Thuletide – Telegram
Thuletide
23.6K subscribers
5.42K photos
494 videos
26 files
2.59K links
Nationalist, Classical Liberal, moderate centrist (circa 1900). You can plagiarize any of my writing & content. Follow: t.me/racerealismchannel
Download Telegram
“I wish it need not have happened in my time,” said Frodo. “So do I,” said Gandalf, “and so do all who live to see such times. But that is not for them to decide. All we have to decide is what to do with the time that is given us.”
Forwarded from Blair Cottrell 🇦🇺
>Man gets blood clots from AstraZeneca shot, is rushed to ICU
>Still wants his second shot, but with Pfizer instead
>His wife after seeing her husband hospitalised for 2 weeks over a vaccine wants her shot too

No, this isn’t the Babylon Bee, this is a state broadcaster and these are real people.

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2021-06-29/garry-recovering-from-blood-clots-linked-to-astrazeneca/100252574
A lot of left-wing political theory and analysis just consists of pointing at objectively good things and then pathologizing them as evil and bigoted. So, if you ignore their stupid conclusions and whining, then a lot of their observations can be helpful.

Take critical race theory, for example: Western Civilization was objectively founded to benefit White people at the disadvantage of everyone else, and that's a good thing. White societies are irreparably "racist," and that's a good thing. Defending the West and the values of the West is defacto defending the political power and ideological values of White people, and that's a good thing.

The problems with Leftist theory is not their observational analysis, but their genius solutions to the "problems" (basic facts of nature) that they identify (pathologize).
New article:
Leading Harvard geneticist David Reich confirms the biological existence of ‘race’

"In 2018, two articles written by leading Harvard geneticist, David Reich, were published in the New York Times: How to Talk About ‘Race’ and Genetics and How Genetics Is Changing Our Understanding of ‘Race’. In both articles, he argued that the “social construct” (man-made categorization) of race accurately maps to the genetic/biological reality of race. However, the articles were, essentially, a plea for sanity on the Left-Wing."

Here are the relevant quotes from David Reich:

“As a geneticist I also know that it is simply no longer possible to ignore average genetic differences among ‘races.'”

“While race may be a social construct, differences in genetic ancestry that happen to correlate to many of today’s racial constructs are real.”

“To insist that no meaningful average differences among human populations are possible is harmful. It is perceived as misleading, even patronizing, by the general public.”

“Genetic studies have demonstrated differences across populations not just in the genetic determinants of simple traits such as skin color, but also in more complex traits like bodily dimensions and susceptibility to diseases.”

“Genetic variations are likely to affect behavior and cognition just as they affect other traits.”

“Given that all genetically determined traits differ somewhat among populations, we should expect that there will be differences in the average effects, including in traits like behavior.”

“Present-day human populations […] have in a number of instances been largely isolated from one another for tens of thousands of years. These long separations have provided adequate opportunity for the frequencies of genetic variations to change.”

“The ancestors of East Asians, Europeans, West Africans and Australians were, until recently, almost completely isolated from one another for 40,000 years or longer, which is more than sufficient time for the forces of evolution to work.”

“Well-meaning people who deny the possibility of substantial biological differences among human populations are digging themselves into an indefensible position, one that will not survive the onslaught of science.”
Image containing selected quotes from Harvard geneticist David Reich confirming the biological realities of race.
Forwarded from Friendly Sperg
Leftists will blame literally every single issue they have with the world on the CIA and Capitalism. But the second a nationalist identifies something he doesn't like (e.g being ethnically cleansed from his own nation) and even slightly hints that the elite might have a hand to play in it, the same leftists recoil and say "Stop blaming all your problems on the elite you conspiracy theorist" and tell you to just have more kids.
Forwarded from Pax Tube
My most recent video: What Fake Democracies Look Like.

Join me as we look at several countries who claim to be the most democratic in the world and analyze whether that’s true or not! You can also find my videos on my Odysee channel.

https://youtu.be/ngIVfXCKaAM
Big tech may pull out of Hong Kong because HK passed laws that ban them from doxing private citizens.

A big tech coalition whined that the laws were "highly unusual and out of step with international privacy developments." Presumably by "international privacy developments" they mean big tech facilitating the doxing of private citizens to enforce the globalist social credit system.

Hilariously, their letter claimed that what qualifies "doxing" and what qualifies "psychological harm" is broad and subjective, and thus the laws are dangerous and open to abuse. Apparently, this logic does not apply to their own "hate speech" regulations. Abuse of power for me but not for thee.

Source: https://www.forbes.com/sites/roberthart/2021/07/05/anti-doxxing-law-could-force-tech-giants-including-amazon-google-from-hong-kong-industry-group-warns
Thomas Aquinas, 'The Causes of Love' from Summa Theologiae (1485) :

Ecclesiasticus 13:19 says, "Every animal loves its like." I respond: Likeness is, properly speaking, a cause of love. [...] Two individuals that have whiteness are said to be like one another. [This] type of likeness is a cause of the love of friendship or benevolence (causat amorem amicitiae seu benevolentiae). For from the fact that two individuals are like one another and have, as it were, one form, they are in some sense united in that form (sunt quodammodo unum in forma illa), in the way that two men are united in the species human nature and in the way that two white individuals are united in whiteness. And so the affections of the one tend toward the other as toward something that is one with himself, and he wills the good for the other just as he wills it for himself.
The most useful thing Marx ever said is "the ideology of an epoch is the ideology of the ruling class."

Occam's razor explanation for why society went from normal to insane immediately after WW2? A new ruling class took power.

Not the most bigbrain thing Marx ever said, and certainly not a unique observation, but definitely the most useful thing he ever said.
New article:
>“Who Are We Europeans?” Based paper published by the University of Helskini [Yamnaya, Corded Ware, Bell Beakers]

(Technically, it's mainly someone else's article).

The University of Helsinki recently published a based paper, authored by the archaeologist Volker Heyd, noscriptd Yamnaya, Corded Wares, Bell Beakers: Or how to conceptualize events of 5000 years ago that shaped modern Europe.

Overall, the essay is written with a neutral tone, but Heyd is quite fearless nonetheless: He denies social constructionism, defends ethnic identity, defines European racial identity, validates prewar archaeology, and even indirectly implies that the (so-called) “European migration crisis” is comparable to genocidal colonialism and a net-negative for native Europeans. He calls out population replacement, and explicitly refers to so-called “New Europeans” (non-White immigrants) as “foreigners.”

https://thuletide.wordpress.com/2021/07/07/who-are-we-europeans-based-paper-published-by-the-university-of-helskini-yamnaya-corded-ware-bell-beakers/
WHO ARE WE EUROPEANS?

Much has already been written about the Europeans and one has often tried to define us. Without a doubt, we are a mixture of different peoples, nations and networking regions, historically grown, and repeatedly interacting with our neighbours. But let’s face it: Is there more than Europeans being only a social construct? And what distinguishes us Europeans from the rest of the world, if we go back in time and beyond the beginnings of what is called the ‘Christian-Occidental’ spiritual and cultural heritage? As a Prehistorian, and with regard to anthropology and genetics, I would first add our language, mostly belonging to the Indo-European language family. Next is it our physiognomy and appearance: distinct faces, eye forms and noses, altogether relatively light-skinned and variable in our hair and eye colours, clearly with a south-north gradient within the continent. Furthermore, we can usually metabolize carbohydrates and alcohol well and are able to digest milk without any problem. Then take into account our body size: on average, we are the tallest people on the planet. Historically, a special social organization predominates: hierarchical and patriarchal; monogamous, exogamous and patrilocal; nuclear and extended families; primogeniture and patrilinear inheritance, etc., and mostly combined in such a way. Finally, we are quite warlike: not only have we decimated ourselves neatly over the last millennia, the rest of the world can also sing a Swan’s Song of it; considering, for example, when European nations at the height of Colonialism at the end of the 19th century were controlling more than three quarters of the world, with Britain alone a quarter of the earth’s population.

From Yamnaya, Corded Wares, Bell Beakers: Or how to conceptualize events of 5000 years ago that shaped modern Europe by University of Helsinki archaeologist Volker Heyd
what the fuck LMFAO
LGBT choir admits that their aim is to groom children.

Lyrics:
>You think that we'll corrupt your kids if our agenda goes unchecked. Just >this once, you're correct
>We'll convert your children, happens bit by bit, quietly and subtlety
>We'll convert your children, reaching one and all. There's really no escaping it
>WE'RE COMING FOR YOUR CHILDREN
>WE'RE COMING FOR YOUR CHILDREN
>WE'RE COMING FOR YOUR CHILDREN

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ArOQF4kadHA
The official Chinese ministry of propaganda claims that "brutality against indigenous people is embedded in Anglo-Saxon DNA."

Evidently the Anglo-Saxons were not brutal enough, given that the entire Anglosphere is currently overrun with "indigenous people."