I've been reading about British hate speech laws:

Communication can be classified as a "hate crime" if it is interpreted to be "intentionally alarming or distressing" and if the victim or anybody else believes that it was motivated by hostility or prejudice based on race, religion, disability, gender identity, or sexual orientation.

The UK has no legal definition of "hostility," so the government uses "the everyday understanding of the word which includes ill-will, spite, contempt, prejudice, unfriendliness, antagonism, resentment and dislike." They also provide no legal definition of "prejudice."

So, it seems the law is intentionally ill-defined and primarily based on the interpretations of the state and feelings of the "victim(s)."

"We interpret [don't have to prove?] that you intended to cause alarm and/or distress with your unfriendly communication, and Victim believes [doesn't have to prove?] that you were motivated by hostility and/or prejudice, therefore you are a hate criminal."

I know the UK is corrupt but this is ridiculous.

People should pay attention to Britain because this is what Leftists want for America. They've been pushing federal "hate speech" laws for decades to no avail. They've had little success in colleges, with "speech codes" getting shot down in court, but some success in work environments by classifying speech as "harassment" and weaponizing the Civil Rights Act.

NEW - U.S. Space Force commander: "I'm here to testify about the ongoing Marxist inspired efforts to subvert and weaken our military and broader American society."

@disclosetv

NEW - WEF president Brende: "What are we able to keep, on the positive side, from the old order to bring into a new world order?"

@disclosetv

This is not the MSM's first "trust us" rodeo

70% of French citizens oppose mass migration as a "solution" to declining birth rates.

Bear in mind that "French citizens" includes countless non-White immigrants.

The heritability of conservatism is higher among more politically-informed individuals:

The population-wide heritability of sociopolitical conservatism is 57%. This falls to 29% among low information individuals (bottom 50% of the population), and rises to 74% among high information individuals (top 20%).

Presumably, the effect is similar for Leftism but I haven't seen any data on that as of yet. Either way, I think we can safely conclude that the more you know about politics, the more genetically-defined your views become.

This data implies that NPCism is real and ideological hegemony is vital to win in a "democratic" society. 71% of the political views of 50% of the population are defined by non-genetic factors, which includes mass propaganda, "education," etc.

Source: Genes, Ideology, and Sophistication (2021)

Weekly earnings of White men, White women, Blacks, and Asians correlate 0.94 with average IQ.

Black-only "safe space" commune = good
White-only "safe space" commune = evil

Christians are less likely to be Socialists than atheists, but are becoming increasingly more Socialist over generations.

JUST IN - U.S. Supreme Court on 5-4 vote allows federal agents to cut razor wire Texas installed on US-Mexico border.

https://www.disclose.tv/id/4vhui0fdxx/

@disclosetv