Forwarded from Slavyangrad (M)
HOW DOES IRAN RESPOND?
One of the most important areas in Iran's military doctrine is ballistic missiles. The advantages of this type of missile have long been known - the shortest flight time and the greatest problems for the receiving side, since it is more difficult to intercept.
Therefore, the Islamic Republic has a wide variety of these missiles, which is especially good when no treaties interfere.
To reach targets in Israel, which is more than 1000 km away, two-stage medium-range ballistic missiles (MRBMs) are used.
What could be used:
Shahab-3 - a missile based on the Soviet R-17, has a range of1000 to 2000 km, with a warhead of up to one ton. It has been in service since the 2000s.
Ghadr-110 - a similar two-stage missile, a further development of the Shahab and has the same characteristics, but with a declared improved accuracy and a different warhead. It was used by the Houthis and was intercepted by the Israeli missile defence system.
Emad is a missile introduced in 2015 and equipped with a detachable warhead with an improved guidance system and a declared CEP of no more than 50 meters. The declared range is still up to ~1700 km and a warhead of about 750 kg.
Sejil is a solid-fuel missile that is a replacement for the liquid-fueled Shahabs, which is presumably an indigenous development, and not a development of Soviet or Chinese projects.
The detailed characteristics of each are poorly known, since in principle few countries disclose them, and it is also worth considering that, for example, the same Shahabs are a "family" of missiles, where each modification is different.
In addition, there are also hypersonic Fattehs, about which little is known, except that they were already used to strike Israel last year
@Slavyangrad
One of the most important areas in Iran's military doctrine is ballistic missiles. The advantages of this type of missile have long been known - the shortest flight time and the greatest problems for the receiving side, since it is more difficult to intercept.
Therefore, the Islamic Republic has a wide variety of these missiles, which is especially good when no treaties interfere.
To reach targets in Israel, which is more than 1000 km away, two-stage medium-range ballistic missiles (MRBMs) are used.
What could be used:
Shahab-3 - a missile based on the Soviet R-17, has a range of1000 to 2000 km, with a warhead of up to one ton. It has been in service since the 2000s.
Ghadr-110 - a similar two-stage missile, a further development of the Shahab and has the same characteristics, but with a declared improved accuracy and a different warhead. It was used by the Houthis and was intercepted by the Israeli missile defence system.
Emad is a missile introduced in 2015 and equipped with a detachable warhead with an improved guidance system and a declared CEP of no more than 50 meters. The declared range is still up to ~1700 km and a warhead of about 750 kg.
Sejil is a solid-fuel missile that is a replacement for the liquid-fueled Shahabs, which is presumably an indigenous development, and not a development of Soviet or Chinese projects.
The detailed characteristics of each are poorly known, since in principle few countries disclose them, and it is also worth considering that, for example, the same Shahabs are a "family" of missiles, where each modification is different.
In addition, there are also hypersonic Fattehs, about which little is known, except that they were already used to strike Israel last year
@Slavyangrad
❤2
It looks like that might be it for the moment. Israel is telling people to come out of their shelters.
We will see what transpires.
We will see what transpires.
❤3
Forwarded from Quds News Network
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Massive destruction in Rishon LeZion in Tel Aviv following Iranian missile strikes carried out this morning.
❤2
Forwarded from Marx Engels Lenin Institute
This is a series of posters produced by Iranian artists at the time of the war against Iraq.
❤2
Forwarded from Resistance News Network
🚨🇮🇷 Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC):
—
In the third phase of Operation True Promise, we targeted the military centers and airbases that were the source of the criminal attack on our country, as well as the military-industrial facilities used by the zionist regime’s army to produce missiles and other weaponry.
Field reports, satellite imagery, and intercepted intelligence confirm that dozens of ballistic missiles successfully struck strategic targets. Despite the enemy’s claims of interception, it failed to repel the waves of missile attacks launched by our forces.
—
In the third phase of Operation True Promise, we targeted the military centers and airbases that were the source of the criminal attack on our country, as well as the military-industrial facilities used by the zionist regime’s army to produce missiles and other weaponry.
Field reports, satellite imagery, and intercepted intelligence confirm that dozens of ballistic missiles successfully struck strategic targets. Despite the enemy’s claims of interception, it failed to repel the waves of missile attacks launched by our forces.
❤1
Forwarded from The Stalin Society
The imperialists have long relied on state-backed propagandists to wage ideological war against socialism. Compradors like William Randolph Hearst and Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn became mouthpieces for anti-Soviet narratives, shaping public opinion to serve the interests of capital. Among the most notorious of these was Robert Conquest, whose book The Great Terror has became a cornerstone of Cold War propaganda.
Far from being an objective historian, Conquest was a committed anti-communist whose work was funded and promoted by Western intelligence-linked institutions. His so-called “history” was riddled with fabrications, hearsay, and Cold War distortions — yet it remains gospel to anti-communists clinging to the myth of Soviet barbarism.
Following Conquest’s death, the Stalin Society produced this presentation to expose the lies and dismantle the ideological weaponry wielded by this stooge of imperialism.
- V. I. Lenin,
Left-Wing Communism: An Infantile Disorder.
https://stalinsociety.net/?p=88
Far from being an objective historian, Conquest was a committed anti-communist whose work was funded and promoted by Western intelligence-linked institutions. His so-called “history” was riddled with fabrications, hearsay, and Cold War distortions — yet it remains gospel to anti-communists clinging to the myth of Soviet barbarism.
Following Conquest’s death, the Stalin Society produced this presentation to expose the lies and dismantle the ideological weaponry wielded by this stooge of imperialism.
If you want to help the “masses” and win the sympathy and support of the “masses,” you should not fear difficulties, or pinpricks, chicanery, insults and persecution from the “leaders,” but must absolutely work wherever the masses are to be found.
- V. I. Lenin,
Left-Wing Communism: An Infantile Disorder.
https://stalinsociety.net/?p=88
The Stalin Society
Robert Conquest dies- but his lies live on!
Recently, the world learned of the death of Robert Conquest, a ‘historian’ and author who worked for the Information Research Department (IRD) – an innocuously-named operation set up by the Labour …
❤1
Forwarded from Enemy Watch — Official
🇮🇷 | Iran must now prioritize exposing covert intelligence breaches that are deeply embedded within its civilian and diplomatic ecosystem. These threats are not limited to overt military aggression but are executed through soft infiltration embassies, cultural centers, consulates, universities, and transnational networks.
A pattern has emerged involving individuals from India, Pakistan, and parts of Europe claiming to be journalists, academic researchers, businessmen, religious pilgrims, or seminary students who have either travelled to the Zionist entity or maintain indirect affiliations with it. Some have participated in “interfaith dialogue” initiatives which are increasingly being used as diplomatic cover for intelligence collection, ideological subversion, and influence operations.
In particular:
• Certain Pakistani clerics with suspicious international mobility and access to both Arab and Western circles must be monitored.
• Hindu nationals entering Iran under non-religious or cultural programs should be carefully vetted.
• Foreign “academic” collaborations, especially those funded or backed by Western think tanks, must be assessed not just for content but for geopolitical intent.
These networks operate not only as intelligence nodes but as long-term social engineering tools, grooming local elites, collecting data, and even misguiding Iran’s internal narrative under labels like “moderation,” “normalization,” or “economic liberalism.”
Iran’s national security apparatus must:
• Re-examine all diplomatic-to-civil society links.
• Freeze unvetted international programs.
• Conduct full intelligence profiles of frequent cross-border actors from suspect regions.
• Impose immediate curbs on NGO activities with Western, Zionist, or Gulf affiliations.
This is not paranoia it’s necessary wartime counter-intelligence, especially as the Zionist enemy and its partners are no longer relying only on missiles, but on minds and networks.
🔹@enemywatch
A pattern has emerged involving individuals from India, Pakistan, and parts of Europe claiming to be journalists, academic researchers, businessmen, religious pilgrims, or seminary students who have either travelled to the Zionist entity or maintain indirect affiliations with it. Some have participated in “interfaith dialogue” initiatives which are increasingly being used as diplomatic cover for intelligence collection, ideological subversion, and influence operations.
In particular:
• Certain Pakistani clerics with suspicious international mobility and access to both Arab and Western circles must be monitored.
• Hindu nationals entering Iran under non-religious or cultural programs should be carefully vetted.
• Foreign “academic” collaborations, especially those funded or backed by Western think tanks, must be assessed not just for content but for geopolitical intent.
These networks operate not only as intelligence nodes but as long-term social engineering tools, grooming local elites, collecting data, and even misguiding Iran’s internal narrative under labels like “moderation,” “normalization,” or “economic liberalism.”
Iran’s national security apparatus must:
• Re-examine all diplomatic-to-civil society links.
• Freeze unvetted international programs.
• Conduct full intelligence profiles of frequent cross-border actors from suspect regions.
• Impose immediate curbs on NGO activities with Western, Zionist, or Gulf affiliations.
This is not paranoia it’s necessary wartime counter-intelligence, especially as the Zionist enemy and its partners are no longer relying only on missiles, but on minds and networks.
🔹@enemywatch
❤3
Forwarded from JHArnous
But it didn't work out because the Zionists destroyed the air defense in Syria.
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Telegram
Stay Free
🇮🇷⚔🏴☠🇺🇸 CNN, citing an Israeli source: Countries in the region have supported our air defense systems, as they did in previous Iranian attacks.
@stayfreeworld
@stayfreeworld
😁3
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
❤2
Forwarded from Sou Wan
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
A stunning view of the Iranian missiles from my balcony near Beirut tonight, before they reached their targets in israel.
❤1