“The revolutionary situation that is manifesting itself may well give Sir Oswald Mosley and his idea their historic opportunity. Sir Oswald owes it to those who follow him and those who watch him that his idea be precise.”

A. James Gregor, ‘An American considers European Socialism’, The European, November 1955.

A pair of AIPAC-funded Republicans, working on behalf of the Anti-Defamation League, sent an intimidating letter to the Wikimedia Foundation on Wednesday announcing they're under investigation in relation to "antisemitic and anti-Israel" content on Wikipedia.
https://www.informationliberation.com/?id=65023

ADVANCE ALBION 🇬🇧

Most normal Balkan man

Lots of things in background.

The corporate state, birthed in the fiery intellect of Saint-Simon, that titan among the utopian socialists, stands as the unspoken cornerstone of all serious socialist thought, from Marx to Proudhon. When Marx wrote about “scientific administration,” he wasn’t chasing phantoms; he meant “this” — a state engineered for function, not flabbiness. Yet, somewhere along the line, the socialists lost the plot, mired in their own dogmatic lies.

We fascists don’t claim a monopoly on this truth, but let’s be clear: when you embrace the corporate state, that sleek, functional beast of governance, you’ve admitted it, whether you like it or not: fascism was right. It demanded a break from the tired orthodoxies of classical Marxism. The corporate state doesn’t just govern; it excises the parasitic rot of the political renter class — those leeches who fatten themselves on bureaucracy and influence-peddling. Mussolini saw it. He built it. And history, that unforgiving arbiter, vindicates him with cold, hard objectivity.

Dimitrov admitting, that Marxism-Leninism must warp into a type of fascism to fight fascism.

Example:

In the American class struggle, where the sinews of labor weave our nation, Industrial Unionism stands as a monument to the indomitable spirit of the working class — a type of socialism forged by titans like Eugene Debs and Daniel De Leon. This is no mere ideology; it is the beating heart of our heritage, a vision of industrial democracy where the toiler, not the tyrant, holds the reins of production. But let us cast a piercing gaze upon Marxist Cockshott…. He argues for a De Leonist syndicalist economy, where the capital of each industry is wrested from the clutches of the bourgeois and vested in industrial syndicates, converging in a state legislature to chart the course toward cybernetic communism. A transitional stage, he calls it, rooted in syndicalism, even flirting with the mutualist ideals of cooperative sovereignty. Yet, does this not bear of compromise, a dalliance with the Third Way?

We have Elon boosting me on X now.

Ground gained.

Published in 1939 by a German newspaper, Der Stürmer.

It reads:

“Land of Freedom”

“Where one is subservient to the Jew, freedom is only an empty illusion.”

Many retards have been calling China communist and uninvestible for years.

Now the USA is copying China's state capitalist model.

https://news.1rj.ru/str/disclosetv/17403

Chris (@CDMorlock) argues in his post (https://x.com/cdmorlock/status/1872525565250642099) that Russia cannot be deemed imperialist under Lenin’s Imperialism, the Highest Stage of Capitalism, pointing to a decline in Russia’s finance capital share from 5.2% in 1910 to 0% in 2024, a claim echoed by @ZaharisJason who asserted
Russia doesn’t meet any of Lenin’s five criteria. This interpretation, is bolstered by ChatGPT-derived data from Chris, that fixates on capital export as the sole marker of imperialism, but such reductionism distorts Lenin’s approach, which views imperialism as a dynamic force in capitalism rooted in historical processes, including pre-capitalist forms like feudal tribute systems (https://www.marxists.org/archive/lenin/works/1916/imp-hsc/). Lenin outlines five interconnected features:

1. Monopoly concentration
2. Finance capital fusion
3. Capital export
4. International monopolies
5. Territorial division

This is not as a rigid checklist but as a holistic framing, and Chris’s narrow focus ignores how Russia’s actions….. especially in 2025 align with a hybrid imperialism blending territorial expansion and resource control. Despite sanctions slashing inflows by 50-70% and depleting $280 billion in reserves by 2025 (https://home.treasury.gov/news/featured-stories/sanctions-and-russias-war-limiting-putins-capabilities), Russia’s outward FDI hit $29 billion in 2023, with net outflows at -0.38% of GDP and $8 billion in inward FDI in 2024, contradicting the “0%” claim (https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/BM.KLT.DINV.WD.GD.ZS?locations=RU) (https://unctad.org/system/files/non-official-document/wir_fs_ru_en.pdf). This shift, driven by sanctions, reflects a pivot to resource-based imperialism, with state-linked monopolies like Gazprom (16% of global gas reserves) and Rosneft (38% of India’s crude imports in 2025) dominating energy markets, fulfilling Lenin’s monopoly and international trust criteria (https://unctad.org/system/files/non-official-document/wir_fs_ru_en.pdf).

Russia’s territorial ambitions, from Crimea’s 2014 annexation to ongoing 2025 Ukraine offensives, fit Lenin’s fifth criterion of world division, while oligarch-driven FDI ($5.9 billion in Q1 2025) and BRICS currency shifts sustain finance capital and capital export dynamics (https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/BM.KLT.DINV.WD.GD.ZS?locations=RU). Chris’s reliance on Michael Hudson’s Super Imperialism also misses, as Hudson critiques U.S. debt imperialism ($34 trillion in 2025) and Russia’s resistance via BRICS but does not absolve its territorial expansionism, such as Donbas resource grabs, which aligns with Lenin’s evolving lens rather than a static baseline (https://www.marxists.org/reference/archive/stalin/works/1938/09.htm). If anything, this extends Lenin’s framework to neo-imperialism, where peripheral powers like Russia project influence through military and resource control, evident in overseas bases and actions in Ukraine, Chechnya, and beyond. Non-Marxist realist analyses and geopolitical reports, label Russia’s 2025 maneuvers as peripheral neo-imperialism, noting its leveling of Grozny and “prison of nations” continuity with Lenin’s tsarist critique (https://www.marxists.org/archive/lenin/works/1914/self-det/ch01.htm; https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2025/8/31/ukraine-planning-new-strikes-deep-inside-russia-says-zelenskyy).

By clinging to a rigid, outdated metric, Chris’s argument sidesteps the dialectical adaptability central to Lenin’s method, whitewashing Russia’s imperialist character as it manifests in 2025 through a synthesis of territorial, resource, and military power projection. Things I support, it provides the Multipolar world a means to crush Anglo-American hegemony. The age of Empires is here! (https://www.multipolarpress.com/p/russias-imperial-destiny-returns) (https://www.multipolarpress.com/p/dugin-on-alaska-and-the-eurasian-monroe-doctrine)

Boost

https://x.com/zoranzoltanous/status/1962500780616716609?s=46

Reading today

Nice to get some love from Thomas Rousseau. Always had a great relationship with Patriot Front and always will!