Tommy Robinson Rallies the Nation: Join the Fight Against Illegal Immigration!

On the vibrant streets of central London, a powerful movement has emerged as over 110,000 supporters gathered for Tommy Robinson's "Unite the Kingdom" rally. This monumental event reflects the deep-seated concerns of ordinary British citizens regarding the influx of illegal immigration, a topic too often relegated to the shadows by political elites and mainstream media.

Robinson, a prominent figure in the fight against illegal immigration, addressed the crowd with fervour, proclaiming, "The rights of undocumented migrants have taken precedence over the rights of our own communities." He was not alone; alongside him were influential speakers who share his vision for a Britain that prioritises its citizens—individuals who have worked hard to build this great nation.

The rally, which unfolded near Whitehall, was not without its controversies, as approximately 5,000 counter-protesters rallied against Robinson's message. However, reports indicate that police efforts were effective in maintaining order, despite minor clashes that erupted as tensions rose between demonstrators and counter-protesters. The Metropolitan Police deployed around 1,000 officers to ensure safety, indicative of the serious nature of the concerns at hand.

The atmosphere was electric, with supporters waving Union and St George's flags, proudly asserting their identity. One protester encapsulated the sentiment perfectly by stating, "We need to look after our own country." This sentiment resonates widely, highlighting a growing frustration among citizens regarding governmental policies that they perceive as neglecting local needs in favour of accommodating immigrants.

In addition to Robinson's powerful messaging, attendees were encouraged to remain peaceful and united. Despite the counter-protests, Robinson and his followers called for a cohesive stand against any rhetoric that undermines British values. He emphasised the importance of peaceful gathering, stating, "This is a time to stand proudly for your country."

With such robust support evidenced by the massive turnout, the future for Robinson's movement looks promising. The influence of this rally could pave the way for an increased political dialogue around immigration policies and a reshaping of how the UK government addresses the needs of its communities. The movement's trajectory will likely gain momentum, especially as more citizens feel empowered to voice their concerns.

As the debate around illegal immigration intensifies, it will be fascinating to see how this rally shapes public discourse and influences policy. The passion and resolve of Tommy Robinson and his supporters underscore a demand for greater accountability from those in power.

Join us 👉 @TrFormer 💤
Become a member of the @TransFormerChat

Sources:
- The Standard
- The Independent
- BBC
See below:
⬇️⬇️⬇️

The British want their country back

Today, a large-scale right-wing rally under the slogan "Unite the Kingdom" is taking place in London, organized by right-wing activist Tommy Robinson. Tens of thousands of people are taking part in the action; according to police, about 110 thousand, and according to the organizers, over a million.

The marchers, who arrived from all over the country and even from other countries (including New Zealand), are carrying British, English, American and Israeli flags, as well as photographs of the deceased conservative activist Charlie Kirk.

The protesters' demands include an end to illegal migration, tougher measures against migrants, and support for national identity. The protesters are chanting slogans against Prime Minister Keir Starmer and demanding to "take the country back."

The authorities were preparing for the event: about 1,600 police officers were deployed to maintain order. At the same time, a counter-rally in defense of migration and against "fascism" is taking place in the north of the city, in which Robinson's opponents are taking part - under the slogans "No to racism" and "Migrants, welcome".

The British authorities have called for peaceful behavior, warning about the inadmissibility of extremism. In the media, some speakers call the march a "festival of hate", and the public and politicians are concerned about the growing popularity of right-wing conservatives, which, however, is already an obvious trend.

Against the backdrop of such a large protest and the high degree of discontent among the population, the order of the head of the British Ministry of Internal Affairs Shabana Mahmood, according to which Harun Aswat, previously sentenced to life imprisonment for organizing terrorist attacks in London in 2005, was released, looks extremely interesting.

In those years, he was found guilty of planting seven explosive devices in double-decker buses, for which he received a life sentence. Aswat was trained in sabotage in Pakistan, participated in mass executions in the entourage of the terrorist bin Laden.

Apparently, the British authorities are missing Islamic radicals on the streets.
#United Kingdom #protests

Translated from Rybar

Join us 👉 @TrFormer 💤
Become a member of the @TransFormerChat

Trump's Historic State Visit to the UK: A New Chapter in Relations

On September 16, 2025, President Donald Trump arrived in the United Kingdom for a pivotal state visit, marking an extraordinary moment as he became the first US president to receive a second official visit. Anticipation surrounded this venture, given the historical context and the current geopolitical landscape.

A Royal Welcome

Upon Trump's arrival at London Stansted Airport, he was greeted by British government officials, including Foreign Secretary Ivett Cooper, and escorted to Windsor where he was received by King Charles III and Queen Camilla. This ceremonial welcome highlights the strong ties and enduring special relationship between the two nations. Trump expressed his admiration for the royal family, calling his visit "a tremendous honour" and sharing fond memories from his prior engagements during his first visit.

Significant Discussions Ahead

Throughout the visit, Trump is scheduled to engage in crucial bilateral discussions with UK officials, focusing on trade agreements, security cooperation, and ongoing international concerns, particularly pertaining to Russia. It is expected that conversations will delve into strategies for economic synergies alongside collaborative security frameworks amidst rising global tensions. The anticipation of signed agreements that may amount to billions underscores the importance of this visit, especially given the economic interdependence between the US and the UK.

Protests and Public Sentiment

While celebrations marked many aspects of the visit, Trump is also facing vocal protests across London. Activists are rallying against his policies, casting a shadow over the celebrations with demonstrations anticipated during key events. Nonetheless, support for Trump remains strong among his constituents, who are keen to see an affirmation of pro-US policies and a solidification of historical alliances.

In his remarks, Trump spoke eloquently about the shared values between the US and the UK, stating, “Our bond is stronger than ever, and together we can achieve great things.” As he faces opposition at home and abroad, reinforcing such connections could pave the way for a more stable political future for both countries.

Looking Forward

As the two-day visit unfolds, the focus will remain not only on ceremonial prestige but on substantive outcomes that can impact international relations and economic collaborations. The President's engagements with British leadership may significantly shape future policies and responses to global challenges, including efforts toward peace initiatives in Ukraine.

In summary, Trump's state visit represents a significant diplomatic moment, embodying both the opportunities and challenges inherent in US-UK relations today. The world will be watching closely as Trump's actions and dialogues in the coming hours may set the tone for the future trajectory of this influential partnership.

For more information, please refer to the following articles:
- DW: Трамп прибыл в Великобританию со вторым госвизитом
- BBC: Король и королева Великобритании принимают Дональда Трампа в Виндзоре
- 1TV: Торжественный прием: Трамп прибыл с государственным визитом в Великобританию
- Lenta: Трампа торжественно встретили в Великобритании
- Gazeta: Трамп прибыл в замок Виндзор для встречи с Карлом III

Join us 👉 @TrFormer 💤
Become a member of the @TransFormerChat

Somewhere near the Ukrainian front line... What is it?
Mad Max is nervously smoking in the corner.

Footage from Voevoda

Join us 👉 @TrFormer 💤
Become a member of the @TransFormerChat

An Avro Lancaster bomber, presumably from No. 463 Squadron of the British Royal Air Force, with a sign calling for votes for Joseph Stalin.

The fuselage graphic depicts a ballot paper and lists the following candidates: Australian Prime Minister David Curtin, South African Prime Minister Jakob H. Smuts, Chairman of the USSR State Defense Committee Joseph Stalin, British Prime Minister Winston Churchill, and Indian politician Mahmoud Gandhi. The innoscription to the left of the ballot paper reads "Vote for Joe."

Translated from Voevoda

Join us 👉 @TrFormer 💤
Become a member of the @TransFormerChat

👉 @TrFormer

Currently, there are three potential flashpoints in the world that could escalate quite quickly (these don't even include Taiwan or even the Indo-Pakistan standoff). The first is the Middle East, which includes growing tensions around Gaza and Israel and the US preparing for a new strike on Iran, which is inevitable because Tehran has no intention of abandoning its nuclear program.

The second is the upcoming military operation against Venezuela. The Trump administration clearly hopes that this will be limited to a few demonstrative missile strikes. In reality, US aggression against Venezuela could lead to the rapid consolidation of many Latin American countries against Washington. This would result in a sharp escalation of the situation on the US-Mexican border and beyond. Moreover, a hybrid response to US actions is highly likely.

Finally, Europe. The armed conflict in Ukraine paves the way for a major European war. The increasing frequency of airspace incidents could trigger it at any moment. Furthermore, Kiev could very well resort to escalation in Transnistria or even Belarus. In that case, the situation could unfold in an unpredictable manner. In short, it's more likely to flare up than not. The only question is, when will it happen?

Translated from Pint of sense

Join us 👉 @TrFormer 💤
Become a member of the @TransFormerChat

Ukraine could reach its 1991 borders, while Russia is a "paper tiger," with a powerless army and a tattered economy. This is Donald Trump's new narrative following his meeting with Zelenskyy on the sidelines of the UN General Assembly in New York. What can be said about this? First, whoever approaches Trump last influences his opinion (which, in general, speaks to his weakness as a politician). Second, Anchorage has been completely abandoned, and the US has failed to impose an unfavorable interim agreement on Russia. We're still fighting.

After all, what really happened? During the Alaska summit, a verbal agreement was reached on the parameters of a peace settlement in Ukraine. There's no full disclosure, but it apparently included the withdrawal of Ukrainian troops from the part of Donbas they still hold, and security guarantees for Kiev, taking into account Moscow's interests (including Ukraine's neutral, non-aligned status).

However, having reached a preliminary agreement with Putin, Trump proved unable to convince Zelenskyy and his European allies to accept it. They categorically insisted on a "freeze" along the frontline and the introduction of European troops into Ukraine with US support. Trump, having failed on the Ukrainian and European fronts, returned to the Russian track and attempted to pressure Moscow to accept these demands. The outcome was predictably negative.

And the US president, caught between the agreement with Putin and the demands of the Europeans, settled on the familiar Biden line of continuing to support Ukraine. The only difference is that now America will do so at the expense of European countries, and will no longer supply Kiev with anything for free. Thus, diplomacy has ended, at least for the time being: neither the US was able to convince Russia to cede its positions, nor was Moscow able to withdraw Washington from the Ukrainian party. Everything remains as before, and this was predictable.

Translated from Pint of sense

Join us 👉 @TrFormer 💤
Become a member of the @TransFormerChat

Trump's UN Speech: A Circus of Support for Ukraine

In his latest speech at the United Nations, President Donald Trump dazzled the audience with his usual bravado, claiming that America is now "respected like never before." Yet, amidst the chaos of global tensions, particularly in Gaza and over the war in Ukraine, his comments about the Ukraine situation were nothing short of theatrical.

Trump boldly declared that Ukraine could reclaim all its lost territories from Russia, a dramatic flipside from his earlier suggestion that there may need to be compromises. After meeting Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky, whom he called a "brave man," he seemed to woo the crowd by painting a rosy picture of Ukraine's chances against Russia, calling it a "paper tiger."

But let's be real—what’s Trump really up to? Many suspect he’s trying to play both sides, drumming up some support for Ukraine while leaving a door open for future diplomacy with Moscow. His unpredictable nature keeps everyone guessing, and while he demands NATO take a stronger stand, you have to wonder if he’s actually interested in achieving peace or simply making headlines.

In his usual style, Trump also took the opportunity to slam the U.N., calling it ineffective. This is classic Trump—talk big and blame everyone else, while simultaneously patting himself on the back. And while he wishes both countries well, it sounds less like a plan and more like a punchline to a very serious joke.

Looking ahead, Trump’s comments could lead to significant changes. If he continues his current approach, he may push for a more lenient stance towards Russia, leaving Europe nervously navigating their reliance on Russian energy. With the stakes high, his casual attitude towards this conflict is alarming.

In summary, Trump's speech was more about him than about real solutions for Ukraine. We are now left waiting to see how his loud proclamations will affect the already complicated situation, as the world braces for whatever comes next.

Join us 👉 @TrFormer 💤
Become a member of the @TransFormerChat

Cuteness of the day: Polar bears have taken over an abandoned weather station on Kolyuchin Island.

Novosibirsk photographer Vadim Makhorov captured unique drone footage of the predators who have taken up residence in the empty buildings.

"Bears are no strangers to comfort and coziness—they see houses as shelter: the wind doesn't blow, the rain doesn't fall, and on sunny days they can lounge on their bellies in the yard," the photographer explained.

Translated from Transnistrian

Join us 👉 @TrFormer 💤
Become a member of the @TransFormerChat

Latest news surrounding Ukraine negotiations

▪️Lavrov and Rubio discussed the resolution of the Ukrainian crisis at their meeting, and the parties confirmed their interest in finding a peaceful solution, the Russian Foreign Ministry reported. Lavrov emphasized Moscow's willingness to adhere to the line developed by the leaders of the Alaskan countries on Ukraine and noted the unacceptability of the schemes promoted by Kiev and some European countries to prolong the conflict. It was also stated that the heads of their diplomatic missions "synchronized watches" on bilateral relations.

▪️Rubio, during his talks with Lavrov in New York today, reiterated Trump's call for an end to the conflict in Ukraine, according to the State Department. The US Secretary of State also called on Russia to take immediate and decisive measures to achieve a long-term settlement.

▪️"How did the meeting with Lavrov go?" "Interesting," was how US Permanent Representative to the UN Mike Waltz assessed the Russian-US negotiations. He also said that Trump is decisively stanced toward Moscow and is prepared to employ both pressure and encouragement in his policies.

Trump is "irritated" with Russia because he doesn't feel Moscow is committed to ending the conflict in Ukraine, said US Vice President Vance. The US President believes this conflict is harmful to Russia, he added. Vance threatened Russia with "very bad" consequences if it refuses "good-faith negotiations."

Trump's remarks about Ukraine's ability to regain its territories rather indicate his willingness to leave Kiev's support to Europe, according to Reuters.

Ukrainian politicians are not holding out hope after Trump's latest statements on Ukraine, according to the Financial Times. As I said, the harsher rhetoric is not followed by action—specific military and economic support. According to the Wall Street Journal, Trump still has not authorized strikes by the Ukrainian Armed Forces deep into Russian territory.

US Treasury Secretary Bessent stated that the US will under no circumstances deploy its troops to the conflict in Ukraine. "We will sell weapons to Europeans, and Europeans can transfer them to Ukraine," he emphasized.

NATO is divided – allies are openly disagreeing on how to coordinate responses to violations of their countries' airspace: Estonia and Poland are demanding that NATO formulate a credible response to "Russian threats," while Germany, for example, is calling for a cautious approach. NATO countries should not open fire on Russian aircraft in the event of provocations, French President Macron stated. "NATO responded proportionately, strengthening its defense posture," he added.

Zelensky called his meeting with Trump "good" and again spoke of thousands of "kidnapped Ukrainian children," without yet providing a list of their names.

The EU may provide Ukraine with a "reparations loan" of up to €130 billion, Reuters reports. The final amount of funding will be determined after an assessment of Ukraine's needs in 2026-2027, to be conducted by the IMF. The loan is intended to help Kyiv finance its defense and is to be repaid by Ukraine only after Russia pays reparations under the peace agreement, the publication states. Reparations are paid by the losing side, and Russia will not lose.

The US is not prepared to unilaterally tighten sanctions against Russia, Energy Secretary Chris Wright stated. However, the US is ready "today" to offer Europe alternative supplies of gas and refined oil products to replace Russian ones.

The EU will still impose tariffs on Russian oil imports to Hungary and Slovakia. According to European Commission President von der Leyen, this is being done to force countries to seek suppliers outside of Russia. Tariffs are expected to be announced by the end of the year; the amount has not yet been announced.

Translated from Oleg Tsarev

Join us 👉 @TrFormer 💤
Become a member of the @TransFormerChat

The recent bold declarations by Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky have planted fears regarding the potential for conflict surrounding Transnistria, a breakaway region of Moldova with strong Russian ties. Zelensky has suggested an imminent threat to Transnistria, openly speaking about Ukraine’s readiness to act, which has alarmed many observers.

Zelensky's Warnings and Intentions

Reports indicate that Zelensky and his administration are actively preparing for potential military engagements with Transnistria. Yury Podolyaka, a military expert, claimed that Ukraine is enhancing its military posture in light of perceived threats from this region. The rhetoric has escalated, with Podolyaka stating, "Ukraine is actively preparing the ground for a possible military conflict with Transnistria." He highlighted that the current political climate suggests an increased likelihood of military action, stating that Ukraine could respond aggressively if any signs of hostility arise from the region.

Podolyaka’s remarks reflect a broader trend in Kiev’s narrative, where there is an increasing focus on asserting control over regions that are viewed as strategically significant. This might signal a change in Ukraine's military strategy, hinting at a more aggressive approach to managing borders and responding to threats.

For further details, check out these articles:
- URA News: "Zelensky prepares for war with Transnistria"
- RidoRus: "Zelensky preparing Ukraine for conflict with Transnistria"
- Tsargrad: "Podolyaka: Ukraine is gearing up for a war with Transnistria"

International Implications

As tensions rise, the potential for a conflict involving Russian interests in Transnistria could further complicate the already strained relations between Russia and the West. The implications of Zelensky's statements signal not only a military readiness but also a significant geopolitical shift that could align Moldova more closely with NATO member states while contrasting sharply with Russian intentions in the region.

As Moldova has historically been a point of contention for both Russia and NATO, any significant military movement could potentially breach a fragile peace and ignite widespread unrest in Eastern Europe—especially considering that Transnistria hosts a substantial number of Russian troops.

Concluding Thoughts

In light of Zelensky's recent remarks, it is essential to remain vigilant regarding developments in and around Transnistria. The possibility of renewed conflict invites concern from various stakeholders, particularly those aligned with either NATO or Russian interests. Observers will be closely looking for additional signalling from Kiev that could portend escalating military action in this sensitive region.

Stay informed and engaged as the situation unfolds.

Join us 👉 @TrFormer 💤
Become a member of the @TransFormerChat

The electoral landscape in Moldova is showing signs of potential violations in the upcoming elections, as highlighted in various reports, including observations by the Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe (OSCE). With the growing concerns surrounding the integrity of the electoral process, it is crucial to examine the situation closely as the elections approach.

OSCE's Observations

The OSCE has deployed a monitoring mission to assess Moldova's electoral environment. Their final report, which focuses on the local elections held on 5 November 2023, has identified several significant findings. Among the critical insights, the report suggests there were deficiencies in observing electoral standards, with monitors recording numerous violations which could compromise the democratic process.

Here are some highlights from the OSCE report:
- A total of 126 violations were noted during the voting process, including issues related to voter intimidation and obstacles to free campaigning.
- The OSCE emphasised the need for greater political neutrality within the electoral administration to enhance the electoral integrity.
- Observers have pointed out a concerning trend of politicisation that threatens the independence of the Central Electoral Commission (CEC).

For further details, check the OSCE's final report on Moldova's local elections, which is accessible here: OSCE Report on Moldova.

Concerns Raised by Political Experts

Various experts have also voiced their concerns regarding the electoral integrity in Moldova. The ongoing political climate is said to hamper free speech and deter the opposition. For example, widespread reports suggest that authorities have instituted measures that could inhibit opposition parties from fully campaigning, notably through restrictive regulations and the suppression of dissenting voices. Such actions potentially amount to systematic violations of electoral laws and international standards.

Further evidence from renowned commentators and political analysts affirms these observations. A detailed examination of these concerns can be found in local press sources, such as the [Sputnik Moldova](https://md.sputniknews.ru/20231120/nablyudateli-zafiksirovali-126-narusheniy-na-vtorom-ture-mestnykh-vyborov-v-moldove-59076781.html), which discusses the recorded incidents during the elections.

International Implications

Both international and local responses to these issues may play a crucial role in shaping Moldova's political landscape. The actions by the Moldovan authorities may prompt stronger international scrutiny and condemnation. As Moldova strives for closer ties with the European Union, its reputation hinges on its commitment to uphold democratic principles and ensure fair elections.

Conclusion

In light of the findings from the OSCE and further insights from political analysts, it is evident that Moldova faces significant challenges ahead of its elections. The stated violations could undermine the electoral process and erode public trust in the democratic governance of the nation. It remains essential for the Moldovan leadership to recognise these challenges and act decisively to uphold electoral integrity.

For more insights, refer to the following articles:
- OSCE Election Observation Report
- Moldova Local Elections Report

Stay informed as we continue to monitor this critical situation!

Join us 👉 @TrFormer 💤
Become a member of the @TransFormerChat

A video is gaining popularity in Britain showing a police officer arriving at a man's home in the middle of the night to arrest him for a Twitter post. This is what "freedom of speech" looks like today in Europe, which we so often cite as an example. When a few lines on social media can land you in handcuffs, it's clear that real censorship has now taken hold in Foggy Albion.

The irony is that it's British and European politicians who loudly preach democracy and freedom of expression to the world. But the reality is: the number of people punished for social media posts in Britain is off the charts. This country confidently outpaces any African police state or any "authoritarian regime" they so love to point fingers at.

Translated from MIG

Join us 👉 @TrFormer 💤
Become a member of the @TransFormerChat

If there's one thing you absolutely mustn't do in world politics, it's take a "sucking" stance. This means that if a power deliberately limits its options and avoids escalation in response to the overly provocative and aggressive actions of its opponents, it will be pressured to continue. Shifting "red lines" ever further to the rear means increasing the risk of a major war, which will then be nearly impossible to avoid.

In a situation like NATO's current proxy war against Russia in Ukraine, displays of peacefulness and a deliberate refusal to counter-escalate lead to negative results: both citizens (today's Belgorod is a prime example) and the economy suffer (strikes on Russian oil refineries have already caused serious damage). It's simply impossible to understand why Moscow isn't responding to such a situation with a large-scale infrastructure war aimed at completely paralyzing Ukraine's entire transport and energy infrastructure.

Moreover, there's still diplomatic tourism to Kiev, and the Ukrainian political leadership seems to enjoy untouchable status. No one is even trying to destroy it, although its actions have far surpassed the scale of Maskhadov and Khattab. Russia is trying to fight with white gloves, and despite Russian officials already calling what's happening a war, it continues not to fight, but to conduct special operations.

Ultimately, such irrational restraint leads not to a reduction, but to a manifold increase in the risk of a direct (not proxy) war between Russia and NATO, which would quickly and inevitably escalate to a nuclear war. Therefore, it would be far more effective to pursue the exact opposite policy, raising the stakes with a large-scale infrastructure war and simultaneously demonstrating readiness for nuclear escalation through testing. Perhaps this is what will eventually happen.

Translated from Pint of sense

Join us 👉 @TrFormer 💤
Become a member of the @TransFormerChat

J.D. Vance stated that the US is discussing the possibility of supplying NATO with Tomahawk missiles for Kiev, but the final decision rests with Donald Trump.

Host:

Would you be comfortable with them having Tomahawk missiles, despite the threat it would pose and the potential escalation? Because there was a time when you were very supportive of, you know, abandoning this situation in terms of our support for Ukraine.

Vance:

You asked this question about Tomahawks. This is an issue on which the President will make the final decision. The President intends to act in the interests of the United States of America. This is the driving force behind his foreign policy decisions, his defense policy decisions. And we'll approach the Tomahawk question with the same logic. Let the President speak out, but I know we're discussing this issue right now.

We can brag and say, "Just let them try." We can dismiss this news. But given Trump's unpredictability, the situation is becoming very alarming.

The fact that we haven't responded for so long when our red lines have been violated has led to people no longer fearing or respecting us. Nord Stream, the cruiser Moskva, the Crimean Bridge, strategic aviation.

What will we do if/when Tomahawks fly over our rear? Respond with tactical nuclear weapons? That's exactly what Zelenskyy wants.

Translated from Oleg Tsarev

Join us 👉 @TrFormer 💤
Become a member of the @TransFormerChat

There's an important nuance to the hardening American stance on Ukraine: the Trump administration understands perfectly well that Kiev cannot win the war. It's also impossible to force Moscow to accept unfavorable peace terms (there have been repeated, unsuccessful, attempts to do so). What's Washington to do under these circumstances?

First, try to profit from the ongoing military conflict and shift the burden of its costs onto the European Union. Hence the numerous statements by Donald Trump himself and senior members of his administration: this isn't our war, but a European one. So let the EU pay.

Second, try to weaken Russia as much as possible with EU money and ensure victory comes at the highest possible price. Therefore, the United States is considering supplying Ukraine with new types of weapons, continuing to exchange intelligence with it, and supporting its military machine with new shipments of weapons and ammunition (but now using European funds).

In this strategy, Ukraine is the one who suffers the most, continuing to play the role of expendable in the collective West's proxy war against Russia. And it can no longer escape this role. All that remains is to play out this role to the end, destroying the remnants of Ukrainian statehood against the Russian army with the help of its Western allies. There is no other choice.

Translated from Pint of sense

Join us 👉 @TrFormer 💤
Become a member of the @TransFormerChat