Sadly, Sanjeev does not understand that there can be no “proportional” way of violating the right to life, there can be no proportional way of removing the right to free medical consent (you either have it or you don’t), and no proportional way of discriminating against the healthy innate characteristics of the human race. Not everything can be reduced to risk vs benefits analysis, and fundamental principles and values should never be considered in this light. https://news.1rj.ru/str/sanjeevsabhlok/3970

Only the belief in anthropogenic climate change poses serious risk to mental health (but sometimes it is the other way around).

Viruses certainly do discriminate, otherwise everyone infected would get sick and suffer the same way. In any case, what viruses do to people has no bearing on how humans ought to relate to one another. We must fight discrimination against healthy, innate characteristics of the human race.

Interesting that they didn't consider it was necessary to scribble eyes onto the masked humanoid. No window to the soul on a sexless humanoid is pretty symbolic of what they are steering humanity towards.

The argument “that the [vaccine] mandate was not a reasonably proportionate response to current risks created by COVID-19" will always lose, because the plaintiffs lack the qualifications to supersede the professional judgement of government experts. https://www.abc.net.au/news/2022-06-04/unvaccinated-submarine-workers-face-axe-after-fair-work-decision/101126302 Not one legal challenge over the last two years has attempted to argue on the fundamental ethical principles (healthy innate characteristics of the human race, the right to life, implications of the removal of the right to free medical consent). https://news.1rj.ru/str/NormalParty/1064 Also, consider this: https://news.1rj.ru/str/NormalParty/1267

If some banks are “too big to fail” and must be bailed out by the taxpayer whenever in financial trouble, then they are not businesses but monopolies, and if they are necessary monopolies, operating with zero risk but guaranteed profits, then they should not be private but nationalised. All private monopolies are systemic theft.

If the state is using a stick, their real aim will be presented as a carrot. The challenge is to recognise and not eat the carrot.

Victoria has its own STASI: “The high-tech data agency was set up in August, 2020 during the Covid pandemic but will continue operating in a move the opposition says is deeply disturbing. Insights Victoria looked at how residents spent their money, their social media presence and physical and mental health.” https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-10884685/Inside-Daniel-Andrews-new-Big-Brother-style-data-agency-tried-secret.html

This is what vaccine mandates are about. They gave you a warning. They explained the rules of the game. Did you watch it? Did you understand? Good Day… https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NTpcT60zA8I

Top comment: “Normally you don't have to pay when you are held hostage.”

“I think, therefore I am” is a proof of rational consciousness, but “I think that AI thinks” is a fundamentally different relation to “I think” being thought by AI: non-reflexive vis-a-vis reflexive, where only the latter relation denotes rational consciousness.

https://culturalanalysisnet.wordpress.com/2018/03/10/the-ontological-limits-of-artificial-intelligence/

Any systemic incentivisation of identity-based “pride” is a set up. Those fringe groups who took the bait and promote “pride” in their abnormalities are being led to the slaughter, given enough rope and seduced to poke the dragon of the collective unconscious. In this sense, LGBTQ appears to be the same kind of operation as Ukraine.

Breaking NEWS. Dan Andrews unveils the new state logo: Victoria - the Sunshine State. The new dictum, “Victoria - The Sunshine State” will be included on all new vehicle number plates in the state of Victoria, and on all government letterheads. The Premier confirmed that public adherence to this new dictum will be carefully monitored by OSS and any disagreement, disparaging remarks or mockery will be included by the Office of State Security under mental health disorders Act and is considered a threat to public wellbeing.

I rarely post video interviews, but this one is too insightful and clear to miss. https://www.bitchute.com/video/8AKXxewZSeRm/

Tattoos are ritualised self-mutilation, a symbolic manifestation of subconscious self-rejection, an antagonistic personality split induced by trauma. This will not fit every case, but the general causal pattern seems to be as follows: a) I hate you (my mother, or father, or brother etc.) for a traumatic experience you caused me; b) you were the symbol of humanity to me, my ideal, and you revealed yourself as an aberration, as a cause of my suffering; c) ‘therefore’, humanity for me is an aberration, a cause of suffering; d) I love myself, I am not an aberration, but I am human, therefore I hate myself, and I am an aberration; e) but I cannot believe this contradiction, I cannot acknowledge this, because I would go mad, I would cease to exist as a Self; f) therefore I will believe that I love myself, that I am pure and whole, and I will hate myself only symbolically, only my skin, not all of me.

How to become more Human:

- accept that you do not belong anywhere,
- assume that there are no likeminded people,
(you just have not realised your disagreements yet),
- acknowledge that you have no tribe,
- accept that you are probably wrong about most things,
- but you need others to make sense of it all.

That is a good place to start.

At this point in history, giving birth in the ocean is probably less risky than trusting the medical experts about what is healthy, especially those who meekly accepted the removal of the right to free medical consent.