Long-term, the goal is to reduce and remove our reliance on supplements and live off of what we grow with our own hands, nutritionally and medicinally.
Yes, easier said than done.

Learn more: @powerofthepulse

What detoxes heavy metals?

'Spirulina & chlorella'
'Zeolite'
'Fulvic'
'Chelation'

'Borax'
'Cilantro'
'Detox smoothie'

Do any of these really remove heavy metals?

Do they enter your organs, enter your cells, bind to toxic metals and then happily leave the body knowing their mission is complete?

No.

Even chelators... do they intelligently know when their time is up and stroll out of the bloodstream and leave your body?

No...

Your body has to remove them.

The truth is that:
ONLY your body can detox you of heavy metals... NOTHING else!

When you realise that the body naturally removes metals — the question becomes how can I support my body to do its job?

Notice the difference:

😱 How to detox heavy metals: i.e. "how can I force metals out of my body using questionable materials & methods?"
😌 How can I support my body to do its intended job: i.e. "why am I still toxic and how can I strengthen myself?"

Binders: https://news.1rj.ru/str/powerofthepulse/705
Detoxing: https://news.1rj.ru/str/powerofthepulse/646, https://news.1rj.ru/str/powerofthepulse/481

Learn more: @powerofthepulse

What is Zeolite composed of?

Is it really aluminum?

I believe it's criminal deeply concerning that people are not told what they're putting in their mouth.

Zeolite FAQ: https://news.1rj.ru/str/powerofthepulse/649

Learn more: @powerofthepulse

The filth of this industry is jarring.

It's one thing to pretend a poison is healthy. It's an entirely other thing to outright lie about what's in the bottle.

Learn more: @powerofthepulse

We're all being manipulated

How does this make you feel?

And how do you think this is implemented in the alternative industry?

Source: https://www.youtube.com/shorts/hU9-DDFkaDk

Learn more: @powerofthepulse

Must-Know Nanotech Fundamentals in 100 Seconds

For those new to the channel: welcome :)

94.8% of info & discussion here is about nanotech...

Here are some essentials you seriously need to know:

😳 Size Matters

Nano means billion. Nanoparticles are in a range around a billionth of a meter in size.

To put this in context:
❗️nanoparticles are on an atomic/molecular size
❗️1 nanometer = diameter of a hair divided by 100,000
❗️1 nanometer to a tennis ball is the same size-ratio as a tennis ball to the entirety of planet earth 🎾🌎

Nanoparticles/nanomaterials can be any normal material, that's at a nano-size.

When things go nanosize... they get
⬇️

🤪 Weird & Wacky

Nanoparticles have unique properties that DIFFER GREATLY from normal-sized particles.

⬇️ Example:
⚖️ Normal Zinc: Mostly healthy. 💀 Nano Zinc: Deadly.
⚖️ Normal Zinc: White. 💀 Nano Zinc: Transparent.
⚖️ Normal Zinc: Acts normally. 💀 Nano Zinc: Weird & wacky nano-specific properties.

🥇 Another example: nano-gold isn't colored gold, it can be pink, red or even blue

These properties are exploited & programmed... making them...
⬇️

♾️ HEAVILY Used in Every Industry Under the Sun

Everything from your iPhone microchip, to your 'organic' sunscreen uses nanotech, thanks to it's programmable weird & wacky properties... making products fine-tuned and cheaper to make!

However, this means
⬇️

🤧 It's EVERYWHERE

Our nano intake levels are insane, you breathe, absorb and eat hundreds of trillions.... -

DAILY.

Because they're super small, they're also super-absorbable.

Now because of the extreme small size, if you bunch the day's nanotech together it won't come to much more than a few grains of rice... but the problem is these miniscule particles are....
⬇️

🤒 Extremely Toxic

Part of the weird and wacky properties is the fact that our bodies cannot handle nanotech.

Particularly large amounts of synthetic nanoparticles. It's not natural and the body is not made to detect, fight and detox this tech.

However, because of the weird and wacky properties it's also...
⬇️

👹 Toxic in Uniquely Weird & Wacky Ways

The study of nanotoxicity is an entire field because nanoparticles act in totally different ways in our body to many other toxins.

There are many concepts and threats purely associated with nanotoxicity, making this an extremely deep and nuanced topic that requires deep study and research.

Worse, nanotech causes every illness under the sun, and then some.

👇 References and more info in the message below

P.S. in the name of brevity, I have vastly simplified some statements. I strongly believe in scientific articulation, however for an intro to beginners I believe in simplifying and sticking to the main points, then adding in detail/nuance later.

https://news.1rj.ru/str/powerofthepulse

Initially, giving up your power to a 'knowledgeable' authority seems easier than making your own decisions.

Then you realise that most 'knowledgeable' ones are actually just goofies that know some fancy words and are fluent in doublespeak and delusion.

And you realise that you don't need them to tell you what's right for you.

You have the resources to find the right info — and you have the power to understand that info and make the right decision for yourself.

Learn more: @powerofthepulse

"I take this poison and I love it" 🤔

Occasionally Zeolite Zealots try to justify all the horrific evidence against Zeolite by claiming:

"I take Zeolite, it helped with X and I love it because my hair tests are great"

This is an extension of the classic "look at me, I took X poison and I'm fine"

The fact is, these stories and results aren't good enough.

Hair tests are entirely up to interpretation.

What is a good hair test?
➡️ low heavy metals: "good because I have no metals"
➡️ high heavy metals: "good because I'm detoxing"

Both results can be interpreted as positive... meaningless without context

And this is all ignoring the fact that regardless of heavy metal detox... Ingesting a poison is a bad idea.

This is the same logic used to promote chemotherapy:

➡️ see, it killed the cancer... that means it's good
➡️ never mind the fact that it killed you too, oops

Do you want to heal ... or are you just trying to look good on paper?

If you want to heal — the short-term isolated benefits are never worth poisoning yourself!

Another example: have hypothyroidism?
Let's radioactively kill your thyroid to rid of the disease.
Oops you don't have a thyroid anymore but don't worry because you no longer have hypothyroidism 😃

Breast cancer? Just chop em off.

By this mentality painkillers are healthy because they stop pain and antibiotics are healthy because they kill bacteria and parasites.

The symptom appears solved, but what has this cost you?

I don't care if Zeolite makes me 3 meters tall and gives me flying superpowers... there is no logical reason why anyone should take a nano aluminum silicate.

"I took X and I'm fine": https://news.1rj.ru/str/powerofthepulse/647

Learn more: @powerofthepulse

Scientists are using living brain cells to build computers that are ALIVE

We've been warning about this madness for years.

Everyone is a conspiracy theorist until reality is forced down people's throats.

This is one of the many things Yuval Harari means when he says:

Biological Data x Computing Power x Data = Hackable animals

Source: https://www.youtube.com/shorts/q215b8d3ric

The Yuval Harari Equation: https://news.1rj.ru/str/powerofthepulse/245
9 Part Series about Nano & Synthetic Biology: https://news.1rj.ru/str/powerofthepulse/195

Learn more: @powerofthepulse

One of the most ridiculous psyop narratives used to avoid the Nano Takeover is:

"it's all about mentality, if you look for it you'll find it so I don't worry about nano and I know I'll be fine"

😂😂😂

These types of arguments either come from new-agers or people that don't understand Terrain theory and think that nothing exists and everything they don't like is an 'illusion'.

These are the same people that will happily take blood transfusions from people that have received the 🥕 poke.

They talk about not being afraid, but that's exactly what's causing them to run away from reality: fear.

They feel so overwhelmed about the Nanotech Assault/Takeover that they just don't want to face the truth.

So nanotech is suddenly just 'not a concern'...

And while we're at it... I guess that means that asbestos, radioactive medicine, heavy metals, plastics & PFAS are all nothing to worry about? How about pharma drugs and pokes 🥕 ?

That's when their hypocrisy is revealed, because suddenly they'll admit all of the above are dangerous... 'except nano'.

Hmm... 🤔

If you take something living, give it a small amount nano and it ends up with organ failure... that's enough warning for me.

If you take some mice, give them some nano and they lose memories that they had yesterday and become infertile... that's enough warning for me.

It's enough warning that the US Government has spent $31 billion on nanotech R&D since 2001.
It's enough warning that Klaus Schwab says nanobiotech is part of the 4th Industrial Revolution and will revolutionize warfare.
It's enough warning that Bill G has been funding nanotech projects for decades.
https://news.1rj.ru/str/powerofthepulse/358 https://news.1rj.ru/str/powerofthepulse/742

And conversely, I know something is working when a client messages to tell me that their weird and 'incurable' symptoms have improved tremendously after using the anti-nano devices

Someone once told me (with a great deal of vague grandiloquent doublespeak) that "our source is incorruptible, nanotech cannot hurt our essence even if it hurts our biology"

Um... OK? Tell that to someone who has cancer, tell that to someone that has 'Lyme', tell that to someone who has 'Fibromyalgia' for whom every waking moment is pain.

They tell those people suffering everyday "just think happy thoughts 😃😃".... "just raise your vibrations"

All because they can't face their fear of nano... not realising that on the other side of that fear is empowerment knowing that you're doing everything in your power to protect yourself and your loved ones.

Learn more: @powerofthepulse

⚠️🍳 Important note when shopping for pans...

Do NOT be fooled by labels that say:

"PFOA/PFAS free"

Teflon has been PFAS-free since 2013... it was replaced with PTFE, another petrochemical in the 'extended family'

PTFE is toxic enough to kill a pet bird in the room, but perfectly safe for you 🦤

Trust us because we said so 🐔

https://news.1rj.ru/str/powerofthepulse

🧐 Evaluating the Truth

When you want to learn, you listen to people.

Everyone talks, but not everyone should be believed.

Except we don't have time to become an expert in every field of interest...

So how do we choose what to believe?

We could use logic — but logic requires knowledge and context...

For example: when a Zeolite Zealot says "Zeolite is an ancient volcanic mineral that binds to heavy metals and removes them"... that sounds great. Logic would say such a material is beneficial.
However, the statement is missing vital information, more accurately: "Zeolite is an unstable nano aluminum silicate discovered just 200 years ago, promoted by Big Pharma that has no legitimate safety proof and causes intestinal inflammation"

The only way to gain this knowledge and context is through days of research... which most people don't have time for.

So if we can't verify every single claim made to us... what do we do instead?

We subconsciously look for signs and signals.

Signs that tell us this person is knowledgeable... like the word "Dr" before their name.

Signs that tell us this person is trustworthy... like if they have supporters and positive feedback in the comments.

Signs that tell us this person is speaking logically... like if they use lots of technical terminology.

However... these signs and signals are unreliable:

➡️ Being a Doctor doesn't make you wise or superior (also note that a lot of alternative gurus fake their 'Doctor' noscript).

➡️ Widespread support of a claim doesn't make it true.

➡️ Technobabble can be used by someone that doesn't understand the words purely to sound clever.

So a crucial part of raising awareness is talking about the signs & signals of a goofy guru — such as:
❗️ Using Doublespeak: https://news.1rj.ru/str/powerofthepulse/711
❗️ Using False Frames: https://news.1rj.ru/str/powerofthepulse/717
❗️ Using Ambiguity: https://news.1rj.ru/str/powerofthepulse/731
❗️ Using Technobabble: https://news.1rj.ru/str/powerofthepulse/763
❗️ Presenting Certainty: https://powerofthepulse.substack.com/p/on-certainty
❗️ Responding with the Big Pharma Dance: https://news.1rj.ru/str/powerofthepulse/772

Another crucial part is challenging mainstream concepts of authority... such as Doctors, 'officials' and the use of fancy lingo.

The more aware we are of this process, the harder it is to be psyop-ed.

So the question is:

What signs & signals do you subconsciously believe represent trustworthiness?

Learn more: @powerofthepulse

Zeolite & Bentonite = Aluminum

Diatomaceous Earth = Nano Razor Blades

Nano silver and gold = Toxic Nanometal Antibiotics

Methylene Blue = Petrochemical Paint

Want nutrition? Eat home-grown food.

Want medicine? Grow your herbs.

Want to stay sick? Keep munching Big Pharma's alternative industry psyops

Learn more: @powerofthepulse

Nanoparticles are not toxic because we say they are...

They are toxic because of many weird and wacky phenomenon that occur when you make particles un-naturally small.

Namely: the quantum mechanical effect, high surface area, molecular stickiness

Many will tell you "not all nano is bad"

To be scientifically accurate, this argument has to be debunked in a very nuanced way.

Often when teaching new concepts, it is easy to provide blanket statements, and then fill in more complex details as your understanding grows.

An argument often used is "we've lived with nanoparticles for thousands of years"

Sure we have.

Although I guarantee you, our ancestors were not ingesting anywhere near the same amount of nanoparticles we do... e v e r y d a y.

Because last I checked, our ancestors weren't intent on producing billions of tons of toxic synthetic nano-monsters in factories every month.

But ignoring that, this is what the goofy gurus would have you believe:

⬇️
Nanoparticles made by the wind: toxic ❌
Nanoparticles made by fire: toxic ❌
Nanoparticles made by volcanoes: toxic ❌
Nanoparticles made in a lab and put in a bottle: healthy ✅

https://news.1rj.ru/str/powerofthepulse

It's all about the marketing spin.

The same aluminum in the poke...
The same aluminum used as an additive in McDonalds...

It gets repackaged and... 5% off our detox package 😃

Zeolite FAQs: https://news.1rj.ru/str/powerofthepulse/649

Learn more: @powerofthepulse

Dear Zeolite Zealots,

I know you tried to silence me.

Next time try harder :)

Zac from Power of the Pulse

Zeolite Investigation Update

My investigation into Zeolite was complete and comprehensive enough to release.

I filmed a full 45 minute presentation and prepared some supporting resources along with it.

It took months to put together the presentation, slides, references and resources.

In addition to the main body of work, I was still uncovering little pieces of important evidence so I also planned a series of smaller Substack articles covering various specific aspects of the Zeolie.

During this process I started looking more closely at the specific products on the Zeolite market. I spoke to a few industry insiders. I started paying more attention to what Zeolite promoters, gurus and TikTok influencers were saying.

I started seeing first hand the unbelievable lies, deception and corruption in this industry.

I always thought I was aware of the dark sides of the alternative world.
Big-Pharma control... willfully blind goofy gurus ... etc.

Nothing could have prepared me for the unimaginable corruption and pure evil I witnessed.

During this process I saw a very popular truther-account promoting Zeolite. Hoping to counteract the new wave of propaganda with awareness I released an article that covered some Zeolite basics, hoping to save a few people before the wave of BS becomes a trend.

The company's PR team tried debating me and when that failed they told me I'm slandering their product.
Not a good sign when the Zeolite industry is notorious for suing people that speak out against them and having evidence taken off the Internet.

I later realised that this is the same company that sued two gurus, a Doctor and a Professor and forced them to remove their articles on Zeolite.

Mike Adams the Health Ranger himself seems reluctant to speak out against Zeolite with appropriate force.
Of course it doesn't help that half of the industry is bought out by Zeolite companies.

The truth cannot be stopped or silenced... however we're going to need to be more strategic.

Thank you to all the channels that are spreading the truth. You don't do it for me, you do it for yourself and your audience ❤️

Learn more: @powerofthepulse

Someone with a brain 🔥

Learn more: @powerofthepulse

🧼 Strong Scents

This is your reminder to check your soaps, conditioners and shampoos.

Particularly if it seems too fragrant or the smell sticks to you.

You know when you wash your hands and then smell the soap on your skin hours later?
No natural fragrance is that strong.

Petrochemicals & plastic-like polymers are used to make scents last longer.

Take for example a popular Australian 'Fruit Hair Conditioner'.

The name of the brand contains the word 'Organic', subconsciously implying to you that their products are clean.
The bottle says it's cruelty free, 100% vegan and plant derived.

The packaging says 'plant derived' but notice that according to the list below, only some ingredients are plant-derived.
Plant derived means they extract a substance from a plant and then use significant chemical processing to manipulate it.

The ingredients are as follows:
Water, Cetearyl Alcohol*, Cetrimonium Chloride*, Lecithin*, Macadamia Ternifolia (Macadamia Nut) Seed Oil, Triticum Vulgare (Wheat) Protein, Panthenol, Phenoxyethanol, Polyquaternium-10*, Cyclopentasiloxane, Dimethicone, Dimethiconol, Citric Acid*, Sodium Benzoate, Fragrance. *Plant Derived.

There's only one way to check how toxic this product is.
Look up each and every single ingredient. There are no shortcuts here.

Initially things look OK... Water, Alcohol, Oil, Protein...

Then you get to a synthetic preservative: Phenoxyethanol.

When you search these types of chemicals, you'll usually get the classic: Only toxic in 'high doses'.

The real question is: how toxic is it in low doses everyday for years?

🤔 Phenoxyethanol is also used in vaccines.

Next: Cyclopentasiloxane, Dimethiconol, Dimethicone
Three types of synthetic silicone. Used for smoothness and reducing frizz.

Yep that's right. Not silicon. Silicone. The same chemical you use to seal your kitchen bench 😂

Sodium Benzoate:
An irritating preservative.

Fragrance (undisclosed composition):
What kind of chemicals are commonly used?
Aldehydes -> toxic
Methyl butanoate -> irritant at best
Phthalates -> 'forever chemical' component in plastic that destroys fertility
Styrene -> like polystyrene 😂

Not only are you hurting your skin and absorbing these chemicals... you're also smelling them which means they can enter your blood through the respiratory system.

Check your products, read the label and look the ingredients up.

Learn more: @powerofthepulse

Cookware: an example of the confidence trick

For decades PFOA, the now notorious forever chemical was used in Teflon.

For decades the industry covered up the truth, avoided regulatory bans and poisoned the world.

In the early 2010's public awareness had increased massively. Companies were forced to change their formulas.

In the case of Teflon, their pans are still toxic enough to kill a bird in the same room...

But they're PFOA free 🤪

You see these labels everywhere:
No PFAS
No BPA
No SLES

This is speaking to your subconscious mind and applying a False Frame.

These labels tell your subconscious: "it doesn't have X, so it's safe".

Otherwise, why would they say "our product doesn't have PFAS"?
If that doesn't mean their product is safe, why say it?

It's marketing and branding propped up by a confidence trick.

You're not expecting the marketing to be openly deceiving so you assume it's true.

You subconsciously think, if the marketing was so deceiving surely there would be repercussions.

But that's just not true.

And you'd think that since people know that PFAS is bad, they'd also be aware of any other toxic components or replacements.

It's confusing, until you learn that the industry doesn't care about the safety of their product...

They only care about your *perception* of their product.

There are people whose full time job is to create these marketing spins... subtly making you believe their poisons are healthy.
It's the difference between bankruptcy after a public health scandal and billions in revenue.

When public awareness of BPA toxicity became unavoidable...the companies began slapping 'BPA-free' on their labels.

And what did they replace the BPA with?

1. BPS (close relative of BPA)
2. Polyester
2. Vinyl

The scale of this confidence trick is shocking. Not only are the consumers completely duped... awake 'gurus' have been recommending BPA free cans for years. The very people whose job it is to research these tricks are pacified with two words "BPA free".

How are they so easily pacified?

A simple confidence trick.

Learn more: @powerofthepulse