Never forget that Moldbug is a wannabe Redcoat. Always keep that in mind when thinking he’s ‘based’.

there is a sort of "naive" monarchism where you are supposed to just submit to the king

I don’t think anyone should just obey [insert whatever “based” form of government] because “this form of government is based, otherwise we’ll have chaos/liberalism.” Your people have cultural values and needs, and if your government fails to work for your people, you have to be able to overthrow it. What’s so hard to understand about that? Why is this even up for debate at all? Why do theorycels reject this? There is no airtight perfect form of government, there’s just a power relationship that can quickly and inevitably become parasitic when your people cannot physically remove them by force of arms.

Form of government matters less than you think, because even a “based dictator” cannot save a lost race. It’s ultimately up to your people whether they want to survive and thrive or not — it’s their choice on the collective level in the long run.

It's strange that no matter how many people call Klaus Schwab a Bond villain he keeps behaving like a Bond villain. Nobody in the elite class is worried about blow-back or the optics.

The only reason it seems strange to us is because our ingrained liberalism brings us to the conclusion that they should be worried about what we think.

In actual fact they care about what we think in the same way Henry VIII or Augustus Caesar cared about the opinion of some carrot munching peasant up to his knees in manure.
https://news.1rj.ru/str/GeneralMcInerney/2901

This looks like an interesting book!

https://news.1rj.ru/str/hvitgardr3/3982

New video.

The theory I explain in this video was originally inspired by tony’s post.

https://youtu.be/2-qQmIfAhkc

TL; DW, Feminists want to get raped

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2-qQmIfAhkc

Even if the media portrayed East Asians as victims as much as they do for blacks, do you think all these feminists would be out in full force for “social justice”? I really don’t. And the simple reason is because East Asians aren’t the rapists and thugs they’re looking for. Feminists will give token support for East Asians only to spite White men, but it pales in comparison to their unending support for black africans and brown (often muslim) populations.

https://news.1rj.ru/str/hapaperspective_chatroom/86241

Going LIVE with Ricardo Duchesne in one hour!

Crap article, but I liked this passage.

These are the types of men feminists will never criticize, even when they rape them — because that’s actually what they want from them.

https://news.1rj.ru/str/pox_populi/1980

It seems to me that the American Right has been placed in an impossible position:

1. Oppose a ban on abortion, and be someone who approves of abortion

2. Celebrate a ban on abortion, and watch as the black population sharply increases and your grandchildren who would have been white end up being brown instead

Of course, (2) is only a problem for honest right-wingers.

The following map graphics are very telling

An environment with strong selection pressures produces men with low mutational load.
Men with low mutational load produce an environment with weak selection pressures.
An environment with weak selection pressures produces men with high mutational load.
Men with high mutational load produce an environment with strong selection pressures.

This is why I think some sort of great collapse would be healthy for our people in the long run. If we returned to a more medieval state of affairs (might makes right minus big government) Whites with martial inclinations would come out on top.

https://news.1rj.ru/str/TheAutistocratChannel/21