Today Telegram blocked a lot of channels and groups in Brazil.
For example: @caminhoneoroscombolsonaro
For example: @caminhoneoroscombolsonaro
List of blockchain usernames that are already in use right now:
@huoke (
@freebuma (
@betbaz (
@caunt (349763173)
@ashari (
@foodsoul (
@gromko (
@flirt4free (
@hinet (
@gotabit (
@cryptofun (
@cario (1542793892)
@acura (
@efsha (
@autodoc (
@galen (
@ddoser (
@gleb (343944578)
@biggame (
@hypixel (
@a_1win (
@b_1win (
@huoke (
1171576319)@freebuma (
-1001737446965)@betbaz (
-1001387803218)@caunt (349763173)
@ashari (
-1001883052342)@foodsoul (
-1001604133965)@gromko (
-1001060019844)@flirt4free (
1740471590)@hinet (
492025726)@gotabit (
-1001775413193)@cryptofun (
-1001845513000)@cario (1542793892)
@acura (
268598156)@efsha (
-1001765948407)@autodoc (
-1001808993218)@galen (
5799126919)@ddoser (
734613855)@gleb (343944578)
@biggame (
204848729)@hypixel (
5685420861)@a_1win (
-1001379091014)@b_1win (
-1001230425266)Accounts created with brazillian phone numbers can't access the channel
@monarktalks
Brazillian IPs can't access t.me/s/monarktalks
@monarktalks
Brazillian IPs can't access t.me/s/monarktalks
Brazilian court determines the blocking of Telegram in the country (despite Telegram forward the group creator data)
The court ordered Telegram to send the phone (and IP) data of all members of 2 neo-Nazi groups in less than 24 hours.
About the 1º group, Telegram release the IP and phone of the creator of the neonazi channel
• Group link:
Despite this, the judge in the case determined the blocking of Telegram in the country. According to him, Telegram failed to comply with the decision because he had requested that Telegram send data from all members of the group (not just from administrators).
The judge also determined, as long as Telegram did not send the data, the application of a daily fine in the amount of 1,000,000 BRL per day or 5% of Telegram's profit in Brazil in 2022 (whichever was less).
Considering that Telegram does not have a very high invoice in Brazil, the amount of the fine is negligible.
Check the full decision below (in Portuguese):
The court ordered Telegram to send the phone (and IP) data of all members of 2 neo-Nazi groups in less than 24 hours.
About the 1º group, Telegram release the IP and phone of the creator of the neonazi channel
@antissemitabr:• Group link:
https://news.1rj.ru/str/antissemitabr
• Creator ID: #6129271951
• Phone: +51969506146
• IP: 190.236.6.11, 11 Apr 2023, 4:16:36, UTC+0
About the 2º group "卐 Frente Anti-Semita 卐" (group ID: 1586278133) Telegram did not send any data claiming that the group had already been deleted and that it would only be able to send the creator's data if the police informed data that identified the creator's account (such as his ID or his phone number).Despite this, the judge in the case determined the blocking of Telegram in the country. According to him, Telegram failed to comply with the decision because he had requested that Telegram send data from all members of the group (not just from administrators).
The judge also determined, as long as Telegram did not send the data, the application of a daily fine in the amount of 1,000,000 BRL per day or 5% of Telegram's profit in Brazil in 2022 (whichever was less).
Considering that Telegram does not have a very high invoice in Brazil, the amount of the fine is negligible.
Check the full decision below (in Portuguese):
Brazilian court determines the unblocking of Telegram in the country 🇧🇷🕊
This week a brazilian judge blocked the app in the whole country.
Telegram claimed judicially that:
🔹 comply with judge's decision would be technically impossible as the groups have already been deleted;
🔹 the judge order itself was incomplete since links to the groups or any information from those investigated were not initially included;
🔹 the brazilian law (Marco Civil da Internet) does not allow the complete blocking of a service, but only of certain kinds of its activities;
🔹 the police leaked to the press information about the secret lawsuit before the "citation" of Telegram itself;
🔹 it would be possible for the police (in possession of the seized cell phone) to create a backup the conversations allowing Telegram to help identifying the users. But the police didn't do it;
🔹 penalties imposed by the judge were "disproportionate and unreasonable", against Brazilian Constitution and were trying, in fact, to prevent the operation of Telegram in Brazil.
The court, according to the understanding signed by the current Brazilian Supreme Court votes in ADPF 403 and ADI 5527 (lawsuits about the blocking of Whatsapp in Brazil that happend 2015 and 2016), understood that the measure of complete suspension of the service is not reasonable, considering that it would also affect the freedom of communication of thousands of people.
The court maintained the fine penalty and urgently ordered the notification of the companies Vivo, Claro, Tim, Oi, Google and Apple to cease any kind of blocking of Telegram in the country.
Check the full decision below (in Portuguese):
This week a brazilian judge blocked the app in the whole country.
Telegram claimed judicially that:
🔹 comply with judge's decision would be technically impossible as the groups have already been deleted;
🔹 the judge order itself was incomplete since links to the groups or any information from those investigated were not initially included;
🔹 the brazilian law (Marco Civil da Internet) does not allow the complete blocking of a service, but only of certain kinds of its activities;
🔹 the police leaked to the press information about the secret lawsuit before the "citation" of Telegram itself;
🔹 it would be possible for the police (in possession of the seized cell phone) to create a backup the conversations allowing Telegram to help identifying the users. But the police didn't do it;
🔹 penalties imposed by the judge were "disproportionate and unreasonable", against Brazilian Constitution and were trying, in fact, to prevent the operation of Telegram in Brazil.
The court, according to the understanding signed by the current Brazilian Supreme Court votes in ADPF 403 and ADI 5527 (lawsuits about the blocking of Whatsapp in Brazil that happend 2015 and 2016), understood that the measure of complete suspension of the service is not reasonable, considering that it would also affect the freedom of communication of thousands of people.
The court maintained the fine penalty and urgently ordered the notification of the companies Vivo, Claro, Tim, Oi, Google and Apple to cease any kind of blocking of Telegram in the country.
Check the full decision below (in Portuguese):
Forwarded from Telegram
O Brasil está prestes a aprovar uma lei que irá acabar com a liberdade de expressão. O PL 2630/2020 dá ao governo poderes de censura sem supervisão judicial prévia.
Para os direitos humanos fundamentais, esse projeto de lei é uma das legislações mais perigosas já consideradas no Brasil – leia aqui o porquê.
Fale com seu deputado aqui ou nas redes sociais hoje mesmo – os brasileiros merecem uma internet livre e um futuro livre.
Para os direitos humanos fundamentais, esse projeto de lei é uma das legislações mais perigosas já consideradas no Brasil – leia aqui o porquê.
Fale com seu deputado aqui ou nas redes sociais hoje mesmo – os brasileiros merecem uma internet livre e um futuro livre.
Telegram
O Brasil está prestes a aprovar uma lei que irá acabar com a liberdade de expressão. O PL 2630/2020 dá ao governo poderes de censura sem supervisão judicial prévia. Para os direitos humanos fundamentais, esse projeto de lei é uma das legislações mais perigosas…
Telegraph
Why PL 2630/2020 is Dangerous
Democracy is under attack in Brazil. The Chamber of Deputies is soon expected to vote on PL 2630/2020 that was recently changed to include over 20 completely new articles that have never been widely debated. If it is passed, companies like Telegram may have…
The Federal Prosecutor's Office (MPF) sent a document charging that Telegram send personal data of employees who drafted the text criticizing the PL 2630/20; documentation was a request from Flávio Dino, Minister of Justice, who criticized the platform and said he would carry out retaliations.
See the points that Telegram will be obliged to deliver to justice:
• Explain why the platform has sent an article showing the dangers of a project that could help censorship.
• Send personal data of employees (full name and email) who drafted the article, as well as the excerpt from the terms of use that allows the boosting of messages other than technical updates
• Explain with formalities the reason why they have sent the message to all people, even if it is a matter that directly interferes with the use of the platform.
With info:
See the points that Telegram will be obliged to deliver to justice:
• Explain why the platform has sent an article showing the dangers of a project that could help censorship.
• Send personal data of employees (full name and email) who drafted the article, as well as the excerpt from the terms of use that allows the boosting of messages other than technical updates
• Explain with formalities the reason why they have sent the message to all people, even if it is a matter that directly interferes with the use of the platform.
With info:
@tupireportSTF Minister Alexandre de Moraes determines the suspension of Telegram in Brazil for 72 hours
According to the minister, Telegram would be using "illicit disinformation" to induce the population to "force" parliamentarians against PL 2630/20. He refer to this message.
The minister determined that Telegram:
1) Delete all messages sent to users within 1h.
2) Send the message below to all users:
“By determination of the FEDERAL SUPREME COURT, the company Telegram communicates: The previous message from Telegram characterized FLAGRANT and ILLEGAL DISINFORMATION that attacks the National Congress, the Judiciary, the Rule of Law and the Brazilian Democracy, since, fraudulently, it distorted the discussion and the debates on the regulation of providers of social networks and private messaging services (PL 2630), in an attempt to induce and instigate users to coerce parliamentarians”.
In case of non-compliance with the decision within a maximum of 1 hour:
3) Temporary suspension of Telegram in Brazil for 72 hours.
"Natural and legal persons who incur conducts in the sense of using technological subterfuges for the continuity of communications made by the TELEGRAM, in the event of suspension, will be subject to civil and criminal sanctions, as provided by law, in addition to hourly fine of BRL 100,000.00 (one hundred thousand reais)."
It is unknown whether this refers to users using proxy or VPN. If so, the minister would be itself offending article 5, XLV, of Federal Constitution: "no penalty will pass from the person of the condemned person..." (principle of intranscendence of punishment).
4) Fine of BRL 500,000 per hour to Telegram.
The Minister also determined that:
5) The Federal Police must interrogate legal representatives of Telegram in Brazil within 48 hours about:
- Who authorized the sending of the message.
- The reasons for sending the message.
It is not yet known whether the Minister acted (again) "ex officio" (without any request from any party or Public Ministry).
Check the full decision bellow (in portuguese):
According to the minister, Telegram would be using "illicit disinformation" to induce the population to "force" parliamentarians against PL 2630/20. He refer to this message.
The minister determined that Telegram:
1) Delete all messages sent to users within 1h.
2) Send the message below to all users:
“By determination of the FEDERAL SUPREME COURT, the company Telegram communicates: The previous message from Telegram characterized FLAGRANT and ILLEGAL DISINFORMATION that attacks the National Congress, the Judiciary, the Rule of Law and the Brazilian Democracy, since, fraudulently, it distorted the discussion and the debates on the regulation of providers of social networks and private messaging services (PL 2630), in an attempt to induce and instigate users to coerce parliamentarians”.
In case of non-compliance with the decision within a maximum of 1 hour:
3) Temporary suspension of Telegram in Brazil for 72 hours.
"Natural and legal persons who incur conducts in the sense of using technological subterfuges for the continuity of communications made by the TELEGRAM, in the event of suspension, will be subject to civil and criminal sanctions, as provided by law, in addition to hourly fine of BRL 100,000.00 (one hundred thousand reais)."
It is unknown whether this refers to users using proxy or VPN. If so, the minister would be itself offending article 5, XLV, of Federal Constitution: "no penalty will pass from the person of the condemned person..." (principle of intranscendence of punishment).
4) Fine of BRL 500,000 per hour to Telegram.
The Minister also determined that:
5) The Federal Police must interrogate legal representatives of Telegram in Brazil within 48 hours about:
- Who authorized the sending of the message.
- The reasons for sending the message.
It is not yet known whether the Minister acted (again) "ex officio" (without any request from any party or Public Ministry).
Check the full decision bellow (in portuguese):
Forwarded from Telegram Brasil
A democracia está sob ataque no Brasil. A Câmara dos Deputados deverá votar em breve o PL 2630/2020, que foi alterado recentemente para incluir mais de 20 artigos completamente novos que nunca foram amplamente debatidos. Veja como esse projeto de lei matará a internet moderna se for aprovado com a redação atual. Caso seja aprovado, empresas como o Telegram podem ter que deixar de prestar serviços no Brasil.
Concede Poderes de Censura ao Governo
Esse projeto de lei permite que o governo limite o que pode ser dito online ao forçar os aplicativos a removerem proativamente fatos ou opiniões que ele considera "inaceitáveis" [1] e suspenda qualquer serviço de internet – sem uma ordem judicial. [2]
Por exemplo, o Ministro da Justiça requisitou recentemente sanções contra o Telegram, alegando que o aplicativo “não respondeu a uma solicitação” – antes mesmo da solicitação ser feita. Se o PL 2630/2020 estivesse em vigor, o governo poderia ter bloqueado imediatamente o aplicativo como “medida preventiva” até que o Telegram provasse que não violou nenhuma lei.
Transfere Poderes Judiciais Aos Aplicativos
Esse projeto de lei torna as plataformas digitais responsáveis por decidir qual conteúdo é “ilegal” em vez dos tribunais – e fornece definições excessivamente amplas de conteúdo ilegal. [3]
Para evitar multas, as plataformas escolherão remover quaisquer opiniões relacionadas a tópicos controversos, especialmente tópicos que não estão alinhados à visão de qualquer governo atualmente no poder, o que coloca a democracia diretamente em risco.
Cria um Sistema de Vigilância Permanente
O projeto de lei exige que as plataformas monitorem as comunicações e informem as autoridades policiais em caso de suspeita de que um crime tenha ocorrido ou possa ocorrer no futuro. [4]
Isso cria um sistema de vigilância permanente, semelhante ao de países com regimes antidemocráticos.
É Desnecessário
O Brasil já possui leis para lidar com as atividades criminosas que esse projeto de lei pretende abranger (incluindo ataques à democracia).
O novo projeto de lei visa burlar essa estrutura legal, permitindo que uma única entidade administrativa regule o discurso sem supervisão judicial independente e prévia. [5]
E Mais!
Isso apenas toca a superfície do motivo pelo qual esse novo projeto de lei é perigoso. É por isso que Google, Meta e outros se uniram para mostrar ao Congresso Nacional do Brasil a razão pela qual o projeto de lei precisa ser reescrito – mas isso não será possível sem a sua ajuda.
O Que Você Pode Fazer Para Mudar Isso
Você pode falar com seu deputado aqui ou nas redes sociais hoje. Os brasileiros merecem uma internet livre e um futuro livre.
Concede Poderes de Censura ao Governo
Esse projeto de lei permite que o governo limite o que pode ser dito online ao forçar os aplicativos a removerem proativamente fatos ou opiniões que ele considera "inaceitáveis" [1] e suspenda qualquer serviço de internet – sem uma ordem judicial. [2]
Por exemplo, o Ministro da Justiça requisitou recentemente sanções contra o Telegram, alegando que o aplicativo “não respondeu a uma solicitação” – antes mesmo da solicitação ser feita. Se o PL 2630/2020 estivesse em vigor, o governo poderia ter bloqueado imediatamente o aplicativo como “medida preventiva” até que o Telegram provasse que não violou nenhuma lei.
Transfere Poderes Judiciais Aos Aplicativos
Esse projeto de lei torna as plataformas digitais responsáveis por decidir qual conteúdo é “ilegal” em vez dos tribunais – e fornece definições excessivamente amplas de conteúdo ilegal. [3]
Para evitar multas, as plataformas escolherão remover quaisquer opiniões relacionadas a tópicos controversos, especialmente tópicos que não estão alinhados à visão de qualquer governo atualmente no poder, o que coloca a democracia diretamente em risco.
Cria um Sistema de Vigilância Permanente
O projeto de lei exige que as plataformas monitorem as comunicações e informem as autoridades policiais em caso de suspeita de que um crime tenha ocorrido ou possa ocorrer no futuro. [4]
Isso cria um sistema de vigilância permanente, semelhante ao de países com regimes antidemocráticos.
É Desnecessário
O Brasil já possui leis para lidar com as atividades criminosas que esse projeto de lei pretende abranger (incluindo ataques à democracia).
O novo projeto de lei visa burlar essa estrutura legal, permitindo que uma única entidade administrativa regule o discurso sem supervisão judicial independente e prévia. [5]
E Mais!
Isso apenas toca a superfície do motivo pelo qual esse novo projeto de lei é perigoso. É por isso que Google, Meta e outros se uniram para mostrar ao Congresso Nacional do Brasil a razão pela qual o projeto de lei precisa ser reescrito – mas isso não será possível sem a sua ajuda.
O Que Você Pode Fazer Para Mudar Isso
Você pode falar com seu deputado aqui ou nas redes sociais hoje. Os brasileiros merecem uma internet livre e um futuro livre.
Telegram Brasil
A democracia está sob ataque no Brasil. A Câmara dos Deputados deverá votar em breve o PL 2630/2020, que foi alterado recentemente para incluir mais de 20 artigos completamente novos que nunca foram amplamente debatidos. Veja como esse projeto de lei matará…
The message above was removed from the official channel Telegram @TelegramBR right now...
Forwarded from Telegram
Recebemos uma ordem do Supremo Tribunal Federal (STF) do Brasil que obriga o Telegram a remover nossa mensagem anterior sobre o PL 2630/2020 e enviar uma nova mensagem aos usuários, que está incluída abaixo.
“Por determinação do SUPREMO TRIBUNAL FEDERAL, a empresa Telegram comunica: A mensagem anterior do Telegram caracterizou FLAGRANTE e ILÍCITA DESINFORMAÇÃO atentatória ao Congresso Nacional, ao Poder Judiciário, ao Estado de Direito e à Democracia Brasileira, pois, fraudulentamente, distorceu a discussão e os debates sobre a regulação dos provedores de redes sociais e de serviços de mensageria privada (PL 2630), na tentativa de induzir e instigar os usuários à coagir os parlamentares.”
“Por determinação do SUPREMO TRIBUNAL FEDERAL, a empresa Telegram comunica: A mensagem anterior do Telegram caracterizou FLAGRANTE e ILÍCITA DESINFORMAÇÃO atentatória ao Congresso Nacional, ao Poder Judiciário, ao Estado de Direito e à Democracia Brasileira, pois, fraudulentamente, distorceu a discussão e os debates sobre a regulação dos provedores de redes sociais e de serviços de mensageria privada (PL 2630), na tentativa de induzir e instigar os usuários à coagir os parlamentares.”
Telegram
Recebemos uma ordem do Supremo Tribunal Federal (STF) do Brasil que obriga o Telegram a remover nossa mensagem anterior sobre o PL 2630/2020 e enviar uma nova mensagem aos usuários, que está incluída abaixo. “Por determinação do SUPREMO TRIBUNAL FEDERAL,…
🚨 Telegram removed the old service message and sent the new message above to all brazilian users.
Forwarded from News and Tips
"Inside information"- may or may not be true. In the end, it is all decided by the @Durov.