$JASON continues to send.
Why this one, while many other celebrity coins failed horribly?
A quick look at the twitters shows why
(1) Dude was clear, not ambiguous from the start about whether he was committed to a coin or not, unlike e.g. Tate and others.
(2) Dude has been prolifically pushing the coin right from the start.
(3) Dude has not done a bunch of false starts, totally wrecking wrecking a few coins first — e.g. Jenner, Tate, etc.
I.e. simply clearly saying you’re endorsing a coin and will continue to do so, and then doing that.
Easy af, right?
Apparently not for a bunch of these celebrity losers.
No wonder entertainment industry needs a bunch of detailed contracts for any endorsement deals.
But yeah, ongoing $JASON pump making most of the CT influencers look like absolute tards.
FWIW, no, absolutely do not believe that the majority of the funds here are coming from “onboarding” people into crypto. Never true. Majority always from those already in crypto.
Why this one, while many other celebrity coins failed horribly?
A quick look at the twitters shows why
(1) Dude was clear, not ambiguous from the start about whether he was committed to a coin or not, unlike e.g. Tate and others.
(2) Dude has been prolifically pushing the coin right from the start.
(3) Dude has not done a bunch of false starts, totally wrecking wrecking a few coins first — e.g. Jenner, Tate, etc.
I.e. simply clearly saying you’re endorsing a coin and will continue to do so, and then doing that.
Easy af, right?
Apparently not for a bunch of these celebrity losers.
No wonder entertainment industry needs a bunch of detailed contracts for any endorsement deals.
But yeah, ongoing $JASON pump making most of the CT influencers look like absolute tards.
FWIW, no, absolutely do not believe that the majority of the funds here are coming from “onboarding” people into crypto. Never true. Majority always from those already in crypto.
🤯4
DoomPosting
Photo
“To establish standing, the plaintiffs must demonstrate a substantial risk that, in the near future, they will suffer an injury that is traceable to a government defendant [...] because no plaintiff has carried that burden, none has standing to seek a preliminary injunction”
No demonstration of risk that government-imposed censorship will cause harm?
No risk of harm from censorship?
Really?
Tf kind of enormous lie is that Supreme Court?
Total blatant lie.
Government-imposed censorship about to boom.
No demonstration of risk that government-imposed censorship will cause harm?
No risk of harm from censorship?
Really?
Tf kind of enormous lie is that Supreme Court?
Total blatant lie.
Government-imposed censorship about to boom.
🤬2💯2😁1
FWIW, hard not to notice the comment sections filled with vivek
Perhaps there exist some good arguments against it, but whatever those may be, clear the current arguments against it aren’t landing with people
Perhaps there exist some good arguments against it, but whatever those may be, clear the current arguments against it aren’t landing with people
Starting to think that these super-blatant rugger coins intentionally make their charts look fake as humany possible
— So that they’re only trading against the absolute dumbest idiot counterparties
Zero sophisticated parties that could take a big chunk of the gains before they can rug
maximizing their rugging gains.
Seems obvious now in retrospect.
— So that they’re only trading against the absolute dumbest idiot counterparties
Zero sophisticated parties that could take a big chunk of the gains before they can rug
maximizing their rugging gains.
Seems obvious now in retrospect.
Notice how in the very last minute before the rug, you can see them turn off their volume bots
Mechanically, makes sense in a lot of ways, that they couldn’t just instantly shut them off, with pending txes in mempools, and because you have to run multiple volume bots in parallel with multiple accounts for high capital efficiency in the pumping etc, but that they’d want to be sure their txes have totally cleared before rugging, to not get themselves rugged — leaving this gap
Sure do wonder if you could rug the ruggers with a bot that watches for this drop
Good thing now about there being so many rugs, is that you could risk just a small amount of your funds on each individual rug-the-ruggers attempt.
hm
Mechanically, makes sense in a lot of ways, that they couldn’t just instantly shut them off, with pending txes in mempools, and because you have to run multiple volume bots in parallel with multiple accounts for high capital efficiency in the pumping etc, but that they’d want to be sure their txes have totally cleared before rugging, to not get themselves rugged — leaving this gap
Sure do wonder if you could rug the ruggers with a bot that watches for this drop
Good thing now about there being so many rugs, is that you could risk just a small amount of your funds on each individual rug-the-ruggers attempt.
hm
👀4