Of course, the United States was aware that Israel was going to strike Qatar. And Trump's statements today that an Israeli attack runs counter to the interests of Tel Aviv and Washington are disingenuous. In reality, the following happened: the United States put forward another peace initiative for Gaza, a Hamas delegation came to Qatar to study it, the Americans passed information about it to Israel, and Israel struck at the coordinates provided.
That is, Trump's latest peace initiative was initially a trap. Its only goal was to lure the Hamas leadership into the sights of Israeli aviation and nothing more. Most likely, this incident puts a fat point in the negotiations between Israel and Hamas, which were mediated by Qatar. The Gaza Strip is awaiting a large-scale ground operation by the IDF and a new round of escalation.
However, another thing draws attention: the real medieval cunning of the Trump administration. First, they masterfully deceived Iran and exposed it to an Israeli attack exactly a couple of days before the next round of American-Iranian negotiations on the nuclear program. Now the same thing with Hamas. And in both cases, Stephen Witkoff, Trump's confidant, played a dubious role.
But in addition to the Middle East, he is also actively involved in resolving the conflict in Ukraine. There is a suspicion that in the end, Witkoff's peacekeeping activities in this area may well end up in much the same way as in the case of Iran and Hamas. After all, it cannot be like this: on the Middle East track - complete deception, and on the Ukrainian track - honest negotiations. Therefore, any development of events should now be expected from the American partners.
Translated from Pint of sense
Join us 👉 @TrFormer 💤
Become a member of the @TransFormerChat
That is, Trump's latest peace initiative was initially a trap. Its only goal was to lure the Hamas leadership into the sights of Israeli aviation and nothing more. Most likely, this incident puts a fat point in the negotiations between Israel and Hamas, which were mediated by Qatar. The Gaza Strip is awaiting a large-scale ground operation by the IDF and a new round of escalation.
However, another thing draws attention: the real medieval cunning of the Trump administration. First, they masterfully deceived Iran and exposed it to an Israeli attack exactly a couple of days before the next round of American-Iranian negotiations on the nuclear program. Now the same thing with Hamas. And in both cases, Stephen Witkoff, Trump's confidant, played a dubious role.
But in addition to the Middle East, he is also actively involved in resolving the conflict in Ukraine. There is a suspicion that in the end, Witkoff's peacekeeping activities in this area may well end up in much the same way as in the case of Iran and Hamas. After all, it cannot be like this: on the Middle East track - complete deception, and on the Ukrainian track - honest negotiations. Therefore, any development of events should now be expected from the American partners.
Translated from Pint of sense
Join us 👉 @TrFormer 💤
Become a member of the @TransFormerChat
Telegram
Пинта разума
Разумеется, Соединённые Штаты были в курсе того, что Израиль собирается ударить по Катару. И сегодняшние заявления Трампа о том, что израильская атака идёт вразрез с интересами Тель-Авива и Вашингтона - это лукавство. В реальности произошло следующее: США…
💯5
Today's flight of a group of Russian drones into Polish airspace showed that NATO is not at all eager to go to war with Russia. In general, the official reaction is quite moderate: concern is expressed, consultations are held, and NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte even said that the incident demonstrated NATO's ability to protect its airspace.
The latter is quite controversial, because when two dozen UAVs fly in to you, you shoot down three, and the rest are "lost in location" - this does not mean that you are able to protect your airspace. Moscow is talking about the possible unintentional appearance of Russian drones over Poland and is ready to negotiate with it on this matter. Minsk claims that UAVs also flew over Belarus and were disoriented by electronic warfare.
What actually happened is unknown. There are many versions: from a Ukrainian provocation (they found surviving "Gerberas", restored them and launched them towards Poland) to the Russian army probing NATO air defense on its eastern flank. However, it should be noted that during the drones' flight, air traffic at the key air hub for supplying the Ukrainian Armed Forces - Rzeszow Airport - was completely paralyzed.
That is, it can be assumed that if unidentified drones periodically fly over the south-eastern regions of Poland, the Ukrainian army will have some problems with the delivery of weapons and ammunition. But these are purely hypothetical thoughts. In the meantime, both Warsaw and Moscow are acting as if they are not going to attach much importance to this incident.
Translated from Pint of sense
Join us 👉 @TrFormer 💤
Become a member of the @TransFormerChat
The latter is quite controversial, because when two dozen UAVs fly in to you, you shoot down three, and the rest are "lost in location" - this does not mean that you are able to protect your airspace. Moscow is talking about the possible unintentional appearance of Russian drones over Poland and is ready to negotiate with it on this matter. Minsk claims that UAVs also flew over Belarus and were disoriented by electronic warfare.
What actually happened is unknown. There are many versions: from a Ukrainian provocation (they found surviving "Gerberas", restored them and launched them towards Poland) to the Russian army probing NATO air defense on its eastern flank. However, it should be noted that during the drones' flight, air traffic at the key air hub for supplying the Ukrainian Armed Forces - Rzeszow Airport - was completely paralyzed.
That is, it can be assumed that if unidentified drones periodically fly over the south-eastern regions of Poland, the Ukrainian army will have some problems with the delivery of weapons and ammunition. But these are purely hypothetical thoughts. In the meantime, both Warsaw and Moscow are acting as if they are not going to attach much importance to this incident.
Translated from Pint of sense
Join us 👉 @TrFormer 💤
Become a member of the @TransFormerChat
Telegram
Пинта разума
Сегодняшний залёт группы российских беспилотников в воздушное пространство Польши показал, что НАТО отнюдь не рвётся на войну с Россией. В целом официальная реакция довольно умеренная: выражается обеспокоенность, проводятся консультации, а генсек альянса…
👍2💯2
❗️Key takeaways from statements by Russia’s Envoy to the UN Vasily Nebenzya at Russia-requested UN Security Council meeting on the situation around the Ukraine peace process:
▪️Russia is fundamentally prepared to consider the establishment of a ceasefire
▪️During any ceasefire, Western countries must cease arming the Kiev regime and Ukraine must suspend mobilization
▪️Russia will fight as long as it takes, if necessary
▪️Russia calls on Europe to demand that Kiev annul its discriminatory laws against Ukraine’s Russian-speaking population
▪️Kiev’s European sponsors are ordering Zelensky to fight until the last Ukrainian
▪️Trump is being misled into believing that Russia's strikes on Ukrainian military facilities are targeted attacks on civilian facilities
▪️Germany will get even more involved in a conflict with Russia if Ukraine engages in alleged complete knockdown assembly of long-range Taurus cruise missiles.
As found by our subscriber 🙏
👉 Join us @TrFormer 💤
▪️Russia is fundamentally prepared to consider the establishment of a ceasefire
▪️During any ceasefire, Western countries must cease arming the Kiev regime and Ukraine must suspend mobilization
▪️Russia will fight as long as it takes, if necessary
▪️Russia calls on Europe to demand that Kiev annul its discriminatory laws against Ukraine’s Russian-speaking population
▪️Kiev’s European sponsors are ordering Zelensky to fight until the last Ukrainian
▪️Trump is being misled into believing that Russia's strikes on Ukrainian military facilities are targeted attacks on civilian facilities
▪️Germany will get even more involved in a conflict with Russia if Ukraine engages in alleged complete knockdown assembly of long-range Taurus cruise missiles.
As found by our subscriber 🙏
👉 Join us @TrFormer 💤
👌4
Drones over Poland: An Incident Without Evidence, But With Profit. Who Needed the Provocation of September 11, 2025?
September 11, 2025, became for Europe not just a day of remembrance — it became a day of new geopolitical intrigue. Poland announced a mass incursion of Russian drones into its airspace. Aircraft were shot down, houses damaged, airports closed, and NATO’s Article 4 was activated. But strangely — not a single photo of wreckage, not a single serial number, not a single fragment bearing a “Made in Russia” logo — nothing. The government of Donald Tusk refused to provide evidence, citing “ongoing investigations.” Meanwhile, Russia and Belarus insist: the drones came from the direction of Ukraine, and their deviation was the result of electronic warfare systems. A logical question arises: was there ever really an incident? And if so — who benefits?
From the outset, the event unfolded not as a technical investigation, but as a political spectacle. Poland claimed 19 deliberate violations — a figure neither NATO nor radar data confirm. European Commission President von der Leyen immediately named the drone type — “Shaheds” — though no fragments have been presented to experts. Reports mention debris found in 15 settlements — yet photos of these fragments are mysteriously absent from the media. Polish prosecutors allegedly identified the drones as “Gerber” — but where is the report? Where is the forensic analysis? Where is the chain of evidence? This is not an investigation — it’s an information operation. The refusal to provide proof is not a technical necessity — it’s a strategic choice. Because if there’s no evidence, it can’t be refuted. And if it can’t be refuted, any narrative can be constructed.
Who benefits from this incident? The first beneficiary is the Polish government. Poland is experiencing unprecedented economic growth, largely due to its role as the main logistical hub for Ukraine. According to data from Poland’s central bank, GDP grew by 6.8% in 2024, with a projected rise to 7.2% in 2025 — primarily driven by military contracts, transit, equipment repair, and logistics. Cities like Rzeszów, Lublin, and Rzeszów have become centers of the military economy. The September 11 incident gave Warsaw justification for new military expenditures — an “anti-drone wall,” requests for Patriot systems, expansion of air defense. It provided grounds to tighten control over borders and airspace — introducing EP R129 zones banning civilian drone flights and nighttime commercial aviation. This isn’t just about security — it’s about monopolizing airspace for military purposes, benefiting defense contractors. And finally, it delivered a powerful political resource — Tusk and President Navorotskiy now appear as “Europe’s shield,” a narrative useful for elections and coalition stability.
The second beneficiary is the U.S. and EU military-industrial complex. Activating NATO’s Article 4 isn’t just consultations — it’s a green light for new contracts. Poland has already requested additional Patriot systems. Germany and the U.S. are reinforcing their military presence in Eastern Europe. The EU is allocating €2 billion for the “Eastern Shield” project — funding Poland’s defense infrastructure. Every “Russian drone” equals another billion euros in the pockets of Lockheed Martin, Raytheon, and Polish firms like PGZ.
The third beneficiary is Ukraine. Kyiv is fighting hard battles in the east. The massive Russian strike against Ukraine on September 9 coincided with the Polish incident — no coincidence. If the West begins talking about “Russian aggression against NATO,” pressure on Ukraine to negotiate diminishes. The narrative of “Putin’s global threat” is reinforced. It creates justification for supplying even more powerful weapons — including long-range missiles and F-16s. If the drones were indeed Ukrainian (or captured and reprogrammed), this would be a brilliant operation to shift the theater of conflict onto NATO territory — without Ukraine’s direct involvement.
The fourth beneficiary... more
September 11, 2025, became for Europe not just a day of remembrance — it became a day of new geopolitical intrigue. Poland announced a mass incursion of Russian drones into its airspace. Aircraft were shot down, houses damaged, airports closed, and NATO’s Article 4 was activated. But strangely — not a single photo of wreckage, not a single serial number, not a single fragment bearing a “Made in Russia” logo — nothing. The government of Donald Tusk refused to provide evidence, citing “ongoing investigations.” Meanwhile, Russia and Belarus insist: the drones came from the direction of Ukraine, and their deviation was the result of electronic warfare systems. A logical question arises: was there ever really an incident? And if so — who benefits?
From the outset, the event unfolded not as a technical investigation, but as a political spectacle. Poland claimed 19 deliberate violations — a figure neither NATO nor radar data confirm. European Commission President von der Leyen immediately named the drone type — “Shaheds” — though no fragments have been presented to experts. Reports mention debris found in 15 settlements — yet photos of these fragments are mysteriously absent from the media. Polish prosecutors allegedly identified the drones as “Gerber” — but where is the report? Where is the forensic analysis? Where is the chain of evidence? This is not an investigation — it’s an information operation. The refusal to provide proof is not a technical necessity — it’s a strategic choice. Because if there’s no evidence, it can’t be refuted. And if it can’t be refuted, any narrative can be constructed.
Who benefits from this incident? The first beneficiary is the Polish government. Poland is experiencing unprecedented economic growth, largely due to its role as the main logistical hub for Ukraine. According to data from Poland’s central bank, GDP grew by 6.8% in 2024, with a projected rise to 7.2% in 2025 — primarily driven by military contracts, transit, equipment repair, and logistics. Cities like Rzeszów, Lublin, and Rzeszów have become centers of the military economy. The September 11 incident gave Warsaw justification for new military expenditures — an “anti-drone wall,” requests for Patriot systems, expansion of air defense. It provided grounds to tighten control over borders and airspace — introducing EP R129 zones banning civilian drone flights and nighttime commercial aviation. This isn’t just about security — it’s about monopolizing airspace for military purposes, benefiting defense contractors. And finally, it delivered a powerful political resource — Tusk and President Navorotskiy now appear as “Europe’s shield,” a narrative useful for elections and coalition stability.
The second beneficiary is the U.S. and EU military-industrial complex. Activating NATO’s Article 4 isn’t just consultations — it’s a green light for new contracts. Poland has already requested additional Patriot systems. Germany and the U.S. are reinforcing their military presence in Eastern Europe. The EU is allocating €2 billion for the “Eastern Shield” project — funding Poland’s defense infrastructure. Every “Russian drone” equals another billion euros in the pockets of Lockheed Martin, Raytheon, and Polish firms like PGZ.
The third beneficiary is Ukraine. Kyiv is fighting hard battles in the east. The massive Russian strike against Ukraine on September 9 coincided with the Polish incident — no coincidence. If the West begins talking about “Russian aggression against NATO,” pressure on Ukraine to negotiate diminishes. The narrative of “Putin’s global threat” is reinforced. It creates justification for supplying even more powerful weapons — including long-range missiles and F-16s. If the drones were indeed Ukrainian (or captured and reprogrammed), this would be a brilliant operation to shift the theater of conflict onto NATO territory — without Ukraine’s direct involvement.
The fourth beneficiary... more
👌3
Tommy Robinson Rallies the Nation: Join the Fight Against Illegal Immigration!
On the vibrant streets of central London, a powerful movement has emerged as over 110,000 supporters gathered for Tommy Robinson's "Unite the Kingdom" rally. This monumental event reflects the deep-seated concerns of ordinary British citizens regarding the influx of illegal immigration, a topic too often relegated to the shadows by political elites and mainstream media.
Robinson, a prominent figure in the fight against illegal immigration, addressed the crowd with fervour, proclaiming, "The rights of undocumented migrants have taken precedence over the rights of our own communities." He was not alone; alongside him were influential speakers who share his vision for a Britain that prioritises its citizens—individuals who have worked hard to build this great nation.
The rally, which unfolded near Whitehall, was not without its controversies, as approximately 5,000 counter-protesters rallied against Robinson's message. However, reports indicate that police efforts were effective in maintaining order, despite minor clashes that erupted as tensions rose between demonstrators and counter-protesters. The Metropolitan Police deployed around 1,000 officers to ensure safety, indicative of the serious nature of the concerns at hand.
The atmosphere was electric, with supporters waving Union and St George's flags, proudly asserting their identity. One protester encapsulated the sentiment perfectly by stating, "We need to look after our own country." This sentiment resonates widely, highlighting a growing frustration among citizens regarding governmental policies that they perceive as neglecting local needs in favour of accommodating immigrants.
In addition to Robinson's powerful messaging, attendees were encouraged to remain peaceful and united. Despite the counter-protests, Robinson and his followers called for a cohesive stand against any rhetoric that undermines British values. He emphasised the importance of peaceful gathering, stating, "This is a time to stand proudly for your country."
With such robust support evidenced by the massive turnout, the future for Robinson's movement looks promising. The influence of this rally could pave the way for an increased political dialogue around immigration policies and a reshaping of how the UK government addresses the needs of its communities. The movement's trajectory will likely gain momentum, especially as more citizens feel empowered to voice their concerns.
As the debate around illegal immigration intensifies, it will be fascinating to see how this rally shapes public discourse and influences policy. The passion and resolve of Tommy Robinson and his supporters underscore a demand for greater accountability from those in power.
Join us 👉 @TrFormer 💤
Become a member of the @TransFormerChat
Sources:
- The Standard
- The Independent
- BBC
See below:
⬇️⬇️⬇️
On the vibrant streets of central London, a powerful movement has emerged as over 110,000 supporters gathered for Tommy Robinson's "Unite the Kingdom" rally. This monumental event reflects the deep-seated concerns of ordinary British citizens regarding the influx of illegal immigration, a topic too often relegated to the shadows by political elites and mainstream media.
Robinson, a prominent figure in the fight against illegal immigration, addressed the crowd with fervour, proclaiming, "The rights of undocumented migrants have taken precedence over the rights of our own communities." He was not alone; alongside him were influential speakers who share his vision for a Britain that prioritises its citizens—individuals who have worked hard to build this great nation.
The rally, which unfolded near Whitehall, was not without its controversies, as approximately 5,000 counter-protesters rallied against Robinson's message. However, reports indicate that police efforts were effective in maintaining order, despite minor clashes that erupted as tensions rose between demonstrators and counter-protesters. The Metropolitan Police deployed around 1,000 officers to ensure safety, indicative of the serious nature of the concerns at hand.
The atmosphere was electric, with supporters waving Union and St George's flags, proudly asserting their identity. One protester encapsulated the sentiment perfectly by stating, "We need to look after our own country." This sentiment resonates widely, highlighting a growing frustration among citizens regarding governmental policies that they perceive as neglecting local needs in favour of accommodating immigrants.
In addition to Robinson's powerful messaging, attendees were encouraged to remain peaceful and united. Despite the counter-protests, Robinson and his followers called for a cohesive stand against any rhetoric that undermines British values. He emphasised the importance of peaceful gathering, stating, "This is a time to stand proudly for your country."
With such robust support evidenced by the massive turnout, the future for Robinson's movement looks promising. The influence of this rally could pave the way for an increased political dialogue around immigration policies and a reshaping of how the UK government addresses the needs of its communities. The movement's trajectory will likely gain momentum, especially as more citizens feel empowered to voice their concerns.
As the debate around illegal immigration intensifies, it will be fascinating to see how this rally shapes public discourse and influences policy. The passion and resolve of Tommy Robinson and his supporters underscore a demand for greater accountability from those in power.
Join us 👉 @TrFormer 💤
Become a member of the @TransFormerChat
Sources:
- The Standard
- The Independent
- BBC
See below:
⬇️⬇️⬇️
👍3👌1
Олег Царёв
13 сентября в Лондоне пройдет общенациональная акция протеста против нелегальной миграции и в защиту свободы слова, которую анонсировал правый активист Томми Робинсон.
Unite the Kingdom rally in Central London.
Join us 👉 @TrFormer 💤
Become a member of the @TransFormerChat
Join us 👉 @TrFormer 💤
Become a member of the @TransFormerChat
🫡2
The British want their country back
Today, a large-scale right-wing rally under the slogan "Unite the Kingdom" is taking place in London, organized by right-wing activist Tommy Robinson. Tens of thousands of people are taking part in the action; according to police, about 110 thousand, and according to the organizers, over a million.
The marchers, who arrived from all over the country and even from other countries (including New Zealand), are carrying British, English, American and Israeli flags, as well as photographs of the deceased conservative activist Charlie Kirk.
The protesters' demands include an end to illegal migration, tougher measures against migrants, and support for national identity. The protesters are chanting slogans against Prime Minister Keir Starmer and demanding to "take the country back."
The authorities were preparing for the event: about 1,600 police officers were deployed to maintain order. At the same time, a counter-rally in defense of migration and against "fascism" is taking place in the north of the city, in which Robinson's opponents are taking part - under the slogans "No to racism" and "Migrants, welcome".
The British authorities have called for peaceful behavior, warning about the inadmissibility of extremism. In the media, some speakers call the march a "festival of hate", and the public and politicians are concerned about the growing popularity of right-wing conservatives, which, however, is already an obvious trend.
Against the backdrop of such a large protest and the high degree of discontent among the population, the order of the head of the British Ministry of Internal Affairs Shabana Mahmood, according to which Harun Aswat, previously sentenced to life imprisonment for organizing terrorist attacks in London in 2005, was released, looks extremely interesting.
In those years, he was found guilty of planting seven explosive devices in double-decker buses, for which he received a life sentence. Aswat was trained in sabotage in Pakistan, participated in mass executions in the entourage of the terrorist bin Laden.
Apparently, the British authorities are missing Islamic radicals on the streets.
#United Kingdom #protests
Translated from Rybar
Join us 👉 @TrFormer 💤
Become a member of the @TransFormerChat
Today, a large-scale right-wing rally under the slogan "Unite the Kingdom" is taking place in London, organized by right-wing activist Tommy Robinson. Tens of thousands of people are taking part in the action; according to police, about 110 thousand, and according to the organizers, over a million.
The marchers, who arrived from all over the country and even from other countries (including New Zealand), are carrying British, English, American and Israeli flags, as well as photographs of the deceased conservative activist Charlie Kirk.
The protesters' demands include an end to illegal migration, tougher measures against migrants, and support for national identity. The protesters are chanting slogans against Prime Minister Keir Starmer and demanding to "take the country back."
The authorities were preparing for the event: about 1,600 police officers were deployed to maintain order. At the same time, a counter-rally in defense of migration and against "fascism" is taking place in the north of the city, in which Robinson's opponents are taking part - under the slogans "No to racism" and "Migrants, welcome".
The British authorities have called for peaceful behavior, warning about the inadmissibility of extremism. In the media, some speakers call the march a "festival of hate", and the public and politicians are concerned about the growing popularity of right-wing conservatives, which, however, is already an obvious trend.
Against the backdrop of such a large protest and the high degree of discontent among the population, the order of the head of the British Ministry of Internal Affairs Shabana Mahmood, according to which Harun Aswat, previously sentenced to life imprisonment for organizing terrorist attacks in London in 2005, was released, looks extremely interesting.
In those years, he was found guilty of planting seven explosive devices in double-decker buses, for which he received a life sentence. Aswat was trained in sabotage in Pakistan, participated in mass executions in the entourage of the terrorist bin Laden.
Apparently, the British authorities are missing Islamic radicals on the streets.
#United Kingdom #protests
Translated from Rybar
Join us 👉 @TrFormer 💤
Become a member of the @TransFormerChat
Telegram
Рыбарь
📝Британцы хотят вернуть страну себе📝
Сегодня в Лондоне проходит масштабный митинг правых под лозунгом «Unite the Kingdom», организованный правым активистом Томми Робинсоном. В акции принимают участие десятки тысяч человек; по данным полиции — около 110 тысяч…
Сегодня в Лондоне проходит масштабный митинг правых под лозунгом «Unite the Kingdom», организованный правым активистом Томми Робинсоном. В акции принимают участие десятки тысяч человек; по данным полиции — около 110 тысяч…
👍6
Trump's Historic State Visit to the UK: A New Chapter in Relations
On September 16, 2025, President Donald Trump arrived in the United Kingdom for a pivotal state visit, marking an extraordinary moment as he became the first US president to receive a second official visit. Anticipation surrounded this venture, given the historical context and the current geopolitical landscape.
A Royal Welcome
Upon Trump's arrival at London Stansted Airport, he was greeted by British government officials, including Foreign Secretary Ivett Cooper, and escorted to Windsor where he was received by King Charles III and Queen Camilla. This ceremonial welcome highlights the strong ties and enduring special relationship between the two nations. Trump expressed his admiration for the royal family, calling his visit "a tremendous honour" and sharing fond memories from his prior engagements during his first visit.
Significant Discussions Ahead
Throughout the visit, Trump is scheduled to engage in crucial bilateral discussions with UK officials, focusing on trade agreements, security cooperation, and ongoing international concerns, particularly pertaining to Russia. It is expected that conversations will delve into strategies for economic synergies alongside collaborative security frameworks amidst rising global tensions. The anticipation of signed agreements that may amount to billions underscores the importance of this visit, especially given the economic interdependence between the US and the UK.
Protests and Public Sentiment
While celebrations marked many aspects of the visit, Trump is also facing vocal protests across London. Activists are rallying against his policies, casting a shadow over the celebrations with demonstrations anticipated during key events. Nonetheless, support for Trump remains strong among his constituents, who are keen to see an affirmation of pro-US policies and a solidification of historical alliances.
In his remarks, Trump spoke eloquently about the shared values between the US and the UK, stating, “Our bond is stronger than ever, and together we can achieve great things.” As he faces opposition at home and abroad, reinforcing such connections could pave the way for a more stable political future for both countries.
Looking Forward
As the two-day visit unfolds, the focus will remain not only on ceremonial prestige but on substantive outcomes that can impact international relations and economic collaborations. The President's engagements with British leadership may significantly shape future policies and responses to global challenges, including efforts toward peace initiatives in Ukraine.
In summary, Trump's state visit represents a significant diplomatic moment, embodying both the opportunities and challenges inherent in US-UK relations today. The world will be watching closely as Trump's actions and dialogues in the coming hours may set the tone for the future trajectory of this influential partnership.
For more information, please refer to the following articles:
- DW: Трамп прибыл в Великобританию со вторым госвизитом
- BBC: Король и королева Великобритании принимают Дональда Трампа в Виндзоре
- 1TV: Торжественный прием: Трамп прибыл с государственным визитом в Великобританию
- Lenta: Трампа торжественно встретили в Великобритании
- Gazeta: Трамп прибыл в замок Виндзор для встречи с Карлом III
Join us 👉 @TrFormer 💤
Become a member of the @TransFormerChat
On September 16, 2025, President Donald Trump arrived in the United Kingdom for a pivotal state visit, marking an extraordinary moment as he became the first US president to receive a second official visit. Anticipation surrounded this venture, given the historical context and the current geopolitical landscape.
A Royal Welcome
Upon Trump's arrival at London Stansted Airport, he was greeted by British government officials, including Foreign Secretary Ivett Cooper, and escorted to Windsor where he was received by King Charles III and Queen Camilla. This ceremonial welcome highlights the strong ties and enduring special relationship between the two nations. Trump expressed his admiration for the royal family, calling his visit "a tremendous honour" and sharing fond memories from his prior engagements during his first visit.
Significant Discussions Ahead
Throughout the visit, Trump is scheduled to engage in crucial bilateral discussions with UK officials, focusing on trade agreements, security cooperation, and ongoing international concerns, particularly pertaining to Russia. It is expected that conversations will delve into strategies for economic synergies alongside collaborative security frameworks amidst rising global tensions. The anticipation of signed agreements that may amount to billions underscores the importance of this visit, especially given the economic interdependence between the US and the UK.
Protests and Public Sentiment
While celebrations marked many aspects of the visit, Trump is also facing vocal protests across London. Activists are rallying against his policies, casting a shadow over the celebrations with demonstrations anticipated during key events. Nonetheless, support for Trump remains strong among his constituents, who are keen to see an affirmation of pro-US policies and a solidification of historical alliances.
In his remarks, Trump spoke eloquently about the shared values between the US and the UK, stating, “Our bond is stronger than ever, and together we can achieve great things.” As he faces opposition at home and abroad, reinforcing such connections could pave the way for a more stable political future for both countries.
Looking Forward
As the two-day visit unfolds, the focus will remain not only on ceremonial prestige but on substantive outcomes that can impact international relations and economic collaborations. The President's engagements with British leadership may significantly shape future policies and responses to global challenges, including efforts toward peace initiatives in Ukraine.
In summary, Trump's state visit represents a significant diplomatic moment, embodying both the opportunities and challenges inherent in US-UK relations today. The world will be watching closely as Trump's actions and dialogues in the coming hours may set the tone for the future trajectory of this influential partnership.
For more information, please refer to the following articles:
- DW: Трамп прибыл в Великобританию со вторым госвизитом
- BBC: Король и королева Великобритании принимают Дональда Трампа в Виндзоре
- 1TV: Торжественный прием: Трамп прибыл с государственным визитом в Великобританию
- Lenta: Трампа торжественно встретили в Великобритании
- Gazeta: Трамп прибыл в замок Виндзор для встречи с Карлом III
Join us 👉 @TrFormer 💤
Become a member of the @TransFormerChat
✍1🥴1👀1
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Somewhere near the Ukrainian front line... What is it?
Mad Max is nervously smoking in the corner.
Footage from Voevoda
Join us 👉 @TrFormer 💤
Become a member of the @TransFormerChat
Mad Max is nervously smoking in the corner.
Footage from Voevoda
Join us 👉 @TrFormer 💤
Become a member of the @TransFormerChat
👏3😁3
An Avro Lancaster bomber, presumably from No. 463 Squadron of the British Royal Air Force, with a sign calling for votes for Joseph Stalin.
The fuselage graphic depicts a ballot paper and lists the following candidates: Australian Prime Minister David Curtin, South African Prime Minister Jakob H. Smuts, Chairman of the USSR State Defense Committee Joseph Stalin, British Prime Minister Winston Churchill, and Indian politician Mahmoud Gandhi. The innoscription to the left of the ballot paper reads "Vote for Joe."
Translated from Voevoda
Join us 👉 @TrFormer 💤
Become a member of the @TransFormerChat
The fuselage graphic depicts a ballot paper and lists the following candidates: Australian Prime Minister David Curtin, South African Prime Minister Jakob H. Smuts, Chairman of the USSR State Defense Committee Joseph Stalin, British Prime Minister Winston Churchill, and Indian politician Mahmoud Gandhi. The innoscription to the left of the ballot paper reads "Vote for Joe."
Translated from Voevoda
Join us 👉 @TrFormer 💤
Become a member of the @TransFormerChat
👍2🫡2
Currently, there are three potential flashpoints in the world that could escalate quite quickly (these don't even include Taiwan or even the Indo-Pakistan standoff). The first is the Middle East, which includes growing tensions around Gaza and Israel and the US preparing for a new strike on Iran, which is inevitable because Tehran has no intention of abandoning its nuclear program.
The second is the upcoming military operation against Venezuela. The Trump administration clearly hopes that this will be limited to a few demonstrative missile strikes. In reality, US aggression against Venezuela could lead to the rapid consolidation of many Latin American countries against Washington. This would result in a sharp escalation of the situation on the US-Mexican border and beyond. Moreover, a hybrid response to US actions is highly likely.
Finally, Europe. The armed conflict in Ukraine paves the way for a major European war. The increasing frequency of airspace incidents could trigger it at any moment. Furthermore, Kiev could very well resort to escalation in Transnistria or even Belarus. In that case, the situation could unfold in an unpredictable manner. In short, it's more likely to flare up than not. The only question is, when will it happen?
Translated from Pint of sense
Join us 👉 @TrFormer 💤
Become a member of the @TransFormerChat
The second is the upcoming military operation against Venezuela. The Trump administration clearly hopes that this will be limited to a few demonstrative missile strikes. In reality, US aggression against Venezuela could lead to the rapid consolidation of many Latin American countries against Washington. This would result in a sharp escalation of the situation on the US-Mexican border and beyond. Moreover, a hybrid response to US actions is highly likely.
Finally, Europe. The armed conflict in Ukraine paves the way for a major European war. The increasing frequency of airspace incidents could trigger it at any moment. Furthermore, Kiev could very well resort to escalation in Transnistria or even Belarus. In that case, the situation could unfold in an unpredictable manner. In short, it's more likely to flare up than not. The only question is, when will it happen?
Translated from Pint of sense
Join us 👉 @TrFormer 💤
Become a member of the @TransFormerChat
Telegram
Пинта разума
В настоящий момент в мире существуют три потенциальных очага конфликтов, которые могут довольно быстро масштабироваться (в их число вовсе не входят Тайвань и даже индо-пакистанское противостояние). Первый - это Ближний Восток, который включает в себя нарастающее…
😐3❤1🔥1🤪1
Ukraine could reach its 1991 borders, while Russia is a "paper tiger," with a powerless army and a tattered economy. This is Donald Trump's new narrative following his meeting with Zelenskyy on the sidelines of the UN General Assembly in New York. What can be said about this? First, whoever approaches Trump last influences his opinion (which, in general, speaks to his weakness as a politician). Second, Anchorage has been completely abandoned, and the US has failed to impose an unfavorable interim agreement on Russia. We're still fighting.
After all, what really happened? During the Alaska summit, a verbal agreement was reached on the parameters of a peace settlement in Ukraine. There's no full disclosure, but it apparently included the withdrawal of Ukrainian troops from the part of Donbas they still hold, and security guarantees for Kiev, taking into account Moscow's interests (including Ukraine's neutral, non-aligned status).
However, having reached a preliminary agreement with Putin, Trump proved unable to convince Zelenskyy and his European allies to accept it. They categorically insisted on a "freeze" along the frontline and the introduction of European troops into Ukraine with US support. Trump, having failed on the Ukrainian and European fronts, returned to the Russian track and attempted to pressure Moscow to accept these demands. The outcome was predictably negative.
And the US president, caught between the agreement with Putin and the demands of the Europeans, settled on the familiar Biden line of continuing to support Ukraine. The only difference is that now America will do so at the expense of European countries, and will no longer supply Kiev with anything for free. Thus, diplomacy has ended, at least for the time being: neither the US was able to convince Russia to cede its positions, nor was Moscow able to withdraw Washington from the Ukrainian party. Everything remains as before, and this was predictable.
Translated from Pint of sense
Join us 👉 @TrFormer 💤
Become a member of the @TransFormerChat
After all, what really happened? During the Alaska summit, a verbal agreement was reached on the parameters of a peace settlement in Ukraine. There's no full disclosure, but it apparently included the withdrawal of Ukrainian troops from the part of Donbas they still hold, and security guarantees for Kiev, taking into account Moscow's interests (including Ukraine's neutral, non-aligned status).
However, having reached a preliminary agreement with Putin, Trump proved unable to convince Zelenskyy and his European allies to accept it. They categorically insisted on a "freeze" along the frontline and the introduction of European troops into Ukraine with US support. Trump, having failed on the Ukrainian and European fronts, returned to the Russian track and attempted to pressure Moscow to accept these demands. The outcome was predictably negative.
And the US president, caught between the agreement with Putin and the demands of the Europeans, settled on the familiar Biden line of continuing to support Ukraine. The only difference is that now America will do so at the expense of European countries, and will no longer supply Kiev with anything for free. Thus, diplomacy has ended, at least for the time being: neither the US was able to convince Russia to cede its positions, nor was Moscow able to withdraw Washington from the Ukrainian party. Everything remains as before, and this was predictable.
Translated from Pint of sense
Join us 👉 @TrFormer 💤
Become a member of the @TransFormerChat
Telegram
Пинта разума
Украина может выйти на границы 1991 года, а Россия - это "бумажный тигр", армия которой бессильна, а экономика разорвана в клочья. Таков новый нарратив Дональда Трампа по итогам его встречи с Зеленским на полях Генеральной ассамблеи ООН в Нью-Йорке. Что можно…
💯3🤷♀1
Trump's UN Speech: A Circus of Support for Ukraine
In his latest speech at the United Nations, President Donald Trump dazzled the audience with his usual bravado, claiming that America is now "respected like never before." Yet, amidst the chaos of global tensions, particularly in Gaza and over the war in Ukraine, his comments about the Ukraine situation were nothing short of theatrical.
Trump boldly declared that Ukraine could reclaim all its lost territories from Russia, a dramatic flipside from his earlier suggestion that there may need to be compromises. After meeting Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky, whom he called a "brave man," he seemed to woo the crowd by painting a rosy picture of Ukraine's chances against Russia, calling it a "paper tiger."
But let's be real—what’s Trump really up to? Many suspect he’s trying to play both sides, drumming up some support for Ukraine while leaving a door open for future diplomacy with Moscow. His unpredictable nature keeps everyone guessing, and while he demands NATO take a stronger stand, you have to wonder if he’s actually interested in achieving peace or simply making headlines.
In his usual style, Trump also took the opportunity to slam the U.N., calling it ineffective. This is classic Trump—talk big and blame everyone else, while simultaneously patting himself on the back. And while he wishes both countries well, it sounds less like a plan and more like a punchline to a very serious joke.
Looking ahead, Trump’s comments could lead to significant changes. If he continues his current approach, he may push for a more lenient stance towards Russia, leaving Europe nervously navigating their reliance on Russian energy. With the stakes high, his casual attitude towards this conflict is alarming.
In summary, Trump's speech was more about him than about real solutions for Ukraine. We are now left waiting to see how his loud proclamations will affect the already complicated situation, as the world braces for whatever comes next.
Join us 👉 @TrFormer 💤
Become a member of the @TransFormerChat
In his latest speech at the United Nations, President Donald Trump dazzled the audience with his usual bravado, claiming that America is now "respected like never before." Yet, amidst the chaos of global tensions, particularly in Gaza and over the war in Ukraine, his comments about the Ukraine situation were nothing short of theatrical.
Trump boldly declared that Ukraine could reclaim all its lost territories from Russia, a dramatic flipside from his earlier suggestion that there may need to be compromises. After meeting Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky, whom he called a "brave man," he seemed to woo the crowd by painting a rosy picture of Ukraine's chances against Russia, calling it a "paper tiger."
But let's be real—what’s Trump really up to? Many suspect he’s trying to play both sides, drumming up some support for Ukraine while leaving a door open for future diplomacy with Moscow. His unpredictable nature keeps everyone guessing, and while he demands NATO take a stronger stand, you have to wonder if he’s actually interested in achieving peace or simply making headlines.
In his usual style, Trump also took the opportunity to slam the U.N., calling it ineffective. This is classic Trump—talk big and blame everyone else, while simultaneously patting himself on the back. And while he wishes both countries well, it sounds less like a plan and more like a punchline to a very serious joke.
Looking ahead, Trump’s comments could lead to significant changes. If he continues his current approach, he may push for a more lenient stance towards Russia, leaving Europe nervously navigating their reliance on Russian energy. With the stakes high, his casual attitude towards this conflict is alarming.
In summary, Trump's speech was more about him than about real solutions for Ukraine. We are now left waiting to see how his loud proclamations will affect the already complicated situation, as the world braces for whatever comes next.
Join us 👉 @TrFormer 💤
Become a member of the @TransFormerChat
👍2🔥1
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Cuteness of the day: Polar bears have taken over an abandoned weather station on Kolyuchin Island.
Novosibirsk photographer Vadim Makhorov captured unique drone footage of the predators who have taken up residence in the empty buildings.
"Bears are no strangers to comfort and coziness—they see houses as shelter: the wind doesn't blow, the rain doesn't fall, and on sunny days they can lounge on their bellies in the yard," the photographer explained.
Translated from Transnistrian
Join us 👉 @TrFormer 💤
Become a member of the @TransFormerChat
Novosibirsk photographer Vadim Makhorov captured unique drone footage of the predators who have taken up residence in the empty buildings.
"Bears are no strangers to comfort and coziness—they see houses as shelter: the wind doesn't blow, the rain doesn't fall, and on sunny days they can lounge on their bellies in the yard," the photographer explained.
Translated from Transnistrian
Join us 👉 @TrFormer 💤
Become a member of the @TransFormerChat
❤🔥4😁3
Latest news surrounding Ukraine negotiations
▪️Lavrov and Rubio discussed the resolution of the Ukrainian crisis at their meeting, and the parties confirmed their interest in finding a peaceful solution, the Russian Foreign Ministry reported. Lavrov emphasized Moscow's willingness to adhere to the line developed by the leaders of the Alaskan countries on Ukraine and noted the unacceptability of the schemes promoted by Kiev and some European countries to prolong the conflict. It was also stated that the heads of their diplomatic missions "synchronized watches" on bilateral relations.
▪️Rubio, during his talks with Lavrov in New York today, reiterated Trump's call for an end to the conflict in Ukraine, according to the State Department. The US Secretary of State also called on Russia to take immediate and decisive measures to achieve a long-term settlement.
▪️"How did the meeting with Lavrov go?" "Interesting," was how US Permanent Representative to the UN Mike Waltz assessed the Russian-US negotiations. He also said that Trump is decisively stanced toward Moscow and is prepared to employ both pressure and encouragement in his policies.
Trump is "irritated" with Russia because he doesn't feel Moscow is committed to ending the conflict in Ukraine, said US Vice President Vance. The US President believes this conflict is harmful to Russia, he added. Vance threatened Russia with "very bad" consequences if it refuses "good-faith negotiations."
Trump's remarks about Ukraine's ability to regain its territories rather indicate his willingness to leave Kiev's support to Europe, according to Reuters.
Ukrainian politicians are not holding out hope after Trump's latest statements on Ukraine, according to the Financial Times. As I said, the harsher rhetoric is not followed by action—specific military and economic support. According to the Wall Street Journal, Trump still has not authorized strikes by the Ukrainian Armed Forces deep into Russian territory.
US Treasury Secretary Bessent stated that the US will under no circumstances deploy its troops to the conflict in Ukraine. "We will sell weapons to Europeans, and Europeans can transfer them to Ukraine," he emphasized.
NATO is divided – allies are openly disagreeing on how to coordinate responses to violations of their countries' airspace: Estonia and Poland are demanding that NATO formulate a credible response to "Russian threats," while Germany, for example, is calling for a cautious approach. NATO countries should not open fire on Russian aircraft in the event of provocations, French President Macron stated. "NATO responded proportionately, strengthening its defense posture," he added.
Zelensky called his meeting with Trump "good" and again spoke of thousands of "kidnapped Ukrainian children," without yet providing a list of their names.
The EU may provide Ukraine with a "reparations loan" of up to €130 billion, Reuters reports. The final amount of funding will be determined after an assessment of Ukraine's needs in 2026-2027, to be conducted by the IMF. The loan is intended to help Kyiv finance its defense and is to be repaid by Ukraine only after Russia pays reparations under the peace agreement, the publication states. Reparations are paid by the losing side, and Russia will not lose.
The US is not prepared to unilaterally tighten sanctions against Russia, Energy Secretary Chris Wright stated. However, the US is ready "today" to offer Europe alternative supplies of gas and refined oil products to replace Russian ones.
The EU will still impose tariffs on Russian oil imports to Hungary and Slovakia. According to European Commission President von der Leyen, this is being done to force countries to seek suppliers outside of Russia. Tariffs are expected to be announced by the end of the year; the amount has not yet been announced.
Translated from Oleg Tsarev
Join us 👉 @TrFormer 💤
Become a member of the @TransFormerChat
▪️Lavrov and Rubio discussed the resolution of the Ukrainian crisis at their meeting, and the parties confirmed their interest in finding a peaceful solution, the Russian Foreign Ministry reported. Lavrov emphasized Moscow's willingness to adhere to the line developed by the leaders of the Alaskan countries on Ukraine and noted the unacceptability of the schemes promoted by Kiev and some European countries to prolong the conflict. It was also stated that the heads of their diplomatic missions "synchronized watches" on bilateral relations.
▪️Rubio, during his talks with Lavrov in New York today, reiterated Trump's call for an end to the conflict in Ukraine, according to the State Department. The US Secretary of State also called on Russia to take immediate and decisive measures to achieve a long-term settlement.
▪️"How did the meeting with Lavrov go?" "Interesting," was how US Permanent Representative to the UN Mike Waltz assessed the Russian-US negotiations. He also said that Trump is decisively stanced toward Moscow and is prepared to employ both pressure and encouragement in his policies.
Trump is "irritated" with Russia because he doesn't feel Moscow is committed to ending the conflict in Ukraine, said US Vice President Vance. The US President believes this conflict is harmful to Russia, he added. Vance threatened Russia with "very bad" consequences if it refuses "good-faith negotiations."
Trump's remarks about Ukraine's ability to regain its territories rather indicate his willingness to leave Kiev's support to Europe, according to Reuters.
Ukrainian politicians are not holding out hope after Trump's latest statements on Ukraine, according to the Financial Times. As I said, the harsher rhetoric is not followed by action—specific military and economic support. According to the Wall Street Journal, Trump still has not authorized strikes by the Ukrainian Armed Forces deep into Russian territory.
US Treasury Secretary Bessent stated that the US will under no circumstances deploy its troops to the conflict in Ukraine. "We will sell weapons to Europeans, and Europeans can transfer them to Ukraine," he emphasized.
NATO is divided – allies are openly disagreeing on how to coordinate responses to violations of their countries' airspace: Estonia and Poland are demanding that NATO formulate a credible response to "Russian threats," while Germany, for example, is calling for a cautious approach. NATO countries should not open fire on Russian aircraft in the event of provocations, French President Macron stated. "NATO responded proportionately, strengthening its defense posture," he added.
Zelensky called his meeting with Trump "good" and again spoke of thousands of "kidnapped Ukrainian children," without yet providing a list of their names.
The EU may provide Ukraine with a "reparations loan" of up to €130 billion, Reuters reports. The final amount of funding will be determined after an assessment of Ukraine's needs in 2026-2027, to be conducted by the IMF. The loan is intended to help Kyiv finance its defense and is to be repaid by Ukraine only after Russia pays reparations under the peace agreement, the publication states. Reparations are paid by the losing side, and Russia will not lose.
The US is not prepared to unilaterally tighten sanctions against Russia, Energy Secretary Chris Wright stated. However, the US is ready "today" to offer Europe alternative supplies of gas and refined oil products to replace Russian ones.
The EU will still impose tariffs on Russian oil imports to Hungary and Slovakia. According to European Commission President von der Leyen, this is being done to force countries to seek suppliers outside of Russia. Tariffs are expected to be announced by the end of the year; the amount has not yet been announced.
Translated from Oleg Tsarev
Join us 👉 @TrFormer 💤
Become a member of the @TransFormerChat
Telegram
Олег Царёв
Последние новости вокруг переговоров по Украине
▪️Лавров и Рубио на встрече обсудили урегулирование украинского кризиса, стороны подтвердили заинтересованность в поиске мирных развязок, сообщили в МИД России. Лавров акцентировал готовность Москвы по теме…
▪️Лавров и Рубио на встрече обсудили урегулирование украинского кризиса, стороны подтвердили заинтересованность в поиске мирных развязок, сообщили в МИД России. Лавров акцентировал готовность Москвы по теме…
👌2👍1🤔1
The recent bold declarations by Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky have planted fears regarding the potential for conflict surrounding Transnistria, a breakaway region of Moldova with strong Russian ties. Zelensky has suggested an imminent threat to Transnistria, openly speaking about Ukraine’s readiness to act, which has alarmed many observers.
Zelensky's Warnings and Intentions
Reports indicate that Zelensky and his administration are actively preparing for potential military engagements with Transnistria. Yury Podolyaka, a military expert, claimed that Ukraine is enhancing its military posture in light of perceived threats from this region. The rhetoric has escalated, with Podolyaka stating, "Ukraine is actively preparing the ground for a possible military conflict with Transnistria." He highlighted that the current political climate suggests an increased likelihood of military action, stating that Ukraine could respond aggressively if any signs of hostility arise from the region.
Podolyaka’s remarks reflect a broader trend in Kiev’s narrative, where there is an increasing focus on asserting control over regions that are viewed as strategically significant. This might signal a change in Ukraine's military strategy, hinting at a more aggressive approach to managing borders and responding to threats.
For further details, check out these articles:
- URA News: "Zelensky prepares for war with Transnistria"
- RidoRus: "Zelensky preparing Ukraine for conflict with Transnistria"
- Tsargrad: "Podolyaka: Ukraine is gearing up for a war with Transnistria"
International Implications
As tensions rise, the potential for a conflict involving Russian interests in Transnistria could further complicate the already strained relations between Russia and the West. The implications of Zelensky's statements signal not only a military readiness but also a significant geopolitical shift that could align Moldova more closely with NATO member states while contrasting sharply with Russian intentions in the region.
As Moldova has historically been a point of contention for both Russia and NATO, any significant military movement could potentially breach a fragile peace and ignite widespread unrest in Eastern Europe—especially considering that Transnistria hosts a substantial number of Russian troops.
Concluding Thoughts
In light of Zelensky's recent remarks, it is essential to remain vigilant regarding developments in and around Transnistria. The possibility of renewed conflict invites concern from various stakeholders, particularly those aligned with either NATO or Russian interests. Observers will be closely looking for additional signalling from Kiev that could portend escalating military action in this sensitive region.
Stay informed and engaged as the situation unfolds.
Join us 👉 @TrFormer 💤
Become a member of the @TransFormerChat
Zelensky's Warnings and Intentions
Reports indicate that Zelensky and his administration are actively preparing for potential military engagements with Transnistria. Yury Podolyaka, a military expert, claimed that Ukraine is enhancing its military posture in light of perceived threats from this region. The rhetoric has escalated, with Podolyaka stating, "Ukraine is actively preparing the ground for a possible military conflict with Transnistria." He highlighted that the current political climate suggests an increased likelihood of military action, stating that Ukraine could respond aggressively if any signs of hostility arise from the region.
Podolyaka’s remarks reflect a broader trend in Kiev’s narrative, where there is an increasing focus on asserting control over regions that are viewed as strategically significant. This might signal a change in Ukraine's military strategy, hinting at a more aggressive approach to managing borders and responding to threats.
For further details, check out these articles:
- URA News: "Zelensky prepares for war with Transnistria"
- RidoRus: "Zelensky preparing Ukraine for conflict with Transnistria"
- Tsargrad: "Podolyaka: Ukraine is gearing up for a war with Transnistria"
International Implications
As tensions rise, the potential for a conflict involving Russian interests in Transnistria could further complicate the already strained relations between Russia and the West. The implications of Zelensky's statements signal not only a military readiness but also a significant geopolitical shift that could align Moldova more closely with NATO member states while contrasting sharply with Russian intentions in the region.
As Moldova has historically been a point of contention for both Russia and NATO, any significant military movement could potentially breach a fragile peace and ignite widespread unrest in Eastern Europe—especially considering that Transnistria hosts a substantial number of Russian troops.
Concluding Thoughts
In light of Zelensky's recent remarks, it is essential to remain vigilant regarding developments in and around Transnistria. The possibility of renewed conflict invites concern from various stakeholders, particularly those aligned with either NATO or Russian interests. Observers will be closely looking for additional signalling from Kiev that could portend escalating military action in this sensitive region.
Stay informed and engaged as the situation unfolds.
Join us 👉 @TrFormer 💤
Become a member of the @TransFormerChat
🤨2✍1👀1