Take the fundamental laws of modern states, take their administration, take freedom of assembly, freedom of the press, or “equality of all citizens before the law,” and you will see at every turn evidence of the hypocrisy of bourgeois democracy with which every honest and class-conscious worker is familiar. There is not a single state, however democratic, which has no loopholes or reservations in its constitution guaranteeing the bourgeoisie the possibility of dispatching troops against the workers, of proclaiming martial law, and so forth, in case of a “violation of public order,” and actually in case the exploited class “violates” its position of slavery and tries to behave in a non-slavish manner. Kautsky shamelessly embellishes bourgeois democracy and omits to mention, for instance, how the most democratic and republican bourgeoisie in America or Switzerland deal with workers on strike.

Lenin
The Proletarian Revolution and the Renegade Kautsk

The liberals approach the language question in the same way as they approach all political questions—like hypocritical hucksters, holding out one hand (openly) to democracy and the other (behind their backs) to the feudalists and police.

Vladimir Lenin
Critical Remarks on the National Question

A few words about wreckers, saboteurs, spies, etc. Now, I think, it is clear to everyone that the present-day wreckers and saboteurs, no matter what flag they disguise themselves under - Trotskyist or Bukharinist - have long ceased to be a political current in the workers' movement, that they have turned into an unprincipled and unprincipled gang of professional wreckers, saboteurs, spies, murderers. It is clear that these gentlemen will have to be smashed and rooted out mercilessly, as enemies of the working class, as traitors to our Motherland. This is clear and does not require further explanation.

The so-called housing shortage, which plays such a great role in the press nowadays, does not consist in the fact that the working-class generally lives in bad, overcrowded, and unhealthy dwellings. That is not something new. It has existed as long as the working-class has existed… The housing shortage from which the workers and part of the petty bourgeoisie suffer is not something peculiar to the present; it is one of the necessary institutions of capitalism, of just as much necessity as the exploitation itself.

Why is Zelensky afraid of peace?
The answer is obvious.
Everything will come to light!
1. The real figures of losses will emerge.
2. The real numbers of disabled and wounded will emerge.
3. What was stolen will come to light. Who stole it and on what.
4. The missing weapons will surface. Including those that are currently in the hands of Ukrainian criminals.
5. Frauds in collections, purchases, etc. will emerge.
6. Reality will emerge.
7. Thousands will return from the war with questions for the authorities.
8. Ukraine’s real debts will emerge and they will start demanding payment.
9. It will come to light that the country has effectively lost its energy and gas infrastructure.
10. Social problems will emerge
11. Housing and communal services problems, etc. will emerge.

But the most important points are that Zelensky will lose his monopoly in everything (government, social media, security forces, etc.). Of course, they will stop giving Kyiv easy money, and Ukraine in such a state will simply not be able to "feed" itself.

This will all lead to who knows what the f@ck. Most likely, the result will be the debunking of the cult of Ze personality. This is what all the "Ze riffraff" is afraid of. This is why they will rip up Trump's peace case.

Mass-minded, communist workers, employed, for in-stance, in the Manchester or Lyons workshops, do not believe that by "pure thinking" they will be able to argue away their industrial masters and their own practical debasement. They are most painfully aware of the difference between being and thinking, between consciousness and life. They know that property, capital, money, wage-labour and the like are no ideal figments of the brain but very practical, very objective products of their self-estrange-ment and that therefore they must be abolished in a practical, objective way for man to become man not only in thinking, in consciousness, but in mass being, in life. Critical Criticism, on the contrary, teaches them that they cease in reality to be wage-workers if in thinking they abolish the thought of wage-labour; if in thinking they cease to regard themselves as wage-workers and, in accordance with that extravagant notion, no longer let them-selves be paid for their person. As absolute idealists, as ethereal beings, they will then naturally be able to live on the ether of pure thought. Critical Criticism teaches them that they abolish real capital by overcoming in thinking the category Capital, that they really change and transform themselves into real human beings by changing their "abstract ego" in consciousness and scorning as an un-Critical operation all real change of their real existence, of the real conditions of their existence, that is to say, of their real ego.
The "spirit", which sees in reality only categories, naturally reduces all human activity and practice to the dialectical process of thought of Critical Criticism. That is what distinguishes its social-ism from mass-type socialism and communism.