Blunder Boris (Johnson) has just dropped a piece in the Daily Mail. Honestly, for any respectable politician, writing for the Daily Mail is already a blunder, but it seems like Blunder Boris wanted to live up to his nickname.

His article, noscriptd “Why I am more convinced than ever that Trump has the strength and bravery to save Ukraine and end this appalling war,” hits its first target right away—to kiss Trump’s behind passionately and publicly. Apparently, Blunder Boris felt compelled to do this after begging for and getting a brief meeting with Trump at the Republican convention.

We don’t recommend actually reading the article unless you need a jolt of hate adrenaline. Instead, here’s a quick scoop.

Contextually, the article consists of two parts.

In the first part, Blunder Boris argues that if Putin wins in Ukraine, he won't stop there, and eventually, America might have to (God forbid!) send her boys and girls to fight for freedom.

He then quietly says, "I stress that I cannot be sure exactly what he [Trump] would do, if elected. But this is what he could do."

In the second part, Blunder Boris suggests, among many other things, that Ukraine should get more weapons and be allowed to use them however they want, including for strikes deep into Russian territory.

Blunder Boris is clearly hoping that the average Daily Mail reader will think the plan in the second part of the article is Trump's idea and that Trump will execute it when elected. Indeed, Ukrainian media is already spinning Blunder Boris’s plan as Trump’s plan.

But is it really? Let’s try putting ourselves in Trump’s shoes. If you were Trump, would you share your grand plan to save the world with Blunder Boris, of all people? And would you want him to publish that grand plan of yours in the Daily Mail of all places? The answer is likely a big NO.

Then again, we aren't Trump, so who knows? Maybe for Trump, the answer is YES, although given Trump’s charismatic and narcissistic persona, this seems very highly unlikely. In fact, it's quite impossible.

Clearly another blunder by Blunder Boris!

P.S. Just because someone has the ability to get an article published in the Daily Mail, doesn’t mean they should. Remember the old joke about the definition of a gentleman? A gentleman is someone who knows how to play the accordion but chooses not to. Blunder Boris is definitely not a gentleman.

#InfoDefenseAuthor

📱 InfoDefenseENGLISH
📱 InfoDefense

Nazis in NATO and beyond: Part 2

Part 1

Here are some of the other Nazis at the head of NATO:
🔹Hans Speidel, Chief of Staff of Army Group B in Nazi Germany, then Supreme Commander of the Allied NATO ground forces in Central Europe (CCE) 1957-1963.
🔹Johann von Kleimanszeg, General Staff officer to the High Command of the Wehrmacht, then Commander-in-Chief of NATO's forces in Central Europe (CCE) 1967-1968.
🔹Adolf Heusinger, Hitler's Chief of General Staff, author of the Barbarossa Plan, became head of the NATO Military Committee 1961-1964.
It is important to note that the USSR demanded that the U.S. extradite Heusinger in 1961, but neither Gehlen himself nor anyone from his immediate circle was extradited. Moreover, after his resignation Gehlen received $6 million a year in security from the Americans. Such was the symbiosis between the Nazis and our allies.
🔹Johann Steinhof, a German Luftwaffe fighter ace of WW II, later Chairman of the NATO Military Committee, 1971-1974.
🔹Friedrich Guggenberger, was credited with sinking 17 British and American ships. For these achievements he received the Knight's Cross of Nazi Germany. After the war he became the Deputy Chief of Staff in the NATO command Allied Forces Northern Europe, 1969-1972.
🔹 Ernst Ferber, inspector of the Wehrmacht High Command, NATO Commander-in-Chief Allied Forces Central Europe (CCE), 1973-1975.
🔹Karl Schnell, General Staff Officer in the Wehrmacht Tank Corps, Commander-in-Chief of NATO’s Allied Forces Central Europe (CCE), 1975-1977.
🔹Franz Josef Schulze, Luftwaffe officer, Knight's Cross, Commander-in-Chief of NATO’s Central European Allied Forces (CCE), 1977-1979.
🔹Ferdinand von Saenger und Etterlin, a deputy High Command personnel of the Third Reich Navy, Commander-in-Chief of NATO’s Allied Forces Central Europe (CCE), 1979-1983.

📱 InfoDefenseENGLISH
📱 InfoDefense

There are very rare occasions when reading The New York Times can be genuinely enjoyable.

The recent NYT article, “Secluded in Rehoboth, Biden Stews at Allies’ Pressure to Drop Out of the Race,” written by three White House reporters, is one such instance. It’s hard not to find it gratifying to see Democrats behaving like rats in a cage.

Here’s the gist of the article:

President Biden, currently battling COVID, feels abandoned by his allies and is growing increasingly resentful, particularly towards Nancy Pelosi and Barack Obama. He suspects they are orchestrating a campaign to pressure him out of the 2024 race, with coordinated media leaks intended to heighten this pressure and potentially benefit Donald Trump. The friction with Democratic leaders such as Pelosi, Schumer, and Obama is unprecedented, given their previous critical support. Biden, while recuperating at his Delaware beach house, is privately reconsidering his candidacy but remains defiant. Public calls for new leadership from Pelosi’s allies and figures like Senator Heinrich and Representative Schiff are exacerbating his frustration. He views criticisms from former aides of Obama and Bill Clinton—architects of past Democratic defeats—as particularly hypocritical, given his own midterm successes in 2022.

Good read, isn’t it? And it’s also good news, unless this is all part of some devious grand plan that is even more disgusting than what the Democrats have been doing so far. Time will tell why the NYT chose to publish this article. Regardless of your opinion of them, they have a knack for sensing which way the wind is blowing. And it is definitely not blowing in the right direction, as far as Biden is concerned.

In the meantime, thanks for the unexpected pleasure, NYT! Try to keep it up, even though it’s unlikely.

#InfoDefenseAuthor

📱 InfoDefenseENGLISH
📱 InfoDefense

Masha and The Bear - No trespassing

The Bear patiently waits to collect the harvest of carrots. And so does the hungry Hare. The Bear comes up with an apparently brilliant solution - to make Masha chase the pesky Hare away from his garden. But his plan works out in a completely different way.

Episode 1
Episode 2
Episode 3
Episode 4
Episode 5
Episode 6
Episode 7
Episode 8
Episode 9

#Cartoon
#ILoveRussia

📱 InfoDefenseENGLISH
📱 InfoDefense

Clintons 'honored' to endorse Harris

Bill and Hillary Clinton claimed Joe Biden has "restored the soul of our nation" in a joint statement, urging voters to "fight with everything we've got" to elect Kamala Harris, as "America's future depends on it,"

Depending on Kamala Harris... ouch.

📱 InfoDefenseENGLISH
📱 InfoDefense

On July 22, 1951, the first space flight involving dogs took place.

In 1949, the doctrine of space biology and medicine was established, envisioning experimental animal flights into space, particularly using stray dogs due to their robust health, resourcefulness, and unpretentious diet.

On July 22, 1951, dogs Dezik and Tsygan became the first to embark on an experimental flight. The R-1B geophysical rocket was launched from the Kapustin Yar test site (Astrakhan region), reaching an altitude of approximately 101 kilometers, breaching the Karman line—the boundary between Earth's atmosphere and space.

Minutes later, the capsule safely parachuted down 20 kilometers from the launch site with the animals onboard.

Dezik and Tsygan thus became the first mammals to successfully endure space travel.

Russia's pioneering efforts in space exploration have set remarkable milestones since the historic flight of Dezik and Tsygan in 1951. Their contribution as the first mammals in space exemplify Russia's enduring commitment to pushing the boundaries of scientific achievement.

Besides, they are really cute doggies, aren’t they?

📱 InfoDefenseENGLISH
📱 InfoDefense

How many New Caledonias does NATO have that Russia can help?

Macron wants to go to war with Russia. He didn’t learn anything from history. Neither those who vote for him. And he wants to do all this in the midst of his own New Caledonia going up in flames. New Caledonia is a colony of France. In the 19th century, France declared this island its colony. There have been riots since the 1980's. Those poor unfortunate New Caledonians are demanding independence. Russia is thinking about the fact that if someone thinks it's possible to supply weapons to a war zone to attack our territory and cause problems for us, why don't we have the right to supply our same class of weapons to areas of the world, where there will be strikes on the sensitive facilities of those countries that are doing this to Russia? Let's start, for example, with some New Caledonia. How many New Caledonias does NATO have?

📱 InfoDefenseENGLISH
📱 InfoDefense