "problems" (basic facts of nature) that they identify (pathologize).
Take critical race theory, for example: Western Civilization was objectively founded to benefit White people at the disadvantage of everyone else, and that's a good thing. White societies are irreparably "racist," and that's a good thing. Defending the West and the values of the West is defacto defending the political power and ideological values of White people, and that's a good thing.
The problems with Leftist theory is not their observational analysis, but their genius solutions to the "problems" (basic facts of nature) that they identify (pathologize).
New article:
Leading Harvard geneticist David Reich confirms the biological existence of ‘race’
"In 2018, two articles written by leading Harvard geneticist, David Reich, were published in the New York Times: How to Talk About ‘Race’ and Genetics and How Genetics Is Changing Our Understanding of ‘Race’. In both articles, he argued that the “social construct” (man-made categorization) of race accurately maps to the genetic/biological reality of race. However, the articles were, essentially, a plea for sanity on the Left-Wing."
Here are the relevant quotes from David Reich:
“As a geneticist I also know that it is simply no longer possible to ignore average genetic differences among ‘races.'”
“While race may be a social construct, differences in genetic ancestry that happen to correlate to many of today’s racial constructs are real.”
“To insist that no meaningful average differences among human populations are possible is harmful. It is perceived as misleading, even patronizing, by the general public.”
“Genetic studies have demonstrated differences across populations not just in the genetic determinants of simple traits such as skin color, but also in more complex traits like bodily dimensions and susceptibility to diseases.”
“Genetic variations are likely to affect behavior and cognition just as they affect other traits.”
“Given that all genetically determined traits differ somewhat among populations, we should expect that there will be differences in the average effects, including in traits like behavior.”
“Present-day human populations […] have in a number of instances been largely isolated from one another for tens of thousands of years. These long separations have provided adequate opportunity for the frequencies of genetic variations to change.”
“The ancestors of East Asians, Europeans, West Africans and Australians were, until recently, almost completely isolated from one another for 40,000 years or longer, which is more than sufficient time for the forces of evolution to work.”
“Well-meaning people who deny the possibility of substantial biological differences among human populations are digging themselves into an indefensible position, one that will not survive the onslaught of science.”
Leading Harvard geneticist David Reich confirms the biological existence of ‘race’
"In 2018, two articles written by leading Harvard geneticist, David Reich, were published in the New York Times: How to Talk About ‘Race’ and Genetics and How Genetics Is Changing Our Understanding of ‘Race’. In both articles, he argued that the “social construct” (man-made categorization) of race accurately maps to the genetic/biological reality of race. However, the articles were, essentially, a plea for sanity on the Left-Wing."
Here are the relevant quotes from David Reich:
“As a geneticist I also know that it is simply no longer possible to ignore average genetic differences among ‘races.'”
“While race may be a social construct, differences in genetic ancestry that happen to correlate to many of today’s racial constructs are real.”
“To insist that no meaningful average differences among human populations are possible is harmful. It is perceived as misleading, even patronizing, by the general public.”
“Genetic studies have demonstrated differences across populations not just in the genetic determinants of simple traits such as skin color, but also in more complex traits like bodily dimensions and susceptibility to diseases.”
“Genetic variations are likely to affect behavior and cognition just as they affect other traits.”
“Given that all genetically determined traits differ somewhat among populations, we should expect that there will be differences in the average effects, including in traits like behavior.”
“Present-day human populations […] have in a number of instances been largely isolated from one another for tens of thousands of years. These long separations have provided adequate opportunity for the frequencies of genetic variations to change.”
“The ancestors of East Asians, Europeans, West Africans and Australians were, until recently, almost completely isolated from one another for 40,000 years or longer, which is more than sufficient time for the forces of evolution to work.”
“Well-meaning people who deny the possibility of substantial biological differences among human populations are digging themselves into an indefensible position, one that will not survive the onslaught of science.”
Thuletide
Leading Harvard geneticist David Reich confirms the biological existence of ‘race’
Contents: IntroductionKey quotes from both articlesFrom: How to Talk About ‘Race’ and GeneticsFrom: How Genetics Is Changing Our Understanding of ‘Race’ 1. Introduction In 2018, two art…
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Happy 4th of July
New article:
>Identities are like onions: Thoughts on White identity and the formation of ethnic groups
My response to "Ummmm, what even is White???" posting from nationalists.
https://thuletide.wordpress.com/2021/07/04/identities-are-like-onions-thoughts-on-white-identity-and-the-formation-of-ethnic-groups/
>Identities are like onions: Thoughts on White identity and the formation of ethnic groups
My response to "Ummmm, what even is White???" posting from nationalists.
https://thuletide.wordpress.com/2021/07/04/identities-are-like-onions-thoughts-on-white-identity-and-the-formation-of-ethnic-groups/
Thuletide
Identities are like onions: Thoughts on White identity and the formation of ethnic groups
“Umm, what even is White???” — Nationalists, apparently There’s a lot of contention over nationalists around the world identifying with the term ‘White’ these da…
Forwarded from Friendly Sperg
Leftists will blame literally every single issue they have with the world on the CIA and Capitalism. But the second a nationalist identifies something he doesn't like (e.g being ethnically cleansed from his own nation) and even slightly hints that the elite might have a hand to play in it, the same leftists recoil and say "Stop blaming all your problems on the elite you conspiracy theorist" and tell you to just have more kids.
Forwarded from Pax Tube
My most recent video: What Fake Democracies Look Like.
Join me as we look at several countries who claim to be the most democratic in the world and analyze whether that’s true or not! You can also find my videos on my Odysee channel.
https://youtu.be/ngIVfXCKaAM
Join me as we look at several countries who claim to be the most democratic in the world and analyze whether that’s true or not! You can also find my videos on my Odysee channel.
https://youtu.be/ngIVfXCKaAM
YouTube
What Fake Democracies Look Like
Several Western governments currently front themselves as examples of democracy to the world. However, many of these nations are essentially fake democracies. Using this allegedly pro-democracy position, they condemn nations like China, Russia, Iran, etc…
Big tech may pull out of Hong Kong because HK passed laws that ban them from doxing private citizens.
A big tech coalition whined that the laws were "highly unusual and out of step with international privacy developments." Presumably by "international privacy developments" they mean big tech facilitating the doxing of private citizens to enforce the globalist social credit system.
Hilariously, their letter claimed that what qualifies "doxing" and what qualifies "psychological harm" is broad and subjective, and thus the laws are dangerous and open to abuse. Apparently, this logic does not apply to their own "hate speech" regulations. Abuse of power for me but not for thee.
Source: https://www.forbes.com/sites/roberthart/2021/07/05/anti-doxxing-law-could-force-tech-giants-including-amazon-google-from-hong-kong-industry-group-warns
A big tech coalition whined that the laws were "highly unusual and out of step with international privacy developments." Presumably by "international privacy developments" they mean big tech facilitating the doxing of private citizens to enforce the globalist social credit system.
Hilariously, their letter claimed that what qualifies "doxing" and what qualifies "psychological harm" is broad and subjective, and thus the laws are dangerous and open to abuse. Apparently, this logic does not apply to their own "hate speech" regulations. Abuse of power for me but not for thee.
Source: https://www.forbes.com/sites/roberthart/2021/07/05/anti-doxxing-law-could-force-tech-giants-including-amazon-google-from-hong-kong-industry-group-warns
Thomas Aquinas, 'The Causes of Love' from Summa Theologiae (1485) :
Ecclesiasticus 13:19 says, "Every animal loves its like." I respond: Likeness is, properly speaking, a cause of love. [...] Two individuals that have whiteness are said to be like one another. [This] type of likeness is a cause of the love of friendship or benevolence (causat amorem amicitiae seu benevolentiae). For from the fact that two individuals are like one another and have, as it were, one form, they are in some sense united in that form (sunt quodammodo unum in forma illa), in the way that two men are united in the species human nature and in the way that two white individuals are united in whiteness. And so the affections of the one tend toward the other as toward something that is one with himself, and he wills the good for the other just as he wills it for himself.
Ecclesiasticus 13:19 says, "Every animal loves its like." I respond: Likeness is, properly speaking, a cause of love. [...] Two individuals that have whiteness are said to be like one another. [This] type of likeness is a cause of the love of friendship or benevolence (causat amorem amicitiae seu benevolentiae). For from the fact that two individuals are like one another and have, as it were, one form, they are in some sense united in that form (sunt quodammodo unum in forma illa), in the way that two men are united in the species human nature and in the way that two white individuals are united in whiteness. And so the affections of the one tend toward the other as toward something that is one with himself, and he wills the good for the other just as he wills it for himself.
The most useful thing Marx ever said is "the ideology of an epoch is the ideology of the ruling class."
Occam's razor explanation for why society went from normal to insane immediately after WW2? A new ruling class took power.
Not the most bigbrain thing Marx ever said, and certainly not a unique observation, but definitely the most useful thing he ever said.
Occam's razor explanation for why society went from normal to insane immediately after WW2? A new ruling class took power.
Not the most bigbrain thing Marx ever said, and certainly not a unique observation, but definitely the most useful thing he ever said.
New article:
>My views on Economics
People often ask for my stances on economics, so here's a short article outlining my thoughts.
https://thuletide.wordpress.com/2021/07/06/my-views-on-economics/
[Expanded upon from my previous, now deleted, Telegram post].
>My views on Economics
People often ask for my stances on economics, so here's a short article outlining my thoughts.
https://thuletide.wordpress.com/2021/07/06/my-views-on-economics/
[Expanded upon from my previous, now deleted, Telegram post].
Thuletide
My views on Economics
Sometimes people ask for my stances on economics, so here they are: Firstly, I don’t particularly care about economics, so my thoughts are on this issue are relatively simplistic. It is obvio…