Narrated An-Nu`man bin Bashir:
Allah's Messenger (ﷺ) said, "You see the believers as regards their being merciful among themselves and showing love among themselves and being kind, resembling one body, so that, if any part of the body is not well then the whole body shares the sleeplessness (insomnia) and fever with it."
Sahih
Sahih al-Bukhari, 6011
In-Book Reference: Book 78, Hadith 42
Allah's Messenger (ﷺ) said, "You see the believers as regards their being merciful among themselves and showing love among themselves and being kind, resembling one body, so that, if any part of the body is not well then the whole body shares the sleeplessness (insomnia) and fever with it."
Sahih
Sahih al-Bukhari, 6011
In-Book Reference: Book 78, Hadith 42
Forwarded from Project Guiding Light
﷽
RE: A recent disastrous pdf that was published; There are many things to point out, but for the sake of brevity, I’ll try to make it short Insha’Allah:
1) When someone spends a significant time writing a “Tawbah” pdf which contains misguidance, you don’t publish this misguidance, then complain when people “accuse” you of blind following. Especially when you published this without a single indication of warning or disclaimer, instead you praised the author and said, “May Allah Honor him and preserve him” — whether you like it or not, you share in the sin and people have the right to refute you and the author, by name, let alone indirectly. I wonder how many of the Salaf said similar words as you, when mentioning the misguidance of those who publicly “repented” from Haqq to Bātil.
2) No matter how much you try and virtue signal, you share in the sin of spreading misguidance. The fact that you claim to disagree with what he wrote, yet you still published it, is a calamity in and of itself.
3) The points discussed in this pdf (which didn’t even stay up for 24-hours), are some of the most basic aspects of the Manhaj, so when someone “publicly makes Tawbah,” from them, it’s expected for people of that Manhaj to speak out, whether it be directly or indirectly (depending on the Maslahah).
4) The type of Istidlāl used within this so-called “Tawbah,” from willful omission of clear statements and proofs from Scholars whom this person is very familiar with, to name dropping and citing out of context quotes — was akin to that of a Madkhali or Surūri, so you can imagine our disappointment.
5) When someone publicly retracts from the Haqq, and publicly takes the opinion of misguidance — you don’t praise his “fairness and sincerity.” This is again, delusion and severe ignorance.
6) Advice is sought before publishing, not after publishing. The fact that this needs to be stated is a calamity.
7) ‘Sincerity’ isn’t the word that should ever be used when someone publicly retracts from Haqq, and takes on Bātil — rather it is ‘ignorance.’ Not to mention deleting this “Tawbah,” not even 24-hours since you posted it. If you thought it’s the truth, why delete it? If you weren’t sure of the contents of the pdf and wanted advise or have it reviewed first by scholars, why did you publish it in the first place? Are you now going to publish a Tawbah for your Tawbah? Secondly, being shocked at the backlash, given that you published this disastrous “Tawbah,” on a channel that amassed its following solely based on the love of the very Manhaj you now publicly repented from, is peak delusion.
8) This Manhaj is one of truth, and not men. One can contribute to this Da’wah without plastering his Kunya everywhere — especially if you’re unqualified (like all of us). There is no shame in being told to know your place, nor is it belittling to know your level. Speaking on heavy matters of Aqeedah with conviction and authority a few years back, and then fast forward to now and you’re publicly “repenting” from the ABC’s of this Manhaj is a sign of either not being grounded in this Manhaj in the first place, and/or immersing yourself into the books of Ahlul Bid’a, and/or having a clouded intention — but definitely not ‘Sincerity.’
9) We hope and make Duā for the brother to return to the truth, and to heal him from that which he has endured of pain and suffering in the dungeons of the Tawagheet. By Allah it is more beloved to us that one returns to the Truth than to stay upon misguidance, especially for one who has contributed to much Khayr in the past.
I ask Allah to preserve our brothers and sisters upon the Truth, and keep us steadfast until we meet Him سبحانه وتعالى.
والحمدلله رب العالمين
RE: A recent disastrous pdf that was published; There are many things to point out, but for the sake of brevity, I’ll try to make it short Insha’Allah:
1) When someone spends a significant time writing a “Tawbah” pdf which contains misguidance, you don’t publish this misguidance, then complain when people “accuse” you of blind following. Especially when you published this without a single indication of warning or disclaimer, instead you praised the author and said, “May Allah Honor him and preserve him” — whether you like it or not, you share in the sin and people have the right to refute you and the author, by name, let alone indirectly. I wonder how many of the Salaf said similar words as you, when mentioning the misguidance of those who publicly “repented” from Haqq to Bātil.
2) No matter how much you try and virtue signal, you share in the sin of spreading misguidance. The fact that you claim to disagree with what he wrote, yet you still published it, is a calamity in and of itself.
3) The points discussed in this pdf (which didn’t even stay up for 24-hours), are some of the most basic aspects of the Manhaj, so when someone “publicly makes Tawbah,” from them, it’s expected for people of that Manhaj to speak out, whether it be directly or indirectly (depending on the Maslahah).
4) The type of Istidlāl used within this so-called “Tawbah,” from willful omission of clear statements and proofs from Scholars whom this person is very familiar with, to name dropping and citing out of context quotes — was akin to that of a Madkhali or Surūri, so you can imagine our disappointment.
5) When someone publicly retracts from the Haqq, and publicly takes the opinion of misguidance — you don’t praise his “fairness and sincerity.” This is again, delusion and severe ignorance.
6) Advice is sought before publishing, not after publishing. The fact that this needs to be stated is a calamity.
7) ‘Sincerity’ isn’t the word that should ever be used when someone publicly retracts from Haqq, and takes on Bātil — rather it is ‘ignorance.’ Not to mention deleting this “Tawbah,” not even 24-hours since you posted it. If you thought it’s the truth, why delete it? If you weren’t sure of the contents of the pdf and wanted advise or have it reviewed first by scholars, why did you publish it in the first place? Are you now going to publish a Tawbah for your Tawbah? Secondly, being shocked at the backlash, given that you published this disastrous “Tawbah,” on a channel that amassed its following solely based on the love of the very Manhaj you now publicly repented from, is peak delusion.
8) This Manhaj is one of truth, and not men. One can contribute to this Da’wah without plastering his Kunya everywhere — especially if you’re unqualified (like all of us). There is no shame in being told to know your place, nor is it belittling to know your level. Speaking on heavy matters of Aqeedah with conviction and authority a few years back, and then fast forward to now and you’re publicly “repenting” from the ABC’s of this Manhaj is a sign of either not being grounded in this Manhaj in the first place, and/or immersing yourself into the books of Ahlul Bid’a, and/or having a clouded intention — but definitely not ‘Sincerity.’
9) We hope and make Duā for the brother to return to the truth, and to heal him from that which he has endured of pain and suffering in the dungeons of the Tawagheet. By Allah it is more beloved to us that one returns to the Truth than to stay upon misguidance, especially for one who has contributed to much Khayr in the past.
I ask Allah to preserve our brothers and sisters upon the Truth, and keep us steadfast until we meet Him سبحانه وتعالى.
والحمدلله رب العالمين
👍1
Forwarded from Lanterns of Tawheed
In addition to the above, any claims that the Shuyūkh are being “gatekept” are complete falsity, and the one who made this claim knows that better than anyone else.
Aside from the fact that the Mashayikh have publicized certain mediums for contacting them, it’s simply not true that even their personal contact details were withheld — in fact, it’s quite the opposite.
No one in their right mind would “guard” their Shaykhs, and then show disapproval when they were not consulted for major issues. Anyone with sincerity would have made all their efforts to make sure their brothers are well connected and that their questions were answered — and anyone with sincerity would not deny that this was done for them.
It’s not befitting for one to take such big steps — the consequences of which can be detrimental to many who aren’t well grounded in their beliefs — and then claim victim when people react in accordance to the severity of the situation.
May Allāh سبحانه وتعالى guide us all to the truth and keep us steadfast.
Aside from the fact that the Mashayikh have publicized certain mediums for contacting them, it’s simply not true that even their personal contact details were withheld — in fact, it’s quite the opposite.
No one in their right mind would “guard” their Shaykhs, and then show disapproval when they were not consulted for major issues. Anyone with sincerity would have made all their efforts to make sure their brothers are well connected and that their questions were answered — and anyone with sincerity would not deny that this was done for them.
It’s not befitting for one to take such big steps — the consequences of which can be detrimental to many who aren’t well grounded in their beliefs — and then claim victim when people react in accordance to the severity of the situation.
May Allāh سبحانه وتعالى guide us all to the truth and keep us steadfast.
👍1
"Even the birds glorify Allah at Fajr.
Shouldn't man be ashamed to miss his Salah, whilst animals and birds surpass him in worship."
@FadingShadow
Shouldn't man be ashamed to miss his Salah, whilst animals and birds surpass him in worship."
@FadingShadow
Al-Mutaffifin 83:12
وَمَا يُكَذِّبُ بِهِۦٓ إِلَّا كُلُّ مُعۡتَدٍ أَثِيمٍ
And none can deny it except every transgressor beyond bounds, (in disbelief, oppression and disobedience of Allah, the sinner!)
Divehi - Abu Bakr Ibrahim Ali (Bakurube)
(12) އަދި ގިނައިން ފާފަކުރާ ކޮންމެ އަނިޔާވެރިއަކުމެނުވީ އެދުވަސް ދޮގުނުކުރާނެއެވެ.
وَمَا يُكَذِّبُ بِهِۦٓ إِلَّا كُلُّ مُعۡتَدٍ أَثِيمٍ
And none can deny it except every transgressor beyond bounds, (in disbelief, oppression and disobedience of Allah, the sinner!)
Divehi - Abu Bakr Ibrahim Ali (Bakurube)
(12) އަދި ގިނައިން ފާފަކުރާ ކޮންމެ އަނިޔާވެރިއަކުމެނުވީ އެދުވަސް ދޮގުނުކުރާނެއެވެ.
Al-'Ankabut 29:11
وَلَيَعۡلَمَنَّ ٱللَّهُ ٱلَّذِينَ ءَامَنُواْ وَلَيَعۡلَمَنَّ ٱلۡمُنَٰفِقِينَ
Verily, Allah knows those who believe, and verily, He knows the hypocrites [i.e. Allah will test the people with good and hard days to discriminate the good from the wicked (although Allah knows all that before putting them to test)].
Divehi - Abu Bakr Ibrahim Ali (Bakurube)
(11) އަދި ހަމަކަށަވަރުން مؤمن ން އެކަލާނގެ ދެނެވޮޑިގެންވެއެވެ. އަދި ހަމަކަށަވަރުން منافق ން އެކަލާނގެ ދެނެވޮޑިގެންވެއެވެ. ކުރިންވެސް بيان ކުރިފަދައިން اللّه ގެ عذاب އާއި ކޯފާއަށްވުރެ މީސްތަކުންގެ އުނދަގުލަށް ޖެހިލުންވާމީހާ އެވަނީ منافق ންގެ ލިސްޓުގައި ކަމުގައި މިއާޔަތް ދަލީލު ކުރެއެވެ.
وَلَيَعۡلَمَنَّ ٱللَّهُ ٱلَّذِينَ ءَامَنُواْ وَلَيَعۡلَمَنَّ ٱلۡمُنَٰفِقِينَ
Verily, Allah knows those who believe, and verily, He knows the hypocrites [i.e. Allah will test the people with good and hard days to discriminate the good from the wicked (although Allah knows all that before putting them to test)].
Divehi - Abu Bakr Ibrahim Ali (Bakurube)
(11) އަދި ހަމަކަށަވަރުން مؤمن ން އެކަލާނގެ ދެނެވޮޑިގެންވެއެވެ. އަދި ހަމަކަށަވަރުން منافق ން އެކަލާނގެ ދެނެވޮޑިގެންވެއެވެ. ކުރިންވެސް بيان ކުރިފަދައިން اللّه ގެ عذاب އާއި ކޯފާއަށްވުރެ މީސްތަކުންގެ އުނދަގުލަށް ޖެހިލުންވާމީހާ އެވަނީ منافق ންގެ ލިސްޓުގައި ކަމުގައި މިއާޔަތް ދަލީލު ކުރެއެވެ.
Al-Infitar 82:10
وَإِنَّ عَلَيۡكُمۡ لَحَٰفِظِينَ
But verily, over you (are appointed angels in charge of mankind) to watch you.
Divehi - Abu Bakr Ibrahim Ali (Bakurube)
(10) އަދި ހަމަކަށަވަރުން އެކަލާނގެ ކަލޭމެންގެ މައްޗަށް ކަލޭމެން ބަލަހައްޓަވާ، ކަލޭމެންގެ عمل ތައް ލިޔުއްވާ ބޭކަލުން ލައްވާފައި ވެއެވެ.
وَإِنَّ عَلَيۡكُمۡ لَحَٰفِظِينَ
But verily, over you (are appointed angels in charge of mankind) to watch you.
Divehi - Abu Bakr Ibrahim Ali (Bakurube)
(10) އަދި ހަމަކަށަވަރުން އެކަލާނގެ ކަލޭމެންގެ މައްޗަށް ކަލޭމެން ބަލަހައްޓަވާ، ކަލޭމެންގެ عمل ތައް ލިޔުއްވާ ބޭކަލުން ލައްވާފައި ވެއެވެ.
Forwarded from UMMAH REPORTS
Destruction in Afghanistan:
On Sunday, a week after earthquakes killed thousands in the same region, another powerful earthquake struck near Herat city, causing scores of casualties.
The WHO says nearly 20,000 people have been affected by the disasters.
On Sunday, a week after earthquakes killed thousands in the same region, another powerful earthquake struck near Herat city, causing scores of casualties.
The WHO says nearly 20,000 people have been affected by the disasters.
💔2
Forwarded from UMMAH REPORTS
In Afghanistan 15 million people don't know where their next meal comes from. 😢
According to the WFP, that is 1/3 of the population. The Herat earthquake is yet another disaster on top of an already dire humanitarian crisis.
Afghans need urgent support.
According to the WFP, that is 1/3 of the population. The Herat earthquake is yet another disaster on top of an already dire humanitarian crisis.
Afghans need urgent support.
💔4