The idea that the media is using narratives to “distract from” assumes that the public is worth distracting, i. e. that were it not distracted, it would notice and punish some shenanigans the ruling class conducts in secret. The reality is different, that the media doesn’t “distract from” and everything the ruling class does, it does in the open, manufacturing the consent needed for it as it goes or after the fact.

What a weird coincidence

There's a lot to be said for the Chinese social credit model. Get a load of that state power!

Based, etc.

Never forget that Moldbug is a wannabe Redcoat. Always keep that in mind when thinking he’s ‘based’.

there is a sort of "naive" monarchism where you are supposed to just submit to the king

I don’t think anyone should just obey [insert whatever “based” form of government] because “this form of government is based, otherwise we’ll have chaos/liberalism.” Your people have cultural values and needs, and if your government fails to work for your people, you have to be able to overthrow it. What’s so hard to understand about that? Why is this even up for debate at all? Why do theorycels reject this? There is no airtight perfect form of government, there’s just a power relationship that can quickly and inevitably become parasitic when your people cannot physically remove them by force of arms.

Form of government matters less than you think, because even a “based dictator” cannot save a lost race. It’s ultimately up to your people whether they want to survive and thrive or not — it’s their choice on the collective level in the long run.

It's strange that no matter how many people call Klaus Schwab a Bond villain he keeps behaving like a Bond villain. Nobody in the elite class is worried about blow-back or the optics.

The only reason it seems strange to us is because our ingrained liberalism brings us to the conclusion that they should be worried about what we think.

In actual fact they care about what we think in the same way Henry VIII or Augustus Caesar cared about the opinion of some carrot munching peasant up to his knees in manure.
https://news.1rj.ru/str/GeneralMcInerney/2901

This looks like an interesting book!

https://news.1rj.ru/str/hvitgardr3/3982

New video.

The theory I explain in this video was originally inspired by tony’s post.

https://youtu.be/2-qQmIfAhkc

TL; DW, Feminists want to get raped

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2-qQmIfAhkc

Even if the media portrayed East Asians as victims as much as they do for blacks, do you think all these feminists would be out in full force for “social justice”? I really don’t. And the simple reason is because East Asians aren’t the rapists and thugs they’re looking for. Feminists will give token support for East Asians only to spite White men, but it pales in comparison to their unending support for black africans and brown (often muslim) populations.

https://news.1rj.ru/str/hapaperspective_chatroom/86241

Going LIVE with Ricardo Duchesne in one hour!

Crap article, but I liked this passage.

These are the types of men feminists will never criticize, even when they rape them — because that’s actually what they want from them.

https://news.1rj.ru/str/pox_populi/1980

It seems to me that the American Right has been placed in an impossible position:

1. Oppose a ban on abortion, and be someone who approves of abortion

2. Celebrate a ban on abortion, and watch as the black population sharply increases and your grandchildren who would have been white end up being brown instead

Of course, (2) is only a problem for honest right-wingers.