I have emailed Ben Fordham (of the 2GB radio breakfast show) with the information/arguments listed here: https://news.1rj.ru/str/NormalParty/1064 Perhaps those listeners of Fordham whose lives were destroyed by medical coercion will find consolation in the fact that they did the right thing, that they did not betray their children and future generations by complying with unethical orders, did not go along with the government propaganda, despite systemic coercion.

The moment you would get into utilitarian (risk vs benefits) arguments about vaccine mandates, those who support the mandates can turn the argument against you, since the commitment to relative utility as the standard of ethical action implicitly denies all absolute values, absolute principles, including your fundamental rights. This is a lost cause, because if someone stronger would increase your risks for not complying with their demands (unemployment, poverty, social isolation), then a utilitarian must conclude that you Ought to comply, and if you Ought to comply, then they have the right to make you comply. For example, according to utilitarian ethics, slaves ought to obey their master if the master would kill them for disobedience. The crucial point, and an implicit contradiction, is that utilitarians are not in principle opposed to extortion, theft, murder or slavery.

“A plastic surgery addict says she feels ‘dehumanised’ after claiming she was kicked off a flight because of her 10kg breasts.” They are not breasts but prosthetics and she is not human but a porn-cyborg.

https://www.news.com.au/travel/travel-updates/incidents/i-was-kicked-off-a-flight-because-of-my-10kg-boobs-model-claims/news-story/3916aa87556bb92bbadc9f5d30c4bcf7

Nativism (Nativist Prioritarianism) is a rejection of that which unites Humanity, which makes us Human. We all share the same ancient ancestors. We are all related. We are all brothers. Reason unites us. Everything else is an attack on consciousness, reducing us to animals and ultimately to dust.

Sadly, Sanjeev does not understand that there can be no “proportional” way of violating the right to life, there can be no proportional way of removing the right to free medical consent (you either have it or you don’t), and no proportional way of discriminating against the healthy innate characteristics of the human race. Not everything can be reduced to risk vs benefits analysis, and fundamental principles and values should never be considered in this light. https://news.1rj.ru/str/sanjeevsabhlok/3970

Only the belief in anthropogenic climate change poses serious risk to mental health (but sometimes it is the other way around).

Viruses certainly do discriminate, otherwise everyone infected would get sick and suffer the same way. In any case, what viruses do to people has no bearing on how humans ought to relate to one another. We must fight discrimination against healthy, innate characteristics of the human race.

Interesting that they didn't consider it was necessary to scribble eyes onto the masked humanoid. No window to the soul on a sexless humanoid is pretty symbolic of what they are steering humanity towards.

The argument “that the [vaccine] mandate was not a reasonably proportionate response to current risks created by COVID-19" will always lose, because the plaintiffs lack the qualifications to supersede the professional judgement of government experts. https://www.abc.net.au/news/2022-06-04/unvaccinated-submarine-workers-face-axe-after-fair-work-decision/101126302 Not one legal challenge over the last two years has attempted to argue on the fundamental ethical principles (healthy innate characteristics of the human race, the right to life, implications of the removal of the right to free medical consent). https://news.1rj.ru/str/NormalParty/1064 Also, consider this: https://news.1rj.ru/str/NormalParty/1267

If some banks are “too big to fail” and must be bailed out by the taxpayer whenever in financial trouble, then they are not businesses but monopolies, and if they are necessary monopolies, operating with zero risk but guaranteed profits, then they should not be private but nationalised. All private monopolies are systemic theft.

If the state is using a stick, their real aim will be presented as a carrot. The challenge is to recognise and not eat the carrot.

Victoria has its own STASI: “The high-tech data agency was set up in August, 2020 during the Covid pandemic but will continue operating in a move the opposition says is deeply disturbing. Insights Victoria looked at how residents spent their money, their social media presence and physical and mental health.” https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-10884685/Inside-Daniel-Andrews-new-Big-Brother-style-data-agency-tried-secret.html

This is what vaccine mandates are about. They gave you a warning. They explained the rules of the game. Did you watch it? Did you understand? Good Day… https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NTpcT60zA8I

Top comment: “Normally you don't have to pay when you are held hostage.”

“I think, therefore I am” is a proof of rational consciousness, but “I think that AI thinks” is a fundamentally different relation to “I think” being thought by AI: non-reflexive vis-a-vis reflexive, where only the latter relation denotes rational consciousness.

https://culturalanalysisnet.wordpress.com/2018/03/10/the-ontological-limits-of-artificial-intelligence/

Any systemic incentivisation of identity-based “pride” is a set up. Those fringe groups who took the bait and promote “pride” in their abnormalities are being led to the slaughter, given enough rope and seduced to poke the dragon of the collective unconscious. In this sense, LGBTQ appears to be the same kind of operation as Ukraine.