This season start is:
- A nightmare for Ferrari;
- A dream for Williams (and sweet ‘vengeance’ for SAI);
- A continuation of ‘24 for McL, but without their opponent;
- Positive for RUS;
- Yet another proof that VER makes the difference.
Ferrari’s top speed was the same as McLaren’s, and their performance in the fast corners was no better.
This means that they didn’t sacrifice quali performance due to a rain-focused setup.
(Track is unrepresentative and this is just Quali.)
What’s your opinion? 🤔
- A nightmare for Ferrari;
- A dream for Williams (and sweet ‘vengeance’ for SAI);
- A continuation of ‘24 for McL, but without their opponent;
- Positive for RUS;
- Yet another proof that VER makes the difference.
Ferrari’s top speed was the same as McLaren’s, and their performance in the fast corners was no better.
This means that they didn’t sacrifice quali performance due to a rain-focused setup.
(Track is unrepresentative and this is just Quali.)
What’s your opinion? 🤔
👍15❤4👎1
Australian GP - Qualifying
Strengths and Weaknesses (Best Laps)
Has Ferrari made a gamble?
Top Speed↔️Drag
Min. Speed @ T9/10↔️Downforce
🟠McL's high drag was worth the gain in downforce
🔵RBR had the lowest drag AND solid downforce
🟢Mercedes lacked downforce
🔴Ferrari was draggy yet still lost in cornering/traction to McL
LEC: "We must have lost a bit of performance. It's the right thing to do for this weekend, but I don't want to go into details" ➡️Wet-focused setup?
Likely not in terms of downforce (Ferrari had the most loaded wing, yet its high-speed cornering was not better than McL's or Red Bull's).
He could be referring to the suspension setup instead. This would explain:
- The sudden lack of pace;
- Their cornering performance deficit despite the loaded wing.
Scuderia Ferrari could be screwed, or could have made the right gamble: the race will tell!
What’s your prediction for the race? 🤔
Strengths and Weaknesses (Best Laps)
Has Ferrari made a gamble?
Top Speed↔️Drag
Min. Speed @ T9/10↔️Downforce
🟠McL's high drag was worth the gain in downforce
🔵RBR had the lowest drag AND solid downforce
🟢Mercedes lacked downforce
🔴Ferrari was draggy yet still lost in cornering/traction to McL
LEC: "We must have lost a bit of performance. It's the right thing to do for this weekend, but I don't want to go into details" ➡️Wet-focused setup?
Likely not in terms of downforce (Ferrari had the most loaded wing, yet its high-speed cornering was not better than McL's or Red Bull's).
He could be referring to the suspension setup instead. This would explain:
- The sudden lack of pace;
- Their cornering performance deficit despite the loaded wing.
Scuderia Ferrari could be screwed, or could have made the right gamble: the race will tell!
What’s your prediction for the race? 🤔
👍13❤1
AUSTRALIAN GP - QUALIFYING
LAPTIME IMPROVEMENT
Alpine (-1.637s) and Williams (-1.393s) gained the most.
McLaren (-1.219s) and Mercedes (-1.178s) improved significantly over their decent '24 performance!
Red Bull, Ferrari, and Aston failed to take a big leap: only 4 tenths gained (losing 8 to McL).
LAPTIME IMPROVEMENT
Alpine (-1.637s) and Williams (-1.393s) gained the most.
McLaren (-1.219s) and Mercedes (-1.178s) improved significantly over their decent '24 performance!
Red Bull, Ferrari, and Aston failed to take a big leap: only 4 tenths gained (losing 8 to McL).
👍7❤3🥰1
AUSTRALIAN GP - RACE PACE ANALYSIS
1)🟠McL (NOR)
2)🔵RBR (VER) +0.63s/lap
3)🟢Merc (RUS) +1.29s/lap
4)🔴Ferrari (LEC) +1.79s/lap
5)🔵Williams (ALB) +1.86s/lap
Strategy:
- Allowed VER to battle with NOR, although McL's pace was out of reach.
- Made Ferrari fall behind ALB/ANT/STR/HUL
2024:
1) Ferrari‼️
2) McL
3) RBR (VER out)
4) Aston❗️
5) Merc❗️
1)🟠McL (NOR)
2)🔵RBR (VER) +0.63s/lap
3)🟢Merc (RUS) +1.29s/lap
4)🔴Ferrari (LEC) +1.79s/lap
5)🔵Williams (ALB) +1.86s/lap
Strategy:
- Allowed VER to battle with NOR, although McL's pace was out of reach.
- Made Ferrari fall behind ALB/ANT/STR/HUL
2024:
1) Ferrari‼️
2) McL
3) RBR (VER out)
4) Aston❗️
5) Merc❗️
❤9🥰2👍1
Formula Data Analysis
AUSTRALIAN GP - RACE PACE ANALYSIS 1)🟠McL (NOR) 2)🔵RBR (VER) +0.63s/lap 3)🟢Merc (RUS) +1.29s/lap 4)🔴Ferrari (LEC) +1.79s/lap 5)🔵Williams (ALB) +1.86s/lap Strategy: - Allowed VER to battle with NOR, although McL's pace was out of reach. - Made Ferrari fall…
My take:
- McL has built a rocketship.
- Improvement by Williams, RacingBulls, Sauber, Alpine.
- Per Sky Italy, LEC's comment ("We must have lost a bit of performance. It's the right thing to do for this weekend, but I don't want to go into details") referred to raising the car to keep the plank wear to legal levels, and NOT a wet setup. This would be the cause of Ferrari's lack of performance.
What's YOUR opinion? 🤔
- McL has built a rocketship.
- Improvement by Williams, RacingBulls, Sauber, Alpine.
- Per Sky Italy, LEC's comment ("We must have lost a bit of performance. It's the right thing to do for this weekend, but I don't want to go into details") referred to raising the car to keep the plank wear to legal levels, and NOT a wet setup. This would be the cause of Ferrari's lack of performance.
What's YOUR opinion? 🤔
✍5🤓1
AUSTRALIAN GP - TOP SPEED PER LAP
LEC reached 333km/h, but HAM's top speed was consistently high: he used DRS on many laps, averaging 326km/h.
RUS (as OCO) NEVER used DRS: qualified well, avoided mistakes, and got on the podium!
Without DRS: ANT highest (317), NOR/OCO lowest (307).
Who surprised you the most in the season-opener? 🤔
LEC reached 333km/h, but HAM's top speed was consistently high: he used DRS on many laps, averaging 326km/h.
RUS (as OCO) NEVER used DRS: qualified well, avoided mistakes, and got on the podium!
Without DRS: ANT highest (317), NOR/OCO lowest (307).
Who surprised you the most in the season-opener? 🤔
❤13👍5
LEC was SLOWER in all the last 4 corners in ⚫️Quali compared to 🔴FP2!🤯
Ferrari's overnight changes (probably raised the car to limit plank wear) killed its downforce and balance:
- Lost 8km/h and almost 1g in T11;
- Had to lift more in T12;
- Lost 2km/h and 0.4g in T13.
Another weird thing happened in qualifying (noted by @GaborWeber): Ferrari switched repeatedly between low and high power modes in qualifying, something I've never seen before (and which has no logical explanation).🤔
Ferrari's performance in the season opener left us with more questions than answers...
Made via @JMP_software
Ferrari's overnight changes (probably raised the car to limit plank wear) killed its downforce and balance:
- Lost 8km/h and almost 1g in T11;
- Had to lift more in T12;
- Lost 2km/h and 0.4g in T13.
Another weird thing happened in qualifying (noted by @GaborWeber): Ferrari switched repeatedly between low and high power modes in qualifying, something I've never seen before (and which has no logical explanation).🤔
Ferrari's performance in the season opener left us with more questions than answers...
Made via @JMP_software
👍10❤4
Formula Data Analysis
LEC was SLOWER in all the last 4 corners in ⚫️Quali compared to 🔴FP2!🤯 Ferrari's overnight changes (probably raised the car to limit plank wear) killed its downforce and balance: - Lost 8km/h and almost 1g in T11; - Had to lift more in T12; - Lost 2km/h…
And, for those of you who are data-nerds and want to understand better how the new cards perform, I’ve written an extensive post-race analysis article!🤩📊
Become a page supporter, and read it through this link:
https://buymeacoffee.com/f1dataanalysis/australian-gp-chaotic-opener-revealed-dominant-car-front-close
Become a page supporter, and read it through this link:
https://buymeacoffee.com/f1dataanalysis/australian-gp-chaotic-opener-revealed-dominant-car-front-close
Buy Me a Coffee
Australian GP – a Chaotic Opener Revealed a Dominant Car in Front of a Close Field! — Formula Data Analysis
Post by Formula Data Analysis
👍3🔥3❤1
Weekly reminder that you can JOIN the CHAT channel to discuss my analyses OUTSIDE of the 'comments'!
👇Use this link👇
https://news.1rj.ru/str/FDataAnCHAT
👇Use this link👇
https://news.1rj.ru/str/FDataAnCHAT
Telegram
[Chat] - Formula Data Analysis
Use this CHAT do discuss the contents posted in the main CHANNEL 💬
Weekly reminder that you can JOIN the CHAT channel to discuss my analyses OUTSIDE of the 'comments'!
👇Use this link👇
https://news.1rj.ru/str/FDataAnCHAT
👇Use this link👇
https://news.1rj.ru/str/FDataAnCHAT
Telegram
[Chat] - Formula Data Analysis
Use this CHAT do discuss the contents posted in the main CHANNEL 💬
Weekly reminder that you can JOIN the CHAT channel to discuss my analyses OUTSIDE of the 'comments'!
👇Use this link👇
https://news.1rj.ru/str/FDataAnCHAT
👇Use this link👇
https://news.1rj.ru/str/FDataAnCHAT
Telegram
[Chat] - Formula Data Analysis
Use this CHAT do discuss the contents posted in the main CHANNEL 💬
CHINESE GP PREVIEW
- More representative track than Australia; one-step-harder compounds (C2-C4) due to high tyre stress;
- Stability under braking and lateral grip will be important;
- Medium wing load provides the best drag/downforce compromise;
- Most stressed tyre: Rear Left.
Will Ferrari solve their issues?
Will the stricter wing flexibility tests impact the pecking order? 🤔
📸: @pirellisport
- More representative track than Australia; one-step-harder compounds (C2-C4) due to high tyre stress;
- Stability under braking and lateral grip will be important;
- Medium wing load provides the best drag/downforce compromise;
- Most stressed tyre: Rear Left.
Will Ferrari solve their issues?
Will the stricter wing flexibility tests impact the pecking order? 🤔
📸: @pirellisport
❤9👍1🥰1
REAR WINGS - Chinese GP
Similar choices across the grid (medium-load wings)➡️Each car's inherent drag and downforce will be more evident! 💡
Ferrari is using a rear wing much more similar to McLaren's 👀(instead of a more loaded one as in Australia).
Remember that the FIA is introducing much stricter tests in China to test wing flexibility❗️(which should hurt some teams more than others).
📸 @AlbertFabrega
Similar choices across the grid (medium-load wings)➡️Each car's inherent drag and downforce will be more evident! 💡
Ferrari is using a rear wing much more similar to McLaren's 👀(instead of a more loaded one as in Australia).
Remember that the FIA is introducing much stricter tests in China to test wing flexibility❗️(which should hurt some teams more than others).
📸 @AlbertFabrega
👍13❤4
Weekly reminder that you can find ALL my socials and extra content through THIS link
👇
https://linktr.ee/fdataanalysis
👇
https://linktr.ee/fdataanalysis
Linktree
Formula Data Analysis | Instagram, Facebook | Linktree
Follow me on all socials!
Weekly reminder that you can find ALL my socials and extra content through THIS link
👇
https://linktr.ee/fdataanalysis
👇
https://linktr.ee/fdataanalysis
Linktree
Formula Data Analysis | Instagram, Facebook | Linktree
Follow me on all socials!
Weekly reminder that you can find ALL my socials and extra content through THIS link
👇
https://linktr.ee/fdataanalysis
👇
https://linktr.ee/fdataanalysis
Linktree
Formula Data Analysis | Instagram, Facebook | Linktree
Follow me on all socials!
Weekly reminder that you can find ALL my socials and extra content through THIS link
👇
https://linktr.ee/fdataanalysis
👇
https://linktr.ee/fdataanalysis
Linktree
Formula Data Analysis | Instagram, Facebook | Linktree
Follow me on all socials!
🔥1
CHINESE GP SPRINT QUALI DATA
Let's analyse Lewis Hamilton's first pole in red!
1) AERO ANALYSIS:
- 🔴🔵Ferrari/RedBull: high efficiency (high downforce, low drag);
- 🟢Mercedes: lowest drag;
- 🟠McL: Highest downforce;
- 🟣Alpine/⚪️Haas: highest drag.
2) MINISECTORS:
HAM/VER's +5km/h higher top speed made them gain on PIA on all the straights (who recovered in the fast corners).
3) GAP TO IDEAL LAP:
A McL P1-P4 finish was possible, but they couldn't combine their best sectors!
Let's analyse Lewis Hamilton's first pole in red!
1) AERO ANALYSIS:
- 🔴🔵Ferrari/RedBull: high efficiency (high downforce, low drag);
- 🟢Mercedes: lowest drag;
- 🟠McL: Highest downforce;
- 🟣Alpine/⚪️Haas: highest drag.
2) MINISECTORS:
HAM/VER's +5km/h higher top speed made them gain on PIA on all the straights (who recovered in the fast corners).
3) GAP TO IDEAL LAP:
A McL P1-P4 finish was possible, but they couldn't combine their best sectors!
❤5👍5🥰1
Formula Data Analysis
CHINESE GP SPRINT QUALI DATA Let's analyse Lewis Hamilton's first pole in red! 1) AERO ANALYSIS: - 🔴🔵Ferrari/RedBull: high efficiency (high downforce, low drag); - 🟢Mercedes: lowest drag; - 🟠McL: Highest downforce; - 🟣Alpine/⚪️Haas: highest drag. 2) MINISECTORS:…
👀 For all the data nerds who want to see ALL the 58 analyses made so far:
https://buymeacoffee.com/f1dataanalysis/chinese-gp-analyses-repository-3557620
https://buymeacoffee.com/f1dataanalysis/chinese-gp-analyses-repository-3557620
Buy Me a Coffee
Chinese GP - Analyses Repository — Formula Data Analysis
Post by Formula Data Analysis
👍3🔥2