NEW: Supreme Court releases it’s Tuesday order list, adding no new cases to its docket for the term. https://www.supremecourt.gov/orders/courtorders/011723zor_5426.pdf

Court will also convene for a set of two oral arguments this morning, beginning at 10amET. Here is the link to the arguments: https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/live.aspx

The Supreme Court will take its last seat for the month of January with a case about whether a deaf student can renew his disability-based discrimination lawsuit against his former school in a case called Perez v. Sturgis Public School. Argument begins at 10amET, here is the link: https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/live.aspx

BREAKING: The Supreme Court has released its findings in the leaked draft opinion of the Dobbs case, however, unfortunately the investigation could not determine who was responsible for leaking the draft opinion to Politico in May of 2022. Here is a link to the findings released: https://www.supremecourt.gov/publicinfo/press/Dobbs_Public_Report_January_19_2023.pdf

BREAKING: Supreme Court has set its first opinion day for the 22-23 term on Monday Jan 23rd. The Court will issue at least one or more opinions.

NEW: Supreme Court releases its order list from last Friday’s conference, it appears no new cases have been granted for this term. Stay tuned at 10 AM ET for one or more opinions to be released from argued cases so far this term. https://www.supremecourt.gov/orders/courtorders/012323zor_0pl1.pdf

BREAKING: Supreme Court releases it’s first opinion, in the case of ARELLANO v. MCDONOUGH, SECRETARY OF VETERANS AFFAIRS. This case was about a veteran who was seeking to receive 30 years of retroactive disability benefits. It was a 9-0 decision by Justice Barrett. https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/22pdf/21-432_f2bh.pdf

At least one more opinion coming today.

BREAKING: In the last opinion of the day, the Supreme Court dismissed a case, which was argued on January 9th, about attorney-client privilege. No reason was given for the dismissal. https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/22pdf/21-1397_ap6b.pdf

Reminder: “dismissed as improvidently granted” is essentially the Supreme Court’s way of saying “oops, we shouldn’t have taken up the case, we take it back”.

BREAKING: Supreme Court will release one or more opinions on Wednesday February 22nd.

It’s Tuesday morning at the Supreme Court, and it’s an argument day. Today the Court will hear a case challenging certain aspects of section 230 of the Communications Decency Act of 1996, which includes company immunity.


In a case called 21-1333 GONZALEZ V. GOOGLE LLC, the Court will answer the following question: “Does section 230(c)(l) immunize interactive computer services when they make targeted recommendations of information provided by another information content provider, or only limit the liability of interactive computer services when they engage in traditional editorial functions (such as deciding whether to display or withdraw) with regard to such information?”

The Court will hear arguments in the case beginning at 10amET. Listen live here: https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/live.aspx

Supreme Court has released an order list this morning from last Friday’s conference, no new cases granted. https://www.supremecourt.gov/orders/courtorders/022123zor_g20h.pdf

It’s Wednesday morning at the Supreme Court, and it’s an opinion day! The justices will convene at 10amET to announce one or more decisions in argued cases so far this term.

Afterwards, The Court will hear arguments in case 21-1496 Twitter, Inc. v. Taamneh. The Court will consider whether or not social media companies are liable for what users post on their platform, which could include aiding and abetting terrorism.

Oral argument will begin after the opinion announcement(s), listen live here: https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/live.aspx

#1 Opinion of the day: Case involving bankruptcy. Another opinion coming momentarily. https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/22pdf/21-908_n6io.pdf

Justice Barrett delivered the opinion for a unanimous Court, Justice Sotomayor filed a concurring opinion, which Justice Jackson joined.

Next opinion, in a 6-3 decision, is from the case HELIX ENERGY SOLUTIONS GROUP, INC., ET AL. v. HEWITT. The case involves the issue of overtime pay when working for more than 40 hours a week on a full time job. The Supreme Court ruled the highly paid workers who are paid by the day are ennoscriptd to the overtime pay. https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/22pdf/21-984_j426.pdf

Justice Kagan delivered the opinion of the Court. Justices Kavanaugh, Gorsuch and Alito dissented in the decision.