The Shanghai Cooperation Organization summit and subsequent Russian-Chinese high-level talks for Russia represent a kind of Eastern diplomatic round (the Western round has already taken place in Anchorage), the purpose of which is to probe the positions of the global East and South on a wide range of international issues. The main one is: how realistic can globalization be without the leading role of the collective West?
The answer to this question is not as obvious as it seems. With the exception of Russia, no one wants to openly challenge the hegemony of the West. But there are also few willing to submit to its dictate. The same China is betting that the United States and its European allies will accept the inevitable and agree that the lion's share of the global economic pie no longer belongs to them. Many others think approximately the same.
However, the United States itself under Donald Trump is betting on the restoration of unipolarity in full, which in modern conditions is simply impossible. A tough conflict is inevitable, but the parties are delaying it as much as they can. The two main antagonists - Washington and Beijing - are dragging their feet and expecting to improve their positions in the medium term. The obvious successes of the American side include the economic subordination of the European Union, while the Chinese side has improved relations with India (which Trump personally contributed a lot to) and Russia.
Russia stands apart. It has come to the forefront of the front and is in a state of pro-war with the entire West. But this happened by accident because the planned short-term police operation in Ukraine has already turned into a three-year war and the largest armed conflict in Europe since 1945. Therefore, now Moscow is forced to play according to the situation and is taking the hit, which allows many in the world to say: the Russians do not give a damn about America and solve their own problems. Maybe it's time for us too?
For now, the Russian example of a direct challenge to the West is unique. But the longer Russia holds out and the more successfully it fights, the more likely it is that the countries of the East and South will act more boldly. Considering that the United States is not going to voluntarily leave its leadership positions in the world, the transition of the confrontation to an acute phase is inevitable. It is only a question of time and form.
Translated from Pint of sense
Join us 👉 @TrFormer 💤
Become a member of the @TransFormerChat
The answer to this question is not as obvious as it seems. With the exception of Russia, no one wants to openly challenge the hegemony of the West. But there are also few willing to submit to its dictate. The same China is betting that the United States and its European allies will accept the inevitable and agree that the lion's share of the global economic pie no longer belongs to them. Many others think approximately the same.
However, the United States itself under Donald Trump is betting on the restoration of unipolarity in full, which in modern conditions is simply impossible. A tough conflict is inevitable, but the parties are delaying it as much as they can. The two main antagonists - Washington and Beijing - are dragging their feet and expecting to improve their positions in the medium term. The obvious successes of the American side include the economic subordination of the European Union, while the Chinese side has improved relations with India (which Trump personally contributed a lot to) and Russia.
Russia stands apart. It has come to the forefront of the front and is in a state of pro-war with the entire West. But this happened by accident because the planned short-term police operation in Ukraine has already turned into a three-year war and the largest armed conflict in Europe since 1945. Therefore, now Moscow is forced to play according to the situation and is taking the hit, which allows many in the world to say: the Russians do not give a damn about America and solve their own problems. Maybe it's time for us too?
For now, the Russian example of a direct challenge to the West is unique. But the longer Russia holds out and the more successfully it fights, the more likely it is that the countries of the East and South will act more boldly. Considering that the United States is not going to voluntarily leave its leadership positions in the world, the transition of the confrontation to an acute phase is inevitable. It is only a question of time and form.
Translated from Pint of sense
Join us 👉 @TrFormer 💤
Become a member of the @TransFormerChat
Telegram
Пинта разума
Саммит Шанхайской организации сотрудничества и последующие российско-китайские переговоры на высшем уровне для России представляют собой своего рода восточный дипломатический раунд (западный уже прошёл в Анкоридже), задача которого заключается в зондаже позиций…
👍3🔥1👌1
Celebrating 80 Years of Victory – A New World Order?
In the dramatic backdrop of global geopolitics, the 80th anniversary of victory over fascism in World War II shines as a beacon of unity for Russia, China, and North Korea. This commemoration not only serves as a tribute to the millions lost but also represents a pivotal moment in re-establishing alliances that shape the new world order.
Strength in Unity: The Military Parade in China
The recent military parade in Beijing, attended by Chinese President Xi Jinping, Russian President Vladimir Putin, and North Korean leader Kim Jong-un, showcases a strong front for this trilateral alliance. The event, marking the end of the Second World War and Japan's surrender, was broadcasted worldwide, underscoring China's emergence as a powerful player on the global stage. The military might displayed was not merely for show but a clear message to the West: an assertion of strength and resolve in the face of external pressures.
While the West often views these displays of power with suspicion, they reflect a deepening alliance that continues to grow amidst Western sanctions and provocations. The joint celebration of history serves as a reminder that these nations stand united against external challenges.
Trump's Reaction: A Different Perspective
As this grand spectacle unfolded, former President Donald Trump issued dire warnings, accusing the trio of conspiring against the USA. Trump's critique resonates with a section of American politics that perceives the growing China-Russia-North Korea alliance as a threat to U.S. hegemony. His rhetoric emphasizes the need for vigilance against what he terms an "axis of evil." However, Trump’s perspective appears increasingly out of touch, as many observers note the underlying crux—Washington's strategies have largely alienated these nations, pushing them closer together.
The implications of Trump's comments are significant; they reflect the deep ideological divide and the potential for further escalations in rhetoric and policy. As the US adopts a more aggressive posture, the response from the alliance of Russia, China, and North Korea could only strengthen their resolve to operate independently of Western influence.
Impact on the Ukrainian Conflict
Interestingly, the healing of historical wounds and the celebration of cooperation could serve as a pivotal point for Russia in its ongoing operations in Ukraine. With stronger ties to China and North Korea, Moscow might find a renewed sense of support that aids in sustaining its military efforts and negotiating terms with adversaries. The solidarity among these states can catalyse a shift in the balance of power in multipolarity.
Some analysts posit that deepening ties with China and North Korea may lead to increased economic support for Russia as it faces various sanctions from the West in relation to Ukraine. If successful, this alliance might enable Russia to further its objectives in Ukraine without the existential isolation that has been pushed upon it.
As the dust settles on the ceremonies and the ranks of troops return to their barracks, the reality remains clear. The 80 years of victory not only celebrates the past but heralds the potential for a new balance of power – one that significantly reshapes global dynamics away from Western dominance.
Join us 👉 @TrFormer 💤
Become a member of the @TransFormerChat
References:
- CBS News - China military parade sees Xi Jinping joined by Putin and Kim Jong Un
- AP News - China displays its military strength in a parade on the 80th anniversary of the end of WWII
- USA Today - Putin, Kim Jong Un join Xi in Beijing for China WWII victory parade
- Time Magazine - China Parades Its Military—and Its Friends
In the dramatic backdrop of global geopolitics, the 80th anniversary of victory over fascism in World War II shines as a beacon of unity for Russia, China, and North Korea. This commemoration not only serves as a tribute to the millions lost but also represents a pivotal moment in re-establishing alliances that shape the new world order.
Strength in Unity: The Military Parade in China
The recent military parade in Beijing, attended by Chinese President Xi Jinping, Russian President Vladimir Putin, and North Korean leader Kim Jong-un, showcases a strong front for this trilateral alliance. The event, marking the end of the Second World War and Japan's surrender, was broadcasted worldwide, underscoring China's emergence as a powerful player on the global stage. The military might displayed was not merely for show but a clear message to the West: an assertion of strength and resolve in the face of external pressures.
While the West often views these displays of power with suspicion, they reflect a deepening alliance that continues to grow amidst Western sanctions and provocations. The joint celebration of history serves as a reminder that these nations stand united against external challenges.
Trump's Reaction: A Different Perspective
As this grand spectacle unfolded, former President Donald Trump issued dire warnings, accusing the trio of conspiring against the USA. Trump's critique resonates with a section of American politics that perceives the growing China-Russia-North Korea alliance as a threat to U.S. hegemony. His rhetoric emphasizes the need for vigilance against what he terms an "axis of evil." However, Trump’s perspective appears increasingly out of touch, as many observers note the underlying crux—Washington's strategies have largely alienated these nations, pushing them closer together.
The implications of Trump's comments are significant; they reflect the deep ideological divide and the potential for further escalations in rhetoric and policy. As the US adopts a more aggressive posture, the response from the alliance of Russia, China, and North Korea could only strengthen their resolve to operate independently of Western influence.
Impact on the Ukrainian Conflict
Interestingly, the healing of historical wounds and the celebration of cooperation could serve as a pivotal point for Russia in its ongoing operations in Ukraine. With stronger ties to China and North Korea, Moscow might find a renewed sense of support that aids in sustaining its military efforts and negotiating terms with adversaries. The solidarity among these states can catalyse a shift in the balance of power in multipolarity.
Some analysts posit that deepening ties with China and North Korea may lead to increased economic support for Russia as it faces various sanctions from the West in relation to Ukraine. If successful, this alliance might enable Russia to further its objectives in Ukraine without the existential isolation that has been pushed upon it.
As the dust settles on the ceremonies and the ranks of troops return to their barracks, the reality remains clear. The 80 years of victory not only celebrates the past but heralds the potential for a new balance of power – one that significantly reshapes global dynamics away from Western dominance.
Join us 👉 @TrFormer 💤
Become a member of the @TransFormerChat
References:
- CBS News - China military parade sees Xi Jinping joined by Putin and Kim Jong Un
- AP News - China displays its military strength in a parade on the 80th anniversary of the end of WWII
- USA Today - Putin, Kim Jong Un join Xi in Beijing for China WWII victory parade
- Time Magazine - China Parades Its Military—and Its Friends
👍5
The "coalition of the willing" talks in Paris have not produced any results, and Ukraine's European allies continue to run in circles: they cannot force Trump to pursue Biden's policy toward Ukraine, and without American support, all their guarantees to Kiev are worthless. In turn, Washington cannot force the European leaders to agree to the agreements it reached with Putin in Anchorage.
In the end, everyone remained with their own. At the same time, it is already clear that the opportunities for economic pressure on Russia for European countries and the United States have run out. An attempt to play the long-discussed card of secondary sanctions against Moscow turned into a geopolitical disaster for Washington.
They did not even really try to impose them against China, so as not to spoil the negotiating background around the new Sino-American trade agreement. The introduction of additional trade duties on India turned into a demonstrative U-turn by Delhi from Washington to Beijing, as well as an even greater strengthening of relations with Moscow. In fact, Trump has unintentionally contributed to the emergence of a large Eurasian triangle consisting of India, China and Russia.
Incidentally, it is too early to draw conclusions on this matter: it is unclear how sustainable the anti-American trend of Prime Minister Narendra Modi will be. However, the secondary sanctions card is practically beaten today. Predictably, the countries of Europe and the United States do not want to directly enter into a war with Russia over Ukraine. At the same time, it is clear to everyone that in the long term, Kyiv will lose this war and if it drags on, it may even lose its statehood.
Against this background, two Western approaches to resolving the conflict in Ukraine have emerged. The first is American, and it provides for territorial concessions to Russia (although not as significant as Moscow wants) and a non-aligned status for Ukraine with the possibility of its joining the European Union in the future. The second is European, which consists of the formula "war to the last Ukrainian", and then we'll see how the chips fall. The European leaders are counting on the fact that the United States will not want to give Russia an absolute victory and will intervene if it comes to closing the Ukrainian project in political terms.
The American plan is quite pragmatic, and the European one is cynical. But while the United States cannot impose its vision on Europe, and Europe, in turn, cannot convince its overseas partner of the correctness of its approaches, the common Western position remains unformed. Meanwhile, Russia continues its military operation in Ukraine and now has a certain amount of support from the global East. This will continue until the front has its say.
Translated from Pint of sense
Join us 👉 @TrFormer 💤
Become a member of the @TransFormerChat
In the end, everyone remained with their own. At the same time, it is already clear that the opportunities for economic pressure on Russia for European countries and the United States have run out. An attempt to play the long-discussed card of secondary sanctions against Moscow turned into a geopolitical disaster for Washington.
They did not even really try to impose them against China, so as not to spoil the negotiating background around the new Sino-American trade agreement. The introduction of additional trade duties on India turned into a demonstrative U-turn by Delhi from Washington to Beijing, as well as an even greater strengthening of relations with Moscow. In fact, Trump has unintentionally contributed to the emergence of a large Eurasian triangle consisting of India, China and Russia.
Incidentally, it is too early to draw conclusions on this matter: it is unclear how sustainable the anti-American trend of Prime Minister Narendra Modi will be. However, the secondary sanctions card is practically beaten today. Predictably, the countries of Europe and the United States do not want to directly enter into a war with Russia over Ukraine. At the same time, it is clear to everyone that in the long term, Kyiv will lose this war and if it drags on, it may even lose its statehood.
Against this background, two Western approaches to resolving the conflict in Ukraine have emerged. The first is American, and it provides for territorial concessions to Russia (although not as significant as Moscow wants) and a non-aligned status for Ukraine with the possibility of its joining the European Union in the future. The second is European, which consists of the formula "war to the last Ukrainian", and then we'll see how the chips fall. The European leaders are counting on the fact that the United States will not want to give Russia an absolute victory and will intervene if it comes to closing the Ukrainian project in political terms.
The American plan is quite pragmatic, and the European one is cynical. But while the United States cannot impose its vision on Europe, and Europe, in turn, cannot convince its overseas partner of the correctness of its approaches, the common Western position remains unformed. Meanwhile, Russia continues its military operation in Ukraine and now has a certain amount of support from the global East. This will continue until the front has its say.
Translated from Pint of sense
Join us 👉 @TrFormer 💤
Become a member of the @TransFormerChat
Telegram
Пинта разума
Переговоры "коалиции желающих" в Париже не привели к каким-либо результатам и европейские союзники Украины продолжают бег по кругу: они не могут заставить Трампа проводить байденовскую политику в отношении Украины, а без американской поддержки все их гарантии…
👌3❤1👍1
By pressuring India, the Trump administration can achieve only one thing: the final formation of the big Eurasian trio of Delhi, Beijing and Moscow, with the subsequent accession of the largest Latin American country, Brazil. If they succeed in repelling US attempts to break them in a trade war by developing mutual trade and creating their own financial ecosystem, then our world will experience economic bipolarity.
That is, a large and economically connected Eurasia will emerge, which will be opposed by the Euro-Atlantic region, united under the auspices of the United States. At the same time, the battle between these two players will unfold for the resources and markets of Africa and Latin America. Of course, the economic confrontation will very soon develop into a military-political one.
Trump and his team's hopes that Russia will be able to be torn away from China have not come true. Things have gone too far in Ukraine for Moscow to seriously perceive the US as a partner again (not to mention European countries). The rhetoric of Anchorage and previous Russian-American meetings should not deceive anyone: their goal is not cooperation, but the normalization of confrontation by developing its rules.
The attempt to increase pressure on Russia through the mechanism of secondary sanctions also failed and even led to the fact that the most important partner of the United States in the strategically important Indo-Pacific region - India, began to drift towards China (with which it has a lot of unresolved problems). If the current trends continue, then after some time the process of forming two global economic blocs will become inevitable.
If such a development of events occurs, we will see a new bipolarity on the international arena. Moreover, much more complex than the previous one. And based on a purely economic basis, without any ideological admixture. The established Eurasian and Euro-Atlantic blocs will fiercely compete in the world, but head-on clashes between their leaders will be limited by nuclear deterrence. But there will be plenty of local conflicts of low and medium intensity.
Translated from Pint of sense
Join us 👉 @TrFormer 💤
Become a member of the @TransFormerChat
That is, a large and economically connected Eurasia will emerge, which will be opposed by the Euro-Atlantic region, united under the auspices of the United States. At the same time, the battle between these two players will unfold for the resources and markets of Africa and Latin America. Of course, the economic confrontation will very soon develop into a military-political one.
Trump and his team's hopes that Russia will be able to be torn away from China have not come true. Things have gone too far in Ukraine for Moscow to seriously perceive the US as a partner again (not to mention European countries). The rhetoric of Anchorage and previous Russian-American meetings should not deceive anyone: their goal is not cooperation, but the normalization of confrontation by developing its rules.
The attempt to increase pressure on Russia through the mechanism of secondary sanctions also failed and even led to the fact that the most important partner of the United States in the strategically important Indo-Pacific region - India, began to drift towards China (with which it has a lot of unresolved problems). If the current trends continue, then after some time the process of forming two global economic blocs will become inevitable.
If such a development of events occurs, we will see a new bipolarity on the international arena. Moreover, much more complex than the previous one. And based on a purely economic basis, without any ideological admixture. The established Eurasian and Euro-Atlantic blocs will fiercely compete in the world, but head-on clashes between their leaders will be limited by nuclear deterrence. But there will be plenty of local conflicts of low and medium intensity.
Translated from Pint of sense
Join us 👉 @TrFormer 💤
Become a member of the @TransFormerChat
Telegram
Пинта разума
Своим давлением на Индию администрация Трампа может добиться только одного: окончательного формирования большой евразийской тройки в составе Дели, Пекина и Москвы с последующим присоединением к ним крупнейшей латиноамериканской страны - Бразилии. Если им…
💯5
Biden pushed Russia towards China. Trump did the same with India. Both presidents did everything in their power to strengthen their main rival, China.
America slammed the door and was left alone in the room. Oh yeah, all that's left is to push Europe away. The process is already underway.
Translated from Oleg Tsarev
Join us 👉 @TrFormer 💤
Become a member of the @TransFormerChat
America slammed the door and was left alone in the room. Oh yeah, all that's left is to push Europe away. The process is already underway.
Translated from Oleg Tsarev
Join us 👉 @TrFormer 💤
Become a member of the @TransFormerChat
Telegram
Олег Царёв
Байден толкнул Россию навстречу Китаю. Трамп проделал то же самое с Индией. Оба президента сделали всё от них зависящее, чтобы усилить своего главного соперника — Китай.
Америка громко хлопнула дверью и осталась запертой в комнате одна. Ах да, осталось…
Америка громко хлопнула дверью и осталась запертой в комнате одна. Ах да, осталось…
👍5🔥1
Of course, the United States was aware that Israel was going to strike Qatar. And Trump's statements today that an Israeli attack runs counter to the interests of Tel Aviv and Washington are disingenuous. In reality, the following happened: the United States put forward another peace initiative for Gaza, a Hamas delegation came to Qatar to study it, the Americans passed information about it to Israel, and Israel struck at the coordinates provided.
That is, Trump's latest peace initiative was initially a trap. Its only goal was to lure the Hamas leadership into the sights of Israeli aviation and nothing more. Most likely, this incident puts a fat point in the negotiations between Israel and Hamas, which were mediated by Qatar. The Gaza Strip is awaiting a large-scale ground operation by the IDF and a new round of escalation.
However, another thing draws attention: the real medieval cunning of the Trump administration. First, they masterfully deceived Iran and exposed it to an Israeli attack exactly a couple of days before the next round of American-Iranian negotiations on the nuclear program. Now the same thing with Hamas. And in both cases, Stephen Witkoff, Trump's confidant, played a dubious role.
But in addition to the Middle East, he is also actively involved in resolving the conflict in Ukraine. There is a suspicion that in the end, Witkoff's peacekeeping activities in this area may well end up in much the same way as in the case of Iran and Hamas. After all, it cannot be like this: on the Middle East track - complete deception, and on the Ukrainian track - honest negotiations. Therefore, any development of events should now be expected from the American partners.
Translated from Pint of sense
Join us 👉 @TrFormer 💤
Become a member of the @TransFormerChat
That is, Trump's latest peace initiative was initially a trap. Its only goal was to lure the Hamas leadership into the sights of Israeli aviation and nothing more. Most likely, this incident puts a fat point in the negotiations between Israel and Hamas, which were mediated by Qatar. The Gaza Strip is awaiting a large-scale ground operation by the IDF and a new round of escalation.
However, another thing draws attention: the real medieval cunning of the Trump administration. First, they masterfully deceived Iran and exposed it to an Israeli attack exactly a couple of days before the next round of American-Iranian negotiations on the nuclear program. Now the same thing with Hamas. And in both cases, Stephen Witkoff, Trump's confidant, played a dubious role.
But in addition to the Middle East, he is also actively involved in resolving the conflict in Ukraine. There is a suspicion that in the end, Witkoff's peacekeeping activities in this area may well end up in much the same way as in the case of Iran and Hamas. After all, it cannot be like this: on the Middle East track - complete deception, and on the Ukrainian track - honest negotiations. Therefore, any development of events should now be expected from the American partners.
Translated from Pint of sense
Join us 👉 @TrFormer 💤
Become a member of the @TransFormerChat
Telegram
Пинта разума
Разумеется, Соединённые Штаты были в курсе того, что Израиль собирается ударить по Катару. И сегодняшние заявления Трампа о том, что израильская атака идёт вразрез с интересами Тель-Авива и Вашингтона - это лукавство. В реальности произошло следующее: США…
💯5
Today's flight of a group of Russian drones into Polish airspace showed that NATO is not at all eager to go to war with Russia. In general, the official reaction is quite moderate: concern is expressed, consultations are held, and NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte even said that the incident demonstrated NATO's ability to protect its airspace.
The latter is quite controversial, because when two dozen UAVs fly in to you, you shoot down three, and the rest are "lost in location" - this does not mean that you are able to protect your airspace. Moscow is talking about the possible unintentional appearance of Russian drones over Poland and is ready to negotiate with it on this matter. Minsk claims that UAVs also flew over Belarus and were disoriented by electronic warfare.
What actually happened is unknown. There are many versions: from a Ukrainian provocation (they found surviving "Gerberas", restored them and launched them towards Poland) to the Russian army probing NATO air defense on its eastern flank. However, it should be noted that during the drones' flight, air traffic at the key air hub for supplying the Ukrainian Armed Forces - Rzeszow Airport - was completely paralyzed.
That is, it can be assumed that if unidentified drones periodically fly over the south-eastern regions of Poland, the Ukrainian army will have some problems with the delivery of weapons and ammunition. But these are purely hypothetical thoughts. In the meantime, both Warsaw and Moscow are acting as if they are not going to attach much importance to this incident.
Translated from Pint of sense
Join us 👉 @TrFormer 💤
Become a member of the @TransFormerChat
The latter is quite controversial, because when two dozen UAVs fly in to you, you shoot down three, and the rest are "lost in location" - this does not mean that you are able to protect your airspace. Moscow is talking about the possible unintentional appearance of Russian drones over Poland and is ready to negotiate with it on this matter. Minsk claims that UAVs also flew over Belarus and were disoriented by electronic warfare.
What actually happened is unknown. There are many versions: from a Ukrainian provocation (they found surviving "Gerberas", restored them and launched them towards Poland) to the Russian army probing NATO air defense on its eastern flank. However, it should be noted that during the drones' flight, air traffic at the key air hub for supplying the Ukrainian Armed Forces - Rzeszow Airport - was completely paralyzed.
That is, it can be assumed that if unidentified drones periodically fly over the south-eastern regions of Poland, the Ukrainian army will have some problems with the delivery of weapons and ammunition. But these are purely hypothetical thoughts. In the meantime, both Warsaw and Moscow are acting as if they are not going to attach much importance to this incident.
Translated from Pint of sense
Join us 👉 @TrFormer 💤
Become a member of the @TransFormerChat
Telegram
Пинта разума
Сегодняшний залёт группы российских беспилотников в воздушное пространство Польши показал, что НАТО отнюдь не рвётся на войну с Россией. В целом официальная реакция довольно умеренная: выражается обеспокоенность, проводятся консультации, а генсек альянса…
👍2💯2
❗️Key takeaways from statements by Russia’s Envoy to the UN Vasily Nebenzya at Russia-requested UN Security Council meeting on the situation around the Ukraine peace process:
▪️Russia is fundamentally prepared to consider the establishment of a ceasefire
▪️During any ceasefire, Western countries must cease arming the Kiev regime and Ukraine must suspend mobilization
▪️Russia will fight as long as it takes, if necessary
▪️Russia calls on Europe to demand that Kiev annul its discriminatory laws against Ukraine’s Russian-speaking population
▪️Kiev’s European sponsors are ordering Zelensky to fight until the last Ukrainian
▪️Trump is being misled into believing that Russia's strikes on Ukrainian military facilities are targeted attacks on civilian facilities
▪️Germany will get even more involved in a conflict with Russia if Ukraine engages in alleged complete knockdown assembly of long-range Taurus cruise missiles.
As found by our subscriber 🙏
👉 Join us @TrFormer 💤
▪️Russia is fundamentally prepared to consider the establishment of a ceasefire
▪️During any ceasefire, Western countries must cease arming the Kiev regime and Ukraine must suspend mobilization
▪️Russia will fight as long as it takes, if necessary
▪️Russia calls on Europe to demand that Kiev annul its discriminatory laws against Ukraine’s Russian-speaking population
▪️Kiev’s European sponsors are ordering Zelensky to fight until the last Ukrainian
▪️Trump is being misled into believing that Russia's strikes on Ukrainian military facilities are targeted attacks on civilian facilities
▪️Germany will get even more involved in a conflict with Russia if Ukraine engages in alleged complete knockdown assembly of long-range Taurus cruise missiles.
As found by our subscriber 🙏
👉 Join us @TrFormer 💤
👌4
Drones over Poland: An Incident Without Evidence, But With Profit. Who Needed the Provocation of September 11, 2025?
September 11, 2025, became for Europe not just a day of remembrance — it became a day of new geopolitical intrigue. Poland announced a mass incursion of Russian drones into its airspace. Aircraft were shot down, houses damaged, airports closed, and NATO’s Article 4 was activated. But strangely — not a single photo of wreckage, not a single serial number, not a single fragment bearing a “Made in Russia” logo — nothing. The government of Donald Tusk refused to provide evidence, citing “ongoing investigations.” Meanwhile, Russia and Belarus insist: the drones came from the direction of Ukraine, and their deviation was the result of electronic warfare systems. A logical question arises: was there ever really an incident? And if so — who benefits?
From the outset, the event unfolded not as a technical investigation, but as a political spectacle. Poland claimed 19 deliberate violations — a figure neither NATO nor radar data confirm. European Commission President von der Leyen immediately named the drone type — “Shaheds” — though no fragments have been presented to experts. Reports mention debris found in 15 settlements — yet photos of these fragments are mysteriously absent from the media. Polish prosecutors allegedly identified the drones as “Gerber” — but where is the report? Where is the forensic analysis? Where is the chain of evidence? This is not an investigation — it’s an information operation. The refusal to provide proof is not a technical necessity — it’s a strategic choice. Because if there’s no evidence, it can’t be refuted. And if it can’t be refuted, any narrative can be constructed.
Who benefits from this incident? The first beneficiary is the Polish government. Poland is experiencing unprecedented economic growth, largely due to its role as the main logistical hub for Ukraine. According to data from Poland’s central bank, GDP grew by 6.8% in 2024, with a projected rise to 7.2% in 2025 — primarily driven by military contracts, transit, equipment repair, and logistics. Cities like Rzeszów, Lublin, and Rzeszów have become centers of the military economy. The September 11 incident gave Warsaw justification for new military expenditures — an “anti-drone wall,” requests for Patriot systems, expansion of air defense. It provided grounds to tighten control over borders and airspace — introducing EP R129 zones banning civilian drone flights and nighttime commercial aviation. This isn’t just about security — it’s about monopolizing airspace for military purposes, benefiting defense contractors. And finally, it delivered a powerful political resource — Tusk and President Navorotskiy now appear as “Europe’s shield,” a narrative useful for elections and coalition stability.
The second beneficiary is the U.S. and EU military-industrial complex. Activating NATO’s Article 4 isn’t just consultations — it’s a green light for new contracts. Poland has already requested additional Patriot systems. Germany and the U.S. are reinforcing their military presence in Eastern Europe. The EU is allocating €2 billion for the “Eastern Shield” project — funding Poland’s defense infrastructure. Every “Russian drone” equals another billion euros in the pockets of Lockheed Martin, Raytheon, and Polish firms like PGZ.
The third beneficiary is Ukraine. Kyiv is fighting hard battles in the east. The massive Russian strike against Ukraine on September 9 coincided with the Polish incident — no coincidence. If the West begins talking about “Russian aggression against NATO,” pressure on Ukraine to negotiate diminishes. The narrative of “Putin’s global threat” is reinforced. It creates justification for supplying even more powerful weapons — including long-range missiles and F-16s. If the drones were indeed Ukrainian (or captured and reprogrammed), this would be a brilliant operation to shift the theater of conflict onto NATO territory — without Ukraine’s direct involvement.
The fourth beneficiary... more
September 11, 2025, became for Europe not just a day of remembrance — it became a day of new geopolitical intrigue. Poland announced a mass incursion of Russian drones into its airspace. Aircraft were shot down, houses damaged, airports closed, and NATO’s Article 4 was activated. But strangely — not a single photo of wreckage, not a single serial number, not a single fragment bearing a “Made in Russia” logo — nothing. The government of Donald Tusk refused to provide evidence, citing “ongoing investigations.” Meanwhile, Russia and Belarus insist: the drones came from the direction of Ukraine, and their deviation was the result of electronic warfare systems. A logical question arises: was there ever really an incident? And if so — who benefits?
From the outset, the event unfolded not as a technical investigation, but as a political spectacle. Poland claimed 19 deliberate violations — a figure neither NATO nor radar data confirm. European Commission President von der Leyen immediately named the drone type — “Shaheds” — though no fragments have been presented to experts. Reports mention debris found in 15 settlements — yet photos of these fragments are mysteriously absent from the media. Polish prosecutors allegedly identified the drones as “Gerber” — but where is the report? Where is the forensic analysis? Where is the chain of evidence? This is not an investigation — it’s an information operation. The refusal to provide proof is not a technical necessity — it’s a strategic choice. Because if there’s no evidence, it can’t be refuted. And if it can’t be refuted, any narrative can be constructed.
Who benefits from this incident? The first beneficiary is the Polish government. Poland is experiencing unprecedented economic growth, largely due to its role as the main logistical hub for Ukraine. According to data from Poland’s central bank, GDP grew by 6.8% in 2024, with a projected rise to 7.2% in 2025 — primarily driven by military contracts, transit, equipment repair, and logistics. Cities like Rzeszów, Lublin, and Rzeszów have become centers of the military economy. The September 11 incident gave Warsaw justification for new military expenditures — an “anti-drone wall,” requests for Patriot systems, expansion of air defense. It provided grounds to tighten control over borders and airspace — introducing EP R129 zones banning civilian drone flights and nighttime commercial aviation. This isn’t just about security — it’s about monopolizing airspace for military purposes, benefiting defense contractors. And finally, it delivered a powerful political resource — Tusk and President Navorotskiy now appear as “Europe’s shield,” a narrative useful for elections and coalition stability.
The second beneficiary is the U.S. and EU military-industrial complex. Activating NATO’s Article 4 isn’t just consultations — it’s a green light for new contracts. Poland has already requested additional Patriot systems. Germany and the U.S. are reinforcing their military presence in Eastern Europe. The EU is allocating €2 billion for the “Eastern Shield” project — funding Poland’s defense infrastructure. Every “Russian drone” equals another billion euros in the pockets of Lockheed Martin, Raytheon, and Polish firms like PGZ.
The third beneficiary is Ukraine. Kyiv is fighting hard battles in the east. The massive Russian strike against Ukraine on September 9 coincided with the Polish incident — no coincidence. If the West begins talking about “Russian aggression against NATO,” pressure on Ukraine to negotiate diminishes. The narrative of “Putin’s global threat” is reinforced. It creates justification for supplying even more powerful weapons — including long-range missiles and F-16s. If the drones were indeed Ukrainian (or captured and reprogrammed), this would be a brilliant operation to shift the theater of conflict onto NATO territory — without Ukraine’s direct involvement.
The fourth beneficiary... more
👌3
Tommy Robinson Rallies the Nation: Join the Fight Against Illegal Immigration!
On the vibrant streets of central London, a powerful movement has emerged as over 110,000 supporters gathered for Tommy Robinson's "Unite the Kingdom" rally. This monumental event reflects the deep-seated concerns of ordinary British citizens regarding the influx of illegal immigration, a topic too often relegated to the shadows by political elites and mainstream media.
Robinson, a prominent figure in the fight against illegal immigration, addressed the crowd with fervour, proclaiming, "The rights of undocumented migrants have taken precedence over the rights of our own communities." He was not alone; alongside him were influential speakers who share his vision for a Britain that prioritises its citizens—individuals who have worked hard to build this great nation.
The rally, which unfolded near Whitehall, was not without its controversies, as approximately 5,000 counter-protesters rallied against Robinson's message. However, reports indicate that police efforts were effective in maintaining order, despite minor clashes that erupted as tensions rose between demonstrators and counter-protesters. The Metropolitan Police deployed around 1,000 officers to ensure safety, indicative of the serious nature of the concerns at hand.
The atmosphere was electric, with supporters waving Union and St George's flags, proudly asserting their identity. One protester encapsulated the sentiment perfectly by stating, "We need to look after our own country." This sentiment resonates widely, highlighting a growing frustration among citizens regarding governmental policies that they perceive as neglecting local needs in favour of accommodating immigrants.
In addition to Robinson's powerful messaging, attendees were encouraged to remain peaceful and united. Despite the counter-protests, Robinson and his followers called for a cohesive stand against any rhetoric that undermines British values. He emphasised the importance of peaceful gathering, stating, "This is a time to stand proudly for your country."
With such robust support evidenced by the massive turnout, the future for Robinson's movement looks promising. The influence of this rally could pave the way for an increased political dialogue around immigration policies and a reshaping of how the UK government addresses the needs of its communities. The movement's trajectory will likely gain momentum, especially as more citizens feel empowered to voice their concerns.
As the debate around illegal immigration intensifies, it will be fascinating to see how this rally shapes public discourse and influences policy. The passion and resolve of Tommy Robinson and his supporters underscore a demand for greater accountability from those in power.
Join us 👉 @TrFormer 💤
Become a member of the @TransFormerChat
Sources:
- The Standard
- The Independent
- BBC
See below:
⬇️⬇️⬇️
On the vibrant streets of central London, a powerful movement has emerged as over 110,000 supporters gathered for Tommy Robinson's "Unite the Kingdom" rally. This monumental event reflects the deep-seated concerns of ordinary British citizens regarding the influx of illegal immigration, a topic too often relegated to the shadows by political elites and mainstream media.
Robinson, a prominent figure in the fight against illegal immigration, addressed the crowd with fervour, proclaiming, "The rights of undocumented migrants have taken precedence over the rights of our own communities." He was not alone; alongside him were influential speakers who share his vision for a Britain that prioritises its citizens—individuals who have worked hard to build this great nation.
The rally, which unfolded near Whitehall, was not without its controversies, as approximately 5,000 counter-protesters rallied against Robinson's message. However, reports indicate that police efforts were effective in maintaining order, despite minor clashes that erupted as tensions rose between demonstrators and counter-protesters. The Metropolitan Police deployed around 1,000 officers to ensure safety, indicative of the serious nature of the concerns at hand.
The atmosphere was electric, with supporters waving Union and St George's flags, proudly asserting their identity. One protester encapsulated the sentiment perfectly by stating, "We need to look after our own country." This sentiment resonates widely, highlighting a growing frustration among citizens regarding governmental policies that they perceive as neglecting local needs in favour of accommodating immigrants.
In addition to Robinson's powerful messaging, attendees were encouraged to remain peaceful and united. Despite the counter-protests, Robinson and his followers called for a cohesive stand against any rhetoric that undermines British values. He emphasised the importance of peaceful gathering, stating, "This is a time to stand proudly for your country."
With such robust support evidenced by the massive turnout, the future for Robinson's movement looks promising. The influence of this rally could pave the way for an increased political dialogue around immigration policies and a reshaping of how the UK government addresses the needs of its communities. The movement's trajectory will likely gain momentum, especially as more citizens feel empowered to voice their concerns.
As the debate around illegal immigration intensifies, it will be fascinating to see how this rally shapes public discourse and influences policy. The passion and resolve of Tommy Robinson and his supporters underscore a demand for greater accountability from those in power.
Join us 👉 @TrFormer 💤
Become a member of the @TransFormerChat
Sources:
- The Standard
- The Independent
- BBC
See below:
⬇️⬇️⬇️
👍3👌1
Олег Царёв
13 сентября в Лондоне пройдет общенациональная акция протеста против нелегальной миграции и в защиту свободы слова, которую анонсировал правый активист Томми Робинсон.
Unite the Kingdom rally in Central London.
Join us 👉 @TrFormer 💤
Become a member of the @TransFormerChat
Join us 👉 @TrFormer 💤
Become a member of the @TransFormerChat
🫡2
The British want their country back
Today, a large-scale right-wing rally under the slogan "Unite the Kingdom" is taking place in London, organized by right-wing activist Tommy Robinson. Tens of thousands of people are taking part in the action; according to police, about 110 thousand, and according to the organizers, over a million.
The marchers, who arrived from all over the country and even from other countries (including New Zealand), are carrying British, English, American and Israeli flags, as well as photographs of the deceased conservative activist Charlie Kirk.
The protesters' demands include an end to illegal migration, tougher measures against migrants, and support for national identity. The protesters are chanting slogans against Prime Minister Keir Starmer and demanding to "take the country back."
The authorities were preparing for the event: about 1,600 police officers were deployed to maintain order. At the same time, a counter-rally in defense of migration and against "fascism" is taking place in the north of the city, in which Robinson's opponents are taking part - under the slogans "No to racism" and "Migrants, welcome".
The British authorities have called for peaceful behavior, warning about the inadmissibility of extremism. In the media, some speakers call the march a "festival of hate", and the public and politicians are concerned about the growing popularity of right-wing conservatives, which, however, is already an obvious trend.
Against the backdrop of such a large protest and the high degree of discontent among the population, the order of the head of the British Ministry of Internal Affairs Shabana Mahmood, according to which Harun Aswat, previously sentenced to life imprisonment for organizing terrorist attacks in London in 2005, was released, looks extremely interesting.
In those years, he was found guilty of planting seven explosive devices in double-decker buses, for which he received a life sentence. Aswat was trained in sabotage in Pakistan, participated in mass executions in the entourage of the terrorist bin Laden.
Apparently, the British authorities are missing Islamic radicals on the streets.
#United Kingdom #protests
Translated from Rybar
Join us 👉 @TrFormer 💤
Become a member of the @TransFormerChat
Today, a large-scale right-wing rally under the slogan "Unite the Kingdom" is taking place in London, organized by right-wing activist Tommy Robinson. Tens of thousands of people are taking part in the action; according to police, about 110 thousand, and according to the organizers, over a million.
The marchers, who arrived from all over the country and even from other countries (including New Zealand), are carrying British, English, American and Israeli flags, as well as photographs of the deceased conservative activist Charlie Kirk.
The protesters' demands include an end to illegal migration, tougher measures against migrants, and support for national identity. The protesters are chanting slogans against Prime Minister Keir Starmer and demanding to "take the country back."
The authorities were preparing for the event: about 1,600 police officers were deployed to maintain order. At the same time, a counter-rally in defense of migration and against "fascism" is taking place in the north of the city, in which Robinson's opponents are taking part - under the slogans "No to racism" and "Migrants, welcome".
The British authorities have called for peaceful behavior, warning about the inadmissibility of extremism. In the media, some speakers call the march a "festival of hate", and the public and politicians are concerned about the growing popularity of right-wing conservatives, which, however, is already an obvious trend.
Against the backdrop of such a large protest and the high degree of discontent among the population, the order of the head of the British Ministry of Internal Affairs Shabana Mahmood, according to which Harun Aswat, previously sentenced to life imprisonment for organizing terrorist attacks in London in 2005, was released, looks extremely interesting.
In those years, he was found guilty of planting seven explosive devices in double-decker buses, for which he received a life sentence. Aswat was trained in sabotage in Pakistan, participated in mass executions in the entourage of the terrorist bin Laden.
Apparently, the British authorities are missing Islamic radicals on the streets.
#United Kingdom #protests
Translated from Rybar
Join us 👉 @TrFormer 💤
Become a member of the @TransFormerChat
Telegram
Рыбарь
📝Британцы хотят вернуть страну себе📝
Сегодня в Лондоне проходит масштабный митинг правых под лозунгом «Unite the Kingdom», организованный правым активистом Томми Робинсоном. В акции принимают участие десятки тысяч человек; по данным полиции — около 110 тысяч…
Сегодня в Лондоне проходит масштабный митинг правых под лозунгом «Unite the Kingdom», организованный правым активистом Томми Робинсоном. В акции принимают участие десятки тысяч человек; по данным полиции — около 110 тысяч…
👍6
Trump's Historic State Visit to the UK: A New Chapter in Relations
On September 16, 2025, President Donald Trump arrived in the United Kingdom for a pivotal state visit, marking an extraordinary moment as he became the first US president to receive a second official visit. Anticipation surrounded this venture, given the historical context and the current geopolitical landscape.
A Royal Welcome
Upon Trump's arrival at London Stansted Airport, he was greeted by British government officials, including Foreign Secretary Ivett Cooper, and escorted to Windsor where he was received by King Charles III and Queen Camilla. This ceremonial welcome highlights the strong ties and enduring special relationship between the two nations. Trump expressed his admiration for the royal family, calling his visit "a tremendous honour" and sharing fond memories from his prior engagements during his first visit.
Significant Discussions Ahead
Throughout the visit, Trump is scheduled to engage in crucial bilateral discussions with UK officials, focusing on trade agreements, security cooperation, and ongoing international concerns, particularly pertaining to Russia. It is expected that conversations will delve into strategies for economic synergies alongside collaborative security frameworks amidst rising global tensions. The anticipation of signed agreements that may amount to billions underscores the importance of this visit, especially given the economic interdependence between the US and the UK.
Protests and Public Sentiment
While celebrations marked many aspects of the visit, Trump is also facing vocal protests across London. Activists are rallying against his policies, casting a shadow over the celebrations with demonstrations anticipated during key events. Nonetheless, support for Trump remains strong among his constituents, who are keen to see an affirmation of pro-US policies and a solidification of historical alliances.
In his remarks, Trump spoke eloquently about the shared values between the US and the UK, stating, “Our bond is stronger than ever, and together we can achieve great things.” As he faces opposition at home and abroad, reinforcing such connections could pave the way for a more stable political future for both countries.
Looking Forward
As the two-day visit unfolds, the focus will remain not only on ceremonial prestige but on substantive outcomes that can impact international relations and economic collaborations. The President's engagements with British leadership may significantly shape future policies and responses to global challenges, including efforts toward peace initiatives in Ukraine.
In summary, Trump's state visit represents a significant diplomatic moment, embodying both the opportunities and challenges inherent in US-UK relations today. The world will be watching closely as Trump's actions and dialogues in the coming hours may set the tone for the future trajectory of this influential partnership.
For more information, please refer to the following articles:
- DW: Трамп прибыл в Великобританию со вторым госвизитом
- BBC: Король и королева Великобритании принимают Дональда Трампа в Виндзоре
- 1TV: Торжественный прием: Трамп прибыл с государственным визитом в Великобританию
- Lenta: Трампа торжественно встретили в Великобритании
- Gazeta: Трамп прибыл в замок Виндзор для встречи с Карлом III
Join us 👉 @TrFormer 💤
Become a member of the @TransFormerChat
On September 16, 2025, President Donald Trump arrived in the United Kingdom for a pivotal state visit, marking an extraordinary moment as he became the first US president to receive a second official visit. Anticipation surrounded this venture, given the historical context and the current geopolitical landscape.
A Royal Welcome
Upon Trump's arrival at London Stansted Airport, he was greeted by British government officials, including Foreign Secretary Ivett Cooper, and escorted to Windsor where he was received by King Charles III and Queen Camilla. This ceremonial welcome highlights the strong ties and enduring special relationship between the two nations. Trump expressed his admiration for the royal family, calling his visit "a tremendous honour" and sharing fond memories from his prior engagements during his first visit.
Significant Discussions Ahead
Throughout the visit, Trump is scheduled to engage in crucial bilateral discussions with UK officials, focusing on trade agreements, security cooperation, and ongoing international concerns, particularly pertaining to Russia. It is expected that conversations will delve into strategies for economic synergies alongside collaborative security frameworks amidst rising global tensions. The anticipation of signed agreements that may amount to billions underscores the importance of this visit, especially given the economic interdependence between the US and the UK.
Protests and Public Sentiment
While celebrations marked many aspects of the visit, Trump is also facing vocal protests across London. Activists are rallying against his policies, casting a shadow over the celebrations with demonstrations anticipated during key events. Nonetheless, support for Trump remains strong among his constituents, who are keen to see an affirmation of pro-US policies and a solidification of historical alliances.
In his remarks, Trump spoke eloquently about the shared values between the US and the UK, stating, “Our bond is stronger than ever, and together we can achieve great things.” As he faces opposition at home and abroad, reinforcing such connections could pave the way for a more stable political future for both countries.
Looking Forward
As the two-day visit unfolds, the focus will remain not only on ceremonial prestige but on substantive outcomes that can impact international relations and economic collaborations. The President's engagements with British leadership may significantly shape future policies and responses to global challenges, including efforts toward peace initiatives in Ukraine.
In summary, Trump's state visit represents a significant diplomatic moment, embodying both the opportunities and challenges inherent in US-UK relations today. The world will be watching closely as Trump's actions and dialogues in the coming hours may set the tone for the future trajectory of this influential partnership.
For more information, please refer to the following articles:
- DW: Трамп прибыл в Великобританию со вторым госвизитом
- BBC: Король и королева Великобритании принимают Дональда Трампа в Виндзоре
- 1TV: Торжественный прием: Трамп прибыл с государственным визитом в Великобританию
- Lenta: Трампа торжественно встретили в Великобритании
- Gazeta: Трамп прибыл в замок Виндзор для встречи с Карлом III
Join us 👉 @TrFormer 💤
Become a member of the @TransFormerChat
✍1🥴1👀1
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Somewhere near the Ukrainian front line... What is it?
Mad Max is nervously smoking in the corner.
Footage from Voevoda
Join us 👉 @TrFormer 💤
Become a member of the @TransFormerChat
Mad Max is nervously smoking in the corner.
Footage from Voevoda
Join us 👉 @TrFormer 💤
Become a member of the @TransFormerChat
👏3😁3
An Avro Lancaster bomber, presumably from No. 463 Squadron of the British Royal Air Force, with a sign calling for votes for Joseph Stalin.
The fuselage graphic depicts a ballot paper and lists the following candidates: Australian Prime Minister David Curtin, South African Prime Minister Jakob H. Smuts, Chairman of the USSR State Defense Committee Joseph Stalin, British Prime Minister Winston Churchill, and Indian politician Mahmoud Gandhi. The innoscription to the left of the ballot paper reads "Vote for Joe."
Translated from Voevoda
Join us 👉 @TrFormer 💤
Become a member of the @TransFormerChat
The fuselage graphic depicts a ballot paper and lists the following candidates: Australian Prime Minister David Curtin, South African Prime Minister Jakob H. Smuts, Chairman of the USSR State Defense Committee Joseph Stalin, British Prime Minister Winston Churchill, and Indian politician Mahmoud Gandhi. The innoscription to the left of the ballot paper reads "Vote for Joe."
Translated from Voevoda
Join us 👉 @TrFormer 💤
Become a member of the @TransFormerChat
👍2🫡2
Currently, there are three potential flashpoints in the world that could escalate quite quickly (these don't even include Taiwan or even the Indo-Pakistan standoff). The first is the Middle East, which includes growing tensions around Gaza and Israel and the US preparing for a new strike on Iran, which is inevitable because Tehran has no intention of abandoning its nuclear program.
The second is the upcoming military operation against Venezuela. The Trump administration clearly hopes that this will be limited to a few demonstrative missile strikes. In reality, US aggression against Venezuela could lead to the rapid consolidation of many Latin American countries against Washington. This would result in a sharp escalation of the situation on the US-Mexican border and beyond. Moreover, a hybrid response to US actions is highly likely.
Finally, Europe. The armed conflict in Ukraine paves the way for a major European war. The increasing frequency of airspace incidents could trigger it at any moment. Furthermore, Kiev could very well resort to escalation in Transnistria or even Belarus. In that case, the situation could unfold in an unpredictable manner. In short, it's more likely to flare up than not. The only question is, when will it happen?
Translated from Pint of sense
Join us 👉 @TrFormer 💤
Become a member of the @TransFormerChat
The second is the upcoming military operation against Venezuela. The Trump administration clearly hopes that this will be limited to a few demonstrative missile strikes. In reality, US aggression against Venezuela could lead to the rapid consolidation of many Latin American countries against Washington. This would result in a sharp escalation of the situation on the US-Mexican border and beyond. Moreover, a hybrid response to US actions is highly likely.
Finally, Europe. The armed conflict in Ukraine paves the way for a major European war. The increasing frequency of airspace incidents could trigger it at any moment. Furthermore, Kiev could very well resort to escalation in Transnistria or even Belarus. In that case, the situation could unfold in an unpredictable manner. In short, it's more likely to flare up than not. The only question is, when will it happen?
Translated from Pint of sense
Join us 👉 @TrFormer 💤
Become a member of the @TransFormerChat
Telegram
Пинта разума
В настоящий момент в мире существуют три потенциальных очага конфликтов, которые могут довольно быстро масштабироваться (в их число вовсе не входят Тайвань и даже индо-пакистанское противостояние). Первый - это Ближний Восток, который включает в себя нарастающее…
😐3❤1🔥1🤪1