Craig Pasta Jardula
@yopasta Replying to @aaronjmate

"But it’s not an invasion, it’s a reaction to a provocation on Russia’s border while the people of Donbass were shelled & slaughtered daily for 8 yrs. Putin was called to intervene by ethnic Russians. I’m not endorsing a war, I’m endorsing the right for people of Donbass to live."
https://twitter.com/yopasta/status/1576217461728256001

We are hearing a lot about "Russian Aggression" these days in order to obfuscate that a mere 20 years ago was being engineered one of the most comprehensive psyop in History aimed at convincing the public of the existence of a completely non-existent threat to US national security in order to carry out the mother of all aggressions...

Unveiled un the waning days of Summer 2002, the War of Aggression against Iraq was conceived and developed as a genuine marketing campaign characterized with a relentless 24/7 hammering of selected talking points delivered by a platter of national security officials, recycled Trotskyists scribes and cynical ideologues.

With the Collective West, "you're damned if you do, you're damned if you don't". Preventing a genocide or standing pat and letting it happen on your doorstep... Moscow followed international law by intervening to prevent Jus Cogens violations. 1. Existence of an Imminent threat of severe bodily harm to the Donbass civilian population , 2. Exhaustion of alternate remedies (Non-application of UN Resolution 2202 by Kiev) 3. Remedial measures designed in proportionality to the stated objectives (Police action limited to the territories of the Donbass characterized by an eye to preserving infrastructures and keeping an open stance to a diplomatic solution, that is until former UK PM Boris Johnson's injunction to Zelenski revealed that Kiev cannot be considered a reliable partner owing to having surrendered its sovereignty to NATO).

"Here’s the top adviser of @ZelenskyyUa in 2019 talking about how their plan to join NATO will prompt Russia to invade Ukraine. “They must do this before we join NATO.” Our price for joining NATO is a big war with Russia. Who calls this an “unprovoked war”?"
https://twitter.com/KimDotcom/status/1577289852848308228

https://rumble.com/v11ho75-the-ukraine-war-foretold.html

Ed Curtin:

"It should now be quite clear to any reasonable person that the Biden administration is hell-bent on destroying Russia and will risk nuclear war in doing so. It has already started World War III with its use of Ukraine to light the final match.

...For years, the U.S.- run NATO has moved military forces and bases into countries encircling Russia. This includes weapons that can very quickly be converted to nuclear use. This, as I’ve pointed out before, is tantamount to Russia doing the same in Mexico and Canada, and let’s add Cuba as well. We know what the U.S. response would be, but when President Putin and his government objected and said this is a betrayal of previous agreements, he was dismissed as if he were a child making things up.

In 2014, when the U.S. engineered a coup in Ukraine, bringing into power neo-Nazi elements, and Russia protested this coup on its western border, Washington mocked such concerns. Every time Russia has complained about such provocative moves, the U.S. has dismissed them as inconsequential.

For years the U.S. has supported the Ukrainian killing of the Russian speaking peoples of eastern Ukraine, and finally, when Ukraine had amassed forces to invade the Donbas region, the Russian government had had enough and sent troops into the region to defend this area. Thus the hypocritical West played at outrage that what they had created was finally backfiring. Russia was cast as the guilty party for invading Ukraine. And now a full-fledged U.S. war against Russia is out in the open and it will become more dangerous as it continues. Nuclear annihilation becomes a very real possibility as the Biden administration continues to push the envelope.

...Only children still believe the America propaganda and its war machine."
http://edwardcurtin.com/only-adult-children-still-believe-u-s-propaganda/

​​​​​​◽️ Member States of the Biological and Toxin Weapons Convention (BTWC) attended Russian-led conference in Geneva from September 5 to 9 held due to the violation of the articles I and IV of the abovementioned Convention by the U.S. and Ukraine.

◽️ The Ministry of Defence of Russia has analysed the data of U.S. and Ukrainian representatives' speeches, the working documents of the member States, joint statements and the outcome document of the conference.

◽️ The Russian Federation has raised over 20 questions related to the illegal activity of Kiev and Washington within the BTWC. Here are some of these questions.

◽️ What was the reason for choosing the pathogenic microorganisms examined in Ukraine within the Biological Threat Reduction Programme and why was the range of the studied pathogens not related to current healthcare problems as, for example, Tap-6 project dedicated to examining agents of glanders that had never been recorded at the territory of Ukraine?

◽️ How shout the accumulation of most dangerous infections' strains and sending them to other countries contribute to improving the situation related to the contagious morbidity?

◽️ Why was the main emphasis made on examining the natural focal and most dangerous infections that, according to the lists of the U.S. Centres for Disease Control and Prevention, are considered possible agents of biological weapons?

◽️ What researches that supposed using agents of contagious diseases and toxic substances were Ukrainian servicemen and mental patients involved in, being one of the most vulnerable categories of citizens?

◽️ Why do the U.S. and Ukraine obscure the military-biological cooperation in international reports under the Biological and Toxin Weapons Convention (BTWC), while the U.S. has been blocking the development of its verification mechanism since 2001?

◽️ The participants of the conference received the copies of genuine documents previously mentioned by Russian Defence Ministry, as well as the physical evidence that proved the implementation of works within military-biological programmes' in Ukraine.

◽️ There was no delegation that doubted the authenticity of the presented documents, including those related to the accumulation of pathogenic materials in Ukrainian laboratories counting the Mechnikov Anti-Plague Institute.

@mod_russia_en

​​​​◽️ The US and Ukrainian explanations regarding the export of strains and biological materials of Ukrainian citizens, as well as the observance of ethical standards while conducting research on military personnel, low-income citizens and one of the most vulnerable categories of the population, patients of psychiatric hospitals, looked extremely unconvincing.

◽️ While discussing this issue, the U.S. delegation recognised these facts emphasising that the pathogenic biological materials were '...seldom...' sent to the United States.

◽️ Apart from this statement that does not allow to evaluate the volume and the frequency of sending biological assays, the participants of the meeting have received no other explanations.

◽️ The questions related to the reasons of emergency elimination of documentary evidence of the military-biological activity have also remained with no comment. At the same time, Ukrainian delegation stated that '...it is not a trial and we are not at a cross-interrogation...'.

@mod_russia_en

​​​​◽️ Russia presented the documents that proved Ukraine's interest in receiving technical equipment for delivering biological weapons.

◽️ This refers to a request by the Ukrainian company Motor Sich to the Turkish manufacturer of unmanned aerial vehicles Bayraktar Akinci, dated 15 December 2021, to equip the UAV with aerosol spraying systems and mechanisms with a capacity of over 20 litres, to which the Turkish party responded negatively.

◽️ Having no other points, Ukraine expressed doubts about the authenticity of this document, with the far-fetched argument that Ukrainian state institutions do not use Russian language in their correspondence. I would remind that Motor Sich is not a Ukrainian state-run company and it uses Russian and English languages to communicate with the Turkish party, that were the languages of the document we have presented. However, Motor Sich itself refrained from commenting.

◽️ I would like to particularly focus on the U.S. response to patents on technical equipment for delivering and using biological weapons, including an unmanned aerial vehicle to spread infected insects in the air.

◽️ The U.S. delegation stated that '...the development and production of biological weapons is prohibited in the U.S., and any violation is punishable by penalties ranging from fines to imprisonment. However, the decision to grant the patent does not violate U.S. obligations under the BTWC and does not mean that the U.S. government condones the inventors' claims ...'.

◽️ This statement is fundamentally contrary to the U.S. patent code that clearly states that a patent in the U.S. cannot be granted in the absence of a full denoscription of the '...the device actually existing...' and its expertise.

◽️ Attempting to evade the raised questions, Kevin Garrett, Deputy Director of the Biological Threat Reduction Programme, spoke exclusively about the historical aspects of the programme. However, Garrett haven't pointed out that the real goals of the programme, which were aimed at reducing the weapons of mass destruction potential of the former Soviet Union, and which had been achieved as early as 2008. Within the congressional hearings, it was reported that the goals of the programme had been achieved, after which it was extended to other regions of the world. Within the congressional hearings, it was reported that the goals of the programme had been achieved, after which it was extended to other regions of the world.

@mod_russia_en

With its claim of responsibility for the bombing of the Kerch bridge, should #Ukraine be labeled as a State sponsor of #Terrorism?

Tout à l’heure Vladimir Poutine a entendu le rapport du chef du bureau des enquêtes au sujet de l’explosion sur le pont de Crimée. A l’issue de l’entrevue Vladimir Poutine a insisté qu’il n’y avait “aucun doute” qu’il s’agissait d’un “acte terroriste dirigé contre une infrastructure civile critique” russe et commandité par les services secrets ukrainiens

Une réunion du Conseil de sécurité russe a été convoquée pour demain

‼️ VLADIMIR POUTINE PARLE

Le chef de la commission d'enquête Alexander Bastrykin a rendu compte au président russe Vladimir Poutine de l'avancement de l'enquête sur l'explosion sur le pont de Crimée.

Les points principaux :

▪️L'affaire de l'explosion sur le pont de Crimée a été ouverte sous l'article "terrorisme".

▪️Des officiers du FSB ont réussi à identifier des suspects dans l'organisation d'une attaque terroriste sur le pont de Crimée, a déclaré Bastrykin.

▪️Les transporteurs ayant participé à l'organisation des transports ont été identifiés.

▪️L'itinéraire du mouvement des camions a été établi, en Bulgarie, en Géorgie, en Arménie, en Ossétie du Nord et sur le Territoire de Krasnodar.

▪️Des citoyens de Russie et de pays étrangers ont aidé les services spéciaux ukrainiens à préparer l'attaque.

Ce qui a été dit :
nous n'allons pas vous traduire mot à mot la video mais en substance Vladimir Poutine demande si c'est une attaque terroriste contre les infrastructures civiles de la Russie. La réponse est oui. Vladimir Poutine demande si c'est bien les service spéciaux qui ont mené cet acte terroriste. La réponse est oui. Et Alexander Bastrykin de rajouter que des agents étrangers y ont participé.

Quoi pensez ?
Rendre public cela peut simplement être un message au peuple russe que l'enquête avance et qu'on sait qui, quoi, comment. Cela peut tout autant est l’appétitif avant la réunion de demain du Conseil de Sécurité.

Petite idée qui me vient :
Et si cet attentat a eu lieu au moment de négociation que nous ignorons et qui aurait pour but de faire faire à la Russie un pas de plus qui rendrait impossible la poursuite de ces négociations ?
Je n'en sais pas plus, je pose les différentes possibilités afin d'ouvrir vos esprits à ce qui va ou pas se passer demain lors de ce Conseil de sécurité de Fédération de Russie.

t.me/russosphere

POLITIQUE RUSSE
OPINION LIBRE (D'UN DEPUTE A LA DOUMA)

L'occident peut organiser une provocation nucléaire en Ukraine, accusant de cela Moscou, pour exclure de la Fédération de Russie du Conseil de Sécurité de l'ONU.

C'est ce qu'à déclaré sur son Vlog le député "Rodina" de la Douma Mikhail Delyagin.

Selon l'homme politique, il peut s'agir de saper une centrale nucléaire ukrainienne ou d'une frappe nucléaire.

« Tout ce que nous conseillons à nos dirigeants est fait par l'Occident après un certain temps. Tout simplement, à commencer par l'arrêt de l'approvisionnement en gaz. Par conséquent, je suppose pleinement que les Américains et les Britanniques lanceront une frappe nucléaire tactique ou feront exploser la centrale nucléaire de Khmelnitsky afin de créer une contamination radioactive locale, nous en accuseront et nous expulseront du Conseil de Sécurité de l'ONU pour cela. Les préparatifs pour cela sont déjà en cours » a déclaré Delyagin.

t.me/russosphere